Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group

Fatal pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic complications are common in hospital inpatients. However, there is little evidence on the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose heparin in the prevention of hospita...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1996-05, Vol.347 (9012), p.1357-1361
Hauptverfasser: Gärdlund, B, Hammers, S, Arneborn, P, Prag, M, Dwyer, R, Krook, A, Montelius, R, Tideström, L, Forsberg, P, Muller, R, Lindblom, A, Nilsson, K, Vig, I, Smedjegård, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1361
container_issue 9012
container_start_page 1357
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 347
creator Gärdlund, B
Hammers, S
Arneborn, P
Prag, M
Dwyer, R
Krook, A
Montelius, R
Tideström, L
Forsberg, P
Muller, R
Lindblom, A
Nilsson, K
Vig, I
Smedjegård, J
description Fatal pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic complications are common in hospital inpatients. However, there is little evidence on the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose heparin in the prevention of hospital-acquired, clinically relevant, fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. Our study used the postrandomisation consent design. 19,751 consecutive patients, aged 55 years or older, admitted to departments of infectious diseases in six Swedish hospitals, were screened for inclusion in the randomised, controlled, unblinded, multicentre trial. Of the eligible patients, 5776 were assigned subcutaneous standard heparin (5000 IU every 12 h) until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 3 weeks; 5917 were assigned no prophylactic treatment (control group). We sought consent only from the heparin group. Follow-up was for 3 weeks after discharge from hospital or for a maximum of 60 days from randomisation. The primary endpoint was necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism of predefined clinical relevance. By intention-to-treat analysis mortality was similar in the heparin and control groups (5.3 vs 5.6%, p = 0.39) and the median time from admission to death was 16 days in both groups (IQR 8-31 vs 6-28 days). Necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism occurred in 15 heparin-treated and 16 control-group patients. There was a significant difference between heparin and control groups in median time from randomisation to fatal pulmonary embolism (28 [24-36] vs 12.5 [10-20] days, p = 0.007). This difference corresponds to the duration of heparin prophylaxis. Non-fatal thromboembolic complications occurred in more of the control than of the heparin group (116 vs 70, p = 0.0012). Our findings do not support the routine use of heparin prophylaxis for 3 weeks or less in large groups of non-surgical patients. Further studies are needed to investigate whether heparin prophylaxis of longer duration may prevent fatal pulmonary embolism.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91009-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_441940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78022376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1280-ca3206398449fb0284e59c0906127cd3858b3360aa98ac14c25ba375c28039373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1TAQRb0AlVL4hEpeIZCaMo4dJ15WBVqkSiAobC0nmfAMTmzsmNf3QfxnjRp1x2pGV2fuaO4QcsrgnAGTbxMwAZVsuXyt5BvFAFQFT8jxo_yMPE_pJwAICc0ROeokb7mAY_L3i1lGP9uE4xkd_LJG7xyOdI3WOOon6vy-Gn1CusNgol3o5CMNEf_gslq__EMmsxY2ZDf7xcQDxbn3zqaZFjqY1RYy0b1dd0WYcChjOdGxrDQJ0zm93SG93sw_Rx92B2fubKJf1zwe6FX0ObwgTyfjEr7c6gn59uH97eV1dfPp6uPlxU0VWN1BNRheg-SqE0JNPdSdwEYNoECyuh1G3jVdz7kEY1RnBiaGuukNb5uhDHNVEjkh1YNv2mPIvQ7RzuUi7Y3Vm_SrdKiFYEpA4c_-y7-z3y-0jz90zpoLDkoV_NUDHqL_nTGtugQ_oHNmwZKJbjuoa97KAp5uYO5nHB99t7fxe71-nDk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78022376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Gärdlund, B ; Hammers, S ; Arneborn, P ; Prag, M ; Dwyer, R ; Krook, A ; Montelius, R ; Tideström, L ; Forsberg, P ; Muller, R ; Lindblom, A ; Nilsson, K ; Vig, I ; Smedjegård, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gärdlund, B ; Hammers, S ; Arneborn, P ; Prag, M ; Dwyer, R ; Krook, A ; Montelius, R ; Tideström, L ; Forsberg, P ; Muller, R ; Lindblom, A ; Nilsson, K ; Vig, I ; Smedjegård, J</creatorcontrib><description>Fatal pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic complications are common in hospital inpatients. However, there is little evidence on the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose heparin in the prevention of hospital-acquired, clinically relevant, fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. Our study used the postrandomisation consent design. 