Fundus first as the standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
In previous studies the fundus first technique (FF) has been a cost-effective way to simplify the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and facilitate patient rehabilitation. The feasibility and safety profile when introducing FF as the standard technique were aimed in this study. Between 2004–2014, 29...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.18736-18736, Article 18736 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18736 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18736 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Cengiz, Yucel Lund, Meisam Jänes, Arthur Lundell, Lars Sandblom, Gabriel Israelsson, Leif |
description | In previous studies the fundus first technique (FF) has been a cost-effective way to simplify the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and facilitate patient rehabilitation. The feasibility and safety profile when introducing FF as the standard technique were aimed in this study. Between 2004–2014, 29 surgeons performed 1425 LC with FF and 320 with a conventional technique. During the first year 56% were with FF and 98% during the last four years. More females, ultrasonic shears, urgent operations, daycare operations and a shorter operation time were found with FF. 63 (3.6%) complications occurred: 10 (0.6%) bleedings, 33 (1.9%) infections and 12 (0.7%) bile leakages. Leakage from cystic duct occurred in 4/112 (3.6%) when closed with ultrasonic shears and in 4/1633 (0.2%) with clips (p 0.008). A common bile duct lesion occurred in 1/1425 (0.07%) with FF and in 3/320 (0.9%) with the conventional approach (p 0.003). In a multivariate regression model, the conventional technique was a risk factor for bile duct injury with an odds ratio of 20.8 (95% CI 1.6–259.2). In conclusion FF was effectively established as the standard procedure and associated with lower rates of bile duct injuries. Clipless closure of the cystic duct increased the rate of leakage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-019-55401-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_474996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2323447561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-e09797ea0c4cb4565b697b0eff4ed82e75b8e4b4bb0b0c68b9e91e27c7076e9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1P3DAQhi1EVRDlD_SAInHhEjp2_BFfKiFaaCWkXgpXy3Ymu6FJvNgJ1f77etkthR7wxZbnmdeemZeQjxTOKVT1p8Sp0HUJVJdCcKCl3COHDLgoWcXY_ovzATlO6R7yEkxzqt-Tg4rWjClFD8n11Tw2cyraLqapsKmYllikyY6NjU0xoV-O3cOMRRti0duVjSH5sOp84ZehR79OGZnCsP5A3rW2T3i824_I7dXXn5ffypsf198vL25KLwRMJYJWWqEFz73jQgontXKAbcuxqRkq4WrkjjsHDrysnUZNkSmvQEnUrjoi5VY3_cbV7MwqdoONaxNsZ3ZXv_IJDVdca_km_6W7uzAhLsw8zIZKBWLDf97yGR6w8ThO0fav0l5Hxm5pFuHRSA1c0ToLnO0EYsiNS5MZuuSx7-2IYU4mT4RrCnlkGT39D70Pcxxz-zZUxbkSkmaKbSmfe58its-foWA2VjBbK5hsBfNkBbMp4-RlGc8pfwefgWrXlxwaFxj_vf2G7B8VwMD1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323447561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fundus first as the standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Cengiz, Yucel ; Lund, Meisam ; Jänes, Arthur ; Lundell, Lars ; Sandblom, Gabriel ; Israelsson, Leif</creator><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Yucel ; Lund, Meisam ; Jänes, Arthur ; Lundell, Lars ; Sandblom, Gabriel ; Israelsson, Leif</creatorcontrib><description>In previous studies the fundus first technique (FF) has been a cost-effective way to simplify the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and facilitate patient rehabilitation. The feasibility and safety profile when introducing FF as the standard technique were aimed in this study. Between 2004–2014, 29 surgeons performed 1425 LC with FF and 320 with a conventional technique. During the first year 56% were with FF and 98% during the last four years. More females, ultrasonic shears, urgent operations, daycare operations and a shorter operation time were found with FF. 63 (3.6%) complications occurred: 10 (0.6%) bleedings, 33 (1.9%) infections and 12 (0.7%) bile leakages. Leakage from cystic duct occurred in 4/112 (3.6%) when closed with ultrasonic shears and in 4/1633 (0.2%) with clips (p 0.008). A common bile duct lesion occurred in 1/1425 (0.07%) with FF and in 3/320 (0.9%) with the conventional approach (p 0.003). In a multivariate regression model, the conventional technique was a risk factor for bile duct injury with an odds ratio of 20.8 (95% CI 1.6–259.2). In conclusion FF was effectively established as the standard procedure and associated with lower rates of bile duct injuries. Clipless closure of the cystic duct increased the rate of leakage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55401-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31822771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/4020/1503/1328/1498/1376 ; 692/700/565/545 ; Adult ; Bile ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Cholelithiasis - surgery ; Common Bile Duct ; Cystic Duct - surgery ; Female ; Gastric Fundus - surgery ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk factors ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.18736-18736, Article 18736</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-e09797ea0c4cb4565b697b0eff4ed82e75b8e4b4bb0b0c68b9e91e27c7076e9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-e09797ea0c4cb4565b697b0eff4ed82e75b8e4b4bb0b0c68b9e91e27c7076e9b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6897-2058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904718/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904718/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31822771$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-167056$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:142500595$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Yucel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Meisam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jänes, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundell, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandblom, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Israelsson, Leif</creatorcontrib><title>Fundus first as the standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>In previous studies the fundus first technique (FF) has been a cost-effective way to simplify the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and facilitate patient rehabilitation. The feasibility and safety profile when introducing FF as the standard technique were aimed in this study. Between 2004–2014, 29 surgeons performed 1425 LC with FF and 320 with a conventional technique. During the first year 56% were with FF and 98% during the last four years. More females, ultrasonic shears, urgent operations, daycare operations and a shorter operation time were found with FF. 63 (3.6%) complications occurred: 10 (0.6%) bleedings, 33 (1.9%) infections and 12 (0.7%) bile leakages. Leakage from cystic duct occurred in 4/112 (3.6%) when closed with ultrasonic shears and in 4/1633 (0.2%) with clips (p 0.008). A common bile duct lesion occurred in 1/1425 (0.07%) with FF and in 3/320 (0.9%) with the conventional approach (p 0.003). In a multivariate regression model, the conventional technique was a risk factor for bile duct injury with an odds ratio of 20.8 (95% CI 1.6–259.2). In conclusion FF was effectively established as the standard procedure and associated with lower rates of bile duct injuries. Clipless closure of the cystic duct increased the rate of leakage.