Strip‐cropping legacy enhances potato plant defence responses to aphids via soil‐mediated mechanisms

Intensive agriculture often comes at the expense of soil health. A shift towards practices that foster soil health will support yield and defences against pests and diseases. Growing crops in monoculture is the standard in modern agriculture, though strip‐cropping, in which different crops are plant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.2679-2692
Hauptverfasser: Riggi, Laura G. A., Dirham, Andi N., Akangbe, Onikepe R., Vos, Ric C. H., Fijen, Thijs P. M., Apeldoorn, Dirk F., Mommer, Liesje, Arkel, Jeroen, Mumm, Roland, Emery, Sara E., Kloth, Karen J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2692
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2679
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 38
creator Riggi, Laura G. A.
Dirham, Andi N.
Akangbe, Onikepe R.
Vos, Ric C. H.
Fijen, Thijs P. M.
Apeldoorn, Dirk F.
Mommer, Liesje
Arkel, Jeroen
Mumm, Roland
Emery, Sara E.
Kloth, Karen J.
description Intensive agriculture often comes at the expense of soil health. A shift towards practices that foster soil health will support yield and defences against pests and diseases. Growing crops in monoculture is the standard in modern agriculture, though strip‐cropping, in which different crops are planted in strips, is a promising strategy in the transition towards sustainable agriculture. Increasing crop diversity is hypothesized to positively influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), thereby enhancing soil health, but the mechanisms by which AMF‐plant symbioses contribute to higher yields and reduced pest populations in strip‐cropping systems remain unclear. We used a green‐house experiment with potato plants to explore the soil legacy effects of mono‐cropping versus strip‐cropping systems, AMF inoculation and aphid infestation on AMF root colonization, the induction of plant defences (untargeted LCMS‐based metabolomics), aphid population size and potato yield. We found that potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil had higher AMF colonization than plants grown in mono‐cropping soil. Potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil also had higher shoot nitrogen content, increased solamargine levels, and reduced aphid populations. AMF root colonization was only enhanced by the addition of commercial AMF in mono‐cropping soils. Potato plant metabolites were affected by strip‐cropping soil, including jasmonic acid (JA) derivatives. Structural equation models revealed that strip‐cropping soil directly reduced aphid populations and also had a negative direct effect on the JA precursor OPC‐8, and hydroxyJA‐glucosides, indicating complex effects of strip‐cropping soils on JA‐inducible plant defences. Indirect benefits of strip‐cropping soil and AMF inoculation on tuber yield were mediated by their direct positive effects on plant nitrogen content. Our results emphasize the potential of strip‐cropping to enhance AMF root colonization in the field. We show that soil legacy effects of strip‐cropping alter the plant metabolome in ways that suppress of aphid populations. Strip‐cropping legacy effects are the result of crop diversity, crop neighbour and edge effects resulting from crop management practices. While the mechanisms by which soil from strip‐cropping supresses pest populations still need to be identified, our study underscores the potential for strip‐cropping to enhance pest control and yield via soil mediated processes. Read the free Plain Language Summary fo
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.14670
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_132900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3154252862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-82399458b5b52bc359843c84905b976104164d5ba71eef64c3745b485a0278873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb-O1DAQxi0EEstBTWuJhiZ7_h-7RKs7QDrpCqC2HGf21qckNnbCaTse4Z6RJ8Eh6Aoa3Iw08_0-zfhD6C0le1rfJeVKNkxwuadCteQZ2j11nqMdYco0Wij-Er0q5Z4QYiRjO3T6MueQfv189DmmFKY7PMCd82cM08lNHgpOcXZzxGlw04x7OELt4gwlxanUcR25dAp9wT-CwyWGoZqN0Ac3Q49H8NUmlLG8Ri-Obijw5m-9QN-ur74ePjU3tx8_Hz7cNJ5TRhrNuDFC6k52knWeS6MF91oYIjvTKkoEVaKXnWspwFEJz1shO6GlI6zVuuUXaL_5lgdIS2dTDqPLZxtdsGVYOpfXYgtYypkhpALvNyDl-H2BMtsxFA9DvRfiUiynUjDJtGJV-u4f6X1c8lTPqSqujVamXQ0vN1X90lIyHJ92oMSuUdk1GLsGY_9EVQm5EQ9hgPP_5Pb66rBxvwFoaZcY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3138986970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strip‐cropping legacy enhances potato plant defence responses to aphids via soil‐mediated mechanisms</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Riggi, Laura G. A. ; Dirham, Andi N. ; Akangbe, Onikepe R. ; Vos, Ric C. H. ; Fijen, Thijs P. M. ; Apeldoorn, Dirk F. ; Mommer, Liesje ; Arkel, Jeroen ; Mumm, Roland ; Emery, Sara E. ; Kloth, Karen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Riggi, Laura G. A. ; Dirham, Andi N. ; Akangbe, Onikepe R. ; Vos, Ric C. H. ; Fijen, Thijs P. M. ; Apeldoorn, Dirk F. ; Mommer, Liesje ; Arkel, Jeroen ; Mumm, Roland ; Emery, Sara E. ; Kloth, Karen J. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Intensive agriculture often comes at the expense of soil health. A shift towards practices that foster soil health will support yield and defences against pests and diseases. Growing crops in monoculture is the standard in modern agriculture, though strip‐cropping, in which different crops are planted in strips, is a promising strategy in the transition towards sustainable agriculture. Increasing crop diversity is hypothesized to positively influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), thereby enhancing soil health, but the mechanisms by which AMF‐plant symbioses contribute to higher yields and reduced pest populations in strip‐cropping systems remain unclear. We used a green‐house experiment with potato plants to explore the soil legacy effects of mono‐cropping versus strip‐cropping systems, AMF inoculation and aphid infestation on AMF root colonization, the induction of plant defences (untargeted LCMS‐based metabolomics), aphid population size and potato yield. We found that potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil had higher AMF colonization than plants grown in mono‐cropping soil. Potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil also had higher shoot nitrogen content, increased solamargine levels, and reduced aphid populations. AMF root colonization was only enhanced by the addition of commercial AMF in mono‐cropping soils. Potato plant metabolites were affected by strip‐cropping soil, including jasmonic acid (JA) derivatives. Structural equation models revealed that strip‐cropping soil directly reduced aphid populations and also had a negative direct effect on the JA precursor OPC‐8, and hydroxyJA‐glucosides, indicating complex effects of strip‐cropping soils on JA‐inducible plant defences. Indirect benefits of strip‐cropping soil and AMF inoculation on tuber yield were mediated by their direct positive effects on plant nitrogen content. Our results emphasize the potential of strip‐cropping to enhance AMF root colonization in the field. We show that soil legacy effects of strip‐cropping alter the plant metabolome in ways that suppress of aphid populations. Strip‐cropping legacy effects are the result of crop diversity, crop neighbour and edge effects resulting from crop management practices. While the mechanisms by which soil from strip‐cropping supresses pest populations still need to be identified, our study underscores the potential for strip‐cropping to enhance pest control and yield via soil mediated processes. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acidic soils ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural Science ; Agriculture ; Aphidoidea ; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ; Arbuscular mycorrhizas ; biological inoculation ; Colonization ; continuous cropping ; Crop diversification ; Crop management ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; Edge effect ; equations ; Glucosides ; Inoculation ; Intensive farming ; Jasmonic acid ; Jordbruksvetenskap ; Metabolites ; metabolome ; Metabolomics ; Monoculture ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen content ; Pest control ; pest population growth ; Pests ; Plant layout ; plant nitrogen content ; Population number ; population size ; Population studies ; Populations ; Potatoes ; soil ; soil health ; Soil microorganisms ; soil quality ; Soils ; Solanum tuberosum ; Strip ; strip cropping ; Sustainable agriculture ; Symbiosis ; Vegetables ; vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.2679-2692</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-82399458b5b52bc359843c84905b976104164d5ba71eef64c3745b485a0278873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4371-2708 ; 0000-0002-3775-0716 ; 0000-0002-7236-3877</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2435.14670$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2435.14670$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/132900$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riggi, Laura G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirham, Andi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akangbe, Onikepe R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Ric C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fijen, Thijs P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apeldoorn, Dirk F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mommer, Liesje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkel, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumm, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, Sara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloth, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Strip‐cropping legacy enhances potato plant defence responses to aphids via soil‐mediated mechanisms</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Intensive agriculture often comes at the expense of soil health. A shift towards practices that foster soil health will support yield and defences against pests and diseases. Growing crops in monoculture is the standard in modern agriculture, though strip‐cropping, in which different crops are planted in strips, is a promising strategy in the transition towards sustainable agriculture. Increasing crop diversity is hypothesized to positively influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), thereby enhancing soil health, but the mechanisms by which AMF‐plant symbioses contribute to higher yields and reduced pest populations in strip‐cropping systems remain unclear. We used a green‐house experiment with potato plants to explore the soil legacy effects of mono‐cropping versus strip‐cropping systems, AMF inoculation and aphid infestation on AMF root colonization, the induction of plant defences (untargeted LCMS‐based metabolomics), aphid population size and potato yield. We found that potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil had higher AMF colonization than plants grown in mono‐cropping soil. Potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil also had higher shoot nitrogen content, increased solamargine levels, and reduced aphid populations. AMF root colonization was only enhanced by the addition of commercial AMF in mono‐cropping soils. Potato plant metabolites were affected by strip‐cropping soil, including jasmonic acid (JA) derivatives. Structural equation models revealed that strip‐cropping soil directly reduced aphid populations and also had a negative direct effect on the JA precursor OPC‐8, and hydroxyJA‐glucosides, indicating complex effects of strip‐cropping soils on JA‐inducible plant defences. Indirect benefits of strip‐cropping soil and AMF inoculation on tuber yield were mediated by their direct positive effects on plant nitrogen content. Our results emphasize the potential of strip‐cropping to enhance AMF root colonization in the field. We show that soil legacy effects of strip‐cropping alter the plant metabolome in ways that suppress of aphid populations. Strip‐cropping legacy effects are the result of crop diversity, crop neighbour and edge effects resulting from crop management practices. While the mechanisms by which soil from strip‐cropping supresses pest populations still need to be identified, our study underscores the potential for strip‐cropping to enhance pest control and yield via soil mediated processes. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><subject>Acidic soils</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Aphidoidea</subject><subject>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</subject><subject>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</subject><subject>biological inoculation</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>continuous cropping</subject><subject>Crop diversification</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Edge effect</subject><subject>equations</subject><subject>Glucosides</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Intensive farming</subject><subject>Jasmonic acid</subject><subject>Jordbruksvetenskap</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>metabolome</subject><subject>Metabolomics</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen content</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>pest population growth</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant layout</subject><subject>plant nitrogen content</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>soil health</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>soil quality</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Solanum tuberosum</subject><subject>Strip</subject><subject>strip cropping</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb-O1DAQxi0EEstBTWuJhiZ7_h-7RKs7QDrpCqC2HGf21qckNnbCaTse4Z6RJ8Eh6Aoa3Iw08_0-zfhD6C0le1rfJeVKNkxwuadCteQZ2j11nqMdYco0Wij-Er0q5Z4QYiRjO3T6MueQfv189DmmFKY7PMCd82cM08lNHgpOcXZzxGlw04x7OELt4gwlxanUcR25dAp9wT-CwyWGoZqN0Ac3Q49H8NUmlLG8Ri-Obijw5m-9QN-ur74ePjU3tx8_Hz7cNJ5TRhrNuDFC6k52knWeS6MF91oYIjvTKkoEVaKXnWspwFEJz1shO6GlI6zVuuUXaL_5lgdIS2dTDqPLZxtdsGVYOpfXYgtYypkhpALvNyDl-H2BMtsxFA9DvRfiUiynUjDJtGJV-u4f6X1c8lTPqSqujVamXQ0vN1X90lIyHJ92oMSuUdk1GLsGY_9EVQm5EQ9hgPP_5Pb66rBxvwFoaZcY</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Riggi, Laura G. A.</creator><creator>Dirham, Andi N.</creator><creator>Akangbe, Onikepe R.</creator><creator>Vos, Ric C. H.</creator><creator>Fijen, Thijs P. M.</creator><creator>Apeldoorn, Dirk F.</creator><creator>Mommer, Liesje</creator><creator>Arkel, Jeroen</creator><creator>Mumm, Roland</creator><creator>Emery, Sara E.</creator><creator>Kloth, Karen J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-2708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-0716</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-3877</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Strip‐cropping legacy enhances potato plant defence responses to aphids via soil‐mediated mechanisms</title><author>Riggi, Laura G. A. ; Dirham, Andi N. ; Akangbe, Onikepe R. ; Vos, Ric C. H. ; Fijen, Thijs P. M. ; Apeldoorn, Dirk F. ; Mommer, Liesje ; Arkel, Jeroen ; Mumm, Roland ; Emery, Sara E. ; Kloth, Karen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-82399458b5b52bc359843c84905b976104164d5ba71eef64c3745b485a0278873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acidic soils</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Aphidoidea</topic><topic>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</topic><topic>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</topic><topic>biological inoculation</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>continuous cropping</topic><topic>Crop diversification</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Edge effect</topic><topic>equations</topic><topic>Glucosides</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Intensive farming</topic><topic>Jasmonic acid</topic><topic>Jordbruksvetenskap</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>metabolome</topic><topic>Metabolomics</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen content</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>pest population growth</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant layout</topic><topic>plant nitrogen content</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>soil health</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>soil quality</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Solanum tuberosum</topic><topic>Strip</topic><topic>strip cropping</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riggi, Laura G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirham, Andi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akangbe, Onikepe R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Ric C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fijen, Thijs P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apeldoorn, Dirk F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mommer, Liesje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkel, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumm, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, Sara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloth, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riggi, Laura G. A.