Estimation of the basic reproduction number for Streptococcus equi spp. equi outbreaks by meta‐analysis of strangles outbreak reports
Background Streptococcus equi spp. equi (S. equi), the cause of strangles in horses, is considered a highly contagious pathogen affecting equines and the equine industry worldwide. Fundamental epidemiological characteristics of outbreaks, such as the basic reproduction number (R0), are not well desc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Equine veterinary journal 2023-05, Vol.55 (3), p.506-514 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 514 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 506 |
container_title | Equine veterinary journal |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Houben, Rosa M. A. C. Maanen, Kees Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G. Waller, Andrew S. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M. Heesterbeek, Hans |
description | Background
Streptococcus equi spp. equi (S. equi), the cause of strangles in horses, is considered a highly contagious pathogen affecting equines and the equine industry worldwide. Fundamental epidemiological characteristics of outbreaks, such as the basic reproduction number (R0), are not well described.
Objectives
Estimate R0 for S. equi in equine populations from outbreak data.
Study design
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of published and unpublished data.
Methods
A literature search for outbreak reports was carried out. Depending on data available in the reports, the early epidemic growth rate or final attack rate (AR) approach was used to estimate the basic reproduction number for that outbreak. Other recorded outbreak characteristics were the type of housing (group vs. individual). An overall estimate for R0 was computed by meta‐analysis.
Results
Data from eight outbreaks were extracted from peer‐reviewed publications. Data from two additional, non‐published outbreaks was also included in the meta‐analysis. A conservative estimate for R0 was 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–2.5). A less conservative estimate, including outbreaks with a 100% AR for which a lower limit R0 was estimated, was 2.7 (95% CI 2.1–3.3).
Main limitations
Few papers describing longitudinal incidence data were found so most estimates were based on the outbreaks' final size. Several outbreaks had a 100% attack rate and could therefore only be included as a lower limit estimate in the meta‐analysis. The reported result therefore may be an underestimation.
Conclusions
This estimate for R0 for S. equi informs parameters for future mathematical modelling, quantifies desired preventive vaccine coverage and helps evaluate the effect of prevention strategies through future modelling studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/evj.13865 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_118758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2693773752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4275-e8188be81ee017e9afd919347498c69b87236e9ffaab209a516d3ce828ea5b673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT1vFDEQhi0EIpdAwR9AlmhIsZe1vR92iaLjS5Eo-Ggt2zcLe-yuNx470XV0tPxGfgm-bLgCiSk8I80zrz1-CXnGyjXLcQE3uzUTsqkfkBUvK14IUTYPySqXdcGaqjohp4i7shSCV_wxORG1bBpRiRX5ucHYjyb2fqK-o_EbUGuwdzTAHPw2ubvOlEYLgXY-0I8xd6J33rmEFK5TT3Ge10vlU7QBzHekdk9HiOb3j19mMsMeezzIYwxm-joAHsnDPT5EfEIedWZAeHqfz8jn15tPl2-Lqw9v3l2-uipcxdu6AMmktPkEKFkLynRbxZSo2kpJ1ygrWy4aUF1njOWlMjVrtsKB5BJMbZtWnJH1oou3MCer55C3D3vtTa9xSNaEQ9IImjHZ1jIPvFwG8ndcJ8Coxx4dDIOZwCfUvFGibUVb84y--Afd-RTy-plqVQ6h6ipT5wvlgkcM0B3fwEp9sFNnO_WdnZl9fq-Y7AjbI_nXvwxcLMBtP8D-_0p68-X9IvkHLgetjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2799993954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of the basic reproduction number for Streptococcus equi spp. equi outbreaks by meta‐analysis of strangles outbreak reports</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Houben, Rosa M. A. C. ; Maanen, Kees ; Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G. ; Waller, Andrew S. ; Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M. ; Heesterbeek, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Houben, Rosa M. A. C. ; Maanen, Kees ; Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G. ; Waller, Andrew S. ; Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M. ; Heesterbeek, Hans ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Streptococcus equi spp. equi (S. equi), the cause of strangles in horses, is considered a highly contagious pathogen affecting equines and the equine industry worldwide. Fundamental epidemiological characteristics of outbreaks, such as the basic reproduction number (R0), are not well described.
Objectives
Estimate R0 for S. equi in equine populations from outbreak data.
Study design
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of published and unpublished data.
Methods
A literature search for outbreak reports was carried out. Depending on data available in the reports, the early epidemic growth rate or final attack rate (AR) approach was used to estimate the basic reproduction number for that outbreak. Other recorded outbreak characteristics were the type of housing (group vs. individual). An overall estimate for R0 was computed by meta‐analysis.
