Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency: A cross-sectional study

•Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency.•ED RNs’ disaster competency was less than “competent”.•This study refined a validated instrument and may have increased its reliability.•Benner’s stages of clinical competence corresponded with the Likert-type scale.•For...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International emergency nursing 2021-09, Vol.58, p.101019, Article 101019
Hauptverfasser: Murphy, Jason P., Kurland, Lisa, Rådestad, Monica, Magnusson, Sofia, Ringqvist, Tove, Rüter, Anders
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 101019
container_title International emergency nursing
container_volume 58
creator Murphy, Jason P.
Kurland, Lisa
Rådestad, Monica
Magnusson, Sofia
Ringqvist, Tove
Rüter, Anders
description •Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency.•ED RNs’ disaster competency was less than “competent”.•This study refined a validated instrument and may have increased its reliability.•Benner’s stages of clinical competence corresponded with the Likert-type scale.•Formal disaster education was associated with more accurate self-assessment.•Self-assessments may be valuable methods for evaluating competency. Major incidents continue to pose a threat to health care systems by overwhelming them with a sudden surge of patients. A major factor impacting a hospital's surge capacity is the skills, abilities, and knowledge of emergency department (ED) registered nurses (RN). The level of disaster nursing competency they possess affects patient safety and outcome. ED RNs' ability to accurately assess their competency and knowledge is imperative for mitigating the effect of major incidents. ED RN’s perception of overall disaster preparedness has not been thoroughly addressed. The aim of this study was to assess emergency department registered nurses' self-perceived disaster preparedness. The study was a cross-sectional study per the STROBE checklist. A self-assessment questionnaire based on the results of a study identifying specific disaster nursing competencies for ED RNs was distributed to all ED RNs at six participating hospitals between January 10th to February 19th of 2019. A five-point Likert-type scale was used to assess competency. ED RNs’ disaster preparedness according to the Total Disaster Competency mean was low. Furthermore, the results indicate that ED RNs’ significantly overestimate their disaster nursing competency when compared to the Total Disaster Competency mean. Additionally, this study identified factors such as experience and education were positively associated with disaster preparedness and self-assessment ability. ED RNs’ overestimate their disaster preparedness. However, ED RNs with experience and education may be better prepared. ED RNs with formal disaster education appeared to have better insight concerning their preparedness. Clinical experience, advanced levels of education, and training were positively associated with preparedness. Overestimating disaster competencies may negatively impact patient outcomes during a major incident.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_460120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1755599X21000574</els_id><sourcerecordid>2582435879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-623f84511774cbac84fd96bcb4dcb7d4364e838daeec5a371843734d5a4ba20c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEEqXwBzhZ4ghZ_O0EcVmVFpAqcWkRN8uxJ7sO3TjYTtH--zqkwKlw8nj0vDOjmbeqXhK8IZjIt8PGwzhsKKZkSWDSPqpOiGC0bqlUj0ushKhF2357Wj1LacBYEknpSdWfHyDuYLRH5GAyMR9gzCjCzqcMERwa55ggoXBbfin7g8mA8h58RM4ns0DIhsMEeanxDm2RjSGlOoHNPozmBqU8u-Pz6klvbhK8uH9Pq-uL86uzT_Xll4-fz7aXtRVS5lpS1jdcEKIUt52xDe9dKzvbcWc75TiTHBrWOANghWGKNJwpxp0wvDMUW3Za1Wvd9BOmudNTLBPHow7G6_vU9xKB5hITigvfPshPMbi_ot9CwpVqlJKL9vWD2g_-61aHuNNpv9ecNKrQb_5PhzjrlpUOBX-14mWKH3PZvB7CHMs-k6aioZyJRrWFoiv1a-kR-j9lCdaLMfSgF2PoxRh6NUYRvV9FUA5x6yHqZAtkwflYrqZd8P-S3wGdyMXz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582435879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency: A cross-sectional study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Murphy, Jason P. ; Kurland, Lisa ; Rådestad, Monica ; Magnusson, Sofia ; Ringqvist, Tove ; Rüter, Anders</creator><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jason P. ; Kurland, Lisa ; Rådestad, Monica ; Magnusson, Sofia ; Ringqvist, Tove ; Rüter, Anders</creatorcontrib><description>•Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency.•ED RNs’ disaster competency was less than “competent”.•This study refined a validated instrument and may have increased its reliability.•Benner’s stages of clinical competence corresponded with the Likert-type scale.•Formal disaster education was associated with more accurate self-assessment.•Self-assessments may be valuable methods for evaluating competency. Major incidents continue to pose a threat to health care systems by overwhelming them with a sudden surge of patients. A major factor impacting a hospital's surge capacity is the skills, abilities, and knowledge of emergency department (ED) registered nurses (RN). The level of disaster nursing competency they possess affects patient safety and outcome. ED RNs' ability to accurately assess their competency and knowledge is imperative for mitigating the effect of major incidents. ED RN’s perception of overall disaster preparedness has not been thoroughly addressed. The aim of this study was to assess emergency department registered nurses' self-perceived disaster preparedness. The study was a cross-sectional study per the STROBE checklist. A self-assessment questionnaire based on the results of a study identifying specific disaster nursing competencies for ED RNs was distributed to all ED RNs at six participating hospitals between January 10th to February 19th of 2019. A five-point Likert-type scale was used to assess competency. ED RNs’ disaster preparedness according to the Total Disaster Competency mean was low. Furthermore, the results indicate that ED RNs’ significantly overestimate their disaster nursing competency when compared to the Total Disaster Competency mean. Additionally, this study identified factors such as experience and education were positively associated with disaster preparedness and self-assessment ability. ED RNs’ overestimate their disaster preparedness. However, ED RNs with experience and education may be better prepared. ED RNs with formal disaster education appeared to have better insight concerning their preparedness. Clinical experience, advanced levels of education, and training were positively associated with preparedness. Overestimating disaster competencies may negatively impact patient outcomes during a major incident.