Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer

In 2021, a joint ESGO/ESTRO/ESP committee updated their evidence-based guidelines for endometrial cancer, recommending a new risk grouping incorporating both clinicopathologic and molecular parameters. We applied the new risk grouping and compared the results to those of the prior 2016 clinicopathol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2021-08, Vol.162 (2), p.394-400
Hauptverfasser: Imboden, Sara, Nastic, Denis, Ghaderi, Mehran, Rydberg, Filippa, Siegenthaler, Franziska, Mueller, Michael D., Rau, Tilman T., Epstein, Elisabeth, Carlson, Joseph W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 2
container_start_page 394
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 162
creator Imboden, Sara
Nastic, Denis
Ghaderi, Mehran
Rydberg, Filippa
Siegenthaler, Franziska
Mueller, Michael D.
Rau, Tilman T.
Epstein, Elisabeth
Carlson, Joseph W.
description In 2021, a joint ESGO/ESTRO/ESP committee updated their evidence-based guidelines for endometrial cancer, recommending a new risk grouping incorporating both clinicopathologic and molecular parameters. We applied the new risk grouping and compared the results to those of the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. We classified molecularly a cohort of 604 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer using immunohistochemistry for TP53 and MMR proteins on a tissue microarray, as well as Sanger sequencing for POLE mutations. These results, combined with clinicopathologic data, allowed the patients to be risk grouped using both the new 2021 molecular/clinicopathologic parameters and the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. The application of the 2021 molecular markers shows Kaplan-Meier curves with a significant difference between the groups for all survival. Molecular classification under the 2021 guidelines revealed a total of 39 patients (39/594, 7%) with a change in risk group in relation to the 2016 classification system: the shift was alone due to either P53abn or POLEmut molecular marker. In order to ensure correct 2021 molecular risk classification, not all patients with endometrial cancer need a molecular diagnostic: 433 (72.9%) cases would need to be analyzed by TP53 IHC, only 46 (7.7%) by MMR IHC and 286 (48.1%) POLE sequencing reactions. Application of the 2021 molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival. IHC for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases and leads to shifting risk groups both upward and downward for a sizeable number of patients. It is possible to significantly reduce the number of analyses required to implement the classification if resources are limited. •Application of the 2021 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival.•Immunochemistry for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases.•The shift in the risk groups are done by P53and and POLEmut classifications in a sizeable number of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_461270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825821004327</els_id><sourcerecordid>2541319622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-1499f9c919e0aa515e1c1a6e48b473943a389f862dcf846d95801fb8bb3b658b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomgAeImfYIuHLtIPlIiQw4dCsNNDRhIkDgzQVGnlLYkqqSUwm9fuQ4yZjkeiO__gfsI-cogZ8Dkcp8fX459yDlwloPIgcsLsmCgRSaV0J_IAkBDprhQV-RzSnsAKIDxBXnedEOLHfajHX3oaWjo-BvpqYh2oUU3tTbS9dPd_XL9tHs8zQcafTrQlximIVHfU-zr0OEYvW2ps73DeEMuG9sm_PL2XpPnn-vd6le2vb_brH5sM1dKPWas1LrRTjONYK1gApljVmKpqvK20GVhC6UbJXntGlXKWgsFrKlUVRWVFKoqrkl27k1_cZgqM0Tf2Xg0wXrz9nWYNzSlZPwWZv7bmR9i-DNhGk3nk8O2tT2GKRkuSlYwLTmf0eKMuhhSiti8lzMwJ-lmb_5LNydXBoSZpc-p7-cUzle_eowmOY-zktpHdKOpg_8w_w-t_Yru</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541319622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Imboden, Sara ; Nastic, Denis ; Ghaderi, Mehran ; Rydberg, Filippa ; Siegenthaler, Franziska ; Mueller, Michael D. ; Rau, Tilman T. ; Epstein, Elisabeth ; Carlson, Joseph W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Imboden, Sara ; Nastic, Denis ; Ghaderi, Mehran ; Rydberg, Filippa ; Siegenthaler, Franziska ; Mueller, Michael D. ; Rau, Tilman T. ; Epstein, Elisabeth ; Carlson, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><description>In 2021, a joint ESGO/ESTRO/ESP committee updated their evidence-based guidelines for endometrial cancer, recommending a new risk grouping incorporating both clinicopathologic and molecular parameters. We applied the new risk grouping and compared the results to those of the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. We classified molecularly a cohort of 604 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer using immunohistochemistry for TP53 and MMR proteins on a tissue microarray, as well as Sanger sequencing for POLE mutations. These results, combined with clinicopathologic