Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 202...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prenatal diagnosis 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.72-83
Hauptverfasser: Shamshirsaz, Alireza A., Chmait, Ramen H., Stirnemann, Julien, Habli, Mounira A., Johnson, Anthony, Hessami, Kamran, Mostafaei, Shayan, Nassr, Ahmed A., Donepudi, Roopali V., Sanz Cortes, Magdalena, Espinoza, Jimmy, Krispin, Eyal, Belfort, Michael A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 72
container_title Prenatal diagnosis
container_volume 43
creator Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
Chmait, Ramen H.
Stirnemann, Julien
Habli, Mounira A.
Johnson, Anthony
Hessami, Kamran
Mostafaei, Shayan
Nassr, Ahmed A.
Donepudi, Roopali V.
Sanz Cortes, Magdalena
Espinoza, Jimmy
Krispin, Eyal
Belfort, Michael A.
description This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption. Key points What's already known about this topic? There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon. What does this study add? The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pd.6246
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_450472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2720925251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb2O1DAUhS0EYocF8QbIHUgoi3-S2KZbLb_SSiABteXE12BI4uCbzGg6SkqekSfBwwzbUd0j-ztfcwh5yNkFZ0w8m_1FK-r2FtlwZlTFhJC3yYbxkqVu-Bm5h_i1gFoYdZecyZbrWim1IT8_pCGNaaJbyLgiRRigX-IWaIAlYZ_m2NPBIWQ6f0lL6pP7vA5uiaUSUqbLLk6_f_w6HLpkN2FY8fCH-8nnNMJzelkyLjCWTk8zbCPsqJs8HWFxpekmN-wx4n1yJ7gB4cHpnpNPr15-vHpTXb97_fbq8rrqhW7aymhmpNFe174DXWvDg_MyBBakDkq7DgKXXRsMCNV4I1mnWWAKJA-KtVrJc1IdvbiDee3snOPo8t4mF-3p6VtJYOuG1UoU_smRn3P6vgIudozYwzC4CdKKVijBjGhEwwv6-Ij2OSFmCDdyzuxhJjt7e5ipkI9O0rUbwd9w_3YpwNMjsIsD7P_nse9f_NX9ActeoOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720925251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. ; Chmait, Ramen H. ; Stirnemann, Julien ; Habli, Mounira A. ; Johnson, Anthony ; Hessami, Kamran ; Mostafaei, Shayan ; Nassr, Ahmed A. ; Donepudi, Roopali V. ; Sanz Cortes, Magdalena ; Espinoza, Jimmy ; Krispin, Eyal ; Belfort, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. ; Chmait, Ramen H. ; Stirnemann, Julien ; Habli, Mounira A. ; Johnson, Anthony ; Hessami, Kamran ; Mostafaei, Shayan ; Nassr, Ahmed A. ; Donepudi, Roopali V. ; Sanz Cortes, Magdalena ; Espinoza, Jimmy ; Krispin, Eyal ; Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption. Key points What's already known about this topic? There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon. What does this study add? The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.6246</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36184777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Abruptio Placentae ; Female ; Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology ; Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery ; Fetoscopy - methods ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Laser Coagulation - methods ; Lasers ; Placenta - blood supply ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Twin</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.72-83</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6333-3177 ; 0000-0002-0265-9859 ; 0000-0002-9830-2212 ; 0000-0003-1722-3553 ; 0000-0001-5859-9528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.6246$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.6246$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36184777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:150863005$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chmait, Ramen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stirnemann, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habli, Mounira A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessami, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafaei, Shayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassr, Ahmed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donepudi, Roopali V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krispin, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><description>This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption. Key points What's already known about this topic? There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon. What does this study add? The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption.</description><subject>Abruptio Placentae</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery</subject><subject>Fetoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Laser Coagulation - methods</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Placenta - blood supply</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Twin</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kb2O1DAUhS0EYocF8QbIHUgoi3-S2KZbLb_SSiABteXE12BI4uCbzGg6SkqekSfBwwzbUd0j-ztfcwh5yNkFZ0w8m_1FK-r2FtlwZlTFhJC3yYbxkqVu-Bm5h_i1gFoYdZecyZbrWim1IT8_pCGNaaJbyLgiRRigX-IWaIAlYZ_m2NPBIWQ6f0lL6pP7vA5uiaUSUqbLLk6_f_w6HLpkN2FY8fCH-8nnNMJzelkyLjCWTk8zbCPsqJs8HWFxpekmN-wx4n1yJ7gB4cHpnpNPr15-vHpTXb97_fbq8rrqhW7aymhmpNFe174DXWvDg_MyBBakDkq7DgKXXRsMCNV4I1mnWWAKJA-KtVrJc1IdvbiDee3snOPo8t4mF-3p6VtJYOuG1UoU_smRn3P6vgIudozYwzC4CdKKVijBjGhEwwv6-Ij2OSFmCDdyzuxhJjt7e5ipkI9O0rUbwd9w_3YpwNMjsIsD7P_nse9f_NX9ActeoOI</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creator><creator>Chmait, Ramen H.</creator><creator>Stirnemann, Julien</creator><creator>Habli, Mounira A.</creator><creator>Johnson, Anthony</creator><creator>Hessami, Kamran</creator><creator>Mostafaei, Shayan</creator><creator>Nassr, Ahmed A.