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-599X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-013X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-013X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ability ; Annan hälsovetenskap ; Clinical experience ; Clinical outcomes ; Competence ; Cross-sectional studies ; Disaster competency ; Disaster medicine ; Disaster nursing ; Emergency department ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency preparedness ; Emergency services ; Health problems ; Hospitals ; Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi ; Hälsovetenskap ; Major incident ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Omvårdnad ; Registered nurse ; Self evaluation</subject><ispartof>International emergency nursing, 2021-09, Vol.58, p.101019, Article 101019</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-623f84511774cbac84fd96bcb4dcb7d4364e838daeec5a371843734d5a4ba20c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-623f84511774cbac84fd96bcb4dcb7d4364e838daeec5a371843734d5a4ba20c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93477$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4187$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:147787760$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurland, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rådestad, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnusson, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringqvist, Tove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüter, Anders</creatorcontrib><title>Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency: A cross-sectional study</title><title>International emergency nursing</title><description>•Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency.•ED RNs’ disaster competency was less than “competent”.•This study refined a validated instrument and may have increased its reliability.•Benner’s stages of clinical competence corresponded with the Likert-type scale.•Formal disaster education was associated with more accurate self-assessment.•Self-assessments may be valuable methods for evaluating competency. Major incidents continue to pose a threat to health care systems by overwhelming them with a sudden surge of patients. A major factor impacting a hospital's surge capacity is the skills, abilities, and knowledge of emergency department (ED) registered nurses (RN). The level of disaster nursing competency they possess affects patient safety and outcome. ED RNs' ability to accurately assess their competency and knowledge is imperative for mitigating the effect of major incidents. ED RN’s perception of overall disaster preparedness has not been thoroughly addressed. The aim of this study was to assess emergency department registered nurses' self-perceived disaster preparedness. The study was a cross-sectional study per the STROBE checklist. A self-assessment questionnaire based on the results of a study identifying specific disaster nursing competencies for ED RNs was distributed to all ED RNs at six participating hospitals between January 10th to February 19th of 2019. A five-point Likert-type scale was used to assess competency. ED RNs’ disaster preparedness according to the Total Disaster Competency mean was low. Furthermore, the results indicate that ED RNs’ significantly overestimate their disaster nursing competency when compared to the Total Disaster Competency mean. Additionally, this study identified factors such as experience and education were positively associated with disaster preparedness and self-assessment ability. ED RNs’ overestimate their disaster preparedness. However, ED RNs with experience and education may be better prepared. ED RNs with formal disaster education appeared to have better insight concerning their preparedness. Clinical experience, advanced levels of education, and training were positively associated with preparedness. Overestimating disaster competencies may negatively impact patient outcomes during a major incident.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Annan hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Clinical experience</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Disaster competency</subject><subject>Disaster medicine</subject><subject>Disaster nursing</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi</subject><subject>Hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Major incident</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Omvårdnad</subject><subject>Registered nurse</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><issn>1755-599X</issn><issn>1878-013X</issn><issn>1532-9267</issn><issn>1878-013X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEEqXwBzhZ4ghZ_O0EcVmVFpAqcWkRN8uxJ7sO3TjYTtH--zqkwKlw8nj0vDOjmbeqXhK8IZjIt8PGwzhsKKZkSWDSPqpOiGC0bqlUj0ushKhF2357Wj1LacBYEknpSdWfHyDuYLRH5GAyMR9gzCjCzqcMERwa55ggoXBbfin7g8mA8h58RM4ns0DIhsMEeanxDm2RjSGlOoHNPozmBqU8u-Pz6klvbhK8uH9Pq-uL86uzT_Xll4-fz7aXtRVS5lpS1jdcEKIUt52xDe9dKzvbcWc75TiTHBrWOANghWGKNJwpxp0wvDMUW3Za1Wvd9BOmudNTLBPHow7G6_vU9xKB5hITigvfPshPMbi_ot9CwpVqlJKL9vWD2g_-61aHuNNpv9ecNKrQb_5PhzjrlpUOBX-14mWKH3PZvB7CHMs-k6aioZyJRrWFoiv1a-kR-j9lCdaLMfSgF2PoxRh6NUYRvV9FUA5x6yHqZAtkwflYrqZd8P-S3wGdyMXz</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Murphy, Jason P.