Neobladder creation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A viable diversion strategy

•Little evidence exists on renal function after urinary diversion, especially neobladders, in patients with CKD•This article analyzes the impact of continent and incontinent diversion on patients with CKD 3A and 3B•CKD 3A and 3B patients saw positive GFR change following both neobladder and conduit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologic oncology 2022-04, Vol.40 (4), p.168.e21-168.e27
Hauptverfasser: Ranti, Daniel, Pfail, John, Garcia, Mariely, Razdan, Shirin, Bieber, Christine, Rosenzweig, Shoshana, Waingankar, Nikhil, Hosseini, Abolfazl, Radros, Jari, Mehrazin, Reza, Lavallée, Etienne, Wiklund, Peter N., Sfakianos, John P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 168.e27
container_issue 4
container_start_page 168.e21
container_title Urologic oncology
container_volume 40
creator Ranti, Daniel
Pfail, John
Garcia, Mariely
Razdan, Shirin
Bieber, Christine
Rosenzweig, Shoshana
Waingankar, Nikhil
Hosseini, Abolfazl
Radros, Jari
Mehrazin, Reza
Lavallée, Etienne
Wiklund, Peter N.
Sfakianos, John P.
description •Little evidence exists on renal function after urinary diversion, especially neobladders, in patients with CKD•This article analyzes the impact of continent and incontinent diversion on patients with CKD 3A and 3B•CKD 3A and 3B patients saw positive GFR change following both neobladder and conduit diversions•Patients with 3A and 3B had higher rates of hydronephrosis in both conduit and neobladder cohorts•ONB may be a viable diversion strategy in patients with lower renal function than guidelines suggest Renal function impairment is often cited as a contraindication to continent diversion strategies. There is little evidence exploring renal function changes between continent and incontinent surgery in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD), in particular CKD3B. This was a retrospective review of two high-volume centers performing robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) or ileal conduit (IC) between 2014 to 2020. Patients were stratified based on CKD estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) stage, which was estimated via the CKD-EPI equation. Postoperative renal function was compared for up to 60 months postoperative. Surgical, post-surgical, complications, and readmission data were gathered and compared between all patients 522 cystectomy patients, 430 with IC and 125 with ONB, were included. eGFR decline was statistically significant in a matched cohort of IC and ONB patients only at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences between readmission rates, time to readmission, or complications. 34.6% of stage 3B patients had hydronephrosis on imaging prior to surgery, compared to 11.4%, 22.1% and 21.8% of CKD stage 1, 2, and 3A patients. CKD stage 3B had statistically and clinically improved eGFR through 24 months. ONB surgery may be a viable diversion strategy in patients previously thought to be contraindicated due to low renal function.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_456179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078143921005354</els_id><sourcerecordid>2621024152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-5522c7dae8e08f052a5eeb11310d00bbcd021733f9368e3e17e12a234e56f7193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P4zAQxa0VaGG7-xFAPnJJ8Nhx_nBBCMGChOAC0t4sx55sXdK42ElRvz2uWrhy8tPo92bk9wg5AZYDg_J8kU_B934wOWcccoCccfGDHENdiYwXTXmQNKvqDArRHJFfMS4Yg6IG-EmOhGSi4VAdk3-P6NteW4uBmoB6dH6gbqCrpHAYI31345yaefCDM_TV2QE31LqIOuIFvaJrp9se02SNIW69cQx6xP-b3-Sw033EP_t3Rl5ub56v77KHp7_311cPmRFCjJmUnJvKaqyR1R2TXEvEFkAAs4y1rbHpd5UQXSPKGgVChcA1FwXKsqugETOS7fbGd1xNrVoFt9Rho7x2aj96TQpVIUuotvzZjl8F_zZhHNXSRYN9rwf0U1S85MB4AZInVO5QE3yMAbuv5cDUtgS1UPsS1LYEBaBSCcl3uj8xtUu0X67P1BNwuQMwBbN2GFQ0KW2D1gU0o7LefXPiA8Apm9E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621024152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neobladder creation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A viable diversion strategy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ranti, Daniel ; Pfail, John ; Garcia, Mariely ; Razdan, Shirin ; Bieber, Christine ; Rosenzweig, Shoshana ; Waingankar, Nikhil ; Hosseini, Abolfazl ; Radros, Jari ; Mehrazin, Reza ; Lavallée, Etienne ; Wiklund, Peter N. ; Sfakianos, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ranti, Daniel ; Pfail, John ; Garcia, Mariely ; Razdan, Shirin ; Bieber, Christine ; Rosenzweig, Shoshana ; Waingankar, Nikhil ; Hosseini, Abolfazl ; Radros, Jari ; Mehrazin, Reza ; Lavallée, Etienne ; Wiklund, Peter N. ; Sfakianos, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>•Little evidence exists on renal function after urinary diversion, especially neobladders, in patients with CKD•This article analyzes the impact of continent and incontinent diversion on patients with CKD 3A and 3B•CKD 3A and 3B patients saw positive GFR change following both neobladder and conduit diversions•Patients with 3A and 3B had higher rates of hydronephrosis in both conduit and neobladder cohorts•ONB may be a viable diversion strategy in patients with lower renal function than guidelines suggest Renal function impairment is often cited as a contraindication to continent diversion strategies. There is little evidence exploring renal function changes between continent and incontinent surgery in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD), in particular CKD3B. This was a retrospective review of two high-volume centers performing robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) or ileal conduit (IC) between 2014 to 2020. Patients were stratified based on CKD estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) stage, which was estimated via the CKD-EPI equation. Postoperative renal function was compared for up to 60 months postoperative. Surgical, post-surgical, complications, and readmission data were gathered and compared between all patients 522 cystectomy patients, 430 with IC and 125 with ONB, were included. eGFR decline was statistically significant in a matched cohort of IC and ONB patients only at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences between readmission rates, time to readmission, or complications. 