Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions

Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys. We present the novel “dating‐bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Methods in ecology and evolution 2019-04, Vol.10 (4), p.471-480
Hauptverfasser: Singer, Alexander, Bradter, Ute, Fabritius, Henna, Snäll, Tord, Peres‐Neto, Pedro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 480
container_issue 4
container_start_page 471
container_title Methods in ecology and evolution
container_volume 10
creator Singer, Alexander
Bradter, Ute
Fabritius, Henna
Snäll, Tord
Peres‐Neto, Pedro
description Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys. We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity. With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods. The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/2041-210X.13134
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_99682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2201478156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgOeO_OStGuPMucUJl4UvIU2e5WM2tQkdcy_3tTK8Oa7vMfj9z2-9xFyCWwOsa45k5BwYK9zECDkCZkcN6d_5nMy837HYom8YFxOyPq2DKZ9o13pA9W2sa35ihvbUvzENngaLO2c3aEOtO5D75D6DrVBT7fGB2eqfqD9BTmry8bj7LdPycvd6nl5n2ye1g_Lm02iRZHKBBEWOVQInJWpAI3ZlmvQGhY1A6hS0LmsZV4UumSa4XbBBSvyFFOhQUIKYkqS8a7fY9dXqnPmvXQHZUujfNNXpRua8qiKIst55K9GPj7x0aMPamd710aLinMGMrpJs0hdj5R21nuH9fEuMDUErIYI1RCh-gk4KrJRsTcNHv7D1eNqJUbhN2QsfXc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2201478156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Singer, Alexander ; Bradter, Ute ; Fabritius, Henna ; Snäll, Tord ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creator><contributor>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Singer, Alexander ; Bradter, Ute ; Fabritius, Henna ; Snäll, Tord ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys. We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity. With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods. The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>back‐casting ; Colonization ; Dating ; Dating techniques ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; epidemiology ; epiphyte ; metapopulation ; Metapopulations ; Neckera pennata ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Recording ; spatiotemporal spread ; Species ; species distribution</subject><ispartof>Methods in ecology and evolution, 2019-04, Vol.10 (4), p.471-480</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2777-3789 ; 0000-0001-5856-5539 ; 0000-0001-5687-1233 ; 0000-0002-3886-3149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F2041-210X.13134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F2041-210X.13134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/99682$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Singer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradter, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabritius, Henna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snäll, Tord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</title><title>Methods in ecology and evolution</title><description>Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys. We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity. With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods. The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information.</description><subject>back‐casting</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Dating</subject><subject>Dating techniques</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>epiphyte</subject><subject>metapopulation</subject><subject>Metapopulations</subject><subject>Neckera pennata</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Recording</subject><subject>spatiotemporal spread</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species distribution</subject><issn>2041-210X</issn><issn>2041-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgOeO_OStGuPMucUJl4UvIU2e5WM2tQkdcy_3tTK8Oa7vMfj9z2-9xFyCWwOsa45k5BwYK9zECDkCZkcN6d_5nMy837HYom8YFxOyPq2DKZ9o13pA9W2sa35ihvbUvzENngaLO2c3aEOtO5D75D6DrVBT7fGB2eqfqD9BTmry8bj7LdPycvd6nl5n2ye1g_Lm02iRZHKBBEWOVQInJWpAI3ZlmvQGhY1A6hS0LmsZV4UumSa4XbBBSvyFFOhQUIKYkqS8a7fY9dXqnPmvXQHZUujfNNXpRua8qiKIst55K9GPj7x0aMPamd710aLinMGMrpJs0hdj5R21nuH9fEuMDUErIYI1RCh-gk4KrJRsTcNHv7D1eNqJUbhN2QsfXc</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Singer, Alexander</creator><creator>Bradter, Ute</creator><creator>Fabritius, Henna</creator><creator>Snäll, Tord</creator><creator>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-3789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-5539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-1233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-3149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</title><author>Singer, Alexander ; Bradter, Ute ; Fabritius, Henna ; Snäll, Tord ; Peres‐Neto, Pedro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-ee1781be120a531ce6d2c1cc17f011b51c84f4899ca0c0ed7230985e53c141513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>back‐casting</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Dating</topic><topic>Dating techniques</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>epiphyte</topic><topic>metapopulation</topic><topic>Metapopulations</topic><topic>Neckera pennata</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Recording</topic><topic>spatiotemporal spread</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradter, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabritius, Henna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snäll, Tord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singer, Alexander</au><au>Bradter, Ute</au><au>Fabritius, Henna</au><au>Snäll, Tord</au><au>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</au><au>Peres‐Neto, Pedro</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions</atitle><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>471-480</pages><issn>2041-210X</issn><eissn>2041-210X</eissn><abstract>Knowledge on the colonization process is important to understand and project future species distributions. The classic method to quantify colonization rates is time‐consuming, as it requires recording infrequent colonization events during extensive, repeated surveys. We present the novel “dating‐based approach” that requires one complete survey of species occurrence and estimates of subpopulation ages to back‐date colonization events. These data allow statistical reconstruction of a virtual, repeated survey to estimate colonization rates in response to environmental covariates or connectivity. With only 30% of survey effort, the dating‐based approach provided similar estimates of rate and distance of dispersal of a metapopulation of the epiphytic moss Neckera pennata as the classic approach relying on long‐term surveys. Projections of the number of colonization events during the next 100 years differed by only 2.3% (95%‐credible interval: [−1.9%; 7.1%]) between methods. The dating‐based approach is applicable across spatial scales and promises enhanced species distribution models with urgently needed quantitative dispersal information.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.13134</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-3789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-5539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-1233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-3149</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-210X
ispartof Methods in ecology and evolution, 2019-04, Vol.10 (4), p.471-480
issn 2041-210X
2041-210X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_99682
source Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects back‐casting
Colonization
Dating
Dating techniques
Dispersal
Dispersion
Ecology
Ekologi
epidemiology
epiphyte
metapopulation
Metapopulations
Neckera pennata
Polls & surveys
Recording
spatiotemporal spread
Species
species distribution
title Dating past colonization events to project future species distributions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T01%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dating%20past%20colonization%20events%20to%20project%20future%20species%20distributions&rft.jtitle=Methods%20in%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Singer,%20Alexander&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=471-480&rft.issn=2041-210X&rft.eissn=2041-210X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/2041-210X.13134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2201478156%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2201478156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true