Boundary‐Crossing Field Research Marks the Way to Evidence‐Based Management of Mercury in Forest Landscapes

The atmospheric deposition of long‐range atmospheric mercury pollution presents forest managers with a “wicked” problem—forestry operations run the risk of mobilizing this pollution legacy. Management of that risk would benefit from a process‐based understanding of how forest management influences t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2022-08, Vol.127 (8), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Bishop, Kevin, Eklöf, Karin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences
container_volume 127
creator Bishop, Kevin
Eklöf, Karin
description The atmospheric deposition of long‐range atmospheric mercury pollution presents forest managers with a “wicked” problem—forestry operations run the risk of mobilizing this pollution legacy. Management of that risk would benefit from a process‐based understanding of how forest management influences the mercury cycle. This commentary highlights the value for building such an understanding of a comprehensive Before‐After‐Control‐Impact study reported by McCarter et al. (2022), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006826 on the Marcel Experimental Forest in the north‐central continental US. That study looked at how different types of forest harvest influenced the movement of mercury through the landscape. The results of this study place it at the minimal end of the range of impacts on Hg mobilization resulting from forest harvest. What makes this paper, together with the companion papers resulting from this study, particularly valuable for improving the understanding of forestry influences on mercury is the number of system boundaries that the study crossed: between land and atmosphere, from a forested hillslope down into a wetland, and finally up into the biota on that wetland. Plain Language Summary Forest harvest can mobilize toxic mercury from forest soils and move it into living organisms. This mercury originated in air pollution created far away from the forest, but forest managers still need to deal with the risks of this “pollution legacy” to people, fish and wildlife. A recent study in the north‐central US took a detailed look at how two different types of forest harvest mobilized mercury in the soil. This study showed a relatively small impact of the forest harvest on mercury relative to some other studies. Since previous studies have found a wide range of mercury responses to forest harvest, this carefully designed and executed study has value in adding to the evidence base about forest management impacts on mercury in the environment. What is particularly valuable about this study is its comprehensiveness, since it crosses a number of environmental system boundaries: between the forest and the atmosphere, from upslope mineral soils into a downslope peatland, and from the wetland environment into the biota. Key Points A well‐executed study sheds new light on the “wicked” problem of how forest harvest influences the mobility and bioaccumulation of mercury The study is particularly valuable because it extends across several environmental system boundaries: a
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022JG007065
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_118920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2707673946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3640-cfc698bf421d39910bc132bab8f5d2a7860bc7859f437ff49f44d21b2699e96a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1OwkAQxxujiQS5-QCbeBXcj7LtHoVAlUBMiMbjZtvOQhG6dbeV9OYj-Iw-iUswxJNz-U8mv_9kPoLgmuABwVTcUUzpLME4wnx4FnQo4aIfC07OT_mQXQY95zbYR-xLhHQCMzJNmSvbfn9-ja1xrihXaFrANkdLcKBstkYLZd8cqteAXlWLaoMmH0UOZQbeM1IOck-UagU7KGtkNFqAzRrboqJEU2PB1WiuytxlqgJ3FVxotXXQ-9Vu8DKdPI8f-vOn5HF8P-8rxkPcz3TGRZzqkJKcCUFwmhFGU5XGephTFcXcV6J4KHTIIq1Dr2FOSUq5ECC4Yt1gcOzr9lA1qaxssfNbSqMK6bZNquxBpANJSCwo9oabo6Gy5r3xQ8uNaWzpZ5Q0whGPmAi5p26PVHa4lQV9akywPLxB_n2Dx9kR3xdbaP9l5SxZJpQyjNkP87iK_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2707673946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Boundary‐Crossing Field Research Marks the Way to Evidence‐Based Management of Mercury in Forest Landscapes</title><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bishop, Kevin ; Eklöf, Karin</creator><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Kevin ; Eklöf, Karin ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>The atmospheric deposition of long‐range atmospheric mercury pollution presents forest managers with a “wicked” problem—forestry operations run the risk of mobilizing this pollution legacy. Management of that risk would benefit from a process‐based understanding of how forest management influences the mercury cycle. This commentary highlights the value for building such an understanding of a comprehensive Before‐After‐Control‐Impact study reported by McCarter et al. (2022), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006826 on the Marcel Experimental Forest in the north‐central continental US. That study looked at how different types of forest harvest influenced the movement of mercury through the landscape. The results of this study place it at the minimal end of the range of impacts on Hg mobilization resulting from forest harvest. What makes this paper, together with the companion papers resulting from this study, particularly valuable for improving the understanding of forestry influences on mercury is the number of system boundaries that the study crossed: between land and atmosphere, from a forested hillslope down into a wetland, and finally up into the biota on that wetland. Plain Language Summary Forest harvest can mobilize toxic mercury from forest soils and move it into living organisms. This mercury originated in air pollution created far away from the forest, but forest managers still need to deal with the risks of this “pollution legacy” to people, fish and wildlife. A recent study in the north‐central US took a detailed look at how two different types of forest harvest mobilized mercury in the soil. This study showed a relatively small impact of the forest harvest on mercury relative to some other studies. Since previous studies have found a wide range of mercury responses to forest harvest, this carefully designed and executed study has value in adding to the evidence base about forest management impacts on mercury in the environment. What is particularly valuable about this study is its comprehensiveness, since it crosses a number of environmental system boundaries: between the forest and the atmosphere, from upslope mineral soils into a downslope peatland, and from the wetland environment into the biota. Key Points A well‐executed study sheds new light on the “wicked” problem of how forest harvest influences the mobility and bioaccumulation of mercury The study is particularly valuable because it extends across several environmental system boundaries: atmosphere‐forest‐peatland‐biota Crossing downstream boundaries can show how more of the stream network embedded in a landscape reacts to land‐use and climate change</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022JG007065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Atmosphere ; Atmospheric composition ; bioaccumulation ; Biota ; Boundaries ; Environmental Sciences ; fieldwork ; Fish ; Forest harvesting ; Forest management ; Forest Science ; Forest soils ; Forestry ; Forests ; hillslope hydrology ; Landscape ; Managers ; Mercury ; Miljövetenskap ; Peatlands ; Skogsvetenskap ; Soil ; Soils ; system boundaries ; Wetlands ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2022-08, Vol.127 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. The Authors.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3640-cfc698bf421d39910bc132bab8f5d2a7860bc7859f437ff49f44d21b2699e96a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8057-1051</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022JG007065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022JG007065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/118920$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklöf, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Boundary‐Crossing Field Research Marks the Way to Evidence‐Based Management of Mercury in Forest Landscapes</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>The atmospheric deposition of long‐range atmospheric mercury pollution presents forest managers with a “wicked” problem—forestry operations run the risk of mobilizing this pollution legacy. Management of that risk would benefit from a process‐based understanding of how forest management influences the mercury cycle. This commentary highlights the value for building such an understanding of a comprehensive Before‐After‐Control‐Impact study reported by McCarter et al. (2022), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006826 on the Marcel Experimental Forest in the north‐central continental US. That study looked at how different types of forest harvest influenced the movement of mercury through the landscape. The results of this study place it at the minimal end of the range of impacts on Hg mobilization resulting from forest harvest. What makes this paper, together with the companion papers resulting from this study, particularly valuable for improving the understanding of forestry influences on mercury is the number of system boundaries that the study crossed: between land and atmosphere, from a forested hillslope down into a wetland, and finally up into the biota on that wetland. Plain Language Summary Forest harvest can mobilize toxic mercury from forest soils and move it into living organisms. This mercury originated in air pollution created far away from the forest, but forest managers still need to deal with the risks of this “pollution legacy” to people, fish and wildlife. A recent study in the north‐central US took a detailed look at how two different types of forest harvest mobilized mercury in the soil. This study showed a relatively small impact of the forest harvest on mercury relative to some other studies. Since previous studies have found a wide range of mercury responses to forest harvest, this carefully designed and executed study has value in adding to the evidence base about forest management impacts on mercury in the environment. What is particularly valuable about this study is its comprehensiveness, since it crosses a number of environmental system boundaries: between the forest and the atmosphere, from upslope mineral soils into a downslope peatland, and from the wetland environment into the biota. Key Points A well‐executed study sheds new light on the “wicked” problem of how forest harvest influences the mobility and bioaccumulation of mercury The study is particularly valuable because it extends across several environmental system boundaries: atmosphere‐forest‐peatland‐biota Crossing downstream boundaries can show how more of the stream network embedded in a landscape reacts to land‐use and climate change</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric composition</subject><subject>bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>fieldwork</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Forest harvesting</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest Science</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>hillslope hydrology</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Miljövetenskap</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Skogsvetenskap</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>system