34.6% of stage 3B patients had hydronephrosis on imaging prior to surgery, compared to 11.4%, 22.1% and 21.8% of CKD stage 1, 2, and 3A patients. CKD stage 3B had statistically and clinically improved eGFR through 24 months. ONB surgery may be a viable diversion strategy in patients previously thought to be contraindicated due to low renal function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2496</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35039217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cystectomy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Orthotopic neobladder ; Patient selection ; Presurgical optimization ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - etiology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urinary diversion ; Urinary Diversion - methods ; Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><ispartof>Urologic oncology, 2022-04, Vol.40 (4), p.168.e21-168.e27</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-5522c7dae8e08f052a5eeb11310d00bbcd021733f9368e3e17e12a234e56f7193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-5522c7dae8e08f052a5eeb11310d00bbcd021733f9368e3e17e12a234e56f7193</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7962-4403 ; 0000-0002-8310-1063</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143921005354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:150171063$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ranti, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfail, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Mariely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razdan, Shirin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenzweig, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waingankar, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radros, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrazin, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavallée, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Peter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sfakianos, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>Neobladder creation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A viable diversion strategy</title><title>Urologic oncology</title><addtitle>Urol Oncol</addtitle><description>•Little evidence exists on renal function after urinary diversion, especially neobladders, in patients with CKD•This article analyzes the impact of continent and incontinent diversion on patients with CKD 3A and 3B•CKD 3A and 3B patients saw positive GFR change following both neobladder and conduit diversions•Patients with 3A and 3B had higher rates of hydronephrosis in both conduit and neobladder cohorts•ONB may be a viable diversion strategy in patients with lower renal function than guidelines suggest Renal function impairment is often cited as a contraindication to continent diversion strategies. There is little evidence exploring renal function changes between continent and incontinent surgery in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD), in particular CKD3B. This was a retrospective review of two high-volume centers performing robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) or ileal conduit (IC) between 2014 to 2020. Patients were stratified based on CKD estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) stage, which was estimated via the CKD-EPI equation. Postoperative renal function was compared for up to 60 months postoperative. Surgical, post-surgical, complications, and readmission data were gathered and compared between all patients 522 cystectomy patients, 430 with IC and 125 with ONB, were included. eGFR decline was statistically significant in a matched cohort of IC and ONB patients only at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences between readmission rates, time to readmission, or complications. 34.6% of stage 3B patients had hydronephrosis on imaging prior to surgery, compared to 11.4%, 22.1% and 21.8% of CKD stage 1, 2, and 3A patients. CKD stage 3B had statistically and clinically improved eGFR through 24 months. ONB surgery may be a viable diversion strategy in patients previously thought to be contraindicated due to low renal function.</description><subject>Cystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthotopic neobladder</subject><subject>Patient selection</subject><subject>Presurgical optimization</subject><subject>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary diversion</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion - methods</subject><subject>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><issn>1078-1439</issn><issn>1873-2496</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P4zAQxa0VaGG7-xFAPnJJ8Nhx_nBBCMGChOAC0t4sx55sXdK42ElRvz2uWrhy8tPo92bk9wg5AZYDg_J8kU_B934wOWcccoCccfGDHENdiYwXTXmQNKvqDArRHJFfMS4Yg6IG-EmOhGSi4VAdk3-P6NteW4uBmoB6dH6gbqCrpHAYI31345yaefCDM_TV2QE31LqIOuIFvaJrp9se02SNIW69cQx6xP-b3-Sw033EP_t3Rl5ub56v77KHp7_311cPmRFCjJmUnJvKaqyR1R2TXEvEFkAAs4y1rbHpd5UQXSPKGgVChcA1FwXKsqugETOS7fbGd1xNrVoFt9Rho7x2aj96TQpVIUuotvzZjl8F_zZhHNXSRYN9rwf0U1S85MB4AZInVO5QE3yMAbuv5cDUtgS1UPsS1LYEBaBSCcl3uj8xtUu0X67P1BNwuQMwBbN2GFQ0KW2D1gU0o7LefXPiA8Apm9E</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Ranti, Daniel</creator><creator>Pfail, John</creator><creator>Garcia, Mariely</creator><creator>Razdan, Shirin</creator><creator>Bieber, Christine</creator><creator>Rosenzweig, Shoshana</creator><creator>Waingankar, Nikhil</creator><creator>Hosseini, Abolfazl</creator><creator>Radros, Jari</creator><creator>Mehrazin, Reza</creator><creator>Lavallée, Etienne</creator><creator>Wiklund, Peter N.