Results
Data from eight outbreaks were extracted from peer‐reviewed publications. Data from two additional, non‐published outbreaks was also included in the meta‐analysis. A conservative estimate for R0 was 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–2.5). A less conservative estimate, including outbreaks with a 100% AR for which a lower limit R0 was estimated, was 2.7 (95% CI 2.1–3.3).
Main limitations
Few papers describing longitudinal incidence data were found so most estimates were based on the outbreaks' final size. Several outbreaks had a 100% attack rate and could therefore only be included as a lower limit estimate in the meta‐analysis. The reported result therefore may be an underestimation.
Conclusions
This estimate for R0 for S. equi informs parameters for future mathematical modelling, quantifies desired preventive vaccine coverage and helps evaluate the effect of prevention strategies through future modelling studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0425-1644</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2042-3306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-3306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/evj.13865</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35866343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; basic reproduction number ; Basic Reproduction Number - veterinary ; Disease Outbreaks - veterinary ; epidemiology ; horse ; Horse Diseases - epidemiology ; Horses ; Meta-analysis ; Pathobiology ; Patobiologi ; strangles ; Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology ; Streptococcal Infections - veterinary ; Streptococcus equi</subject><ispartof>Equine veterinary journal, 2023-05, Vol.55 (3), p.506-514</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4275-e8188be81ee017e9afd919347498c69b87236e9ffaab209a516d3ce828ea5b673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4275-e8188be81ee017e9afd919347498c69b87236e9ffaab209a516d3ce828ea5b673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8541-1313 ; 0000-0001-5337-5576 ; 0000-0001-8537-6418 ; 0000-0002-7111-9549 ; 0000-0002-1506-8097</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fevj.13865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fevj.13865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/118758$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Houben, Rosa M. A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maanen, Kees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heesterbeek, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of the basic reproduction number for Streptococcus equi spp. equi outbreaks by meta‐analysis of strangles outbreak reports</title><title>Equine veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Equine Vet J</addtitle><description>Background
Streptococcus equi spp. equi (S. equi), the cause of strangles in horses, is considered a highly contagious pathogen affecting equines and the equine industry worldwide. Fundamental epidemiological characteristics of outbreaks, such as the basic reproduction number (R0), are not well described.
Objectives
Estimate R0 for S. equi in equine populations from outbreak data.
Study design
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of published and unpublished data.
Methods
A literature search for outbreak reports was carried out. Depending on data available in the reports, the early epidemic growth rate or final attack rate (AR) approach was used to estimate the basic reproduction number for that outbreak. Other recorded outbreak characteristics were the type of housing (group vs. individual). An overall estimate for R0 was computed by meta‐analysis.
Results
Data from eight outbreaks were extracted from peer‐reviewed publications. Data from two additional, non‐published outbreaks was also included in the meta‐analysis. A conservative estimate for R0 was 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–2.5). A less conservative estimate, including outbreaks with a 100% AR for which a lower limit R0 was estimated, was 2.7 (95% CI 2.1–3.3).
Main limitations
Few papers describing longitudinal incidence data were found so most estimates were based on the outbreaks' final size. Several outbreaks had a 100% attack rate and could therefore only be included as a lower limit estimate in the meta‐analysis. The reported result therefore may be an underestimation.
Conclusions
This estimate for R0 for S. equi informs parameters for future mathematical modelling, quantifies desired preventive vaccine coverage and helps evaluate the effect of prevention strategies through future modelling studies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>basic reproduction number</subject><subject>Basic Reproduction Number - veterinary</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - veterinary</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>horse</subject><subject>Horse Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pathobiology</subject><subject>Patobiologi</subject><subject>strangles</subject><subject>Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Streptococcal Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Streptococcus equi</subject><issn>0425-1644</issn><issn>2042-3306</issn><issn>2042-3306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kT1vFDEQhi0EIpdAwR9AlmhIsZe1vR92iaLjS5Eo-Ggt2zcLe-yuNx470XV0tPxGfgm-bLgCiSk8I80zrz1-CXnGyjXLcQE3uzUTsqkfkBUvK14IUTYPySqXdcGaqjohp4i7shSCV_wxORG1bBpRiRX5ucHYjyb2fqK-o_EbUGuwdzTAHPw2ubvOlEYLgXY-0I8xd6J33rmEFK5TT3Ge10vlU7QBzHekdk9HiOb3j19mMsMeezzIYwxm-joAHsnDPT5EfEIedWZAeHqfz8jn15tPl2-Lqw9v3l2-uipcxdu6AMmktPkEKFkLynRbxZSo2kpJ1ygrWy4aUF1njOWlMjVrtsKB5BJMbZtWnJH1oou3MCer55C3D3vtTa9xSNaEQ9IImjHZ1jIPvFwG8ndcJ8Coxx4dDIOZwCfUvFGibUVb84y--Afd-RTy-plqVQ6h6ipT5wvlgkcM0B3fwEp9sFNnO_WdnZl9fq-Y7AjbI_nXvwxcLMBtP8D-_0p68-X9IvkHLgetjg</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Houben, Rosa M. A. C.</creator><creator>Maanen, Kees</creator><creator>Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G.</creator><creator>Waller, Andrew S.</creator><creator>Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M.</creator><creator>Heesterbeek, Hans</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8541-1313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-5576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-6418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-9549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1506-8097</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Estimation of the basic reproduction number for Streptococcus equi spp. equi outbreaks by meta‐analysis of strangles outbreak reports</title><author>Houben, Rosa M. A. C. ; Maanen, Kees ; Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G. ; Waller, Andrew S. ; Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M. ; Heesterbeek, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4275-e8188be81ee017e9afd919347498c69b87236e9ffaab209a516d3ce828ea5b673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>basic reproduction number</topic><topic>Basic Reproduction Number - veterinary</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - veterinary</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>horse</topic><topic>Horse Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pathobiology</topic><topic>Patobiologi</topic><topic>strangles</topic><topic>Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Streptococcal Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Streptococcus equi</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Houben, Rosa M. A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maanen, Kees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heesterbeek, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Equine veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Houben, Rosa M. A. C.</au><au>Maanen, Kees</au><au>Kemp‐Symonds, Jeremy G.</au><au>Waller, Andrew S.</au><au>Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan, Marianne M.</au><au>Heesterbeek, Hans</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of the basic reproduction number for Streptococcus equi spp. equi outbreaks by meta‐analysis of strangles outbreak reports</atitle><jtitle>Equine veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Equine Vet J</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>506-514</pages><issn>0425-1644</issn><issn>2042-3306</issn><eissn>2042-3306</eissn><abstract>Background
Streptococcus equi spp. equi (S. equi), the cause of strangles in horses, is considered a highly contagious pathogen affecting equines and the equine industry worldwide. Fundamental epidemiological characteristics of outbreaks, such as the basic reproduction number (R0), are not well described.
Objectives
Estimate R0 for S. equi in equine populations from outbreak data.
Study design
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of published and unpublished data.
Methods
A literature search for outbreak reports was carried out. Depending on data available in the reports, the early epidemic growth rate or final attack rate (AR) approach was used to estimate the basic reproduction number for that outbreak. Other recorded outbreak characteristics were the type of housing (group vs. individual). An overall estimate for R0 was computed by meta‐analysis.
Results
Data from eight outbreaks were extracted from peer‐reviewed publications. Data from two additional, non‐published outbreaks was also included in the meta‐analysis. A conservative estimate for R0 was 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–2.5). A less conservative estimate, including outbreaks with a 100% AR for which a lower limit R0 was estimated, was 2.7 (95% CI 2.1–3.3).
Main limitations
Few papers describing longitudinal incidence data were found so most estimates were based on the outbreaks' final size. Several outbreaks had a 100% attack rate and could therefore only be included as a lower limit estimate in the meta‐analysis. The reported result therefore may be an underestimation.
Conclusions
This estimate for R0 for S. equi informs parameters for future mathematical modelling, quantifies desired preventive vaccine coverage and helps evaluate the effect of prevention strategies through future modelling studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35866343</pmid><doi>10.1111/evj.13865</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8541-1313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-5576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-6418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-9549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1506-8097</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0425-1644 |
ispartof | Equine veterinary journal, 2023-05, Vol.55 (3), p.506-514 |
issn | 0425-1644 2042-3306 2042-3306 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_118758 |
source | MEDLINE; SWEPUB Freely available online; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Animals basic reproduction number Basic Reproduction Number - veterinary Disease Outbreaks - veterinary epidemiology horse Horse Diseases - epidemiology Horses Meta-analysis Pathobiology Patobiologi strangles Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology Streptococcal Infections - veterinary Streptococcus equi |
title | Estimation of the basic reproduction number for Streptococcus equi spp. equi outbreaks by meta‐analysis of strangles outbreak reports |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A53%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20the%20basic%20reproduction%20number%20for%20Streptococcus%20equi%20spp.%20equi%20outbreaks%20by%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20of%20strangles%20outbreak%20reports&rft.jtitle=Equine%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=Houben,%20Rosa%20M.%20A.%20C.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=506-514&rft.issn=0425-1644&rft.eissn=2042-3306&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/evj.13865&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2693773752%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2799993954&rft_id=info:pmid/35866343&rfr_iscdi=true |