Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions
Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys. We present the novel “dating‐bas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methods in ecology and evolution 2019-04, Vol.10 (4), p.471-480 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 480 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | Methods in ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Singer, Alexander Bradter, Ute Fabritius, Henna Snäll, Tord Peres‐Neto, Pedro |
description | Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys.
We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity.
With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods.
The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/2041-210X.13134 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_99682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2201478156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgOeO_OStGuPMucUJl4UvIU2e5WM2tQkdcy_3tTK8Oa7vMfj9z2-9xFyCWwOsa45k5BwYK9zECDkCZkcN6d_5nMy837HYom8YFxOyPq2DKZ9o13pA9W2sa35ihvbUvzENngaLO2c3aEOtO5D75D6DrVBT7fGB2eqfqD9BTmry8bj7LdPycvd6nl5n2ye1g_Lm02iRZHKBBEWOVQInJWpAI3ZlmvQGhY1A6hS0LmsZV4UumSa4XbBBSvyFFOhQUIKYkqS8a7fY9dXqnPmvXQHZUujfNNXpRua8qiKIst55K9GPj7x0aMPamd710aLinMGMrpJs0hdj5R21nuH9fEuMDUErIYI1RCh-gk4KrJRsTcNHv7D1eNqJUbhN2QsfXc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2201478156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Singer, Alexander ; Bradter, Ute ; Fabritius, Henna ; Snäll, Tord ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creator><contributor>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Singer, Alexander ; Bradter, Ute ; Fabritius, Henna ; Snäll, Tord ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys.
We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity.
With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods.
The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>back‐casting ; Colonization ; Dating ; Dating techniques ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; epidemiology ; epiphyte ; metapopulation ; Metapopulations ; Neckera pennata ; Polls & surveys ; Recording ; spatiotemporal spread ; Species ; species distribution</subject><ispartof>Methods in ecology and evolution, 2019-04, Vol.10 (4), p.471-480</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2777-3789 ; 0000-0001-5856-5539 ; 0000-0001-5687-1233 ; 0000-0002-3886-3149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F2041-210X.13134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F2041-210X.13134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/99682$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Singer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradter, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabritius, Henna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snäll, Tord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</title><title>Methods in ecology and evolution</title><description>Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys.
We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity.
With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods.
The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information.</description><subject>back‐casting</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Dating</subject><subject>Dating techniques</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>epiphyte</subject><subject>metapopulation</subject><subject>Metapopulations</subject><subject>Neckera pennata</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Recording</subject><subject>spatiotemporal spread</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species distribution</subject><issn>2041-210X</issn><issn>2041-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgOeO_OStGuPMucUJl4UvIU2e5WM2tQkdcy_3tTK8Oa7vMfj9z2-9xFyCWwOsa45k5BwYK9zECDkCZkcN6d_5nMy837HYom8YFxOyPq2DKZ9o13pA9W2sa35ihvbUvzENngaLO2c3aEOtO5D75D6DrVBT7fGB2eqfqD9BTmry8bj7LdPycvd6nl5n2ye1g_Lm02iRZHKBBEWOVQInJWpAI3ZlmvQGhY1A6hS0LmsZV4UumSa4XbBBSvyFFOhQUIKYkqS8a7fY9dXqnPmvXQHZUujfNNXpRua8qiKIst55K9GPj7x0aMPamd710aLinMGMrpJs0hdj5R21nuH9fEuMDUErIYI1RCh-gk4KrJRsTcNHv7D1eNqJUbhN2QsfXc</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Singer, Alexander</creator><creator>Bradter, Ute</creator><creator>Fabritius, Henna</creator><creator>Snäll, Tord</creator><creator>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-3789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-5539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-1233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-3149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</title><author>Singer, Alexander ; Bradter, Ute ; Fabritius, Henna ; Snäll, Tord ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>back‐casting</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Dating</topic><topic>Dating techniques</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>epiphyte</topic><topic>metapopulation</topic><topic>Metapopulations</topic><topic>Neckera pennata</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Recording</topic><topic>spatiotemporal spread</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradter, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabritius, Henna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snäll, Tord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singer, Alexander</au><au>Bradter, Ute</au><au>Fabritius, Henna</au><au>Snäll, Tord</au><au>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</au><au>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</atitle><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>471-480</pages><issn>2041-210X</issn><eissn>2041-210X</eissn><abstract>Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys.
We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity.
With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods.
The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.13134</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-3789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-5539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-1233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-3149</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-210X |
ispartof | Methods in ecology and evolution, 2019-04, Vol.10 (4), p.471-480 |
issn | 2041-210X 2041-210X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_99682 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | back‐casting Colonization Dating Dating techniques Dispersal Dispersion Ecology Ekologi epidemiology epiphyte metapopulation Metapopulations Neckera pennata Polls & surveys Recording spatiotemporal spread Species species distribution |
title | Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T01%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dating%20past%20colonization%20events%20to%20project%20future%20species%20distributions&rft.jtitle=Methods%20in%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Singer,%20Alexander&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=471-480&rft.issn=2041-210X&rft.eissn=2041-210X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/2041-210X.13134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2201478156%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2201478156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |