Farmer Preference, Utilization, and Biochemical Composition of Improved Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties in Southeastern Africa
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties are ethnobotanically classified by farmers into two distinct classes—"sweet" or "bitter"—based on their taste, most often reflecting the inherent cyanogenic glucoside potential and intended end use. Varietal preference based on general...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic botany 2015-03, Vol.69 (1), p.42-56 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 56 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | Economic botany |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Chiwona-Karltun, Linley Nyirenda, Drinah Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola Kongor, John Edem Brimer, Leon Haggblade, Steven Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene |
description | Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties are ethnobotanically classified by farmers into two distinct classes—"sweet" or "bitter"—based on their taste, most often reflecting the inherent cyanogenic glucoside potential and intended end use. Varietal preference based on general utilization as well as more targeted end use for preferred local and improved varieties is poorly understood and not well documented. The objectives of this study were to investigate prevailing varietal preferences based on utilization and the biochemical composition of local and recently improved cassava varieties. Interviews were conducted with farmers to document the existing varieties, their origin and taste classification, and processing in relation to end use. Biochemical composition was determined for flour samples with particular emphasis on color and perceived dryness. Of the nine varieties identified, four were classified as local, while the rest were classified as improved varieties. Two varieties were classified as bitter, and the rest were classified as sweet based on end use. The classification dichotomy based on taste is an important factor in determining potential toxicity. Labile varieties that are easily affected by microenvironmental factors were classified as bitter. Reasons for preference and utilization focus as much on the leaves for use as vegetables as on the roots. The taste classification of the roots determines how and whether they are to be processed. The varieties "Mweulu" and "Tanganyika" were perceived by farmers as having excellent characteristics for making the staple dish "nshima," reflected by their high carbohydrate contents. The variety "Bangweulu" was identified as having "bigger and starchier" roots in interviews, and the biochemical assay verified these observations. The flour sample analysis revealed crude protein content ranged from 4.86% to 7.09%. Cluster and principal component analyses showed four groupings, with the single Malawian variety exhibiting the greatest differences from the Zambian clones, while the improved varieties bred from a single mother line displayed the closest similarities. The high energy and carbohydrate values of the nine varieties provide a good basis for acceptance; however, factors such as shelf life, storage, and other postharvest qualities such as susceptibility to weevil attacks also play a determining role in the acceptance of improved cassava varieties. Mitundu ya Chinangwa (Manihot esculenta Crantz) ili |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12231-015-9298-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_76078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24825460</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24825460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7b9879a483b3499adf847427b2172e6383baeb0c46c86c426808b80bd6f961653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEkvLA3BAssQFpKa1Hcd2jiWipVJRkaBcrUl2wnqV2IvtFLWvwEvjKFXFiYvHsr__n7H_onjD6CmjVJ1FxnnFSsrqsuGNLtWzYsO0EmVTSfG82FDKqpLm9WXxKsZ93ilWi03x5wLChIF8DThgQNfjCblNdrQPkKx3JwTclny0vt_hZHsYSeung492uSR-IFfTIfg73JIWYoQ7IO-_gLM7nwjGfh7RJSBtAJcePpAfECwmi5FYR775Oe0QYsLgyPkQsvlx8WKAMeLrx3pU3F58-t5-Lq9vLq_a8-uyrxlPpeoarRoQuuoq0TSwHbRQgquOM8VRVvkcsKO9kL2WveBSU91p2m3l0Egm6-qoKFff-BsPc2cOwU4Q7o0Ha-I4dxCWYiIaJanSmX-38vmpv2aMyez9HFwe0TApG8GW7pliK9UHH2P-zidfRs2SkVkzMjkjs2RkFg1_nCSz7ieGf5z_I3q7ivYx-fDUhQvNayFp9Rdrvp9i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1669417427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farmer Preference, Utilization, and Biochemical Composition of Improved Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties in Southeastern Africa</title><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chiwona-Karltun, Linley ; Nyirenda, Drinah ; Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola ; Kongor, John Edem ; Brimer, Leon ; Haggblade, Steven ; Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiwona-Karltun, Linley ; Nyirenda, Drinah ; Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola ; Kongor, John Edem ; Brimer, Leon ; Haggblade, Steven ; Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties are ethnobotanically classified by farmers into two distinct classes—"sweet" or "bitter"—based on their taste, most often reflecting the inherent cyanogenic glucoside potential and intended end use. Varietal preference based on general utilization as well as more targeted end use for preferred local and improved varieties is poorly understood and not well documented. The objectives of this study were to investigate prevailing varietal preferences based on utilization and the biochemical composition of local and recently improved cassava varieties. Interviews were conducted with farmers to document the existing varieties, their origin and taste classification, and processing in relation to end use. Biochemical composition was determined for flour samples with particular emphasis on color and perceived dryness. Of the nine varieties identified, four were classified as local, while the rest were classified as improved varieties. Two varieties were classified as bitter, and the rest were classified as sweet based on end use. The classification dichotomy based on taste is an important factor in determining potential toxicity. Labile varieties that are easily affected by microenvironmental factors were classified as bitter. Reasons for preference and utilization focus as much on the leaves for use as vegetables as on the roots. The taste classification of the roots determines how and whether they are to be processed. The varieties "Mweulu" and "Tanganyika" were perceived by farmers as having excellent characteristics for making the staple dish "nshima," reflected by their high carbohydrate contents. The variety "Bangweulu" was identified as having "bigger and starchier" roots in interviews, and the biochemical assay verified these observations. The flour sample analysis revealed crude protein content ranged from 4.86% to 7.09%. Cluster and principal component analyses showed four groupings, with the single Malawian variety exhibiting the greatest differences from the Zambian clones, while the improved varieties bred from a single mother line displayed the closest similarities. The high energy and carbohydrate values of the nine varieties provide a good basis for acceptance; however, factors such as shelf life, storage, and other postharvest qualities such as susceptibility to weevil attacks also play a determining role in the acceptance of improved cassava varieties. Mitundu ya Chinangwa (Manihot esculenta Crantz) ilipo iwiri – "Chokoma" ndi "Chowawa" malingana ndi makomedwe ake. Mitundu iwiriyi imawunikiranso kusiyana kwa kagwiritsidwe ntchito ka mitundu imeneyi. Kagwiritsidwe nchito ka mitundu ya chinangwa yochokera mu kafukufuku kapena mitundu ina ya makolo sizimvetsetsedwa bwino komanso sizinalembedwe bwino. Zolinga za kafukufuku uyu zinali kufufuza makonda a kagwiritsidwe ntchito ka mitundu ya chinangwa ndi kawawidwe mu chinangwa cha makolo komanso cha makono. Alimi osiyanasiyana anafunsidwa pofuna kulembera mitundu yosiyana siyana imene ilipo, kumene inachokera ndi gulu lomwe chili malingana ndi kakomendwe kake, komanso kakonzedwe kake ndi ntchito yake. Kukoma kapena kuwawa kwa chinangwa kunatsimikizidwa poyesa ufa wake, polingalira mtundu ndi maumidwe ake. Mwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi imene inazindikiridwa, inayi inali ya makolo, pamene yotsalayo inali ya makono. Mwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi, iwiri inali yowawa, ndipo yotsalayo inali yokoma polingalira ntchito yomwe chimagwiritsidwa. Kusiyanitsa magawo polingalira kakomedwe, ndi chinthu chofunika kwambiri pofuna kudziwa kuopsya kumene kungakhalepo pa kudya chinangwa. Mitundu "yowawirako" imene imakhudzidwa kwambiri ndi kusinthasintha kwa nyengo inapezeka kuti ndi yowawa. Zifukwa zokondera chinangwa zimalingaliridwanso pa kakomedwe ka masamba ngati ntapasha ngati m'mene ziliri ndi mizu ya chinangwacho. Kusiyanitsa mitundu ya chinangwa mu kakomedwe kake kumapangitsanso kudziwa momwe chingakonzedwere. Alimi anawona mitundu ya "Mweulu" udi "Tanganyika" kukhala ndi makhalidwe abwino opangira chakudya chomwe amachidalira "nsima" chifukwa ndi chokhutitsa ndiponso chopatsa mphamvu. Pochezanso ndi alimi, mtundu wa "Bangweulu" unapezeka kukhala ndi mizu yaikulu ndi ufa wambiri" ndipo kafukufuku anatsimikiziranso izi. Ufa wachinangwa unapezeka kukhala ndi puloteni wa mlingo wa pakati pa 4.86–7.09%. Kawuniwuni wa magulu a chingwachi anapeza magulu akulu-akulu anayi. Mtundu umodzi waku Malawi unaonetsa kusiyana kwakukulu ndi mtundu wofana nawo waku Zambia, pamene mtundu wamakono wopangidwa kuchokera ku kholo limodzi unawonetsa zinthu zofananiranako kwambiri. Kukhutitsa ndi kupereka mphamvu kwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi ya chinangwayi ndilo gwero lalikulu limene alimi amachikondera; komabe, zinthu monga nthawi yomwe chingatenge chisanaonengeke, kasungidwe, ndi masamalidwe chikakololedwa monga kugwidwa ndi anankafumbwe zimapangitsanso momwe mbewu ya makono ya chinangwa ingakondedwere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-9364</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12231-015-9298-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science & Business Media</publisher><subject>Agricultural Science ; Biochemical composition ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Botanik ; Botany ; Classification ; Farmers ; Jordbruksvetenskap ; Life Sciences ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Roots ; Taste</subject><ispartof>Economic botany, 2015-03, Vol.69 (1), p.42-56</ispartof><rights>2015 The New York Botanical Garden</rights><rights>The New York Botanical Garden 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7b9879a483b3499adf847427b2172e6383baeb0c46c86c426808b80bd6f961653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7b9879a483b3499adf847427b2172e6383baeb0c46c86c426808b80bd6f961653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24825460$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24825460$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/76078$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiwona-Karltun, Linley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyirenda, Drinah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kongor, John Edem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brimer, Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haggblade, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Farmer Preference, Utilization, and Biochemical Composition of Improved Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties in Southeastern Africa</title><title>Economic botany</title><addtitle>Econ Bot</addtitle><description>Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties are ethnobotanically classified by farmers into two distinct classes—"sweet" or "bitter"—based on their taste, most often reflecting the inherent cyanogenic glucoside potential and intended end use. Varietal preference based on general utilization as well as more targeted end use for preferred local and improved varieties is poorly understood and not well documented. The objectives of this study were to investigate prevailing varietal preferences based on utilization and the biochemical composition of local and recently improved cassava varieties. Interviews were conducted with farmers to document the existing varieties, their origin and taste classification, and processing in relation to end use. Biochemical composition was determined for flour samples with particular emphasis on color and perceived dryness. Of the nine varieties identified, four were classified as local, while the rest were classified as improved varieties. Two varieties were classified as bitter, and the rest were classified as sweet based on end use. The classification dichotomy based on taste is an important factor in determining potential toxicity. Labile varieties that are easily affected by microenvironmental factors were classified as bitter. Reasons for preference and utilization focus as much on the leaves for use as vegetables as on the roots. The taste classification of the roots determines how and whether they are to be processed. The varieties "Mweulu" and "Tanganyika" were perceived by farmers as having excellent characteristics for making the staple dish "nshima," reflected by their high carbohydrate contents. The variety "Bangweulu" was identified as having "bigger and starchier" roots in interviews, and the biochemical assay verified these observations. The flour sample analysis revealed crude protein content ranged from 4.86% to 7.09%. Cluster and principal component analyses showed four groupings, with the single Malawian variety exhibiting the greatest differences from the Zambian clones, while the improved varieties bred from a single mother line displayed the closest similarities. The high energy and carbohydrate values of the nine varieties provide a good basis for acceptance; however, factors such as shelf life, storage, and other postharvest qualities such as susceptibility to weevil attacks also play a determining role in the acceptance of improved cassava varieties. Mitundu ya Chinangwa (Manihot esculenta Crantz) ilipo iwiri – "Chokoma" ndi "Chowawa" malingana ndi makomedwe ake. Mitundu iwiriyi imawunikiranso kusiyana kwa kagwiritsidwe ntchito ka mitundu imeneyi. Kagwiritsidwe nchito ka mitundu ya chinangwa yochokera mu kafukufuku kapena mitundu ina ya makolo sizimvetsetsedwa bwino komanso sizinalembedwe bwino. Zolinga za kafukufuku uyu zinali kufufuza makonda a kagwiritsidwe ntchito ka mitundu ya chinangwa ndi kawawidwe mu chinangwa cha makolo komanso cha makono. Alimi osiyanasiyana anafunsidwa pofuna kulembera mitundu yosiyana siyana imene ilipo, kumene inachokera ndi gulu lomwe chili malingana ndi kakomendwe kake, komanso kakonzedwe kake ndi ntchito yake. Kukoma kapena kuwawa kwa chinangwa kunatsimikizidwa poyesa ufa wake, polingalira mtundu ndi maumidwe ake. Mwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi imene inazindikiridwa, inayi inali ya makolo, pamene yotsalayo inali ya makono. Mwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi, iwiri inali yowawa, ndipo yotsalayo inali yokoma polingalira ntchito yomwe chimagwiritsidwa. Kusiyanitsa magawo polingalira kakomedwe, ndi chinthu chofunika kwambiri pofuna kudziwa kuopsya kumene kungakhalepo pa kudya chinangwa. Mitundu "yowawirako" imene imakhudzidwa kwambiri ndi kusinthasintha kwa nyengo inapezeka kuti ndi yowawa. Zifukwa zokondera chinangwa zimalingaliridwanso pa kakomedwe ka masamba ngati ntapasha ngati m'mene ziliri ndi mizu ya chinangwacho. Kusiyanitsa mitundu ya chinangwa mu kakomedwe kake kumapangitsanso kudziwa momwe chingakonzedwere. Alimi anawona mitundu ya "Mweulu" udi "Tanganyika" kukhala ndi makhalidwe abwino opangira chakudya chomwe amachidalira "nsima" chifukwa ndi chokhutitsa ndiponso chopatsa mphamvu. Pochezanso ndi alimi, mtundu wa "Bangweulu" unapezeka kukhala ndi mizu yaikulu ndi ufa wambiri" ndipo kafukufuku anatsimikiziranso izi. Ufa wachinangwa unapezeka kukhala ndi puloteni wa mlingo wa pakati pa 4.86–7.09%. Kawuniwuni wa magulu a chingwachi anapeza magulu akulu-akulu anayi. Mtundu umodzi waku Malawi unaonetsa kusiyana kwakukulu ndi mtundu wofana nawo waku Zambia, pamene mtundu wamakono wopangidwa kuchokera ku kholo limodzi unawonetsa zinthu zofananiranako kwambiri. Kukhutitsa ndi kupereka mphamvu kwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi ya chinangwayi ndilo gwero lalikulu limene alimi amachikondera; komabe, zinthu monga nthawi yomwe chingatenge chisanaonengeke, kasungidwe, ndi masamalidwe chikakololedwa monga kugwidwa ndi anankafumbwe zimapangitsanso momwe mbewu ya makono ya chinangwa ingakondedwere.</description><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Biochemical composition</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Botanik</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Jordbruksvetenskap</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Taste</subject><issn>0013-0001</issn><issn>1874-9364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEkvLA3BAssQFpKa1Hcd2jiWipVJRkaBcrUl2wnqV2IvtFLWvwEvjKFXFiYvHsr__n7H_onjD6CmjVJ1FxnnFSsrqsuGNLtWzYsO0EmVTSfG82FDKqpLm9WXxKsZ93ilWi03x5wLChIF8DThgQNfjCblNdrQPkKx3JwTclny0vt_hZHsYSeung492uSR-IFfTIfg73JIWYoQ7IO-_gLM7nwjGfh7RJSBtAJcePpAfECwmi5FYR775Oe0QYsLgyPkQsvlx8WKAMeLrx3pU3F58-t5-Lq9vLq_a8-uyrxlPpeoarRoQuuoq0TSwHbRQgquOM8VRVvkcsKO9kL2WveBSU91p2m3l0Egm6-qoKFff-BsPc2cOwU4Q7o0Ha-I4dxCWYiIaJanSmX-38vmpv2aMyez9HFwe0TApG8GW7pliK9UHH2P-zidfRs2SkVkzMjkjs2RkFg1_nCSz7ieGf5z_I3q7ivYx-fDUhQvNayFp9Rdrvp9i</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Chiwona-Karltun, Linley</creator><creator>Nyirenda, Drinah</creator><creator>Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola</creator><creator>Kongor, John Edem</creator><creator>Brimer, Leon</creator><creator>Haggblade, Steven</creator><creator>Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene</creator><general>Springer Science & Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Farmer Preference, Utilization, and Biochemical Composition of Improved Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties in Southeastern Africa</title><author>Chiwona-Karltun, Linley ; Nyirenda, Drinah ; Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola ; Kongor, John Edem ; Brimer, Leon ; Haggblade, Steven ; Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7b9879a483b3499adf847427b2172e6383baeb0c46c86c426808b80bd6f961653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Biochemical composition</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Botanik</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Jordbruksvetenskap</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Taste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiwona-Karltun, Linley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyirenda, Drinah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kongor, John Edem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brimer, Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haggblade, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Economic botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiwona-Karltun, Linley</au><au>Nyirenda, Drinah</au><au>Mwansa, Cornelius Nkonkola</au><au>Kongor, John Edem</au><au>Brimer, Leon</au><au>Haggblade, Steven</au><au>Afoakwa, Emmanuel Ohene</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farmer Preference, Utilization, and Biochemical Composition of Improved Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties in Southeastern Africa</atitle><jtitle>Economic botany</jtitle><stitle>Econ Bot</stitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>42-56</pages><issn>0013-0001</issn><eissn>1874-9364</eissn><abstract>Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties are ethnobotanically classified by farmers into two distinct classes—"sweet" or "bitter"—based on their taste, most often reflecting the inherent cyanogenic glucoside potential and intended end use. Varietal preference based on general utilization as well as more targeted end use for preferred local and improved varieties is poorly understood and not well documented. The objectives of this study were to investigate prevailing varietal preferences based on utilization and the biochemical composition of local and recently improved cassava varieties. Interviews were conducted with farmers to document the existing varieties, their origin and taste classification, and processing in relation to end use. Biochemical composition was determined for flour samples with particular emphasis on color and perceived dryness. Of the nine varieties identified, four were classified as local, while the rest were classified as improved varieties. Two varieties were classified as bitter, and the rest were classified as sweet based on end use. The classification dichotomy based on taste is an important factor in determining potential toxicity. Labile varieties that are easily affected by microenvironmental factors were classified as bitter. Reasons for preference and utilization focus as much on the leaves for use as vegetables as on the roots. The taste classification of the roots determines how and whether they are to be processed. The varieties "Mweulu" and "Tanganyika" were perceived by farmers as having excellent characteristics for making the staple dish "nshima," reflected by their high carbohydrate contents. The variety "Bangweulu" was identified as having "bigger and starchier" roots in interviews, and the biochemical assay verified these observations. The flour sample analysis revealed crude protein content ranged from 4.86% to 7.09%. Cluster and principal component analyses showed four groupings, with the single Malawian variety exhibiting the greatest differences from the Zambian clones, while the improved varieties bred from a single mother line displayed the closest similarities. The high energy and carbohydrate values of the nine varieties provide a good basis for acceptance; however, factors such as shelf life, storage, and other postharvest qualities such as susceptibility to weevil attacks also play a determining role in the acceptance of improved cassava varieties. Mitundu ya Chinangwa (Manihot esculenta Crantz) ilipo iwiri – "Chokoma" ndi "Chowawa" malingana ndi makomedwe ake. Mitundu iwiriyi imawunikiranso kusiyana kwa kagwiritsidwe ntchito ka mitundu imeneyi. Kagwiritsidwe nchito ka mitundu ya chinangwa yochokera mu kafukufuku kapena mitundu ina ya makolo sizimvetsetsedwa bwino komanso sizinalembedwe bwino. Zolinga za kafukufuku uyu zinali kufufuza makonda a kagwiritsidwe ntchito ka mitundu ya chinangwa ndi kawawidwe mu chinangwa cha makolo komanso cha makono. Alimi osiyanasiyana anafunsidwa pofuna kulembera mitundu yosiyana siyana imene ilipo, kumene inachokera ndi gulu lomwe chili malingana ndi kakomendwe kake, komanso kakonzedwe kake ndi ntchito yake. Kukoma kapena kuwawa kwa chinangwa kunatsimikizidwa poyesa ufa wake, polingalira mtundu ndi maumidwe ake. Mwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi imene inazindikiridwa, inayi inali ya makolo, pamene yotsalayo inali ya makono. Mwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi, iwiri inali yowawa, ndipo yotsalayo inali yokoma polingalira ntchito yomwe chimagwiritsidwa. Kusiyanitsa magawo polingalira kakomedwe, ndi chinthu chofunika kwambiri pofuna kudziwa kuopsya kumene kungakhalepo pa kudya chinangwa. Mitundu "yowawirako" imene imakhudzidwa kwambiri ndi kusinthasintha kwa nyengo inapezeka kuti ndi yowawa. Zifukwa zokondera chinangwa zimalingaliridwanso pa kakomedwe ka masamba ngati ntapasha ngati m'mene ziliri ndi mizu ya chinangwacho. Kusiyanitsa mitundu ya chinangwa mu kakomedwe kake kumapangitsanso kudziwa momwe chingakonzedwere. Alimi anawona mitundu ya "Mweulu" udi "Tanganyika" kukhala ndi makhalidwe abwino opangira chakudya chomwe amachidalira "nsima" chifukwa ndi chokhutitsa ndiponso chopatsa mphamvu. Pochezanso ndi alimi, mtundu wa "Bangweulu" unapezeka kukhala ndi mizu yaikulu ndi ufa wambiri" ndipo kafukufuku anatsimikiziranso izi. Ufa wachinangwa unapezeka kukhala ndi puloteni wa mlingo wa pakati pa 4.86–7.09%. Kawuniwuni wa magulu a chingwachi anapeza magulu akulu-akulu anayi. Mtundu umodzi waku Malawi unaonetsa kusiyana kwakukulu ndi mtundu wofana nawo waku Zambia, pamene mtundu wamakono wopangidwa kuchokera ku kholo limodzi unawonetsa zinthu zofananiranako kwambiri. Kukhutitsa ndi kupereka mphamvu kwa mitundu isanu ndi inayi ya chinangwayi ndilo gwero lalikulu limene alimi amachikondera; komabe, zinthu monga nthawi yomwe chingatenge chisanaonengeke, kasungidwe, ndi masamalidwe chikakololedwa monga kugwidwa ndi anankafumbwe zimapangitsanso momwe mbewu ya makono ya chinangwa ingakondedwere.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science & Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s12231-015-9298-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0001 |
ispartof | Economic botany, 2015-03, Vol.69 (1), p.42-56 |
issn | 0013-0001 1874-9364 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_76078 |
source | JSTOR; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural Science Biochemical composition Biomedical and Life Sciences Botanik Botany Classification Farmers Jordbruksvetenskap Life Sciences Plant Anatomy/Development Plant Ecology Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Roots Taste |
title | Farmer Preference, Utilization, and Biochemical Composition of Improved Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties in Southeastern Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farmer%20Preference,%20Utilization,%20and%20Biochemical%20Composition%20of%20Improved%20Cassava%20(Manihot%20esculenta%20Crantz)%20Varieties%20in%20Southeastern%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Economic%20botany&rft.au=Chiwona-Karltun,%20Linley&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=42-56&rft.issn=0013-0001&rft.eissn=1874-9364&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12231-015-9298-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E24825460%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1669417427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24825460&rfr_iscdi=true |