data, allowed the patients to be risk grouped using both the new 2021 molecular/clinicopathologic parameters and the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. The application of the 2021 molecular markers shows Kaplan-Meier curves with a significant difference between the groups for all survival. Molecular classification under the 2021 guidelines revealed a total of 39 patients (39/594, 7%) with a change in risk group in relation to the 2016 classification system: the shift was alone due to either P53abn or POLEmut molecular marker. In order to ensure correct 2021 molecular risk classification, not all patients with endometrial cancer need a molecular diagnostic: 433 (72.9%) cases would need to be analyzed by TP53 IHC, only 46 (7.7%) by MMR IHC and 286 (48.1%) POLE sequencing reactions. Application of the 2021 molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival. IHC for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases and leads to shifting risk groups both upward and downward for a sizeable number of patients. It is possible to significantly reduce the number of analyses required to implement the classification if resources are limited. •Application of the 2021 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival.•Immunochemistry for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases.•The shift in the risk groups are done by P53and and POLEmut classifications in a sizeable number of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Endometrial cancer ; Genomic subgroups ; MMR ; P53 ; POLE ; Risk group</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2021-08, Vol.162 (2), p.394-400</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-1499f9c919e0aa515e1c1a6e48b473943a389f862dcf846d95801fb8bb3b658b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-1499f9c919e0aa515e1c1a6e48b473943a389f862dcf846d95801fb8bb3b658b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825821004327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:147220861$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imboden, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nastic, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaderi, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydberg, Filippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegenthaler, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, Tilman T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><description>In 2021, a joint ESGO/ESTRO/ESP committee updated their evidence-based guidelines for endometrial cancer, recommending a new risk grouping incorporating both clinicopathologic and molecular parameters. We applied the new risk grouping and compared the results to those of the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. We classified molecularly a cohort of 604 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer using immunohistochemistry for TP53 and MMR proteins on a tissue microarray, as well as Sanger sequencing for POLE mutations. These results, combined with clinicopathologic data, allowed the patients to be risk grouped using both the new 2021 molecular/clinicopathologic parameters and the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. The application of the 2021 molecular markers shows Kaplan-Meier curves with a significant difference between the groups for all survival. Molecular classification under the 2021 guidelines revealed a total of 39 patients (39/594, 7%) with a change in risk group in relation to the 2016 classification system: the shift was alone due to either P53abn or POLEmut molecular marker. In order to ensure correct 2021 molecular risk classification, not all patients with endometrial cancer need a molecular diagnostic: 433 (72.9%) cases would need to be analyzed by TP53 IHC, only 46 (7.7%) by MMR IHC and 286 (48.1%) POLE sequencing reactions. Application of the 2021 molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival. IHC for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases and leads to shifting risk groups both upward and downward for a sizeable number of patients. It is possible to significantly reduce the number of analyses required to implement the classification if resources are limited. •Application of the 2021 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival.•Immunochemistry for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases.•The shift in the risk groups are done by P53and and POLEmut classifications in a sizeable number of patients.