Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading
AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical pathology 2024-01, Vol.77 (1), p.22-26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | Journal of clinical pathology |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Flach, Rachel N Egevad, Lars Eklund, Martin van der Kwast, Theodorus H Delahunt, Brett Samaratunga, Hemamali Suelmann, Britt B M Willemse, Peter-Paul M Meijer, Richard P van Diest, Paul J |
description | AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jcp-2022-208506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_449826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2901405718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1LHTEUxUOp6NO67q4EuinI1HzNJLMsYlUQFPTtCiHJ3LF5nY_XZMbif98r87RQcHMT7v3l5CSHkI-cfeVcVqebsC0EEwKLKVn1jqy40qJQXFXvyYoxwYtaq-qAHOa8YYxLzeU-OZCVFEbJakV-rDPQsaXTT6BXd-tbCkUHLg1xeKD92Mwd0Nhv0_gImcZhgpQcFpqgi87HLk5P2KYI5AkHNLgh4PghuQYVPpC91nUZjnfrEVl_P78_uyyuby6uzr5dF17W9VSE4GvWOCWZ0YI1QSsoa1_rxjDVSs4aVvKA1jUw0EIY02oIpS69kkE7r-URKRbd_Ae2s7fbFHuXnuzoot21fuEOrFK1ERXyXxYeff-eIU-2jzlA17kBxjlboaUopVFCIvr5P3QzzmnA11hRM65YqblB6nShAn5ETtC-WuDMPgdlMSj7HJRdgsITn3a6s--heeVfkkHgZAF8v_l351tyfwESeJt6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2901405718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Flach, Rachel N ; Egevad, Lars ; Eklund, Martin ; van der Kwast, Theodorus H ; Delahunt, Brett ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Suelmann, Britt B M ; Willemse, Peter-Paul M ; Meijer, Richard P ; van Diest, Paul J</creator><creatorcontrib>Flach, Rachel N ; Egevad, Lars ; Eklund, Martin ; van der Kwast, Theodorus H ; Delahunt, Brett ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Suelmann, Britt B M ; Willemse, Peter-Paul M ; Meijer, Richard P ; van Diest, Paul J</creatorcontrib><description>AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36328436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Classification ; Computer-Assisted Instruction ; EDUCATION ; Education, Medical ; Humans ; Investigations ; Laboratories ; Male ; Neoplasm Grading ; Online instruction ; Original research ; Pathology ; Prognosis ; PROSTATE ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveillance ; Tumors ; Urologic Neoplasms ; Urological cancer</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pathology, 2024-01, Vol.77 (1), p.22-26</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8640-5786 ; 0000-0003-0658-2745 ; 0000-0002-5398-0300 ; 0000-0002-7155-3337 ; 0000-0002-4448-2895 ; 0000-0001-5796-1791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36328436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:151132295$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flach, Rachel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egevad, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahunt, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaratunga, Hemamali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suelmann, Britt B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Diest, Paul J</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</title><title>Journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer-Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>EDUCATION</subject><subject>Education, Medical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Original research</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>PROSTATE</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms</subject><subject>Urological cancer</subject><issn>0021-9746</issn><issn>1472-4146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1LHTEUxUOp6NO67q4EuinI1HzNJLMsYlUQFPTtCiHJ3LF5nY_XZMbif98r87RQcHMT7v3l5CSHkI-cfeVcVqebsC0EEwKLKVn1jqy40qJQXFXvyYoxwYtaq-qAHOa8YYxLzeU-OZCVFEbJakV-rDPQsaXTT6BXd-tbCkUHLg1xeKD92Mwd0Nhv0_gImcZhgpQcFpqgi87HLk5P2KYI5AkHNLgh4PghuQYVPpC91nUZjnfrEVl_P78_uyyuby6uzr5dF17W9VSE4GvWOCWZ0YI1QSsoa1_rxjDVSs4aVvKA1jUw0EIY02oIpS69kkE7r-URKRbd_Ae2s7fbFHuXnuzoot21fuEOrFK1ERXyXxYeff-eIU-2jzlA17kBxjlboaUopVFCIvr5P3QzzmnA11hRM65YqblB6nShAn5ETtC-WuDMPgdlMSj7HJRdgsITn3a6s--heeVfkkHgZAF8v_l351tyfwESeJt6</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Flach, Rachel N</creator><creator>Egevad, Lars</creator><creator>Eklund, Martin</creator><creator>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</creator><creator>Delahunt, Brett</creator><creator>Samaratunga, Hemamali</creator><creator>Suelmann, Britt B M</creator><creator>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</creator><creator>Meijer, Richard P</creator><creator>van Diest, Paul J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-5786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-0300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-3337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-2895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-1791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</title><author>Flach, Rachel N ; Egevad, Lars ; Eklund, Martin ; van der Kwast, Theodorus H ; Delahunt, Brett ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Suelmann, Britt B M ; Willemse, Peter-Paul M ; Meijer, Richard P ; van Diest, Paul J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer-Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>EDUCATION</topic><topic>Education, Medical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Original research</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>PROSTATE</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms</topic><topic>Urological cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flach, Rachel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egevad, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahunt, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaratunga, Hemamali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suelmann, Britt B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Diest, Paul J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flach, Rachel N</au><au>Egevad, Lars</au><au>Eklund, Martin</au><au>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</au><au>Delahunt, Brett</au><au>Samaratunga, Hemamali</au><au>Suelmann, Britt B M</au><au>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</au><au>Meijer, Richard P</au><au>van Diest, Paul J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Pathol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>22-26</pages><issn>0021-9746</issn><eissn>1472-4146</eissn><abstract>AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</pub><pmid>36328436</pmid><doi>10.1136/jcp-2022-208506</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-5786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-0300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-3337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-2895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-1791</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9746 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical pathology, 2024-01, Vol.77 (1), p.22-26 |
issn | 0021-9746 1472-4146 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_449826 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biopsy Classification Computer-Assisted Instruction EDUCATION Education, Medical Humans Investigations Laboratories Male Neoplasm Grading Online instruction Original research Pathology Prognosis PROSTATE Prostate - pathology Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Reproducibility of Results Surveillance Tumors Urologic Neoplasms Urological cancer |
title | Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A00%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20ISUP%20e-learning%20module%20improves%20interrater%20reliability%20in%20prostate%20cancer%20grading&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Flach,%20Rachel%20N&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=22-26&rft.issn=0021-9746&rft.eissn=1472-4146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jcp-2022-208506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2901405718%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2901405718&rft_id=info:pmid/36328436&rfr_iscdi=true |