Forest management and natural biocontrol of insect pests

Current silvicultural practices are under revision as result of changing demands and pressing environmental issues. We compared the monoculture clear-cut regime commonly used during the recent decades in Europe, especially in Fennoscandia, and in North America, with three alternative forest manageme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forestry (London) 2016-07, Vol.89 (3), p.253-262
Hauptverfasser: Klapwijk, Maartje J., Bylund, Helena, Schroeder, Martin, Björkman, Christer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 3
container_start_page 253
container_title Forestry (London)
container_volume 89
creator Klapwijk, Maartje J.
Bylund, Helena
Schroeder, Martin
Björkman, Christer
description Current silvicultural practices are under revision as result of changing demands and pressing environmental issues. We compared the monoculture clear-cut regime commonly used during the recent decades in Europe, especially in Fennoscandia, and in North America, with three alternative forest management methods, short rotation forestry, mixed forest stands and continuous cover forestry. We evaluate how these alternative management methods are Likely to affect the natural control of forest insect (regeneration pests, defoliators and bark beetles). Particular emphasis was placed on the effects of forest management on natural enemy pressure. We argue that changing forest management to any of the methods discussed will, in most cases, decrease the relative effects of bottom-up forces (resource quality and quantity) and increase the relative effects of top-down forces (natural enemy pressure) on forest pests. As population growth of the pest species presently causing most damage in European managed forests (i.e. pine weevil and spruce bark beetle) is mainly Limited by bottom-up forces (quantity of suitable breeding material), changes in forest management could increase the relative importance of top-down forces by modifying stand characteristics to actively support the natural enemies. However, it remains to be investigated to what extent such alterations will result in decreased damage to trees even though some evidence points in that direction.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/forestry/cpw019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>swepub_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_79266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_slubar_slu_se_79266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c66b3470186e47e0067c2d67399e974227ed5da137887ecaa0249ff8693983f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1OwzAURi0EEqUws_oFQq_txD8jqihUqsQCEpvlONcoKIkjO1HVt6elwPQt53zDIeSewQMDI1YhJsxTOqz8uAdmLsiClbIshOTykiwAWFWoin9ck5ucvwBAV1wviN78aLR3g_vEHoeJuqGhg5vm5Dpat9HHYUqxozHQdsjoJzoehXxLroLrMt797pK8b57e1i_F7vV5u37cFV5wmAovZS1KBUxLLBUCSOV5I5UwBo0qOVfYVI1jQmmt0DsHvDQhaGmE0SIosSTF-TfvcZxrO6a2d-lgo2tt7ubapdPYjFYZLuWRX515n2LOCcO_wcCeQtm_UPYcSnwDdHRfzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forest management and natural biocontrol of insect pests</title><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Klapwijk, Maartje J. ; Bylund, Helena ; Schroeder, Martin ; Björkman, Christer</creator><creatorcontrib>Klapwijk, Maartje J. ; Bylund, Helena ; Schroeder, Martin ; Björkman, Christer ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Current silvicultural practices are under revision as result of changing demands and pressing environmental issues. We compared the monoculture clear-cut regime commonly used during the recent decades in Europe, especially in Fennoscandia, and in North America, with three alternative forest management methods, short rotation forestry, mixed forest stands and continuous cover forestry. We evaluate how these alternative management methods are Likely to affect the natural control of forest insect (regeneration pests, defoliators and bark beetles). Particular emphasis was placed on the effects of forest management on natural enemy pressure. We argue that changing forest management to any of the methods discussed will, in most cases, decrease the relative effects of bottom-up forces (resource quality and quantity) and increase the relative effects of top-down forces (natural enemy pressure) on forest pests. As population growth of the pest species presently causing most damage in European managed forests (i.e. pine weevil and spruce bark beetle) is mainly Limited by bottom-up forces (quantity of suitable breeding material), changes in forest management could increase the relative importance of top-down forces by modifying stand characteristics to actively support the natural enemies. However, it remains to be investigated to what extent such alterations will result in decreased damage to trees even though some evidence points in that direction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-752X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1464-3626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpw019</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Ecology ; Ekologi ; Forest Science ; Skogsvetenskap</subject><ispartof>Forestry (London), 2016-07, Vol.89 (3), p.253-262</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c66b3470186e47e0067c2d67399e974227ed5da137887ecaa0249ff8693983f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c66b3470186e47e0067c2d67399e974227ed5da137887ecaa0249ff8693983f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,553,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/79266$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klapwijk, Maartje J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bylund, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Björkman, Christer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Forest management and natural biocontrol of insect pests</title><title>Forestry (London)</title><description>Current silvicultural practices are under revision as result of changing demands and pressing environmental issues. We compared the monoculture clear-cut regime commonly used during the recent decades in Europe, especially in Fennoscandia, and in North America, with three alternative forest management methods, short rotation forestry, mixed forest stands and continuous cover forestry. We evaluate how these alternative management methods are Likely to affect the natural control of forest insect (regeneration pests, defoliators and bark beetles). Particular emphasis was placed on the effects of forest management on natural enemy pressure. We argue that changing forest management to any of the methods discussed will, in most cases, decrease the relative effects of bottom-up forces (resource quality and quantity) and increase the relative effects of top-down forces (natural enemy pressure) on forest pests. As population growth of the pest species presently causing most damage in European managed forests (i.e. pine weevil and spruce bark beetle) is mainly Limited by bottom-up forces (quantity of suitable breeding material), changes in forest management could increase the relative importance of top-down forces by modifying stand characteristics to actively support the natural enemies. However, it remains to be investigated to what extent such alterations will result in decreased damage to trees even though some evidence points in that direction.</description><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Forest Science</subject><subject>Skogsvetenskap</subject><issn>0015-752X</issn><issn>1464-3626</issn><issn>1464-3626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kL1OwzAURi0EEqUws_oFQq_txD8jqihUqsQCEpvlONcoKIkjO1HVt6elwPQt53zDIeSewQMDI1YhJsxTOqz8uAdmLsiClbIshOTykiwAWFWoin9ck5ucvwBAV1wviN78aLR3g_vEHoeJuqGhg5vm5Dpat9HHYUqxozHQdsjoJzoehXxLroLrMt797pK8b57e1i_F7vV5u37cFV5wmAovZS1KBUxLLBUCSOV5I5UwBo0qOVfYVI1jQmmt0DsHvDQhaGmE0SIosSTF-TfvcZxrO6a2d-lgo2tt7ubapdPYjFYZLuWRX515n2LOCcO_wcCeQtm_UPYcSnwDdHRfzw</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Klapwijk, Maartje J.</creator><creator>Bylund, Helena</creator><creator>Schroeder, Martin</creator><creator>Björkman, Christer</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Forest management and natural biocontrol of insect pests</title><author>Klapwijk, Maartje J. ; Bylund, Helena ; Schroeder, Martin ; Björkman, Christer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c66b3470186e47e0067c2d67399e974227ed5da137887ecaa0249ff8693983f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Forest Science</topic><topic>Skogsvetenskap</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klapwijk, Maartje J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bylund, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Björkman, Christer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Forestry (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klapwijk, Maartje J.</au><au>Bylund, Helena</au><au>Schroeder, Martin</au><au>Björkman, Christer</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forest management and natural biocontrol of insect pests</atitle><jtitle>Forestry (London)</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>253-262</pages><issn>0015-752X</issn><issn>1464-3626</issn><eissn>1464-3626</eissn><abstract>Current silvicultural practices are under revision as result of changing demands and pressing environmental issues. We compared the monoculture clear-cut regime commonly used during the recent decades in Europe, especially in Fennoscandia, and in North America, with three alternative forest management methods, short rotation forestry, mixed forest stands and continuous cover forestry. We evaluate how these alternative management methods are Likely to affect the natural control of forest insect (regeneration pests, defoliators and bark beetles). Particular emphasis was placed on the effects of forest management on natural enemy pressure. We argue that changing forest management to any of the methods discussed will, in most cases, decrease the relative effects of bottom-up forces (resource quality and quantity) and increase the relative effects of top-down forces (natural enemy pressure) on forest pests. As population growth of the pest species presently causing most damage in European managed forests (i.e. pine weevil and spruce bark beetle) is mainly Limited by bottom-up forces (quantity of suitable breeding material), changes in forest management could increase the relative importance of top-down forces by modifying stand characteristics to actively support the natural enemies. However, it remains to be investigated to what extent such alterations will result in decreased damage to trees even though some evidence points in that direction.</abstract><doi>10.1093/forestry/cpw019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-752X
ispartof Forestry (London), 2016-07, Vol.89 (3), p.253-262
issn 0015-752X
1464-3626
1464-3626
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_79266
source SWEPUB Freely available online; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Ecology
Ekologi
Forest Science
Skogsvetenskap
title Forest management and natural biocontrol of insect pests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T03%3A39%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-swepub_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forest%20management%20and%20natural%20biocontrol%20of%20insect%20pests&rft.jtitle=Forestry%20(London)&rft.au=Klapwijk,%20Maartje%20J.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=253-262&rft.issn=0015-752X&rft.eissn=1464-3626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/forestry/cpw019&rft_dat=%3Cswepub_cross%3Eoai_slubar_slu_se_79266%3C/swepub_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true