Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis
Different regulations about the permission and approval rate of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) between the USA and Europe have been controversial for decades. While there is a wide scientific coverage of what may be the cause of this divergence, little is known about the rol...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buchkapitel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 314 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 299 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Galata, Lena Karantininis, Kostas Hess, Sebastian |
| description | Different regulations about the permission and approval rate of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) between the USA and Europe have been controversial for decades. While there is a wide scientific coverage of what may be the cause of this divergence, little is known about the role that popular media play in the related political discourse. We analyzed the media coverage of biotechnology topics in both the USA and UK from 2011-2013 by examining two opinion-leading newspapers. We test the hypothesis that the respective media content reflects differences in transatlantic policies towards biotechnology. The two newspapers differed in reporting intensity but were alike in their content about GMOs: with the central actors being scientists and NGOs, arguing mostly in the field of the agricultural sector, the debate seems to be locked in a stalemate of potential risks re-iterated against potential benefits, with none of the two positions clearly dominating the discourse. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_16 |
| format | Book Chapter |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_76231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC1782956_201_302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2161-eb2ee7d9e3c188dc454342f660e052d79075c330ab5a3eead6ca87832060e1803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9OGzEQh40qUIHyBj34BQxje9d_ekvTNiAlcAGpN8vrncC2Wzu1N0J5exyIxJXTaGa-bw6_IeQrh0sOoK-sNkwyyS0DpWTLlOPqiJzJOnkdmE_vTfP7hJwa23AN0NrP5KKUPwDAhTJa21NyO8-pFDabRh-nIdAfw3qNGWPAQodIvw9pwvAU05ged9THni5Wd-UbndEV9oOn8xQnjBOdRT_uylC-kOO1HwteHOo5efj1835-zZZ3i5v5bMmC4Ioz7ASi7i3KwI3pQ9M2shFrpQChFb22oNsgJfiu9RLR9yp4o40UUAluQJ4T9na3PONm27lNHv75vHPJD66M287nfXEFnVZC8spffpCvCYvWVkEchIrGR8yuS-lvqes9oV39gZOuhuxeI3f7H1SpeZM2Of3fYpkc7q1QE8p-DE9-M2GuN7QRtlVOAHcShHwBv12J8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC1782956_201_302</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Galata, Lena ; Karantininis, Kostas ; Hess, Sebastian</creator><contributor>Baourakis, George ; Zopounidis, Constantin ; Kalogeras, Nikos ; Mattas, Konstadinos ; van Dijk, Gert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Galata, Lena ; Karantininis, Kostas ; Hess, Sebastian ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet ; Baourakis, George ; Zopounidis, Constantin ; Kalogeras, Nikos ; Mattas, Konstadinos ; van Dijk, Gert</creatorcontrib><description>Different regulations about the permission and approval rate of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) between the USA and Europe have been controversial for decades. While there is a wide scientific coverage of what may be the cause of this divergence, little is known about the role that popular media play in the related political discourse. We analyzed the media coverage of biotechnology topics in both the USA and UK from 2011-2013 by examining two opinion-leading newspapers. We test the hypothesis that the respective media content reflects differences in transatlantic policies towards biotechnology. The two newspapers differed in reporting intensity but were alike in their content about GMOs: with the central actors being scientists and NGOs, arguing mostly in the field of the agricultural sector, the debate seems to be locked in a stalemate of potential risks re-iterated against potential benefits, with none of the two positions clearly dominating the discourse.</description><identifier>ISBN: 331906634X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783319066349</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3319066358</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783319066356</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 3319066358</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9783319066356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_16</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 894170059</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: T57.6-.97</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG</publisher><subject>3D graphics & modelling ; British Press ; Economics ; Media Coverage ; Media Profile ; Mere Exposure Effect ; Nationalekonomi ; Operational research ; Plant Biotechnology ; Political economy ; Public Outrage ; Växtbioteknologi</subject><ispartof>Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy, 2014, p.299-314</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2161-eb2ee7d9e3c188dc454342f660e052d79075c330ab5a3eead6ca87832060e1803</citedby><relation>Cooperative Management</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/1782956-l.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,775,776,780,789,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/100259$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/76231$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Baourakis, George</contributor><contributor>Zopounidis, Constantin</contributor><contributor>Kalogeras, Nikos</contributor><contributor>Mattas, Konstadinos</contributor><contributor>van Dijk, Gert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Galata, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantininis, Kostas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis</title><title>Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy</title><description>Different regulations about the permission and approval rate of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) between the USA and Europe have been controversial for decades. While there is a wide scientific coverage of what may be the cause of this divergence, little is known about the role that popular media play in the related political discourse. We analyzed the media coverage of biotechnology topics in both the USA and UK from 2011-2013 by examining two opinion-leading newspapers. We test the hypothesis that the respective media content reflects differences in transatlantic policies towards biotechnology. The two newspapers differed in reporting intensity but were alike in their content about GMOs: with the central actors being scientists and NGOs, arguing mostly in the field of the agricultural sector, the debate seems to be locked in a stalemate of potential risks re-iterated against potential benefits, with none of the two positions clearly dominating the discourse.