boundaries</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1OwkAQxxujiQS5-QCbeBXcj7LtHoVAlUBMiMbjZtvOQhG6dbeV9OYj-Iw-iUswxJNz-U8mv_9kPoLgmuABwVTcUUzpLME4wnx4FnQo4aIfC07OT_mQXQY95zbYR-xLhHQCMzJNmSvbfn9-ja1xrihXaFrANkdLcKBstkYLZd8cqteAXlWLaoMmH0UOZQbeM1IOck-UagU7KGtkNFqAzRrboqJEU2PB1WiuytxlqgJ3FVxotXXQ-9Vu8DKdPI8f-vOn5HF8P-8rxkPcz3TGRZzqkJKcCUFwmhFGU5XGephTFcXcV6J4KHTIIq1Dr2FOSUq5ECC4Yt1gcOzr9lA1qaxssfNbSqMK6bZNquxBpANJSCwo9oabo6Gy5r3xQ8uNaWzpZ5Q0whGPmAi5p26PVHa4lQV9akywPLxB_n2Dx9kR3xdbaP9l5SxZJpQyjNkP87iK_Q</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Bishop, Kevin</creator><creator>Eklöf, Karin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8057-1051</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Boundary‐Crossing Field Research Marks the Way to Evidence‐Based Management of Mercury in Forest Landscapes</title><author>Bishop, Kevin ; Eklöf, Karin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3640-cfc698bf421d39910bc132bab8f5d2a7860bc7859f437ff49f44d21b2699e96a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric composition</topic><topic>bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>fieldwork</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Forest harvesting</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest Science</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>hillslope hydrology</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Miljövetenskap</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Skogsvetenskap</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>system boundaries</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklöf, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bishop, Kevin</au><au>Eklöf, Karin</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Boundary‐Crossing Field Research Marks the Way to Evidence‐Based Management of Mercury in Forest Landscapes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>The atmospheric deposition of long‐range atmospheric mercury pollution presents forest managers with a “wicked” problem—forestry operations run the risk of mobilizing this pollution legacy. Management of that risk would benefit from a process‐based understanding of how forest management influences the mercury cycle. This commentary highlights the value for building such an understanding of a comprehensive Before‐After‐Control‐Impact study reported by McCarter et al. (2022), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006826 on the Marcel Experimental Forest in the north‐central continental US. That study looked at how different types of forest harvest influenced the movement of mercury through the landscape. The results of this study place it at the minimal end of the range of impacts on Hg mobilization resulting from forest harvest. What makes this paper, together with the companion papers resulting from this study, particularly valuable for improving the understanding of forestry influences on mercury is the number of system boundaries that the study crossed: between land and atmosphere, from a forested hillslope down into a wetland, and finally up into the biota on that wetland. Plain Language Summary Forest harvest can mobilize toxic mercury from forest soils and move it into living organisms. This mercury originated in air pollution created far away from the forest, but forest managers still need to deal with the risks of this “pollution legacy” to people, fish and wildlife. A recent study in the north‐central US took a detailed look at how two different types of forest harvest mobilized mercury in the soil. This study showed a relatively small impact of the forest harvest on mercury relative to some other studies. Since previous studies have found a wide range of mercury responses to forest harvest, this carefully designed and executed study has value in adding to the evidence base about forest management impacts on mercury in the environment. What is particularly valuable about this study is its comprehensiveness, since it crosses a number of environmental system boundaries: between the forest and the atmosphere, from upslope mineral soils into a downslope peatland, and from the wetland environment into the biota. Key Points A well‐executed study sheds new light on the “wicked” problem of how forest harvest influences the mobility and bioaccumulation of mercury The study is particularly valuable because it extends across several environmental system boundaries: atmosphere‐forest‐peatland‐biota Crossing downstream boundaries can show how more of the stream network embedded in a landscape reacts to land‐use and climate change</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2022JG007065</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8057-1051</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-8953
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2022-08, Vol.127 (8), p.n/a
issn 2169-8953
2169-8961
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_118920
source SWEPUB Freely available online; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Air pollution
Atmosphere
Atmospheric composition
bioaccumulation
Biota
Boundaries
Environmental Sciences
fieldwork
Fish
Forest harvesting
Forest management
Forest Science
Forest soils
Forestry
Forests
hillslope hydrology
Landscape
Managers
Mercury
Miljövetenskap
Peatlands
Skogsvetenskap
Soil
Soils
system boundaries
Wetlands
Wildlife
title Boundary‐Crossing Field Research Marks the Way to Evidence‐Based Management of Mercury in Forest Landscapes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A40%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Boundary%E2%80%90Crossing%20Field%20Research%20Marks%20the%20Way%20to%20Evidence%E2%80%90Based%20Management%20of%20Mercury%20in%20Forest%20Landscapes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Bishop,%20Kevin&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022JG007065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2707673946%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2707673946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true