</creator><creator>Sfakianos, John P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-4403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8310-1063</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Neobladder creation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A viable diversion strategy</title><author>Ranti, Daniel ; Pfail, John ; Garcia, Mariely ; Razdan, Shirin ; Bieber, Christine ; Rosenzweig, Shoshana ; Waingankar, Nikhil ; Hosseini, Abolfazl ; Radros, Jari ; Mehrazin, Reza ; Lavallée, Etienne ; Wiklund, Peter N. ; Sfakianos, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-5522c7dae8e08f052a5eeb11310d00bbcd021733f9368e3e17e12a234e56f7193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthotopic neobladder</topic><topic>Patient selection</topic><topic>Presurgical optimization</topic><topic>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary diversion</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion - methods</topic><topic>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ranti, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfail, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Mariely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razdan, Shirin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenzweig, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waingankar, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radros, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrazin, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavallée, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Peter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sfakianos, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Urologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ranti, Daniel</au><au>Pfail, John</au><au>Garcia, Mariely</au><au>Razdan, Shirin</au><au>Bieber, Christine</au><au>Rosenzweig, Shoshana</au><au>Waingankar, Nikhil</au><au>Hosseini, Abolfazl</au><au>Radros, Jari</au><au>Mehrazin, Reza</au><au>Lavallée, Etienne</au><au>Wiklund, Peter N.</au><au>Sfakianos, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neobladder creation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A viable diversion strategy</atitle><jtitle>Urologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>168.e21</spage><epage>168.e27</epage><pages>168.e21-168.e27</pages><issn>1078-1439</issn><eissn>1873-2496</eissn><abstract>•Little evidence exists on renal function after urinary diversion, especially neobladders, in patients with CKD•This article analyzes the impact of continent and incontinent diversion on patients with CKD 3A and 3B•CKD 3A and 3B patients saw positive GFR change following both neobladder and conduit diversions•Patients with 3A and 3B had higher rates of hydronephrosis in both conduit and neobladder cohorts•ONB may be a viable diversion strategy in patients with lower renal function than guidelines suggest Renal function impairment is often cited as a contraindication to continent diversion strategies. There is little evidence exploring renal function changes between continent and incontinent surgery in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD), in particular CKD3B. This was a retrospective review of two high-volume centers performing robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) or ileal conduit (IC) between 2014 to 2020. Patients were stratified based on CKD estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) stage, which was estimated via the CKD-EPI equation. Postoperative renal function was compared for up to 60 months postoperative. Surgical, post-surgical, complications, and readmission data were gathered and compared between all patients 522 cystectomy patients, 430 with IC and 125 with ONB, were included. eGFR decline was statistically significant in a matched cohort of IC and ONB patients only at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences between readmission rates, time to readmission, or complications. 34.6% of stage 3B patients had hydronephrosis on imaging prior to surgery, compared to 11.4%, 22.1% and 21.8% of CKD stage 1, 2, and 3A patients. CKD stage 3B had statistically and clinically improved eGFR through 24 months. ONB surgery may be a viable diversion strategy in patients previously thought to be contraindicated due to low renal function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35039217</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.023</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-4403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8310-1063</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1439
ispartof Urologic oncology, 2022-04, Vol.40 (4), p.168.e21-168.e27
issn 1078-1439
1873-2496
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_456179
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cystectomy - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Orthotopic neobladder
Patient selection
Presurgical optimization
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - complications
Retrospective Studies
Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - etiology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urinary diversion
Urinary Diversion - methods
Urinary Reservoirs, Continent
title Neobladder creation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A viable diversion strategy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A24%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neobladder%20creation%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20kidney%20disease:%20A%20viable%20diversion%20strategy&rft.jtitle=Urologic%20oncology&rft.au=Ranti,%20Daniel&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=168.e21&rft.epage=168.e27&rft.pages=168.e21-168.e27&rft.issn=1078-1439&rft.eissn=1873-2496&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2621024152%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621024152&rft_id=info:pmid/35039217&rft_els_id=S1078143921005354&rfr_iscdi=true