</description><subject>692/4020/1503/1328/1498/1376</subject><subject>692/700/565/545</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bile</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Cholelithiasis - surgery</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct</subject><subject>Cystic Duct - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric Fundus - surgery</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1P3DAQhi1EVRDlD_SAInHhEjp2_BFfKiFaaCWkXgpXy3Ymu6FJvNgJ1f77etkthR7wxZbnmdeemZeQjxTOKVT1p8Sp0HUJVJdCcKCl3COHDLgoWcXY_ovzATlO6R7yEkxzqt-Tg4rWjClFD8n11Tw2cyraLqapsKmYllikyY6NjU0xoV-O3cOMRRti0duVjSH5sOp84ZehR79OGZnCsP5A3rW2T3i824_I7dXXn5ffypsf198vL25KLwRMJYJWWqEFz73jQgontXKAbcuxqRkq4WrkjjsHDrysnUZNkSmvQEnUrjoi5VY3_cbV7MwqdoONaxNsZ3ZXv_IJDVdca_km_6W7uzAhLsw8zIZKBWLDf97yGR6w8ThO0fav0l5Hxm5pFuHRSA1c0ToLnO0EYsiNS5MZuuSx7-2IYU4mT4RrCnlkGT39D70Pcxxz-zZUxbkSkmaKbSmfe58its-foWA2VjBbK5hsBfNkBbMp4-RlGc8pfwefgWrXlxwaFxj_vf2G7B8VwMD1</recordid><startdate>20191210</startdate><enddate>20191210</enddate><creator>Cengiz, Yucel</creator><creator>Lund, Meisam</creator><creator>Jänes, Arthur</creator><creator>Lundell, Lars</creator><creator>Sandblom, Gabriel</creator><creator>Israelsson, Leif</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADHXS</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D93</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6897-2058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191210</creationdate><title>Fundus first as the standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy</title><author>Cengiz, Yucel ; Lund, Meisam ; Jänes, Arthur ; Lundell, Lars ; Sandblom, Gabriel ; Israelsson, Leif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-e09797ea0c4cb4565b697b0eff4ed82e75b8e4b4bb0b0c68b9e91e27c7076e9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>692/4020/1503/1328/1498/1376</topic><topic>692/700/565/545</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bile</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Cholelithiasis - surgery</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct</topic><topic>Cystic Duct - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric Fundus - surgery</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Yucel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Meisam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jänes, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundell, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandblom, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Israelsson, Leif</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cengiz, Yucel</au><au>Lund, Meisam</au><au>Jänes, Arthur</au><au>Lundell, Lars</au><au>Sandblom, Gabriel</au><au>Israelsson, Leif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fundus first as the standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-12-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18736</spage><epage>18736</epage><pages>18736-18736</pages><artnum>18736</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>In previous studies the fundus first technique (FF) has been a cost-effective way to simplify the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and facilitate patient rehabilitation. The feasibility and safety profile when introducing FF as the standard technique were aimed in this study. Between 2004–2014, 29 surgeons performed 1425 LC with FF and 320 with a conventional technique. During the first year 56% were with FF and 98% during the last four years. More females, ultrasonic shears, urgent operations, daycare operations and a shorter operation time were found with FF. 63 (3.6%) complications occurred: 10 (0.6%) bleedings, 33 (1.9%) infections and 12 (0.7%) bile leakages. Leakage from cystic duct occurred in 4/112 (3.6%) when closed with ultrasonic shears and in 4/1633 (0.2%) with clips (p 0.008). A common bile duct lesion occurred in 1/1425 (0.07%) with FF and in 3/320 (0.9%) with the conventional approach (p 0.003). In a multivariate regression model, the conventional technique was a risk factor for bile duct injury with an odds ratio of 20.8 (95% CI 1.6–259.2). In conclusion FF was effectively established as the standard procedure and associated with lower rates of bile duct injuries. Clipless closure of the cystic duct increased the rate of leakage.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>31822771</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-019-55401-6</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6897-2058</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.18736-18736, Article 18736 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_474996 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SWEPUB Freely available online; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 692/4020/1503/1328/1498/1376 692/700/565/545 Adult Bile Cholecystectomy Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Cholelithiasis - surgery Common Bile Duct Cystic Duct - surgery Female Gastric Fundus - surgery Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Laparoscopy Male Middle Aged multidisciplinary Postoperative Complications - surgery Retrospective Studies Risk factors Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | Fundus first as the standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fundus%20first%20as%20the%20standard%20technique%20for%20laparoscopic%20cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Cengiz,%20Yucel&rft.date=2019-12-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18736&rft.epage=18736&rft.pages=18736-18736&rft.artnum=18736&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-019-55401-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2323447561%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323447561&rft_id=info:pmid/31822771&rfr_iscdi=true |