Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling

Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. A rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dento-maxillo-facial radiology 2020-01, Vol.49 (3), p.20190364-20190364
Hauptverfasser: Verhelst, Pieter-Jan, Shaheen, Eman, de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla, Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic, Shujaat, Sohaib, Coudyzer, Walter, Salmon, Benjamin, Swennen, Gwen, Politis, Constantinus, Jacobs, Reinhilde
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20190364
container_issue 3
container_start_page 20190364
container_title Dento-maxillo-facial radiology
container_volume 49
creator Verhelst, Pieter-Jan
Shaheen, Eman
de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla
Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic
Shujaat, Sohaib
Coudyzer, Walter
Salmon, Benjamin
Swennen, Gwen
Politis, Constantinus
Jacobs, Reinhilde
description Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. A rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique for registration of two post-operative CBCT-scans was tested. Two modified mandibular rami, with or without gonial angle, were investigated as the volume of interest for registration. Inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of this technique was tested on 10 mandibular rami of orthognathic patients by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) and descriptive statistics of the transformation values from the VBR. The difference in reproducibility between the two modified rami was evaluated using a paired -test ( < 0.05). For the segmentation, eight fresh frozen cadaver heads were scanned with CBCT and micro-CT. These data were used to test the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility (ICC's) and accuracy (Bland-Altman plot) of a newly designed workflow based on semi-automated contour enhancement. Excellent ICC's (0.94-0.99) were obtained for the voxel-based registration technique using both modified rami. If the gonial angle was not included in the volume of interest, there was a trend of increased operator error suggested by significant higher interoperator differences in translation values ( = 0,0036). The segmentation workflow proved to be highly reproducible with excellent ICC's (0.99), low absolute mean volume differences between operators (23.19 mm ), within operators (28.93 mm ) and low surface distances between models of different operators (
doi_str_mv 10.1259/dmfr.20190364
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_475994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2311658096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f2409e91978befff075c12061b7146d0d1b289a81c8c5f1f5813433a996beacc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQhS0EIkPgyBX5yKWD9-WCBBOWSJFySVA4WW4vSYO7PdjdRPn3eJSZLAdOVSp_75VLD4C3GB1hwvUHP8ZyRBDWiAr2DKwwk6LjjFw-BytEOOoUJZcH4FWtvxBCjHLxEhxQLCSTmq3Azx82Dd7OQ55gjtBCegzXn9fnXW9r8HBT8pxdTjDmAufr0GpK-aZbNlt6tJMf-iXZAl2e_G0KsIQx-5CG6eo1eBFtquHNrh6Ci69fztffu9OzbyfrT6edY5LPXSQM6aCxlqoPMUYkucMECdxLzIRHHvdEaauwU45HHLnClFFqtRZ9sM7RQ9Dd-dabsFl6synDaMutyXYwu9Hv1gXT1mnNGq__y7dz_YNoL8SMYs6YVE378U7bgDF4F6a52PTU4snLNFybq_zXSCQUkrQZvN8ZlPxnCXU241BdSMlOIS_VEIqx4App8XCXK7nWEuL9GozMNnqzjd7so2_8u8d_u6f3WdN_csysrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311658096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Verhelst, Pieter-Jan ; Shaheen, Eman ; de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla ; Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic ; Shujaat, Sohaib ; Coudyzer, Walter ; Salmon, Benjamin ; Swennen, Gwen ; Politis, Constantinus ; Jacobs, Reinhilde</creator><creatorcontrib>Verhelst, Pieter-Jan ; Shaheen, Eman ; de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla ; Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic ; Shujaat, Sohaib ; Coudyzer, Walter ; Salmon, Benjamin ; Swennen, Gwen ; Politis, Constantinus ; Jacobs, Reinhilde</creatorcontrib><description>Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. A rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique for registration of two post-operative CBCT-scans was tested. Two modified mandibular rami, with or without gonial angle, were investigated as the volume of interest for registration. Inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of this technique was tested on 10 mandibular rami of orthognathic patients by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) and descriptive statistics of the transformation values from the VBR. The difference in reproducibility between the two modified rami was evaluated using a paired -test ( &lt; 0.05). For the segmentation, eight fresh frozen cadaver heads were scanned with CBCT and micro-CT. These data were used to test the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility (ICC's) and accuracy (Bland-Altman plot) of a newly designed workflow based on semi-automated contour enhancement. Excellent ICC's (0.94-0.99) were