Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MS

OBJECTIVETo determine what kappa free light chain (KFLC) metric has the highest capacity to separate healthy patients from patients with MS, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of 4 different KFLC metrics. To assess the usefulness of KFLC in the diagnostics...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology : neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation 2020-07, Vol.7 (4), p.e775-e775
Hauptverfasser: Duell, Frida, Evertsson, Björn, Al Nimer, Faiez, Sandin, Åsa, Olsson, Daniel, Olsson, Tomas, Khademi, Mohsen, Hietala, Max Albert, Piehl, Fredrik, Hansson, Magnus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e775
container_issue 4
container_start_page e775
container_title Neurology : neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation
container_volume 7
creator Duell, Frida
Evertsson, Björn
Al Nimer, Faiez
Sandin, Åsa
Olsson, Daniel
Olsson, Tomas
Khademi, Mohsen
Hietala, Max Albert
Piehl, Fredrik
Hansson, Magnus
description OBJECTIVETo determine what kappa free light chain (KFLC) metric has the highest capacity to separate healthy patients from patients with MS, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of 4 different KFLC metrics. To assess the usefulness of KFLC in the diagnostics of MS, we compared the different KFLC metrics with oligoclonal bands (OCBs), the current gold standard biochemical method to demonstrate intrathecal antibody production. METHODSCSF and plasma were collected from patients with confirmed or suspected MS, other neurological diseases, as well as symptomatic and healthy controls between May 2017 and May 2018 (n = 335) at the Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, as part of routine diagnostic workup. KFLC analysis and isoelectric focusing for the detection of oligoclonal bands (OCB) were determined and correlated with diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine accuracy. RESULTSOCBs yielded a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 100%. All KFLC metrics showed a high sensitivity (89%-95%) and specificity (95%-100%). Using the optimal cutoff according to the Youden Index resulted for the KFLC intrathecal fraction in a cutoff of -0.41 with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 97% and for CSF KFLC/CSF albumin with a cutoff of 1.93 × 10-3 with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONAll evaluated KFLC metrics have excellent accuracy, and both KFLC intrathecal fraction and CSF KFLC/CSF albumin are at least as good as OCB in separating patients with MS from a control group. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCEThis study provides Class III evidence that CSF KFLC accurately distinguishes patients with MS from healthy controls.
doi_str_mv 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000775
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_470581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2412995347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4689-2971fc276f29b7e8f7ed14ccf9fd2565ee8e7022d4abf7e8a4c1853af246ab563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9vFCEUxYnR2Kb2G_jAoy9T4Q4MzIuJrn_apNqHauIbYZnLDu7sMMKMm357aXZTW0kIN5zfOYQcQl5zdsGBw9tvP68u2OOllHxGTqGuoVKaw_NH8wk5z_lXYThIqRr1kpzUIEGphp2S24_BbsaY5-CodW5J1t3R6GkY52TnHp0d6NZOk6U-IdIhbPqZut6GMVMXd5NN2NF9mHt6s_qQi41-vX1FXng7ZDw_nmfkx-dP31eX1fXNl6vV--vKiUa3FbSKeweq8dCuFWqvsOPCOd_6DmQjETUqBtAJuy6atsJxLWvrQTR2LZv6jFSH3LzHaVmbKYWdTXcm2mCOV9syoRGKSc0L_-7AF2WHncP7Pw5PbE-VMfRmE_8YVbNWgi4Bb44BKf5eMM9mF7LDYbAjxiUbEBzaVtZCFVQcUJdizgn9wzOcmfsKTanQ_F_hP9s-DjOmvB2WPSbTox3m3jCutBKMV8Cg8MVTlQ1t_Rc-bp3v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2412995347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MS</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Duell, Frida ; Evertsson, Björn ; Al Nimer, Faiez ; Sandin, Åsa ; Olsson, Daniel ; Olsson, Tomas ; Khademi, Mohsen ; Hietala, Max Albert ; Piehl, Fredrik ; Hansson, Magnus</creator><creatorcontrib>Duell, Frida ; Evertsson, Björn ; Al Nimer, Faiez ; Sandin, Åsa ; Olsson, Daniel ; Olsson, Tomas ; Khademi, Mohsen ; Hietala, Max Albert ; Piehl, Fredrik ; Hansson, Magnus</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVETo determine what kappa free light chain (KFLC) metric has the highest capacity to separate healthy patients from patients with MS, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of 4 different KFLC metrics. To assess the usefulness of KFLC in the diagnostics of MS, we compared the different KFLC metrics with oligoclonal bands (OCBs), the current gold standard biochemical method to demonstrate intrathecal antibody production. METHODSCSF and plasma were collected from patients with confirmed or suspected MS, other neurological diseases, as well as symptomatic and healthy controls between May 2017 and May 2018 (n = 335) at the Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, as part of routine diagnostic workup. KFLC analysis and isoelectric focusing for the detection of oligoclonal bands (OCB) were determined and correlated with diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine accuracy. RESULTSOCBs yielded a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 100%. All KFLC metrics showed a high sensitivity (89%-95%) and specificity (95%-100%). Using the optimal cutoff according to the Youden Index resulted for the KFLC intrathecal fraction in a cutoff of -0.41 with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 97% and for CSF KFLC/CSF albumin with a cutoff of 1.93 × 10-3 with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONAll evaluated KFLC metrics have excellent accuracy, and both KFLC intrathecal fraction and CSF KFLC/CSF albumin are at least as good as OCB in separating patients with MS from a control group. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCEThis study provides Class III evidence that CSF KFLC accurately distinguishes patients with MS from healthy controls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2332-7812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-7812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000775</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32527760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Academy of Neurology</publisher><ispartof>Neurology : neuroimmunology &amp; neuroinflammation, 2020-07, Vol.7 (4), p.e775-e775</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Neurology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. 2020 American Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4689-2971fc276f29b7e8f7ed14ccf9fd2565ee8e7022d4abf7e8a4c1853af246ab563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4689-2971fc276f29b7e8f7ed14ccf9fd2565ee8e7022d4abf7e8a4c1853af246ab563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309528/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309528/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:144422266$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duell, Frida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evertsson, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Nimer, Faiez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandin, Åsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hietala, Max Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piehl, Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansson, Magnus</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MS</title><title>Neurology : neuroimmunology &amp; neuroinflammation</title><description>OBJECTIVETo determine what kappa free light chain (KFLC) metric has the highest capacity to separate healthy patients from patients with MS, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of 4 different KFLC metrics. To assess the usefulness of KFLC in the diagnostics of MS, we compared the different KFLC metrics with oligoclonal bands (OCBs), the current gold standard biochemical method to demonstrate intrathecal antibody production. METHODSCSF and plasma were collected from patients with confirmed or suspected MS, other neurological diseases, as well as symptomatic and healthy controls between May 2017 and May 2018 (n = 335) at the Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, as part of routine diagnostic workup. KFLC analysis and isoelectric focusing for the detection of oligoclonal bands (OCB) were determined and correlated with diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine accuracy. RESULTSOCBs yielded a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 100%. All KFLC metrics showed a high sensitivity (89%-95%) and specificity (95%-100%). Using the optimal cutoff according to the Youden Index resulted for the KFLC intrathecal fraction in a cutoff of -0.41 with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 97% and for CSF KFLC/CSF albumin with a cutoff of 1.93 × 10-3 with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONAll evaluated KFLC metrics have excellent accuracy, and both KFLC intrathecal fraction and CSF KFLC/CSF albumin are at least as good as OCB in separating patients with MS from a control group. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCEThis study provides Class III evidence that CSF KFLC accurately distinguishes patients with MS from healthy controls.