</au><au>Dirham, Andi N.</au><au>Akangbe, Onikepe R.</au><au>Vos, Ric C. H.</au><au>Fijen, Thijs P. M.</au><au>Apeldoorn, Dirk F.</au><au>Mommer, Liesje</au><au>Arkel, Jeroen</au><au>Mumm, Roland</au><au>Emery, Sara E.</au><au>Kloth, Karen J.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strip‐cropping legacy enhances potato plant defence responses to aphids via soil‐mediated mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2679</spage><epage>2692</epage><pages>2679-2692</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Intensive agriculture often comes at the expense of soil health. A shift towards practices that foster soil health will support yield and defences against pests and diseases. Growing crops in monoculture is the standard in modern agriculture, though strip‐cropping, in which different crops are planted in strips, is a promising strategy in the transition towards sustainable agriculture. Increasing crop diversity is hypothesized to positively influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), thereby enhancing soil health, but the mechanisms by which AMF‐plant symbioses contribute to higher yields and reduced pest populations in strip‐cropping systems remain unclear. We used a green‐house experiment with potato plants to explore the soil legacy effects of mono‐cropping versus strip‐cropping systems, AMF inoculation and aphid infestation on AMF root colonization, the induction of plant defences (untargeted LCMS‐based metabolomics), aphid population size and potato yield. We found that potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil had higher AMF colonization than plants grown in mono‐cropping soil. Potato plants grown in strip‐cropping soil also had higher shoot nitrogen content, increased solamargine levels, and reduced aphid populations. AMF root colonization was only enhanced by the addition of commercial AMF in mono‐cropping soils. Potato plant metabolites were affected by strip‐cropping soil, including jasmonic acid (JA) derivatives. Structural equation models revealed that strip‐cropping soil directly reduced aphid populations and also had a negative direct effect on the JA precursor OPC‐8, and hydroxyJA‐glucosides, indicating complex effects of strip‐cropping soils on JA‐inducible plant defences. Indirect benefits of strip‐cropping soil and AMF inoculation on tuber yield were mediated by their direct positive effects on plant nitrogen content. Our results emphasize the potential of strip‐cropping to enhance AMF root colonization in the field. We show that soil legacy effects of strip‐cropping alter the plant metabolome in ways that suppress of aphid populations. Strip‐cropping legacy effects are the result of crop diversity, crop neighbour and edge effects resulting from crop management practices. While the mechanisms by which soil from strip‐cropping supresses pest populations still need to be identified, our study underscores the potential for strip‐cropping to enhance pest control and yield via soil mediated processes. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.14670</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-2708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-0716</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-3877</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.2679-2692
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_132900
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects Acidic soils
Agricultural production
Agricultural Science
Agriculture
Aphidoidea
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Arbuscular mycorrhizas
biological inoculation
Colonization
continuous cropping
Crop diversification
Crop management
Crop yield
Cropping systems
Crops
Edge effect
equations
Glucosides
Inoculation
Intensive farming
Jasmonic acid
Jordbruksvetenskap
Metabolites
metabolome
Metabolomics
Monoculture
Nitrogen
nitrogen content
Pest control
pest population growth
Pests
Plant layout
plant nitrogen content
Population number
population size
Population studies
Populations
Potatoes
soil
soil health
Soil microorganisms
soil quality
Soils
Solanum tuberosum
Strip
strip cropping
Sustainable agriculture
Symbiosis
Vegetables
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae
title Strip‐cropping legacy enhances potato plant defence responses to aphids via soil‐mediated mechanisms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T22%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strip%E2%80%90cropping%20legacy%20enhances%20potato%20plant%20defence%20responses%20to%20aphids%20via%20soil%E2%80%90mediated%20mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Riggi,%20Laura%20G.%20A.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2679&rft.epage=2692&rft.pages=2679-2692&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.14670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3154252862%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3138986970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true