obtained for the voxel-based registration technique using both modified rami. If the gonial angle was not included in the volume of interest, there was a trend of increased operator error suggested by significant higher interoperator differences in translation values ( = 0,0036). The segmentation workflow proved to be highly reproducible with excellent ICC's (0.99), low absolute mean volume differences between operators (23.19 mm ), within operators (28.93 mm ) and low surface distances between models of different operators (&lt;0.20 mm). Regarding the accuracy, CBCT-models slightly overestimate the condylar volume compared to micro-CT. This study provides a validated user-friendly and reproducible method of creating three-dimensional-surface models of mandibular condyles out of longitudinal CBCT-scans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-542X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190364</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31674794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging ; Mandibular Condyle - surgery ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><ispartof>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2020-01, Vol.49 (3), p.20190364-20190364</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology. 2020 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f2409e91978befff075c12061b7146d0d1b289a81c8c5f1f5813433a996beacc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f2409e91978befff075c12061b7146d0d1b289a81c8c5f1f5813433a996beacc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2127-441X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31674794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:143154478$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verhelst, Pieter-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaheen, Eman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shujaat, Sohaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coudyzer, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politis, Constantinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Reinhilde</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling</title><title>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</title><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><description>Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. A rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique for registration of two post-operative CBCT-scans was tested. Two modified mandibular rami, with or without gonial angle, were investigated as the volume of interest for registration. Inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of this technique was tested on 10 mandibular rami of orthognathic patients by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) and descriptive statistics of the transformation values from the VBR. The difference in reproducibility between the two modified rami was evaluated using a paired -test ( &lt; 0.05). For the segmentation, eight fresh frozen cadaver heads were scanned with CBCT and micro-CT. These data were used to test the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility (ICC's) and accuracy (Bland-Altman plot) of a newly designed workflow based on semi-automated contour enhancement. Excellent ICC's (0.94-0.99) were obtained for the voxel-based registration technique using both modified rami. If the gonial angle was not included in the volume of interest, there was a trend of increased operator error suggested by significant higher interoperator differences in translation values ( = 0,0036). The segmentation workflow proved to be highly reproducible with excellent ICC's (0.99), low absolute mean volume differences between operators (23.19 mm ), within operators (28.93 mm ) and low surface distances between models of different operators (&lt;0.20 mm). Regarding the accuracy, CBCT-models slightly overestimate the condylar volume compared to micro-CT. This study provides a validated user-friendly and reproducible method of creating three-dimensional-surface models of mandibular condyles out of longitudinal CBCT-scans.</description><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - surgery</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><issn>0250-832X</issn><issn>1476-542X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQhS0EIkPgyBX5yKWD9-WCBBOWSJFySVA4WW4vSYO7PdjdRPn3eJSZLAdOVSp_75VLD4C3GB1hwvUHP8ZyRBDWiAr2DKwwk6LjjFw-BytEOOoUJZcH4FWtvxBCjHLxEhxQLCSTmq3Azx82Dd7OQ55gjtBCegzXn9fnXW9r8HBT8pxdTjDmAufr0GpK-aZbNlt6tJMf-iXZAl2e_G0KsIQx-5CG6eo1eBFtquHNrh6Ci69fztffu9OzbyfrT6edY5LPXSQM6aCxlqoPMUYkucMECdxLzIRHHvdEaauwU45HHLnClFFqtRZ9sM7RQ9Dd-dabsFl6synDaMutyXYwu9Hv1gXT1mnNGq__y7dz_YNoL8SMYs6YVE378U7bgDF4F6a52PTU4snLNFybq_zXSCQUkrQZvN8ZlPxnCXU241BdSMlOIS_VEIqx4App8XCXK7nWEuL9GozMNnqzjd7so2_8u8d_u6f3WdN_csysrA</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Verhelst, Pieter-Jan</creator><creator>Shaheen, Eman</creator><creator>de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla</creator><creator>Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic</creator><creator>Shujaat, Sohaib</creator><creator>Coudyzer, Walter</creator><creator>Salmon, Benjamin</creator><creator>Swennen, Gwen</creator><creator>Politis, Constantinus</creator><creator>Jacobs, Reinhilde</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2127-441X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling</title><author>Verhelst, Pieter-Jan ; Shaheen, Eman ; de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla ; Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic ; Shujaat, Sohaib ; Coudyzer, Walter ; Salmon, Benjamin ; Swennen, Gwen ; Politis, Constantinus ; Jacobs, Reinhilde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f2409e91978befff075c12061b7146d0d1b289a81c8c5f1f5813433a996beacc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - surgery</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verhelst, Pieter-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaheen, Eman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shujaat, Sohaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coudyzer, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politis, Constantinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Reinhilde</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verhelst, Pieter-Jan</au><au>Shaheen, Eman</au><au>de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla</au><au>Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic</au><au>Shujaat, Sohaib</au><au>Coudyzer, Walter</au><au>Salmon, Benjamin</au><au>Swennen, Gwen</au><au>Politis, Constantinus</au><au>Jacobs, Reinhilde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling</atitle><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>20190364</spage><epage>20190364</epage><pages>20190364-20190364</pages><issn>0250-832X</issn><eissn>1476-542X</eissn><abstract>Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. A rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique for registration of two post-operative CBCT-scans was tested. Two modified mandibular rami, with or without gonial angle, were investigated as the volume of interest for registration. Inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of this technique was tested on 10 mandibular rami of orthognathic patients by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) and descriptive statistics of the transformation values from the VBR. The difference in reproducibility between the two modified rami was evaluated using a paired -test ( &lt; 0.05). For the segmentation, eight fresh frozen cadaver heads were scanned with CBCT and micro-CT. These data were used to test the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility (ICC's) and accuracy (Bland-Altman plot) of a newly designed workflow based on semi-automated contour enhancement. Excellent ICC's (0.94-0.99) were obtained for the voxel-based registration technique using both modified rami. If the gonial angle was not included in the volume of interest, there was a trend of increased operator error suggested by significant higher interoperator differences in translation values ( = 0,0036). The segmentation workflow proved to be highly reproducible with excellent ICC's (0.99), low absolute mean volume differences between operators (23.19 mm ), within operators (28.93 mm ) and low surface distances between models of different operators (&lt;0.20 mm). Regarding the accuracy, CBCT-models slightly overestimate the condylar volume compared to micro-CT. This study provides a validated user-friendly and reproducible method of creating three-dimensional-surface models of mandibular condyles out of longitudinal CBCT-scans.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>31674794</pmid><doi>10.1259/dmfr.20190364</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2127-441X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0250-832X
ispartof Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2020-01, Vol.49 (3), p.20190364-20190364
issn 0250-832X
1476-542X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_475994
source MEDLINE; SWEPUB Freely available online; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging
Mandibular Condyle - surgery
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Reproducibility of Results
Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A33%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%203D%20CBCT-based%20protocol%20for%20the%20follow-up%20of%20mandibular%20condyle%20remodeling&rft.jtitle=Dento-maxillo-facial%20radiology&rft.au=Verhelst,%20Pieter-Jan&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=20190364&rft.epage=20190364&rft.pages=20190364-20190364&rft.issn=0250-832X&rft.eissn=1476-542X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/dmfr.20190364&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2311658096%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311658096&rft_id=info:pmid/31674794&rfr_iscdi=true