Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading

AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pathology 2024-01, Vol.77 (1), p.22-26
Hauptverfasser: Flach, Rachel N, Egevad, Lars, Eklund, Martin, van der Kwast, Theodorus H, Delahunt, Brett, Samaratunga, Hemamali, Suelmann, Britt B M, Willemse, Peter-Paul M, Meijer, Richard P, van Diest, Paul J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title Journal of clinical pathology
container_volume 77
creator Flach, Rachel N
Egevad, Lars
Eklund, Martin
van der Kwast, Theodorus H
Delahunt, Brett
Samaratunga, Hemamali
Suelmann, Britt B M
Willemse, Peter-Paul M
Meijer, Richard P
van Diest, Paul J
description AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jcp-2022-208506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_449826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2901405718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1LHTEUxUOp6NO67q4EuinI1HzNJLMsYlUQFPTtCiHJ3LF5nY_XZMbif98r87RQcHMT7v3l5CSHkI-cfeVcVqebsC0EEwKLKVn1jqy40qJQXFXvyYoxwYtaq-qAHOa8YYxLzeU-OZCVFEbJakV-rDPQsaXTT6BXd-tbCkUHLg1xeKD92Mwd0Nhv0_gImcZhgpQcFpqgi87HLk5P2KYI5AkHNLgh4PghuQYVPpC91nUZjnfrEVl_P78_uyyuby6uzr5dF17W9VSE4GvWOCWZ0YI1QSsoa1_rxjDVSs4aVvKA1jUw0EIY02oIpS69kkE7r-URKRbd_Ae2s7fbFHuXnuzoot21fuEOrFK1ERXyXxYeff-eIU-2jzlA17kBxjlboaUopVFCIvr5P3QzzmnA11hRM65YqblB6nShAn5ETtC-WuDMPgdlMSj7HJRdgsITn3a6s--heeVfkkHgZAF8v_l351tyfwESeJt6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2901405718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Flach, Rachel N ; Egevad, Lars ; Eklund, Martin ; van der Kwast, Theodorus H ; Delahunt, Brett ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Suelmann, Britt B M ; Willemse, Peter-Paul M ; Meijer, Richard P ; van Diest, Paul J</creator><creatorcontrib>Flach, Rachel N ; Egevad, Lars ; Eklund, Martin ; van der Kwast, Theodorus H ; Delahunt, Brett ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Suelmann, Britt B M ; Willemse, Peter-Paul M ; Meijer, Richard P ; van Diest, Paul J</creatorcontrib><description>AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36328436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Classification ; Computer-Assisted Instruction ; EDUCATION ; Education, Medical ; Humans ; Investigations ; Laboratories ; Male ; Neoplasm Grading ; Online instruction ; Original research ; Pathology ; Prognosis ; PROSTATE ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveillance ; Tumors ; Urologic Neoplasms ; Urological cancer</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pathology, 2024-01, Vol.77 (1), p.22-26</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8640-5786 ; 0000-0003-0658-2745 ; 0000-0002-5398-0300 ; 0000-0002-7155-3337 ; 0000-0002-4448-2895 ; 0000-0001-5796-1791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36328436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:151132295$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flach, Rachel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egevad, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahunt, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaratunga, Hemamali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suelmann, Britt B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Diest, Paul J</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</title><title>Journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer-Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>EDUCATION</subject><subject>Education, Medical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Original research</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>PROSTATE</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms</subject><subject>Urological cancer</subject><issn>0021-9746</issn><issn>1472-4146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1LHTEUxUOp6NO67q4EuinI1HzNJLMsYlUQFPTtCiHJ3LF5nY_XZMbif98r87RQcHMT7v3l5CSHkI-cfeVcVqebsC0EEwKLKVn1jqy40qJQXFXvyYoxwYtaq-qAHOa8YYxLzeU-OZCVFEbJakV-rDPQsaXTT6BXd-tbCkUHLg1xeKD92Mwd0Nhv0_gImcZhgpQcFpqgi87HLk5P2KYI5AkHNLgh4PghuQYVPpC91nUZjnfrEVl_P78_uyyuby6uzr5dF17W9VSE4GvWOCWZ0YI1QSsoa1_rxjDVSs4aVvKA1jUw0EIY02oIpS69kkE7r-URKRbd_Ae2s7fbFHuXnuzoot21fuEOrFK1ERXyXxYeff-eIU-2jzlA17kBxjlboaUopVFCIvr5P3QzzmnA11hRM65YqblB6nShAn5ETtC-WuDMPgdlMSj7HJRdgsITn3a6s--heeVfkkHgZAF8v_l351tyfwESeJt6</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Flach, Rachel N</creator><creator>Egevad, Lars</creator><creator>Eklund, Martin</creator><creator>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</creator><creator>Delahunt, Brett</creator><creator>Samaratunga, Hemamali</creator><creator>Suelmann, Britt B M</creator><creator>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</creator><creator>Meijer, Richard P</creator><creator>van Diest, Paul J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-5786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-0300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-3337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-2895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-1791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</title><author>Flach, Rachel