Respiratory outcomes after delivery room stabilisation with a new respiratory support system using nasal prongs

Aim To study if stabilisation using a new respiratory support system with nasal prongs compared to T‐piece with a face mask is associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Methods A single‐centre follow‐up study of neonates born

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta Paediatrica 2023-04, Vol.112 (4), p.719-725
Hauptverfasser: Baldursdottir, Sonja, Donaldsson, Snorri, Palleri, Elena, Drevhammar, Thomas, Jonsson, Baldvin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 725
container_issue 4
container_start_page 719
container_title Acta Paediatrica
container_volume 112
creator Baldursdottir, Sonja
Donaldsson, Snorri
Palleri, Elena
Drevhammar, Thomas
Jonsson, Baldvin
description Aim To study if stabilisation using a new respiratory support system with nasal prongs compared to T‐piece with a face mask is associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Methods A single‐centre follow‐up study of neonates born
doi_str_mv 10.1111/apa.16665
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_448494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2785184481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5265-88adc02ec17335c7a4fb6f55aa54ba6dd564a2345257ee2563dfebe62910a6033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhwB9AlrjAIa2_kz2uKr6kSiAEZ2uSTIpLEgdP0tX-e8zutlRIveCLrdHzvp53NIy9lOJM5nMOE5xJ55x9xFbSWVkopcrHbCUqoQurrD5hz4iuhVB6bdxTdqKdU6UVbsXiV6QpJJhj2vG4zE0ckDh0MybeYh9uMNdTjAOnGerQB4I5xJFvw_yDAx9xy9M9B1qmKaaZ045mHPhCYbziIxD0fEpxvKLn7EkHPeGL433Kvr9_9-3iY3H5-cOni81l0VjlbFFV0DZCYSNLrW1Tgulq11kLYE0Nrm2tM6C0yeFKRGWdbjus0am1FOCE1qesOPjSFqel9lMKA6SdjxD8sfQzv9AbU5m1yfz6QT533v4V3QrV7RD_QyutLKUo9_--OWgz-GtBmv0QqMG-hxHjQl6Vzhgj7D7S63_Q67ikMU8xU5WVVY4iM_X2QDUpEiXs7tqRwv_ZFp-3xe-3JbOvjo5LPWB7R95Ldn4AtqHH3cNOfvNlc7D8DXlfzS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785184481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Respiratory outcomes after delivery room stabilisation with a new respiratory support system using nasal prongs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baldursdottir, Sonja ; Donaldsson, Snorri ; Palleri, Elena ; Drevhammar, Thomas ; Jonsson, Baldvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldursdottir, Sonja ; Donaldsson, Snorri ; Palleri, Elena ; Drevhammar, Thomas ; Jonsson, Baldvin</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To study if stabilisation using a new respiratory support system with nasal prongs compared to T‐piece with a face mask is associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Methods A single‐centre follow‐up study of neonates born &lt;28 weeks gestation at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm included in the multicentre Comparison of Respiratory Support after Delivery (CORSAD) trial and randomised to initial respiratory support with the new system versus T‐piece. Data on respiratory support, neonatal morbidities and mortality were collected up to 36 weeks post‐menstrual age. Results Ninety‐four infants, 51 female, with a median (range) gestational age of 25 + 2 (23 + 0, 27 + 6) weeks and days, were included. Significantly fewer infants in the new system group received mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h, 24 (52.2%) compared with 35 (72.9%) (p = 0.034) and during the first 7 days, 29 (63.0%) compared with 39 (81.3%) (p = 0.045) in the T‐piece group. At 36 weeks post‐menstrual age, 13 (28.3%) in the new system and 13 (27.1%) in the T‐piece group were diagnosed with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Conclusion Stabilisation with the new system was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation during the first week of life. No significant difference was seen in the outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-5253</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apa.16665</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36627506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norway: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age ; Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia ; delivery room ; Delivery Rooms ; Dysplasia ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gestational age ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Infants ; Lung diseases ; Mechanical ventilation ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Menstruation ; nasal prongs ; Neonates ; Pregnancy ; pre‐term ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnosis ; stabilisation ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Acta Paediatrica, 2023-04, Vol.112 (4), p.719-725</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5265-88adc02ec17335c7a4fb6f55aa54ba6dd564a2345257ee2563dfebe62910a6033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5265-88adc02ec17335c7a4fb6f55aa54ba6dd564a2345257ee2563dfebe62910a6033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2282-003X ; 0000-0002-4038-2221 ; 0000-0003-2264-7449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fapa.16665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fapa.16665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627506$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:151710794$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:236627506$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldursdottir, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldsson, Snorri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palleri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drevhammar, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonsson, Baldvin</creatorcontrib><title>Respiratory outcomes after delivery room stabilisation with a new respiratory support system using nasal prongs</title><title>Acta Paediatrica</title><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><description>Aim To study if stabilisation using a new respiratory support system with nasal prongs compared to T‐piece with a face mask is associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Methods A single‐centre follow‐up study of neonates born &lt;28 weeks gestation at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm included in the multicentre Comparison of Respiratory Support after Delivery (CORSAD) trial and randomised to initial respiratory support with the new system versus T‐piece. Data on respiratory support, neonatal morbidities and mortality were collected up to 36 weeks post‐menstrual age. Results Ninety‐four infants, 51 female, with a median (range) gestational age of 25 + 2 (23 + 0, 27 + 6) weeks and days, were included. Significantly fewer infants in the new