19,751 consecutive patients, aged 55 years or older, admitted to departments of infectious diseases in six Swedish hospitals, were screened for inclusion in the randomised, controlled, unblinded, multicentre trial. Of the eligible patients, 5776 were assigned subcutaneous standard heparin (5000 IU every 12 h) until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 3 weeks; 5917 were assigned no prophylactic treatment (control group). We sought consent only from the heparin group. Follow-up was for 3 weeks after discharge from hospital or for a maximum of 60 days from randomisation. The primary endpoint was necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism of predefined clinical relevance. By intention-to-treat analysis mortality was similar in the heparin and control groups (5.3 vs 5.6%, p = 0.39) and the median time from admission to death was 16 days in both groups (IQR 8-31 vs 6-28 days). Necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism occurred in 15 heparin-treated and 16 control-group patients. There was a significant difference between heparin and control groups in median time from randomisation to fatal pulmonary embolism (28 [24-36] vs 12.5 [10-20] days, p = 0.007). This difference corresponds to the duration of heparin prophylaxis. Non-fatal thromboembolic complications occurred in more of the control than of the heparin group (116 vs 70, p = 0.0012). Our findings do not support the routine use of heparin prophylaxis for 3 weeks or less in large groups of non-surgical patients. Further studies are needed to investigate whether heparin prophylaxis of longer duration may prevent fatal pulmonary embolism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91009-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8637340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Communicable Diseases - complications ; Female ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pulmonary Embolism - etiology ; Pulmonary Embolism - mortality ; Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1996-05, Vol.347 (9012), p.1357-1361</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,64366</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8637340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-343099$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:1942331$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gärdlund, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammers, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arneborn, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prag, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krook, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montelius, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tideström, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsberg, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindblom, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vig, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smedjegård, J</creatorcontrib><title>Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Fatal pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic complications are common in hospital inpatients. However, there is little evidence on the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose heparin in the prevention of hospital-acquired, clinically relevant, fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. Our study used the postrandomisation consent design. 19,751 consecutive patients, aged 55 years or older, admitted to departments of infectious diseases in six Swedish hospitals, were screened for inclusion in the randomised, controlled, unblinded, multicentre trial. Of the eligible patients, 5776 were assigned subcutaneous standard heparin (5000 IU every 12 h) until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 3 weeks; 5917 were assigned no prophylactic treatment (control group). We sought consent only from the heparin group. Follow-up was for 3 weeks after discharge from hospital or for a maximum of 60 days from randomisation. The primary endpoint was necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism of predefined clinical relevance. By intention-to-treat analysis mortality was similar in the heparin and control groups (5.3 vs 5.6%, p = 0.39) and the median time from admission to death was 16 days in both groups (IQR 8-31 vs 6-28 days). Necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism occurred in 15 heparin-treated and 16 control-group patients. There was a significant difference between heparin and control groups in median time from randomisation to fatal pulmonary embolism (28 [24-36] vs 12.5 [10-20] days, p = 0.007). This difference corresponds to the duration of heparin prophylaxis. Non-fatal thromboembolic complications occurred in more of the control than of the heparin group (116 vs 70, p = 0.0012). Our findings do not support the routine use of heparin prophylaxis for 3 weeks or less in large groups of non-surgical patients. Further studies are needed to investigate whether heparin prophylaxis of longer duration may prevent fatal pulmonary embolism.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Communicable Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - etiology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - mortality</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1TAQRb0AlVL4hEpeIZCaMo4dJ15WBVqkSiAobC0nmfAMTmzsmNf3QfxnjRp1x2pGV2fuaO4QcsrgnAGTbxMwAZVsuXyt5BvFAFQFT8jxo_yMPE_pJwAICc0ROeokb7mAY_L3i1lGP9uE4xkd_LJG7xyOdI3WOOon6vy-Gn1CusNgol3o5CMNEf_gslq__EMmsxY2ZDf7xcQDxbn3zqaZFjqY1RYy0b1dd0WYcChjOdGxrDQJ0zm93SG93sw_Rx92B2fubKJf1zwe6FX0ObwgTyfjEr7c6gn59uH97eV1dfPp6uPlxU0VWN1BNRheg-SqE0JNPdSdwEYNoECyuh1G3jVdz7kEY1RnBiaGuukNb5uhDHNVEjkh1YNv2mPIvQ7RzuUi7Y3Vm_SrdKiFYEpA4c_-y7-z3y-0jz90zpoLDkoV_NUDHqL_nTGtugQ_oHNmwZKJbjuoa97KAp5uYO5nHB99t7fxe71-nDk</recordid><startdate>19960518</startdate><enddate>19960518</enddate><creator>Gärdlund, B</creator><creator>Hammers, S</creator><creator>Arneborn, P</creator><creator>Prag, M</creator><creator>Dwyer, R</creator><creator>Krook, A</creator><creator>Montelius, R</creator><creator>Tideström, L</creator><creator>Forsberg, P</creator><creator>Muller, R</creator><creator>Lindblom, A</creator><creator>Nilsson, K</creator><creator>Vig, I</creator><creator>Smedjegård, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960518</creationdate><title>Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group</title><author>Gärdlund, B ; Hammers, S ; Arneborn, P ; Prag, M ; Dwyer, R ; Krook, A ; Montelius, R ; Tideström, L ; Forsberg, P ; Muller, R ; Lindblom, A ; Nilsson, K ; Vig, I ; Smedjegård, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1280-ca3206398449fb0284e59c0906127cd3858b3360aa98ac14c25ba375c28039373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Communicable Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - etiology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - mortality</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gärdlund, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammers, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arneborn, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prag, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krook, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montelius, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tideström, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsberg, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindblom, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vig, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smedjegård, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gärdlund, B</au><au>Hammers, S</au><au>Arneborn, P</au><au>Prag, M</au><au>Dwyer, R</au><au>Krook, A</au><au>Montelius, R</au><au>Tideström, L</au><au>Forsberg, P</au><au>Muller, R</au><au>Lindblom, A</au><au>Nilsson, K</au><au>Vig, I</au><au>Smedjegård, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>1996-05-18</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>347</volume><issue>9012</issue><spage>1357</spage><epage>1361</epage><pages>1357-1361</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><abstract>Fatal pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic complications are common in hospital inpatients. However, there is little evidence on the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose heparin in the prevention of hospital-acquired, clinically relevant, fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. Our study used the postrandomisation consent design. 19,751 consecutive patients, aged 55 years or older, admitted to departments of infectious diseases in six Swedish hospitals, were screened for inclusion in the randomised, controlled, unblinded, multicentre trial. Of the eligible patients, 5776 were assigned subcutaneous standard heparin (5000 IU every 12 h) until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 3 weeks; 5917 were assigned no prophylactic treatment (control group). We sought consent only from the heparin group. Follow-up was for 3 weeks after discharge from hospital or for a maximum of 60 days from randomisation. The primary endpoint was necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism of predefined clinical relevance. By intention-to-treat analysis mortality was similar in the heparin and control groups (5.3 vs 5.6%, p = 0.39) and the median time from admission to death was 16 days in both groups (IQR 8-31 vs 6-28 days). Necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism occurred in 15 heparin-treated and 16 control-group patients. There was a significant difference between heparin and control groups in median time from randomisation to fatal pulmonary embolism (28 [24-36] vs 12.5 [10-20] days, p = 0.007). This difference corresponds to the duration of heparin prophylaxis. Non-fatal thromboembolic complications occurred in more of the control than of the heparin group (116 vs 70, p = 0.0012). Our findings do not support the routine use of heparin prophylaxis for 3 weeks or less in large groups of non-surgical patients. Further studies are needed to investigate whether heparin prophylaxis of longer duration may prevent fatal pulmonary embolism.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>8637340</pmid><doi>10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91009-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 1996-05, Vol.347 (9012), p.1357-1361
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_441940
source MEDLINE; EBSCO Business Source Complete; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Communicable Diseases - complications
Female
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Embolism - etiology
Pulmonary Embolism - mortality
Pulmonary Embolism - prevention & control
Survival Analysis
title Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T00%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomised,%20controlled%20trial%20of%20low-dose%20heparin%20for%20prevention%20of%20fatal%20pulmonary%20embolism%20in%20patients%20with%20infectious%20diseases.%20The%20Heparin%20Prophylaxis%20Study%20Group&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=G%C3%A4rdlund,%20B&rft.date=1996-05-18&rft.volume=347&rft.issue=9012&rft.spage=1357&rft.epage=1361&rft.pages=1357-1361&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91009-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E78022376%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78022376&rft_id=info:pmid/8637340&rfr_iscdi=true