Use of digital images to predict carcass cut yields in cattle
The objective of this study was to assess the potential of video image analysis (VIA) in predicting various wholesale carcass cuts in cattle. Video image analysis and meat cut weights were available from two different sources: an experimental (n=346) and a commercial dataset (n=281). The cattle used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Livestock science 2011-05, Vol.137 (1-3), p.130-140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Livestock science |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Pabiou, T. Fikse, W.F. Cromie, A.R. Keane, M.G. Näsholm, A. Berry, D.P. |
description | The objective of this study was to assess the potential of video image analysis (VIA) in predicting various wholesale carcass cuts in cattle. Video image analysis and meat cut weights were available from two different sources: an experimental (n=346) and a commercial dataset (n=281). The cattle used were crossbred steers (predominant breeds were Belgian Blue, Angus, Friesian, Charolais, Holstein, Limousin, and Simmental) in the experimental dataset, and crossbred heifers (predominant breeds were Limousin, Belgian Blue, Charolais, and Simmental) in the commercial dataset. In both datasets, the meat cuts were grouped into four groups based on retail value: Low Value Cuts (LVC), Medium Value Cuts (MVC), High Value Cuts (HVC), and Very High Value Cuts (VHVC); total meat weight was calculated as the sum of the individual meat cut weights. In addition, total bone weight and total fat weight were available in the experimental dataset. In both datasets, a calibration and a validation sub-dataset were created for each of the carcass cut groups. Multiple regression analyses were applied to each calibration dataset to predict the cuts from using three different sets of models based on the predictors: 1) carcass weight only, 2) carcass weight plus EUROP carcass classification, and 3) carcass weight plus VIA parameters. The accuracy of predicting yields of cuts was superior to prediction of cut yields as a proportion of the carcass weight. Across both the experimental and the commercial datasets, the proportion of variation of wholesale cut yields in the validation dataset explained (R2) ranged from 0.33 (total fat weight in the experimental dataset) to 0.91 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) using carcass weight as the sole predictor. The R2 increased to between 0.65 (LVC in the commercial dataset) and 0.97 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) when carcass weight plus VIA variables were used as predictors. In the analyses of both the experimental and the commercial data, models that included the VIA variables had the lowest root mean square error of prediction across traits. Mean bias and correlations between the residuals and predicted values were generally not different from zero. Results from this study show that wholesale cuts in steers and heifers can be accurately predicted using multiple regression models incorporating carcass weight and VIA variables. The carcass images routinely stored provide a powerful tool for use in a beef breeding |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_36441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1871141310005603</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1871141310005603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8fb682550f7697849229d63fe2232b8aaa8f3afc2ea2325387c4e344f0a0414f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QDB_oPXko216oSDDLxh4obsOaXoyMuo6km7ivzddxUuvzuHlfc_HQ8g1g5wBK283eecP0fqcw1HKgfETMmOqUhnIGk6PPcuYZOKcXMS4ASikVHJG7lYRae9o69d-MB31n2aNkQ493QVsvR2oNcGaGKndD_TbY9dG6rdJHYYOL8mZM13Eq986J6unx4_FS7Z8e35dPCwzK0o1ZMo1peJFAa4q60rJmvO6LYVDzgVvlDFGOWGc5WiSUAhVWYlCSgcGJJNOzEk2zY1fuNs3ehfSneFb98br2O0bE8aiI2pRyvTknMjJb0MfY0D3l2CgR2R6oydkekQ2qglZit1MMWd6bdbBR716TwYJAIKruk6O-8mB6duDx7TXetzahCqgHXTb-_9X_AAwT3-h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of digital images to predict carcass cut yields in cattle</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Pabiou, T. ; Fikse, W.F. ; Cromie, A.R. ; Keane, M.G. ; Näsholm, A. ; Berry, D.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pabiou, T. ; Fikse, W.F. ; Cromie, A.R. ; Keane, M.G. ; Näsholm, A. ; Berry, D.P. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to assess the potential of video image analysis (VIA) in predicting various wholesale carcass cuts in cattle. Video image analysis and meat cut weights were available from two different sources: an experimental (n=346) and a commercial dataset (n=281). The cattle used were crossbred steers (predominant breeds were Belgian Blue, Angus, Friesian, Charolais, Holstein, Limousin, and Simmental) in the experimental dataset, and crossbred heifers (predominant breeds were Limousin, Belgian Blue, Charolais, and Simmental) in the commercial dataset. In both datasets, the meat cuts were grouped into four groups based on retail value: Low Value Cuts (LVC), Medium Value Cuts (MVC), High Value Cuts (HVC), and Very High Value Cuts (VHVC); total meat weight was calculated as the sum of the individual meat cut weights. In addition, total bone weight and total fat weight were available in the experimental dataset. In both datasets, a calibration and a validation sub-dataset were created for each of the carcass cut groups. Multiple regression analyses were applied to each calibration dataset to predict the cuts from using three different sets of models based on the predictors: 1) carcass weight only, 2) carcass weight plus EUROP carcass classification, and 3) carcass weight plus VIA parameters. The accuracy of predicting yields of cuts was superior to prediction of cut yields as a proportion of the carcass weight. Across both the experimental and the commercial datasets, the proportion of variation of wholesale cut yields in the validation dataset explained (R2) ranged from 0.33 (total fat weight in the experimental dataset) to 0.91 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) using carcass weight as the sole predictor. The R2 increased to between 0.65 (LVC in the commercial dataset) and 0.97 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) when carcass weight plus VIA variables were used as predictors. In the analyses of both the experimental and the commercial data, models that included the VIA variables had the lowest root mean square error of prediction across traits. Mean bias and correlations between the residuals and predicted values were generally not different from zero. Results from this study show that wholesale cuts in steers and heifers can be accurately predicted using multiple regression models incorporating carcass weight and VIA variables. The carcass images routinely stored provide a powerful tool for use in a beef breeding program to select for more valuable carcasses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1871-1413</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-0490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Angus ; Animal and Dairy Science ; Beef ; Belgian Blue ; breeding ; Carcass cut ; carcass weight ; Charolais ; cutting ; data collection ; digital images ; heifers ; Holstein ; Husdjursvetenskap ; image analysis ; meat carcasses ; meat cuts ; prediction ; regression analysis ; Simmental ; steers ; Veterinary Science ; Veterinärmedicin ; Video image analysis</subject><ispartof>Livestock science, 2011-05, Vol.137 (1-3), p.130-140</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8fb682550f7697849229d63fe2232b8aaa8f3afc2ea2325387c4e344f0a0414f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8fb682550f7697849229d63fe2232b8aaa8f3afc2ea2325387c4e344f0a0414f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141310005603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/36441$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pabiou, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fikse, W.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromie, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Näsholm, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Use of digital images to predict carcass cut yields in cattle</title><title>Livestock science</title><description>The objective of this study was to assess the potential of video image analysis (VIA) in predicting various wholesale carcass cuts in cattle. Video image analysis and meat cut weights were available from two different sources: an experimental (n=346) and a commercial dataset (n=281). The cattle used were crossbred steers (predominant breeds were Belgian Blue, Angus, Friesian, Charolais, Holstein, Limousin, and Simmental) in the experimental dataset, and crossbred heifers (predominant breeds were Limousin, Belgian Blue, Charolais, and Simmental) in the commercial dataset. In both datasets, the meat cuts were grouped into four groups based on retail value: Low Value Cuts (LVC), Medium Value Cuts (MVC), High Value Cuts (HVC), and Very High Value Cuts (VHVC); total meat weight was calculated as the sum of the individual meat cut weights. In addition, total bone weight and total fat weight were available in the experimental dataset. In both datasets, a calibration and a validation sub-dataset were created for each of the carcass cut groups. Multiple regression analyses were applied to each calibration dataset to predict the cuts from using three different sets of models based on the predictors: 1) carcass weight only, 2) carcass weight plus EUROP carcass classification, and 3) carcass weight plus VIA parameters. The accuracy of predicting yields of cuts was superior to prediction of cut yields as a proportion of the carcass weight. Across both the experimental and the commercial datasets, the proportion of variation of wholesale cut yields in the validation dataset explained (R2) ranged from 0.33 (total fat weight in the experimental dataset) to 0.91 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) using carcass weight as the sole predictor. The R2 increased to between 0.65 (LVC in the commercial dataset) and 0.97 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) when carcass weight plus VIA variables were used as predictors. In the analyses of both the experimental and the commercial data, models that included the VIA variables had the lowest root mean square error of prediction across traits. Mean bias and correlations between the residuals and predicted values were generally not different from zero. Results from this study show that wholesale cuts in steers and heifers can be accurately predicted using multiple regression models incorporating carcass weight and VIA variables. The carcass images routinely stored provide a powerful tool for use in a beef breeding program to select for more valuable carcasses.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Angus</subject><subject>Animal and Dairy Science</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Belgian Blue</subject><subject>breeding</subject><subject>Carcass cut</subject><subject>carcass weight</subject><subject>Charolais</subject><subject>cutting</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>digital images</subject><subject>heifers</subject><subject>Holstein</subject><subject>Husdjursvetenskap</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>meat carcasses</subject><subject>meat cuts</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Simmental</subject><subject>steers</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Veterinärmedicin</subject><subject>Video image analysis</subject><issn>1871-1413</issn><issn>1878-0490</issn><issn>1878-0490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QDB_oPXko216oSDDLxh4obsOaXoyMuo6km7ivzddxUuvzuHlfc_HQ8g1g5wBK283eecP0fqcw1HKgfETMmOqUhnIGk6PPcuYZOKcXMS4ASikVHJG7lYRae9o69d-MB31n2aNkQ493QVsvR2oNcGaGKndD_TbY9dG6rdJHYYOL8mZM13Eq986J6unx4_FS7Z8e35dPCwzK0o1ZMo1peJFAa4q60rJmvO6LYVDzgVvlDFGOWGc5WiSUAhVWYlCSgcGJJNOzEk2zY1fuNs3ehfSneFb98br2O0bE8aiI2pRyvTknMjJb0MfY0D3l2CgR2R6oydkekQ2qglZit1MMWd6bdbBR716TwYJAIKruk6O-8mB6duDx7TXetzahCqgHXTb-_9X_AAwT3-h</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Pabiou, T.</creator><creator>Fikse, W.F.</creator><creator>Cromie, A.R.</creator><creator>Keane, M.G.</creator><creator>Näsholm, A.</creator><creator>Berry, D.P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Use of digital images to predict carcass cut yields in cattle</title><author>Pabiou, T. ; Fikse, W.F. ; Cromie, A.R. ; Keane, M.G. ; Näsholm, A. ; Berry, D.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8fb682550f7697849229d63fe2232b8aaa8f3afc2ea2325387c4e344f0a0414f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Angus</topic><topic>Animal and Dairy Science</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Belgian Blue</topic><topic>breeding</topic><topic>Carcass cut</topic><topic>carcass weight</topic><topic>Charolais</topic><topic>cutting</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>digital images</topic><topic>heifers</topic><topic>Holstein</topic><topic>Husdjursvetenskap</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>meat carcasses</topic><topic>meat cuts</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Simmental</topic><topic>steers</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Veterinärmedicin</topic><topic>Video image analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pabiou, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fikse, W.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromie, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Näsholm, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Livestock science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pabiou, T.</au><au>Fikse, W.F.</au><au>Cromie, A.R.</au><au>Keane, M.G.</au><au>Näsholm, A.</au><au>Berry, D.P.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of digital images to predict carcass cut yields in cattle</atitle><jtitle>Livestock science</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>130-140</pages><issn>1871-1413</issn><issn>1878-0490</issn><eissn>1878-0490</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to assess the potential of video image analysis (VIA) in predicting various wholesale carcass cuts in cattle. Video image analysis and meat cut weights were available from two different sources: an experimental (n=346) and a commercial dataset (n=281). The cattle used were crossbred steers (predominant breeds were Belgian Blue, Angus, Friesian, Charolais, Holstein, Limousin, and Simmental) in the experimental dataset, and crossbred heifers (predominant breeds were Limousin, Belgian Blue, Charolais, and Simmental) in the commercial dataset. In both datasets, the meat cuts were grouped into four groups based on retail value: Low Value Cuts (LVC), Medium Value Cuts (MVC), High Value Cuts (HVC), and Very High Value Cuts (VHVC); total meat weight was calculated as the sum of the individual meat cut weights. In addition, total bone weight and total fat weight were available in the experimental dataset. In both datasets, a calibration and a validation sub-dataset were created for each of the carcass cut groups. Multiple regression analyses were applied to each calibration dataset to predict the cuts from using three different sets of models based on the predictors: 1) carcass weight only, 2) carcass weight plus EUROP carcass classification, and 3) carcass weight plus VIA parameters. The accuracy of predicting yields of cuts was superior to prediction of cut yields as a proportion of the carcass weight. Across both the experimental and the commercial datasets, the proportion of variation of wholesale cut yields in the validation dataset explained (R2) ranged from 0.33 (total fat weight in the experimental dataset) to 0.91 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) using carcass weight as the sole predictor. The R2 increased to between 0.65 (LVC in the commercial dataset) and 0.97 (total meat weight in the experimental dataset) when carcass weight plus VIA variables were used as predictors. In the analyses of both the experimental and the commercial data, models that included the VIA variables had the lowest root mean square error of prediction across traits. Mean bias and correlations between the residuals and predicted values were generally not different from zero. Results from this study show that wholesale cuts in steers and heifers can be accurately predicted using multiple regression models incorporating carcass weight and VIA variables. The carcass images routinely stored provide a powerful tool for use in a beef breeding program to select for more valuable carcasses.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.012</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1871-1413 |
ispartof | Livestock science, 2011-05, Vol.137 (1-3), p.130-140 |
issn | 1871-1413 1878-0490 1878-0490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_36441 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Accuracy Angus Animal and Dairy Science Beef Belgian Blue breeding Carcass cut carcass weight Charolais cutting data collection digital images heifers Holstein Husdjursvetenskap image analysis meat carcasses meat cuts prediction regression analysis Simmental steers Veterinary Science Veterinärmedicin Video image analysis |
title | Use of digital images to predict carcass cut yields in cattle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T20%3A50%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20digital%20images%20to%20predict%20carcass%20cut%20yields%20in%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Livestock%20science&rft.au=Pabiou,%20T.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=130-140&rft.issn=1871-1413&rft.eissn=1878-0490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.012&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_swepu%3ES1871141310005603%3C/elsevier_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1871141310005603&rfr_iscdi=true |