</description><subject>3D graphics & modelling</subject><subject>British Press</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Media Coverage</subject><subject>Media Profile</subject><subject>Mere Exposure Effect</subject><subject>Nationalekonomi</subject><subject>Operational research</subject><subject>Plant Biotechnology</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Public Outrage</subject><subject>Växtbioteknologi</subject><isbn>331906634X</isbn><isbn>9783319066349</isbn><isbn>3319066358</isbn><isbn>9783319066356</isbn><isbn>3319066358</isbn><isbn>9783319066356</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9OGzEQh40qUIHyBj34BQxje9d_ekvTNiAlcAGpN8vrncC2Wzu1N0J5exyIxJXTaGa-bw6_IeQrh0sOoK-sNkwyyS0DpWTLlOPqiJzJOnkdmE_vTfP7hJwa23AN0NrP5KKUPwDAhTJa21NyO8-pFDabRh-nIdAfw3qNGWPAQodIvw9pwvAU05ged9THni5Wd-UbndEV9oOn8xQnjBOdRT_uylC-kOO1HwteHOo5efj1835-zZZ3i5v5bMmC4Ioz7ASi7i3KwI3pQ9M2shFrpQChFb22oNsgJfiu9RLR9yp4o40UUAluQJ4T9na3PONm27lNHv75vHPJD66M287nfXEFnVZC8spffpCvCYvWVkEchIrGR8yuS-lvqes9oV39gZOuhuxeI3f7H1SpeZM2Of3fYpkc7q1QE8p-DE9-M2GuN7QRtlVOAHcShHwBv12J8A</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Galata, Lena</creator><creator>Karantininis, Kostas</creator><creator>Hess, Sebastian</creator><general>Springer International Publishing AG</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>FFUUA</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>BMRNB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis</title><author>Galata, Lena ; Karantininis, Kostas ; Hess, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2161-eb2ee7d9e3c188dc454342f660e052d79075c330ab5a3eead6ca87832060e1803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>3D graphics & modelling</topic><topic>British Press</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Media Coverage</topic><topic>Media Profile</topic><topic>Mere Exposure Effect</topic><topic>Nationalekonomi</topic><topic>Operational research</topic><topic>Plant Biotechnology</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Public Outrage</topic><topic>Växtbioteknologi</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galata, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantininis, Kostas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Book Chapter</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galata, Lena</au><au>Karantininis, Kostas</au><au>Hess, Sebastian</au><au>Baourakis, George</au><au>Zopounidis, Constantin</au><au>Kalogeras, Nikos</au><au>Mattas, Konstadinos</au><au>van Dijk, Gert</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis</atitle><btitle>Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy</btitle><seriestitle>Cooperative Management</seriestitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><spage>299</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>299-314</pages><isbn>331906634X</isbn><isbn>9783319066349</isbn><isbn>3319066358</isbn><isbn>9783319066356</isbn><eisbn>3319066358</eisbn><eisbn>9783319066356</eisbn><abstract>Different regulations about the permission and approval rate of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) between the USA and Europe have been controversial for decades. While there is a wide scientific coverage of what may be the cause of this divergence, little is known about the role that popular media play in the related political discourse. We analyzed the media coverage of biotechnology topics in both the USA and UK from 2011-2013 by examining two opinion-leading newspapers. We test the hypothesis that the respective media content reflects differences in transatlantic policies towards biotechnology. The two newspapers differed in reporting intensity but were alike in their content about GMOs: with the central actors being scientists and NGOs, arguing mostly in the field of the agricultural sector, the debate seems to be locked in a stalemate of potential risks re-iterated against potential benefits, with none of the two positions clearly dominating the discourse.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing AG</pub><doi>10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_16</doi><oclcid>894170059</oclcid><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISBN: 331906634X |
| ispartof | Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy, 2014, p.299-314 |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_76231 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | 3D graphics & modelling British Press Economics Media Coverage Media Profile Mere Exposure Effect Nationalekonomi Operational research Plant Biotechnology Political economy Public Outrage Växtbioteknologi |
| title | Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A36%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Cross-Atlantic%20Differences%20in%20Biotechnology%20and%20GMOs:%20A%20Media%20Content%20Analysis&rft.btitle=Agricultural%20Cooperative%20Management%20and%20Policy&rft.au=Galata,%20Lena&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2014&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=299-314&rft.isbn=331906634X&rft.isbn_list=9783319066349&rft.isbn_list=3319066358&rft.isbn_list=9783319066356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3EEBC1782956_201_302%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=3319066358&rft.eisbn_list=9783319066356&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC1782956_201_302&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |