Inter- and intra-tester reliability when measuring seated spinal postures with inertial sensors

Prolonged awkward sitting postures may be associated with neck or back pain, but it is often unclear which specific postures cause most problems and which mechanisms that may underlie the pain. In order to increase the knowledge in this field, it seems crucial first of all to be able to analyse, in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of industrial ergonomics 2014-09, Vol.44 (5), p.732-738
Hauptverfasser: Stenlund, T.C., Öhberg, F., Lundström, R., Lindroos, O., Häger, C., Rehn, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 738
container_issue 5
container_start_page 732
container_title International journal of industrial ergonomics
container_volume 44
creator Stenlund, T.C.
Öhberg, F.
Lundström, R.
Lindroos, O.
Häger, C.
Rehn, B.
description Prolonged awkward sitting postures may be associated with neck or back pain, but it is often unclear which specific postures cause most problems and which mechanisms that may underlie the pain. In order to increase the knowledge in this field, it seems crucial first of all to be able to analyse, in depth, different seated spinal postures. A problem is however the lack of reliable and direct measurement methods of the posture, especially for sitting. Recently developed systems with inertial sensor attached along the spine have potential for this purpose. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the reliability of using such a system to assess various seated postures. Inter- and intra-tester as well as intra-subject relative reliability was estimated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability was estimated with standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Ten + ten healthy subjects and four testers participated. Three standardised unsupported seated postures (lumbar lordosis, lumbar kyphosis and neutral posture) and two standing postures (neutral and lumbar kyphosis) were evaluated using five sensors attached to the head, the thorax (high and low), the lumbar spine and the pelvis. The ICC for intra-tester reliability ranged from 0.37 to 0.90, SEM 2.5–12.0°, and SDC 7.1–33.3° where the largest measurement error was from the head. Intra-tester reliability was higher than inter-tester reliability but not as good as intra-subject reliability. The intra-tester absolute reliability was nevertheless not considered sufficient to distinguish smaller differences. The low reliability may depend on inertial sensor size and attachment but also on the tester's accuracy. This study shows that assessing unsupported seated spinal postures with inertial sensors could be performed with higher reliability if done by the same, rather than different, testers. Prolonged awkward seated postures at work may be associated with back and neck pain and should therefore be analysed. Inertial sensor units is a promising tool to measure spinal posture. Smaller sensors attached by one skilled tester directly onto the body will most likely improve assessment in the future. •Occupational sitting is common and postures may be associated with back pain.•The use of a direct measurement system to assess seated spinal postures is evaluated.•The inertial sensor measurement system has a promising potential.•Smaller differences in spina
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.06.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_63296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169814114000961</els_id><sourcerecordid>3473020981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-cc2b82c5adddb2c7f069fc736785e2c008271b71747d79277826c21f8b5757be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cFu1DAQBuAIgcRSeAIulrhwIMF2Ets5cKgKtJUq9dJytRxnsvUqawePzapvj5dFHJBAPVkafTPyzF9VbxltGGXi466BuA2-4ZR1DRUNpfxZtWFK8lpxNjyvNkUNtWIde1m9QtxRyiTt2abS1z5BrInxE3E-RVMnwFIhERZnRre49EgOD-DJHgzm6PyWIJgEE8HVebOQNWDKEZAcXHooMyAmV8oIHkPE19WL2SwIb36_Z9X91y93F1f1ze3l9cX5TW07yVNtLR8Vt72ZpmnkVs5UDLOVrZCqB24pVVyyUTLZyUkOXErFheVsVmMvezlCe1bVp7l4gDWPeo1ub-KjDsZpXPJo4vHRCFq0fBDFf_in_-y-nesQtzrvsx5E0YW_P_E1hu-5XEjvHVpYFuMhZNRM9KwdhOjYE2jb0463XBX67i-6CzmWox4Vk2XlYotqT8rGgBhh_vNZRvUxfr3Tv-LXx_g1FbrEX7o-nbqgXP2Hg7K_deAtTC6CTXoK7r_9PwHWv7rM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1617271635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter- and intra-tester reliability when measuring seated spinal postures with inertial sensors</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stenlund, T.C. ; Öhberg, F. ; Lundström, R. ; Lindroos, O. ; Häger, C. ; Rehn, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stenlund, T.C. ; Öhberg, F. ; Lundström, R. ; Lindroos, O. ; Häger, C. ; Rehn, B. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Prolonged awkward sitting postures may be associated with neck or back pain, but it is often unclear which specific postures cause most problems and which mechanisms that may underlie the pain. In order to increase the knowledge in this field, it seems crucial first of all to be able to analyse, in depth, different seated spinal postures. A problem is however the lack of reliable and direct measurement methods of the posture, especially for sitting. Recently developed systems with inertial sensor attached along the spine have potential for this purpose. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the reliability of using such a system to assess various seated postures. Inter- and intra-tester as well as intra-subject relative reliability was estimated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability was estimated with standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Ten + ten healthy subjects and four testers participated. Three standardised unsupported seated postures (lumbar lordosis, lumbar kyphosis and neutral posture) and two standing postures (neutral and lumbar kyphosis) were evaluated using five sensors attached to the head, the thorax (high and low), the lumbar spine and the pelvis. The ICC for intra-tester reliability ranged from 0.37 to 0.90, SEM 2.5–12.0°, and SDC 7.1–33.3° where the largest measurement error was from the head. Intra-tester reliability was higher than inter-tester reliability but not as good as intra-subject reliability. The intra-tester absolute reliability was nevertheless not considered sufficient to distinguish smaller differences. The low reliability may depend on inertial sensor size and attachment but also on the tester's accuracy. This study shows that assessing unsupported seated spinal postures with inertial sensors could be performed with higher reliability if done by the same, rather than different, testers. Prolonged awkward seated postures at work may be associated with back and neck pain and should therefore be analysed. Inertial sensor units is a promising tool to measure spinal posture. Smaller sensors attached by one skilled tester directly onto the body will most likely improve assessment in the future. •Occupational sitting is common and postures may be associated with back pain.•The use of a direct measurement system to assess seated spinal postures is evaluated.•The inertial sensor measurement system has a promising potential.•Smaller differences in spinal postures are difficult to assess.•It is suggested that smaller inertial sensors would improve the reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-8141</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-8219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.06.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Arbetslivsstudier ; Arbetsterapi ; Biomechanics ; Ergonomics ; Human engineering ; Inertial ; Measurement methods ; Medical Ergonomics ; Medical Laboratory and Measurements Technologies ; Medicinsk ergonomi ; Medicinsk laboratorie- och mätteknik ; Necks ; Observer variations ; Occupational health ; Occupational Therapy ; Pain ; Physiotherapy ; Posture ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Sensors ; Sjukgymnastik ; Spine ; Work Sciences</subject><ispartof>International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2014-09, Vol.44 (5), p.732-738</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-cc2b82c5adddb2c7f069fc736785e2c008271b71747d79277826c21f8b5757be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-cc2b82c5adddb2c7f069fc736785e2c008271b71747d79277826c21f8b5757be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814114000961$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-96963$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/63296$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stenlund, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öhberg, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundström, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindroos, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Häger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehn, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Inter- and intra-tester reliability when measuring seated spinal postures with inertial sensors</title><title>International journal of industrial ergonomics</title><description>Prolonged awkward sitting postures may be associated with neck or back pain, but it is often unclear which specific postures cause most problems and which mechanisms that may underlie the pain. In order to increase the knowledge in this field, it seems crucial first of all to be able to analyse, in depth, different seated spinal postures. A problem is however the lack of reliable and direct measurement methods of the posture, especially for sitting. Recently developed systems with inertial sensor attached along the spine have potential for this purpose. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the reliability of using such a system to assess various seated postures. Inter- and intra-tester as well as intra-subject relative reliability was estimated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability was estimated with standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Ten + ten healthy subjects and four testers participated. Three standardised unsupported seated postures (lumbar lordosis, lumbar kyphosis and neutral posture) and two standing postures (neutral and lumbar kyphosis) were evaluated using five sensors attached to the head, the thorax (high and low), the lumbar spine and the pelvis. The ICC for intra-tester reliability ranged from 0.37 to 0.90, SEM 2.5–12.0°, and SDC 7.1–33.3° where the largest measurement error was from the head. Intra-tester reliability was higher than inter-tester reliability but not as good as intra-subject reliability. The intra-tester absolute reliability was nevertheless not considered sufficient to distinguish smaller differences. The low reliability may depend on inertial sensor size and attachment but also on the tester's accuracy. This study shows that assessing unsupported seated spinal postures with inertial sensors could be performed with higher reliability if done by the same, rather than different, testers. Prolonged awkward seated postures at work may be associated with back and neck pain and should therefore be analysed. Inertial sensor units is a promising tool to measure spinal posture. Smaller sensors attached by one skilled tester directly onto the body will most likely improve assessment in the future. •Occupational sitting is common and postures may be associated with back pain.•The use of a direct measurement system to assess seated spinal postures is evaluated.•The inertial sensor measurement system has a promising potential.•Smaller differences in spinal postures are difficult to assess.•It is suggested that smaller inertial sensors would improve the reliability.</description><subject>Arbetslivsstudier</subject><subject>Arbetsterapi</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Human engineering</subject><subject>Inertial</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medical Ergonomics</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory and Measurements Technologies</subject><subject>Medicinsk ergonomi</subject><subject>Medicinsk laboratorie- och mätteknik</subject><subject>Necks</subject><subject>Observer variations</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physiotherapy</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Sjukgymnastik</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Work Sciences</subject><issn>0169-8141</issn><issn>1872-8219</issn><issn>1872-8219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0cFu1DAQBuAIgcRSeAIulrhwIMF2Ets5cKgKtJUq9dJytRxnsvUqawePzapvj5dFHJBAPVkafTPyzF9VbxltGGXi466BuA2-4ZR1DRUNpfxZtWFK8lpxNjyvNkUNtWIde1m9QtxRyiTt2abS1z5BrInxE3E-RVMnwFIhERZnRre49EgOD-DJHgzm6PyWIJgEE8HVebOQNWDKEZAcXHooMyAmV8oIHkPE19WL2SwIb36_Z9X91y93F1f1ze3l9cX5TW07yVNtLR8Vt72ZpmnkVs5UDLOVrZCqB24pVVyyUTLZyUkOXErFheVsVmMvezlCe1bVp7l4gDWPeo1ub-KjDsZpXPJo4vHRCFq0fBDFf_in_-y-nesQtzrvsx5E0YW_P_E1hu-5XEjvHVpYFuMhZNRM9KwdhOjYE2jb0463XBX67i-6CzmWox4Vk2XlYotqT8rGgBhh_vNZRvUxfr3Tv-LXx_g1FbrEX7o-nbqgXP2Hg7K_deAtTC6CTXoK7r_9PwHWv7rM</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Stenlund, T.C.</creator><creator>Öhberg, F.</creator><creator>Lundström, R.</creator><creator>Lindroos, O.</creator><creator>Häger, C.</creator><creator>Rehn, B.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D93</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Inter- and intra-tester reliability when measuring seated spinal postures with inertial sensors</title><author>Stenlund, T.C. ; Öhberg, F. ; Lundström, R. ; Lindroos, O. ; Häger, C. ; Rehn, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-cc2b82c5adddb2c7f069fc736785e2c008271b71747d79277826c21f8b5757be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Arbetslivsstudier</topic><topic>Arbetsterapi</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Human engineering</topic><topic>Inertial</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medical Ergonomics</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory and Measurements Technologies</topic><topic>Medicinsk ergonomi</topic><topic>Medicinsk laboratorie- och mätteknik</topic><topic>Necks</topic><topic>Observer variations</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physiotherapy</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Sjukgymnastik</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Work Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stenlund, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öhberg, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundström, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindroos, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Häger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehn, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><jtitle>International journal of industrial ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stenlund, T.C.</au><au>Öhberg, F.</au><au>Lundström, R.</au><au>Lindroos, O.</au><au>Häger, C.</au><au>Rehn, B.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter- and intra-tester reliability when measuring seated spinal postures with inertial sensors</atitle><jtitle>International journal of industrial ergonomics</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>732-738</pages><issn>0169-8141</issn><issn>1872-8219</issn><eissn>1872-8219</eissn><abstract>Prolonged awkward sitting postures may be associated with neck or back pain, but it is often unclear which specific postures cause most problems and which mechanisms that may underlie the pain. In order to increase the knowledge in this field, it seems crucial first of all to be able to analyse, in depth, different seated spinal postures. A problem is however the lack of reliable and direct measurement methods of the posture, especially for sitting. Recently developed systems with inertial sensor attached along the spine have potential for this purpose. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the reliability of using such a system to assess various seated postures. Inter- and intra-tester as well as intra-subject relative reliability was estimated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability was estimated with standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Ten + ten healthy subjects and four testers participated. Three standardised unsupported seated postures (lumbar lordosis, lumbar kyphosis and neutral posture) and two standing postures (neutral and lumbar kyphosis) were evaluated using five sensors attached to the head, the thorax (high and low), the lumbar spine and the pelvis. The ICC for intra-tester reliability ranged from 0.37 to 0.90, SEM 2.5–12.0°, and SDC 7.1–33.3° where the largest measurement error was from the head. Intra-tester reliability was higher than inter-tester reliability but not as good as intra-subject reliability. The intra-tester absolute reliability was nevertheless not considered sufficient to distinguish smaller differences. The low reliability may depend on inertial sensor size and attachment but also on the tester's accuracy. This study shows that assessing unsupported seated spinal postures with inertial sensors could be performed with higher reliability if done by the same, rather than different, testers. Prolonged awkward seated postures at work may be associated with back and neck pain and should therefore be analysed. Inertial sensor units is a promising tool to measure spinal posture. Smaller sensors attached by one skilled tester directly onto the body will most likely improve assessment in the future. •Occupational sitting is common and postures may be associated with back pain.•The use of a direct measurement system to assess seated spinal postures is evaluated.•The inertial sensor measurement system has a promising potential.•Smaller differences in spinal postures are difficult to assess.•It is suggested that smaller inertial sensors would improve the reliability.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ergon.2014.06.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-8141
ispartof International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2014-09, Vol.44 (5), p.732-738
issn 0169-8141
1872-8219
1872-8219
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_63296
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Arbetslivsstudier
Arbetsterapi
Biomechanics
Ergonomics
Human engineering
Inertial
Measurement methods
Medical Ergonomics
Medical Laboratory and Measurements Technologies
Medicinsk ergonomi
Medicinsk laboratorie- och mätteknik
Necks
Observer variations
Occupational health
Occupational Therapy
Pain
Physiotherapy
Posture
Scanning electron microscopy
Sensors
Sjukgymnastik
Spine
Work Sciences
title Inter- and intra-tester reliability when measuring seated spinal postures with inertial sensors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A34%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-%20and%20intra-tester%20reliability%20when%20measuring%20seated%20spinal%20postures%20with%20inertial%20sensors&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20industrial%20ergonomics&rft.au=Stenlund,%20T.C.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=732-738&rft.issn=0169-8141&rft.eissn=1872-8219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3473020981%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1617271635&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169814114000961&rfr_iscdi=true