</creator><creator>Kurland, Lisa</creator><creator>Rådestad, Monica</creator><creator>Magnusson, Sofia</creator><creator>Ringqvist, Tove</creator><creator>Rüter, Anders</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>AABEP</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D91</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>ACDKN</scope><scope>DF4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency: A cross-sectional study</title><author>Murphy, Jason P. ; Kurland, Lisa ; Rådestad, Monica ; Magnusson, Sofia ; Ringqvist, Tove ; Rüter, Anders</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-623f84511774cbac84fd96bcb4dcb7d4364e838daeec5a371843734d5a4ba20c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Annan hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Clinical experience</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Disaster competency</topic><topic>Disaster medicine</topic><topic>Disaster nursing</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi</topic><topic>Hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Major incident</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Omvårdnad</topic><topic>Registered nurse</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurland, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rådestad, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnusson, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringqvist, Tove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüter, Anders</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Sophiahemmet Högskola full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Sophiahemmet Högskola</collection><jtitle>International emergency nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murphy, Jason P.</au><au>Kurland, Lisa</au><au>Rådestad, Monica</au><au>Magnusson, Sofia</au><au>Ringqvist, Tove</au><au>Rüter, Anders</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency: A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>International emergency nursing</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><spage>101019</spage><pages>101019-</pages><artnum>101019</artnum><issn>1755-599X</issn><issn>1878-013X</issn><eissn>1532-9267</eissn><eissn>1878-013X</eissn><abstract>•Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency.•ED RNs’ disaster competency was less than “competent”.•This study refined a validated instrument and may have increased its reliability.•Benner’s stages of clinical competence corresponded with the Likert-type scale.•Formal disaster education was associated with more accurate self-assessment.•Self-assessments may be valuable methods for evaluating competency. Major incidents continue to pose a threat to health care systems by overwhelming them with a sudden surge of patients. A major factor impacting a hospital's surge capacity is the skills, abilities, and knowledge of emergency department (ED) registered nurses (RN). The level of disaster nursing competency they possess affects patient safety and outcome. ED RNs' ability to accurately assess their competency and knowledge is imperative for mitigating the effect of major incidents. ED RN’s perception of overall disaster preparedness has not been thoroughly addressed. The aim of this study was to assess emergency department registered nurses' self-perceived disaster preparedness. The study was a cross-sectional study per the STROBE checklist. A self-assessment questionnaire based on the results of a study identifying specific disaster nursing competencies for ED RNs was distributed to all ED RNs at six participating hospitals between January 10th to February 19th of 2019. A five-point Likert-type scale was used to assess competency. ED RNs’ disaster preparedness according to the Total Disaster Competency mean was low. Furthermore, the results indicate that ED RNs’ significantly overestimate their disaster nursing competency when compared to the Total Disaster Competency mean. Additionally, this study identified factors such as experience and education were positively associated with disaster preparedness and self-assessment ability. ED RNs’ overestimate their disaster preparedness. However, ED RNs with experience and education may be better prepared. ED RNs with formal disaster education appeared to have better insight concerning their preparedness. Clinical experience, advanced levels of education, and training were positively associated with preparedness. Overestimating disaster competencies may negatively impact patient outcomes during a major incident.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101019</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-599X
ispartof International emergency nursing, 2021-09, Vol.58, p.101019, Article 101019
issn 1755-599X
1878-013X
1532-9267
1878-013X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_460120
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; SWEPUB Freely available online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Ability
Annan hälsovetenskap
Clinical experience
Clinical outcomes
Competence
Cross-sectional studies
Disaster competency
Disaster medicine
Disaster nursing
Emergency department
Emergency medical care
Emergency preparedness
Emergency services
Health problems
Hospitals
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi
Hälsovetenskap
Major incident
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Nurses
Nursing
Omvårdnad
Registered nurse
Self evaluation
title Emergency department registered nurses overestimate their disaster competency: A cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A26%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergency%20department%20registered%20nurses%20overestimate%20their%20disaster%20competency:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20emergency%20nursing&rft.au=Murphy,%20Jason%20P.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=58&rft.spage=101019&rft.pages=101019-&rft.artnum=101019&rft.issn=1755-599X&rft.eissn=1532-9267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2582435879%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582435879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1755599X21000574&rfr_iscdi=true