system group received mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h, 24 (52.2%) compared with 35 (72.9%) (p = 0.034) and during the first 7 days, 29 (63.0%) compared with 39 (81.3%) (p = 0.045) in the T‐piece group. At 36 weeks post‐menstrual age, 13 (28.3%) in the new system and 13 (27.1%) in the T‐piece group were diagnosed with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Conclusion Stabilisation with the new system was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation during the first week of life. No significant difference was seen in the outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia</subject><subject>delivery room</subject><subject>Delivery Rooms</subject><subject>Dysplasia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>nasal prongs</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pre‐term</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnosis</subject><subject>stabilisation</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhwB9AlrjAIa2_kz2uKr6kSiAEZ2uSTIpLEgdP0tX-e8zutlRIveCLrdHzvp53NIy9lOJM5nMOE5xJ55x9xFbSWVkopcrHbCUqoQurrD5hz4iuhVB6bdxTdqKdU6UVbsXiV6QpJJhj2vG4zE0ckDh0MybeYh9uMNdTjAOnGerQB4I5xJFvw_yDAx9xy9M9B1qmKaaZ045mHPhCYbziIxD0fEpxvKLn7EkHPeGL433Kvr9_9-3iY3H5-cOni81l0VjlbFFV0DZCYSNLrW1Tgulq11kLYE0Nrm2tM6C0yeFKRGWdbjus0am1FOCE1qesOPjSFqel9lMKA6SdjxD8sfQzv9AbU5m1yfz6QT533v4V3QrV7RD_QyutLKUo9_--OWgz-GtBmv0QqMG-hxHjQl6Vzhgj7D7S63_Q67ikMU8xU5WVVY4iM_X2QDUpEiXs7tqRwv_ZFp-3xe-3JbOvjo5LPWB7R95Ldn4AtqHH3cNOfvNlc7D8DXlfzS8</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Baldursdottir, Sonja</creator><creator>Donaldsson, Snorri</creator><creator>Palleri, Elena</creator><creator>Drevhammar, Thomas</creator><creator>Jonsson, Baldvin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-003X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-2221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-7449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Respiratory outcomes after delivery room stabilisation with a new respiratory support system using nasal prongs</title><author>Baldursdottir, Sonja ; Donaldsson, Snorri ; Palleri, Elena ; Drevhammar, Thomas ; Jonsson, Baldvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5265-88adc02ec17335c7a4fb6f55aa54ba6dd564a2345257ee2563dfebe62910a6033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia</topic><topic>delivery room</topic><topic>Delivery Rooms</topic><topic>Dysplasia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>nasal prongs</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pre‐term</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnosis</topic><topic>stabilisation</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldursdottir, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldsson, Snorri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palleri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drevhammar, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonsson, Baldvin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldursdottir, Sonja</au><au>Donaldsson, Snorri</au><au>Palleri, Elena</au><au>Drevhammar, Thomas</au><au>Jonsson, Baldvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Respiratory outcomes after delivery room stabilisation with a new respiratory support system using nasal prongs</atitle><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>719</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>719-725</pages><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><eissn>1651-2227</eissn><abstract>Aim To study if stabilisation using a new respiratory support system with nasal prongs compared to T‐piece with a face mask is associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Methods A single‐centre follow‐up study of neonates born &lt;28 weeks gestation at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm included in the multicentre Comparison of Respiratory Support after Delivery (CORSAD) trial and randomised to initial respiratory support with the new system versus T‐piece. Data on respiratory support, neonatal morbidities and mortality were collected up to 36 weeks post‐menstrual age. Results Ninety‐four infants, 51 female, with a median (range) gestational age of 25 + 2 (23 + 0, 27 + 6) weeks and days, were included. Significantly fewer infants in the new system group received mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h, 24 (52.2%) compared with 35 (72.9%) (p = 0.034) and during the first 7 days, 29 (63.0%) compared with 39 (81.3%) (p = 0.045) in the T‐piece group. At 36 weeks post‐menstrual age, 13 (28.3%) in the new system and 13 (27.1%) in the T‐piece group were diagnosed with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Conclusion Stabilisation with the new system was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation during the first week of life. No significant difference was seen in the outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36627506</pmid><doi>10.1111/apa.16665</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-003X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-2221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-7449</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0803-5253
ispartof Acta Paediatrica, 2023-04, Vol.112 (4), p.719-725
issn 0803-5253
1651-2227
1651-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_448494
source MEDLINE; SWEPUB Freely available online; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Age
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
delivery room
Delivery Rooms
Dysplasia
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gestational age
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infants
Lung diseases
Mechanical ventilation
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Menstruation
nasal prongs
Neonates
Pregnancy
pre‐term
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - diagnosis
stabilisation
Ventilators
title Respiratory outcomes after delivery room stabilisation with a new respiratory support system using nasal prongs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Respiratory%20outcomes%20after%20delivery%20room%20stabilisation%20with%20a%20new%20respiratory%20support%20system%20using%20nasal%20prongs&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Paediatrica&rft.au=Baldursdottir,%20Sonja&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=719&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=719-725&rft.issn=0803-5253&rft.eissn=1651-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apa.16665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2785184481%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785184481&rft_id=info:pmid/36627506&rfr_iscdi=true