</creator><creator>Donepudi, Roopali V.</creator><creator>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</creator><creator>Espinoza, Jimmy</creator><creator>Krispin, Eyal</creator><creator>Belfort, Michael A.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-3177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-9859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-3553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-9528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. ; Chmait, Ramen H. ; Stirnemann, Julien ; Habli, Mounira A. ; Johnson, Anthony ; Hessami, Kamran ; Mostafaei, Shayan ; Nassr, Ahmed A. ; Donepudi, Roopali V. ; Sanz Cortes, Magdalena ; Espinoza, Jimmy ; Krispin, Eyal ; Belfort, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2856-9809398d84dbe84891fad3ff0f38f78abef13b6f9e275d930b80f07e31f706873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abruptio Placentae</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery</topic><topic>Fetoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Laser Coagulation - methods</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Placenta - blood supply</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Twin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chmait, Ramen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stirnemann, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habli, Mounira A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessami, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafaei, Shayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassr, Ahmed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donepudi, Roopali V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krispin, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfort, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.</au><au>Chmait, Ramen H.</au><au>Stirnemann, Julien</au><au>Habli, Mounira A.</au><au>Johnson, Anthony</au><au>Hessami, Kamran</au><au>Mostafaei, Shayan</au><au>Nassr, Ahmed A.</au><au>Donepudi, Roopali V.</au><au>Sanz Cortes, Magdalena</au><au>Espinoza, Jimmy</au><au>Krispin, Eyal</au><au>Belfort, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>72-83</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><abstract>This meta‐analysis aims to compare the perinatal outcome of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies undergoing selective versus vascular equator (Solomon) fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP). We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Web of Science from inception up to 25 July 2021. Studies comparing the Solomon and selective techniques of FLP for treatment of TTTS pregnancies were eligible. Random‐effects or fixed‐effect models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratio. Seven studies with a total of 1664 TTTS pregnancies (n = 671 undergoing Solomon and n = 993 selective techniques) were included. As compared to the selective FLP, Solomon was associated with a lower risk of recurrent TTTS compared to the selective technique (Log odds ratio [OR]: −1.167; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −2.01, −0.33; p = 0.021; I2: 67%). In addition, Solomon was significantly associated with a higher risk of placental abruption than the selective technique (Log [OR]: 1.44; 95% CrI: 0.45, 2.47; p = 0.012; I2: 0.0%). Furthermore, a trend for the higher risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes was observed among those undergoing Solomon (Log [OR]: 0.581; 95% CrI: −0.43, 1.49; p = 0.131; I2: 17%). As compared to selective FLP, the Solomon technique for TTTS pregnancies is associated with a significantly lower recurrence of TTTS; however, it significantly increases the risk of placental abruption. Key points What's already known about this topic? There are conflicting findings regarding adverse effects of different fetoscopic laser photocoagulation techniques, especially Solomon. What does this study add? The Solomon technique for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) pregnancies is associated with the lower recurrence of TTTS but significantly the increased risk of placental abruption.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36184777</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.6246</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-3177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-9859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-3553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-9528</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-3851
ispartof Prenatal diagnosis, 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.72-83
issn 0197-3851
1097-0223
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_450472
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abruptio Placentae
Female
Fetofetal Transfusion - epidemiology
Fetofetal Transfusion - surgery
Fetoscopy - methods
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Laser Coagulation - methods
Lasers
Placenta - blood supply
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Twin
title Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Solomon%20versus%20selective%20fetoscopic%20laser%20photocoagulation%20for%20twin%E2%80%90twin%20transfusion%20syndrome:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Shamshirsaz,%20Alireza%20A.&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=72-83&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.6246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2720925251%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720925251&rft_id=info:pmid/36184777&rfr_iscdi=true