Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 202...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prenatal diagnosis 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.72-83 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 83 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Prenatal diagnosis |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. Chmait, Ramen H. Stirnemann, Julien Habli, Mounira A. Johnson, Anthony Hessami, Kamran Mostafaei, Shayan Nassr, Ahmed A. Donepudi, Roopali V. Sanz Cortes, Magdalena Espinoza, Jimmy Krispin, Eyal Belfort, Michael A. |
description | This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon.
What does this study add?
The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pd.6246 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_450472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2720925251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb2O1DAUhS0EYocF8QbIHUgoi3-S2KZbLb_SSiABteXE12BI4uCbzGg6SkqekSfBwwzbUd0j-ztfcwh5yNkFZ0w8m_1FK-r2FtlwZlTFhJC3yYbxkqVu-Bm5h_i1gFoYdZecyZbrWim1IT8_pCGNaaJbyLgiRRigX-IWaIAlYZ_m2NPBIWQ6f0lL6pP7vA5uiaUSUqbLLk6_f_w6HLpkN2FY8fCH-8nnNMJzelkyLjCWTk8zbCPsqJs8HWFxpekmN-wx4n1yJ7gB4cHpnpNPr15-vHpTXb97_fbq8rrqhW7aymhmpNFe174DXWvDg_MyBBakDkq7DgKXXRsMCNV4I1mnWWAKJA-KtVrJc1IdvbiDee3snOPo8t4mF-3p6VtJYOuG1UoU_smRn3P6vgIudozYwzC4CdKKVijBjGhEwwv6-Ij2OSFmCDdyzuxhJjt7e5ipkI9O0rUbwd9w_3YpwNMjsIsD7P_nse9f_NX9ActeoOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720925251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. ; Chmait, Ramen H. ; Stirnemann, Julien ; Habli, Mounira A. ; Johnson, Anthony ; Hessami, Kamran ; Mostafaei, Shayan ; Nassr, Ahmed A. ; Donepudi, Roopali V. ; Sanz Cortes, Magdalena ; Espinoza, Jimmy ; Krispin, Eyal ; Belfort, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. ; Chmait, Ramen H. ; Stirnemann, Julien ; Habli, Mounira A. ; Johnson, Anthony ; Hessami, Kamran ; Mostafaei, Shayan ; Nassr, Ahmed A. ; Donepudi, Roopali V. ; Sanz Cortes, Magdalena ; Espinoza, Jimmy ; Krispin, Eyal ; Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon.
What does this study add?
The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.6246</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36184777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Abruptio Placentae ; Female ; Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology ; Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery ; Fetoscopy - methods ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Laser Coagulation - methods ; Lasers ; Placenta - blood supply ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Twin</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.72-83</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6333-3177 ; 0000-0002-0265-9859 ; 0000-0002-9830-2212 ; 0000-0003-1722-3553 ; 0000-0001-5859-9528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.6246$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.6246$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36184777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:150863005$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chmait, Ramen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stirnemann, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habli, Mounira A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessami, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafaei, Shayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassr, Ahmed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donepudi, Roopali V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krispin, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><description>This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon.
What does this study add?
The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption.</description><subject>Abruptio Placentae</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery</subject><subject>Fetoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Laser Coagulation - methods</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Placenta - blood supply</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Twin</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kb2O1DAUhS0EYocF8QbIHUgoi3-S2KZbLb_SSiABteXE12BI4uCbzGg6SkqekSfBwwzbUd0j-ztfcwh5yNkFZ0w8m_1FK-r2FtlwZlTFhJC3yYbxkqVu-Bm5h_i1gFoYdZecyZbrWim1IT8_pCGNaaJbyLgiRRigX-IWaIAlYZ_m2NPBIWQ6f0lL6pP7vA5uiaUSUqbLLk6_f_w6HLpkN2FY8fCH-8nnNMJzelkyLjCWTk8zbCPsqJs8HWFxpekmN-wx4n1yJ7gB4cHpnpNPr15-vHpTXb97_fbq8rrqhW7aymhmpNFe174DXWvDg_MyBBakDkq7DgKXXRsMCNV4I1mnWWAKJA-KtVrJc1IdvbiDee3snOPo8t4mF-3p6VtJYOuG1UoU_smRn3P6vgIudozYwzC4CdKKVijBjGhEwwv6-Ij2OSFmCDdyzuxhJjt7e5ipkI9O0rUbwd9w_3YpwNMjsIsD7P_nse9f_NX9ActeoOI</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creator><creator>Chmait, Ramen H.</creator><creator>Stirnemann, Julien</creator><creator>Habli, Mounira A.</creator><creator>Johnson, Anthony</creator><creator>Hessami, Kamran</creator><creator>Mostafaei, Shayan</creator><creator>Nassr, Ahmed A.</creator><creator>Donepudi, Roopali V.</creator><creator>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</creator><creator>Espinoza, Jimmy</creator><creator>Krispin, Eyal</creator><creator>Belfort, Michael A.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-3177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-9859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-3553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-9528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. ; Chmait, Ramen H. ; Stirnemann, Julien ; Habli, Mounira A. ; Johnson, Anthony ; Hessami, Kamran ; Mostafaei, Shayan ; Nassr, Ahmed A. ; Donepudi, Roopali V. ; Sanz Cortes, Magdalena ; Espinoza, Jimmy ; Krispin, Eyal ; Belfort, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abruptio Placentae</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery</topic><topic>Fetoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Laser Coagulation - methods</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Placenta - blood supply</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Twin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chmait, Ramen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stirnemann, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habli, Mounira A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessami, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafaei, Shayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassr, Ahmed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donepudi, Roopali V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krispin, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</au><au>Chmait, Ramen H.</au><au>Stirnemann, Julien</au><au>Habli, Mounira A.</au><au>Johnson, Anthony</au><au>Hessami, Kamran</au><au>Mostafaei, Shayan</au><au>Nassr, Ahmed A.</au><au>Donepudi, Roopali V.</au><au>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</au><au>Espinoza, Jimmy</au><au>Krispin, Eyal</au><au>Belfort, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>72-83</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><abstract>This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon.
What does this study add?
The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36184777</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.6246</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-3177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-9859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-3553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-9528</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-3851 |
ispartof | Prenatal diagnosis, 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.72-83 |
issn | 0197-3851 1097-0223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_450472 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Abruptio Placentae Female Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery Fetoscopy - methods Gestational Age Humans Infant, Newborn Laser Coagulation - methods Lasers Placenta - blood supply Pregnancy Pregnancy, Twin |
title | Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Solomon%20versus%20selective%20fetoscopic%20laser%20photocoagulation%20for%20twin%E2%80%90twin%20transfusion%20syndrome:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Shamshirsaz,%20Alireza%20A.&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=72-83&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.6246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2720925251%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720925251&rft_id=info:pmid/36184777&rfr_iscdi=true |