Genomic profile – a possible diagnostic and prognostic marker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Objectives To investigate gene alterations as diagnostic and prognostic markers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy between 2005 and 2012 were followed until November 2020. DNA was extracted from paraffin‐embedded tumou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2022-07, Vol.130 (1), p.92-101
Hauptverfasser: Grahn, Alexandra, Eisfeldt, Jesper, Malm, Camilla, Foroughi Asl, Hassan, Jaremko, Georg, Tham, Emma, Brehmer, Marianne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 1
container_start_page 92
container_title BJU international
container_volume 130
creator Grahn, Alexandra
Eisfeldt, Jesper
Malm, Camilla
Foroughi Asl, Hassan
Jaremko, Georg
Tham, Emma
Brehmer, Marianne
description Objectives To investigate gene alterations as diagnostic and prognostic markers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy between 2005 and 2012 were followed until November 2020. DNA was extracted from paraffin‐embedded tumour tissue. Next‐generation sequencing using a 388‐gene panel was performed. First a blinded analysis using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering was used to search for patterns of mutations. Then a comparative analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to search for mutations enriched in groups of various grades, stages, and survival. In addition, careful manual annotation was used to identify pathogenic mutations over‐represented in tumours of high grade/stage and/or poor survival. Results A total of 39 patients were included. All tumour stages and grades were represented in the cohort. The median follow‐up was 10.6 years. In all, 11 patients died from UTUC during the follow‐up. Tumour mutational burden showed a statistically significant correlation with stage, grade, and stage + grade. Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 tumours had different mutational patterns. Patients who died from UTUC had pathogenic mutations in specific genes e.g. tumour protein p53 (TP53) and HRas proto‐oncogene, GTPase (HRAS). Patients with Ta Grade 1 tumours with a known pathogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation did not die from UTUC. Conclusion The genetic analysis was highly concordant with histopathological features and added prognostic information in some cases. Thus, results from genomic profiling may contribute to the choice of treatment and follow‐up regimens in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bju.15566
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_459900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681968411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-78842e05b899f127426c24b84727c1b2a991d79ef71021042a3a42c2e429f0763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFOwzAMhisEEmNw4A0qcYFDtyRN0uYIEwzQJC5M4halWQrZurYkrabdeAfekCfBoxtISMsltvX9lu0_CM4xGmB4w2zeDjBjnB8EPUw5jShGL4e7GAl-HJx4P0cICpz1Aj02ZbW0OqxdldvChF8fn6EK68p7m0E6s-q1rHwDhCpnG2qXLpVbGBfaMmzrGoLGKd2ErauaN1NYVYRaOW2huToNjnJVeHO2_fvB9O72eXQfTZ7GD6PrSaQpi3mUpCklBrEsFSLHJKGEa0KzlCYk0TgjSgg8S4TJE4wIRpSoWFGiiaFE5CjhcT-Iur5-Zeo2k7WzMORaVsrKbWkBkZGUCYEQ8GIvD4vO_kQ7IaYJI4iyFLSXnRbA99b4Ri6t16YoVGmq1kvCOCKCiRgDevEPnVetK-ESkvAUC55SvKGuOko7uL0z-e84GMmNtRKslT_WAjvs2BU4tt4PypvHaaf4BusPpoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681968411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic profile – a possible diagnostic and prognostic marker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma</title><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Grahn, Alexandra ; Eisfeldt, Jesper ; Malm, Camilla ; Foroughi Asl, Hassan ; Jaremko, Georg ; Tham, Emma ; Brehmer, Marianne</creator><creatorcontrib>Grahn, Alexandra ; Eisfeldt, Jesper ; Malm, Camilla ; Foroughi Asl, Hassan ; Jaremko, Georg ; Tham, Emma ; Brehmer, Marianne</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To investigate gene alterations as diagnostic and prognostic markers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy between 2005 and 2012 were followed until November 2020. DNA was extracted from paraffin‐embedded tumour tissue. Next‐generation sequencing using a 388‐gene panel was performed. First a blinded analysis using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering was used to search for patterns of mutations. Then a comparative analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to search for mutations enriched in groups of various grades, stages, and survival. In addition, careful manual annotation was used to identify pathogenic mutations over‐represented in tumours of high grade/stage and/or poor survival. Results A total of 39 patients were included. All tumour stages and grades were represented in the cohort. The median follow‐up was 10.6 years. In all, 11 patients died from UTUC during the follow‐up. Tumour mutational burden showed a statistically significant correlation with stage, grade, and stage + grade. Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 tumours had different mutational patterns. Patients who died from UTUC had pathogenic mutations in specific genes e.g. tumour protein p53 (TP53) and HRas proto‐oncogene, GTPase (HRAS). Patients with Ta Grade 1 tumours with a known pathogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation did not die from UTUC. Conclusion The genetic analysis was highly concordant with histopathological features and added prognostic information in some cases. Thus, results from genomic profiling may contribute to the choice of treatment and follow‐up regimens in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.15566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bladder cancer ; Comparative analysis ; Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 ; Fibroblast growth factor receptors ; Genetic analysis ; Genomic profile ; Genomics ; Kidney‐sparing surgery ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Mutation ; p53 Protein ; Paraffin ; Patients ; Principal components analysis ; Prognostic marker ; Statistical analysis ; Survival ; Tumors ; Urothelial carcinoma ; UTUC ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2022-07, Vol.130 (1), p.92-101</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-78842e05b899f127426c24b84727c1b2a991d79ef71021042a3a42c2e429f0763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-78842e05b899f127426c24b84727c1b2a991d79ef71021042a3a42c2e429f0763</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8048-9058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.15566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.15566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:147520458$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grahn, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisfeldt, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malm, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foroughi Asl, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaremko, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehmer, Marianne</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic profile – a possible diagnostic and prognostic marker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma</title><title>BJU international</title><description>Objectives To investigate gene alterations as diagnostic and prognostic markers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy between 2005 and 2012 were followed until November 2020. DNA was extracted from paraffin‐embedded tumour tissue. Next‐generation sequencing using a 388‐gene panel was performed. First a blinded analysis using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering was used to search for patterns of mutations. Then a comparative analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to search for mutations enriched in groups of various grades, stages, and survival. In addition, careful manual annotation was used to identify pathogenic mutations over‐represented in tumours of high grade/stage and/or poor survival. Results A total of 39 patients were included. All tumour stages and grades were represented in the cohort. The median follow‐up was 10.6 years. In all, 11 patients died from UTUC during the follow‐up. Tumour mutational burden showed a statistically significant correlation with stage, grade, and stage + grade. Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 tumours had different mutational patterns. Patients who died from UTUC had pathogenic mutations in specific genes e.g. tumour protein p53 (TP53) and HRas proto‐oncogene, GTPase (HRAS). Patients with Ta Grade 1 tumours with a known pathogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation did not die from UTUC. Conclusion The genetic analysis was highly concordant with histopathological features and added prognostic information in some cases. Thus, results from genomic profiling may contribute to the choice of treatment and follow‐up regimens in the future.</description><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3</subject><subject>Fibroblast growth factor receptors</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genomic profile</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Kidney‐sparing surgery</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>p53 Protein</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Prognostic marker</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urothelial carcinoma</subject><subject>UTUC</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFOwzAMhisEEmNw4A0qcYFDtyRN0uYIEwzQJC5M4halWQrZurYkrabdeAfekCfBoxtISMsltvX9lu0_CM4xGmB4w2zeDjBjnB8EPUw5jShGL4e7GAl-HJx4P0cICpz1Aj02ZbW0OqxdldvChF8fn6EK68p7m0E6s-q1rHwDhCpnG2qXLpVbGBfaMmzrGoLGKd2ErauaN1NYVYRaOW2huToNjnJVeHO2_fvB9O72eXQfTZ7GD6PrSaQpi3mUpCklBrEsFSLHJKGEa0KzlCYk0TgjSgg8S4TJE4wIRpSoWFGiiaFE5CjhcT-Iur5-Zeo2k7WzMORaVsrKbWkBkZGUCYEQ8GIvD4vO_kQ7IaYJI4iyFLSXnRbA99b4Ri6t16YoVGmq1kvCOCKCiRgDevEPnVetK-ESkvAUC55SvKGuOko7uL0z-e84GMmNtRKslT_WAjvs2BU4tt4PypvHaaf4BusPpoA</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Grahn, Alexandra</creator><creator>Eisfeldt, Jesper</creator><creator>Malm, Camilla</creator><creator>Foroughi