Small‐scale resource tracking in a population of a long‐lived insect
How plant‐feeding insects distribute themselves and utilize their host plant resources is still poorly understood. Several processes may be involved, and their relative roles may vary with the spatial scale considered. Herein, we investigate small‐scale patterns, namely how population density of a g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2012-11, Vol.2 (11), p.2659-2668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2668 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2659 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Widenfalk, Olof Solbreck, Christer Bergeå, Hanna L. |
description | How plant‐feeding insects distribute themselves and utilize their host plant resources is still poorly understood. Several processes may be involved, and their relative roles may vary with the spatial scale considered. Herein, we investigate small‐scale patterns, namely how population density of a gall midge is affected by individual growth form, phenology, and microsite characteristics of its herb host. The long‐lived plant individuals vary much with regard to number of shoots, flower abundance, and flowering phenology. This variation is connected to site characteristics, primarily the degree of sun exposure. The monophagous insect galls the flowers of the host plant – an easily defined food resource. It is a poor disperser, but very long‐lived; diapausing larvae can stay in the soil for many years. Galls were censused on individual plants during 5 years; from a peak to a low in gall population density. Only a very small fraction of the flowers produced ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.378 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_42449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1712563781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-39d7558952958229b98102c962487df28fd255b790eca2983abd4f7bf91fd04a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9KHDEUxoO0VFmFPkEZ6E1vRk-SySS5KZRlqwXBC9vrkMmcWWOzk22yo3jXR_AZfRKzaP1TKM3NScjvfMn5PkLeUzikAOwIHfJDLtUO2WPQiFpKod682O-Sg5wvoawWWAPyHdllnEpgwPfIyfnKhnD3-zY7G7BKmOOUHFabZN1PPy4rP1a2Wsf1FOzGx7GKQzmHOC5LT_BX2Bcio9vsk7eDDRkPHuuM_Pi6-D4_qU_Pjr_Nv5zWToBWNde9FEJpwbRQjOlOKwrM6ZY1SvYDU0PPhOikBnSWacVt1zeD7AZNhx4ay2ekftDN17ieOrNOfmXTjYnWmxymzqZtMRlNw5pGF_7zA1_gFfYOxzJaeNX2-mb0F2YZrwwXQNvi0Yx8ehRI8deEeWNWPjsMwY4Yp2yopEy0xX_6f5SqVrNWQlvQj3-hl8X4sThniiugFICWz4IuxZwTDk__pmC24Ztt-KY8XtAPL-d8Av9E_WzctQ94808hs5gv-FbwHtVMuQY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290880097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small‐scale resource tracking in a population of a long‐lived insect</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Widenfalk, Olof ; Solbreck, Christer ; Bergeå, Hanna L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Widenfalk, Olof ; Solbreck, Christer ; Bergeå, Hanna L. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>How plant‐feeding insects distribute themselves and utilize their host plant resources is still poorly understood. Several processes may be involved, and their relative roles may vary with the spatial scale considered. Herein, we investigate small‐scale patterns, namely how population density of a gall midge is affected by individual growth form, phenology, and microsite characteristics of its herb host. The long‐lived plant individuals vary much with regard to number of shoots, flower abundance, and flowering phenology. This variation is connected to site characteristics, primarily the degree of sun exposure. The monophagous insect galls the flowers of the host plant – an easily defined food resource. It is a poor disperser, but very long‐lived; diapausing larvae can stay in the soil for many years. Galls were censused on individual plants during 5 years; from a peak to a low in gall population density. Only a very small fraction of the flowers produced (<0.5%) were galled even in the peak year. Nevertheless, most plant individuals had galls at least 1 year. In a stepwise multiple regression, plant size (number of shoots) was found to be the most important predictor of gall density (galls/flower). However, gall density decreased more than one order of magnitude over the plant size range observed. There was also a weak effect of plant phenology. Early flowering plants had lower gall densities than those starting later. Sun exposure had no direct effect on gall density, but a path analysis revealed indirect effects via the timing of flowering. Gall population change was highly synchronous in different parts of the study area with no significant decrease in synchrony with distance.
What determines gall density on herb individuals? Plant size is the main factor, but contrary to expectations gall density decreases strongly with plant size. There are also weak indirect effects of sun exposure via flowering phenology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.378</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23170203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; Exploitation ; Exposure ; Flowering ; Flowering pattern ; Flowers ; Flowers & plants ; Food plants ; Galls ; Host plants ; Insects ; Larvae ; Original Research ; Phenology ; Plant resistance ; Plant resources ; Plants (botany) ; Population density ; Population growth ; prolonged diapause ; Regression analysis ; resource exploitation ; Shoots ; small scale patchiness ; Sun ; white swallow‐wort</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2012-11, Vol.2 (11), p.2659-2668</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2012. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2012 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-39d7558952958229b98102c962487df28fd255b790eca2983abd4f7bf91fd04a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-39d7558952958229b98102c962487df28fd255b790eca2983abd4f7bf91fd04a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501620/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501620/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23170203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/42449$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Widenfalk, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solbreck, Christer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergeå, Hanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Small‐scale resource tracking in a population of a long‐lived insect</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>How plant‐feeding insects distribute themselves and utilize their host plant resources is still poorly understood. Several processes may be involved, and their relative roles may vary with the spatial scale considered. Herein, we investigate small‐scale patterns, namely how population density of a gall midge is affected by individual growth form, phenology, and microsite characteristics of its herb host. The long‐lived plant individuals vary much with regard to number of shoots, flower abundance, and flowering phenology. This variation is connected to site characteristics, primarily the degree of sun exposure. The monophagous insect galls the flowers of the host plant – an easily defined food resource. It is a poor disperser, but very long‐lived; diapausing larvae can stay in the soil for many years. Galls were censused on individual plants during 5 years; from a peak to a low in gall population density. Only a very small fraction of the flowers produced (<0.5%) were galled even in the peak year. Nevertheless, most plant individuals had galls at least 1 year. In a stepwise multiple regression, plant size (number of shoots) was found to be the most important predictor of gall density (galls/flower). However, gall density decreased more than one order of magnitude over the plant size range observed. There was also a weak effect of plant phenology. Early flowering plants had lower gall densities than those starting later. Sun exposure had no direct effect on gall density, but a path analysis revealed indirect effects via the timing of flowering. Gall population change was highly synchronous in different parts of the study area with no significant decrease in synchrony with distance.