N ; Egevad, Lars ; Eklund, Martin ; van der Kwast, Theodorus H ; Delahunt, Brett ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Suelmann, Britt B M ; Willemse, Peter-Paul M ; Meijer, Richard P ; van Diest, Paul J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-ccb90da4308720dc74e59b97d804f310d051c1377e0e72288f7ec575b43c7ab73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer-Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>EDUCATION</topic><topic>Education, Medical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Original research</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>PROSTATE</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms</topic><topic>Urological cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flach, Rachel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egevad, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahunt, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaratunga, Hemamali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suelmann, Britt B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Diest, Paul J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flach, Rachel N</au><au>Egevad, Lars</au><au>Eklund, Martin</au><au>van der Kwast, Theodorus H</au><au>Delahunt, Brett</au><au>Samaratunga, Hemamali</au><au>Suelmann, Britt B M</au><au>Willemse, Peter-Paul M</au><au>Meijer, Richard P</au><au>van Diest, Paul J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Pathol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>22-26</pages><issn>0021-9746</issn><eissn>1472-4146</eissn><abstract>AimsProstate cancer (PCa) grading is an important prognostic parameter, but is subject to considerable observer variation. Previous studies have shown that interobserver variability decreases after participants were trained using an e-learning module. However, since the publication of these studies, grading of PCa has been enhanced by adopting the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 grading classification. This study investigates the effect of training on interobserver variability of PCa grading, using the ISUP Education web e-learning on Gleason grading.MethodsThe ISUP Education Prostate Test B Module was distributed among Dutch pathologists. The module uses images graded by the ISUP consensus panel consisting of 24 expert uropathologists. Participants graded the same 10 images before and after e-learning. We included those who completed the tests before and after training. We evaluated variation in PCa grading in a fully crossed study design, using linearly weighted kappa values for each pathologist, comparing them to other pathologists and to the ISUP consensus panel. We analysed the improvement in median weighted kappas before and after training, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank-test.ResultsWe included 42 pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists improved from 0.70 before training to 0.74 after training (p=0.01). When compared with the ISUP consensus panel, five pathologists improved significantly, whereas the kappa of one pathologist was significantly lower after training. All pathologists who improved significantly, graded with less than substantial agreement before training.ConclusionsISUP Prostate Test B e-learning reduces variability in PCa grading. E-learning is a cost-effective method for standardisation of pathology.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</pub><pmid>36328436</pmid><doi>10.1136/jcp-2022-208506</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-5786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-0300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-3337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-2895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-1791</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9746
ispartof Journal of clinical pathology, 2024-01, Vol.77 (1), p.22-26
issn 0021-9746
1472-4146
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_449826
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Biopsy
Classification
Computer-Assisted Instruction
EDUCATION
Education, Medical
Humans
Investigations
Laboratories
Male
Neoplasm Grading
Online instruction
Original research
Pathology
Prognosis
PROSTATE
Prostate - pathology
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Reproducibility of Results
Surveillance
Tumors
Urologic Neoplasms
Urological cancer
title Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A00%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20ISUP%20e-learning%20module%20improves%20interrater%20reliability%20in%20prostate%20cancer%20grading&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Flach,%20Rachel%20N&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=22-26&rft.issn=0021-9746&rft.eissn=1472-4146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jcp-2022-208506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2901405718%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2901405718&rft_id=info:pmid/36328436&rfr_iscdi=true