Asl, Hassan</creator><creator>Jaremko, Georg</creator><creator>Tham, Emma</creator><creator>Brehmer, Marianne</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8048-9058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Genomic profile – a possible diagnostic and prognostic marker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma</title><author>Grahn, Alexandra ; Eisfeldt, Jesper ; Malm, Camilla ; Foroughi Asl, Hassan ; Jaremko, Georg ; Tham, Emma ; Brehmer, Marianne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-78842e05b899f127426c24b84727c1b2a991d79ef71021042a3a42c2e429f0763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3</topic><topic>Fibroblast growth factor receptors</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genomic profile</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Kidney‐sparing surgery</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>p53 Protein</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Prognostic marker</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urothelial carcinoma</topic><topic>UTUC</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grahn, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisfeldt, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malm, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foroughi Asl, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaremko, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehmer, Marianne</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grahn, Alexandra</au><au>Eisfeldt, Jesper</au><au>Malm, Camilla</au><au>Foroughi Asl, Hassan</au><au>Jaremko, Georg</au><au>Tham, Emma</au><au>Brehmer, Marianne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic profile – a possible diagnostic and prognostic marker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>92-101</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objectives To investigate gene alterations as diagnostic and prognostic markers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and Methods Patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy between 2005 and 2012 were followed until November 2020. DNA was extracted from paraffin‐embedded tumour tissue. Next‐generation sequencing using a 388‐gene panel was performed. First a blinded analysis using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering was used to search for patterns of mutations. Then a comparative analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to search for mutations enriched in groups of various grades, stages, and survival. In addition, careful manual annotation was used to identify pathogenic mutations over‐represented in tumours of high grade/stage and/or poor survival. Results A total of 39 patients were included. All tumour stages and grades were represented in the cohort. The median follow‐up was 10.6 years. In all, 11 patients died from UTUC during the follow‐up. Tumour mutational burden showed a statistically significant correlation with stage, grade, and stage + grade. Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 tumours had different mutational patterns. Patients who died from UTUC had pathogenic mutations in specific genes e.g. tumour protein p53 (TP53) and HRas proto‐oncogene, GTPase (HRAS). Patients with Ta Grade 1 tumours with a known pathogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation did not die from UTUC. Conclusion The genetic analysis was highly concordant with histopathological features and added prognostic information in some cases. Thus, results from genomic profiling may contribute to the choice of treatment and follow‐up regimens in the future.</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/bju.15566</doi><tpages>101</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8048-9058</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2022-07, Vol.130 (1), p.92-101
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_459900
source SWEPUB Freely available online; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Bladder cancer
Comparative analysis
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3
Fibroblast growth factor receptors
Genetic analysis
Genomic profile
Genomics
Kidney‐sparing surgery
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Mutation
p53 Protein
Paraffin
Patients
Principal components analysis
Prognostic marker
Statistical analysis
Survival
Tumors
Urothelial carcinoma
UTUC
Variance analysis
title Genomic profile – a possible diagnostic and prognostic marker in upper tract urothelial carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20profile%20%E2%80%93%20a%20possible%20diagnostic%20and%20prognostic%20marker%20in%20upper%20tract%20urothelial%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Grahn,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=92-101&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.15566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2681968411%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681968411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true