What determines gall density on herb individuals? Plant size is the main factor, but contrary to expectations gall density decreases strongly with plant size. There are also weak indirect effects of sun exposure via flowering phenology.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowering pattern</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Galls</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>Plant resources</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>prolonged diapause</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>resource exploitation</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>small scale patchiness</subject><subject>Sun</subject><subject>white swallow‐wort</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9KHDEUxoO0VFmFPkEZ6E1vRk-SySS5KZRlqwXBC9vrkMmcWWOzk22yo3jXR_AZfRKzaP1TKM3NScjvfMn5PkLeUzikAOwIHfJDLtUO2WPQiFpKod682O-Sg5wvoawWWAPyHdllnEpgwPfIyfnKhnD3-zY7G7BKmOOUHFabZN1PPy4rP1a2Wsf1FOzGx7GKQzmHOC5LT_BX2Bcio9vsk7eDDRkPHuuM_Pi6-D4_qU_Pjr_Nv5zWToBWNde9FEJpwbRQjOlOKwrM6ZY1SvYDU0PPhOikBnSWacVt1zeD7AZNhx4ay2ekftDN17ieOrNOfmXTjYnWmxymzqZtMRlNw5pGF_7zA1_gFfYOxzJaeNX2-mb0F2YZrwwXQNvi0Yx8ehRI8deEeWNWPjsMwY4Yp2yopEy0xX_6f5SqVrNWQlvQj3-hl8X4sThniiugFICWz4IuxZwTDk__pmC24Ztt-KY8XtAPL-d8Av9E_WzctQ94808hs5gv-FbwHtVMuQY</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Widenfalk, Olof</creator><creator>Solbreck, Christer</creator><creator>Bergeå, Hanna L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Small‐scale resource tracking in a population of a long‐lived insect</title><author>Widenfalk, Olof ; Solbreck, Christer ; Bergeå, Hanna L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5098-39d7558952958229b98102c962487df28fd255b790eca2983abd4f7bf91fd04a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowering pattern</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Galls</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>Plant resources</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>prolonged diapause</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>resource exploitation</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>small scale patchiness</topic><topic>Sun</topic><topic>white swallow‐wort</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Widenfalk, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solbreck, Christer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergeå, Hanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Widenfalk, Olof</au><au>Solbreck, Christer</au><au>Bergeå, Hanna L.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small‐scale resource tracking in a population of a long‐lived insect</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2659</spage><epage>2668</epage><pages>2659-2668</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>How plant‐feeding insects distribute themselves and utilize their host plant resources is still poorly understood. Several processes may be involved, and their relative roles may vary with the spatial scale considered. Herein, we investigate small‐scale patterns, namely how population density of a gall midge is affected by individual growth form, phenology, and microsite characteristics of its herb host. The long‐lived plant individuals vary much with regard to number of shoots, flower abundance, and flowering phenology. This variation is connected to site characteristics, primarily the degree of sun exposure. The monophagous insect galls the flowers of the host plant – an easily defined food resource. It is a poor disperser, but very long‐lived; diapausing larvae can stay in the soil for many years. Galls were censused on individual plants during 5 years; from a peak to a low in gall population density. Only a very small fraction of the flowers produced (<0.5%) were galled even in the peak year. Nevertheless, most plant individuals had galls at least 1 year. In a stepwise multiple regression, plant size (number of shoots) was found to be the most important predictor of gall density (galls/flower). However, gall density decreased more than one order of magnitude over the plant size range observed. There was also a weak effect of plant phenology. Early flowering plants had lower gall densities than those starting later. Sun exposure had no direct effect on gall density, but a path analysis revealed indirect effects via the timing of flowering. Gall population change was highly synchronous in different parts of the study area with no significant decrease in synchrony with distance.
What determines gall density on herb individuals? Plant size is the main factor, but contrary to expectations gall density decreases strongly with plant size. There are also weak indirect effects of sun exposure via flowering phenology.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>23170203</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.378</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2012-11, Vol.2 (11), p.2659-2668 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_42449 |
source | Wiley Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animal behavior Ecology Ekologi Exploitation Exposure Flowering Flowering pattern Flowers Flowers & plants Food plants Galls Host plants Insects Larvae Original Research Phenology Plant resistance Plant resources Plants (botany) Population density Population growth prolonged diapause Regression analysis resource exploitation Shoots small scale patchiness Sun white swallow‐wort |
title | Small‐scale resource tracking in a population of a long‐lived insect |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A33%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%E2%80%90scale%20resource%20tracking%20in%20a%20population%20of%20a%20long%E2%80%90lived%20insect&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Widenfalk,%20Olof&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2659&rft.epage=2668&rft.pages=2659-2668&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1712563781%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290880097&rft_id=info:pmid/23170203&rfr_iscdi=true |