</description><issn>2332-7812</issn><issn>2332-7812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9vFCEUxYnR2Kb2G_jAoy9T4Q4MzIuJrn_apNqHauIbYZnLDu7sMMKMm357aXZTW0kIN5zfOYQcQl5zdsGBw9tvP68u2OOllHxGTqGuoVKaw_NH8wk5z_lXYThIqRr1kpzUIEGphp2S24_BbsaY5-CodW5J1t3R6GkY52TnHp0d6NZOk6U-IdIhbPqZut6GMVMXd5NN2NF9mHt6s_qQi41-vX1FXng7ZDw_nmfkx-dP31eX1fXNl6vV--vKiUa3FbSKeweq8dCuFWqvsOPCOd_6DmQjETUqBtAJuy6atsJxLWvrQTR2LZv6jFSH3LzHaVmbKYWdTXcm2mCOV9syoRGKSc0L_-7AF2WHncP7Pw5PbE-VMfRmE_8YVbNWgi4Bb44BKf5eMM9mF7LDYbAjxiUbEBzaVtZCFVQcUJdizgn9wzOcmfsKTanQ_F_hP9s-DjOmvB2WPSbTox3m3jCutBKMV8Cg8MVTlQ1t_Rc-bp3v</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Duell, Frida</creator><creator>Evertsson, Björn</creator><creator>Al Nimer, Faiez</creator><creator>Sandin, Åsa</creator><creator>Olsson, Daniel</creator><creator>Olsson, Tomas</creator><creator>Khademi, Mohsen</creator><creator>Hietala, Max Albert</creator><creator>Piehl, Fredrik</creator><creator>Hansson, Magnus</creator><general>American Academy of Neurology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MS</title><author>Duell, Frida ; Evertsson, Björn ; Al Nimer, Faiez ; Sandin, Åsa ; Olsson, Daniel ; Olsson, Tomas ; Khademi, Mohsen ; Hietala, Max Albert ; Piehl, Fredrik ; Hansson, Magnus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4689-2971fc276f29b7e8f7ed14ccf9fd2565ee8e7022d4abf7e8a4c1853af246ab563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duell, Frida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evertsson, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Nimer, Faiez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandin, Åsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hietala, Max Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piehl, Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansson, Magnus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Neurology : neuroimmunology &amp; neuroinflammation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duell, Frida</au><au>Evertsson, Björn</au><au>Al Nimer, Faiez</au><au>Sandin, Åsa</au><au>Olsson, Daniel</au><au>Olsson, Tomas</au><au>Khademi, Mohsen</au><au>Hietala, Max Albert</au><au>Piehl, Fredrik</au><au>Hansson, Magnus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MS</atitle><jtitle>Neurology : neuroimmunology &amp; neuroinflammation</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e775</spage><epage>e775</epage><pages>e775-e775</pages><issn>2332-7812</issn><eissn>2332-7812</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVETo determine what kappa free light chain (KFLC) metric has the highest capacity to separate healthy patients from patients with MS, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of 4 different KFLC metrics. To assess the usefulness of KFLC in the diagnostics of MS, we compared the different KFLC metrics with oligoclonal bands (OCBs), the current gold standard biochemical method to demonstrate intrathecal antibody production. METHODSCSF and plasma were collected from patients with confirmed or suspected MS, other neurological diseases, as well as symptomatic and healthy controls between May 2017 and May 2018 (n = 335) at the Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, as part of routine diagnostic workup. KFLC analysis and isoelectric focusing for the detection of oligoclonal bands (OCB) were determined and correlated with diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine accuracy. RESULTSOCBs yielded a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 100%. All KFLC metrics showed a high sensitivity (89%-95%) and specificity (95%-100%). Using the optimal cutoff according to the Youden Index resulted for the KFLC intrathecal fraction in a cutoff of -0.41 with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 97% and for CSF KFLC/CSF albumin with a cutoff of 1.93 × 10-3 with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONAll evaluated KFLC metrics have excellent accuracy, and both KFLC intrathecal fraction and CSF KFLC/CSF albumin are at least as good as OCB in separating patients with MS from a control group. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCEThis study provides Class III evidence that CSF KFLC accurately distinguishes patients with MS from healthy controls.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Academy of Neurology</pub><pmid>32527760</pmid><doi>10.1212/NXI.0000000000000775</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2332-7812
ispartof Neurology : neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2020-07, Vol.7 (4), p.e775-e775
issn 2332-7812
2332-7812
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_470581
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; PubMed Central
title Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20intrathecal%20kappa%20free%20light%20chains%20compared%20with%20OCBs%20in%20MS&rft.jtitle=Neurology%20:%20neuroimmunology%20&%20neuroinflammation&rft.au=Duell,%20Frida&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e775&rft.epage=e775&rft.pages=e775-e775&rft.issn=2332-7812&rft.eissn=2332-7812&rft_id=info:doi/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000775&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2412995347%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2412995347&rft_id=info:pmid/32527760&rfr_iscdi=true