</description><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Genomic subgroups</subject><subject>MMR</subject><subject>P53</subject><subject>POLE</subject><subject>Risk group</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomgAeImfYIuHLtIPlIiQw4dCsNNDRhIkDgzQVGnlLYkqqSUwm9fuQ4yZjkeiO__gfsI-cogZ8Dkcp8fX459yDlwloPIgcsLsmCgRSaV0J_IAkBDprhQV-RzSnsAKIDxBXnedEOLHfajHX3oaWjo-BvpqYh2oUU3tTbS9dPd_XL9tHs8zQcafTrQlximIVHfU-zr0OEYvW2ps73DeEMuG9sm_PL2XpPnn-vd6le2vb_brH5sM1dKPWas1LrRTjONYK1gApljVmKpqvK20GVhC6UbJXntGlXKWgsFrKlUVRWVFKoqrkl27k1_cZgqM0Tf2Xg0wXrz9nWYNzSlZPwWZv7bmR9i-DNhGk3nk8O2tT2GKRkuSlYwLTmf0eKMuhhSiti8lzMwJ-lmb_5LNydXBoSZpc-p7-cUzle_eowmOY-zktpHdKOpg_8w_w-t_Yru</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Imboden, Sara</creator><creator>Nastic, Denis</creator><creator>Ghaderi, Mehran</creator><creator>Rydberg, Filippa</creator><creator>Siegenthaler, Franziska</creator><creator>Mueller, Michael D.</creator><creator>Rau, Tilman T.</creator><creator>Epstein, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Carlson, Joseph W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer</title><author>Imboden, Sara ; Nastic, Denis ; Ghaderi, Mehran ; Rydberg, Filippa ; Siegenthaler, Franziska ; Mueller, Michael D. ; Rau, Tilman T. ; Epstein, Elisabeth ; Carlson, Joseph W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-1499f9c919e0aa515e1c1a6e48b473943a389f862dcf846d95801fb8bb3b658b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Genomic subgroups</topic><topic>MMR</topic><topic>P53</topic><topic>POLE</topic><topic>Risk group</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imboden, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nastic, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaderi, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydberg, Filippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegenthaler, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, Tilman T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imboden, Sara</au><au>Nastic, Denis</au><au>Ghaderi, Mehran</au><au>Rydberg, Filippa</au><au>Siegenthaler, Franziska</au><au>Mueller, Michael D.</au><au>Rau, Tilman T.</au><au>Epstein, Elisabeth</au><au>Carlson, Joseph W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>394-400</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>In 2021, a joint ESGO/ESTRO/ESP committee updated their evidence-based guidelines for endometrial cancer, recommending a new risk grouping incorporating both clinicopathologic and molecular parameters. We applied the new risk grouping and compared the results to those of the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. We classified molecularly a cohort of 604 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer using immunohistochemistry for TP53 and MMR proteins on a tissue microarray, as well as Sanger sequencing for POLE mutations. These results, combined with clinicopathologic data, allowed the patients to be risk grouped using both the new 2021 molecular/clinicopathologic parameters and the prior 2016 clinicopathologic system. The application of the 2021 molecular markers shows Kaplan-Meier curves with a significant difference between the groups for all survival. Molecular classification under the 2021 guidelines revealed a total of 39 patients (39/594, 7%) with a change in risk group in relation to the 2016 classification system: the shift was alone due to either P53abn or POLEmut molecular marker. In order to ensure correct 2021 molecular risk classification, not all patients with endometrial cancer need a molecular diagnostic: 433 (72.9%) cases would need to be analyzed by TP53 IHC, only 46 (7.7%) by MMR IHC and 286 (48.1%) POLE sequencing reactions. Application of the 2021 molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival. IHC for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases and leads to shifting risk groups both upward and downward for a sizeable number of patients. It is possible to significantly reduce the number of analyses required to implement the classification if resources are limited. •Application of the 2021 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP molecular risk groups is feasible and shows significant differences in survival.•Immunochemistry for TP53 and MMR and applying POLE sequencing is only needed in selected cases.•The shift in the risk groups are done by P53and and POLEmut classifications in a sizeable number of patients.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.026</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2021-08, Vol.162 (2), p.394-400
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_461270
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects Endometrial cancer
Genomic subgroups
MMR
P53
POLE
Risk group
title Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A26%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20the%202021%20molecular%20ESGO/ESTRO/ESP%20risk%20groups%20in%20endometrial%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Imboden,%20Sara&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=394-400&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2541319622%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541319622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0090825821004327&rfr_iscdi=true