Pelleting torrefied biomass at pilot-scale – Quality and implications for co-firing

The co-firing of solid biofuels in coal plants is an attractive and fast-track means of cutting emissions but its potential is linked to biomass densification. For torrefied materials this topic is under-represented in literature. This pilot-scale (121–203 kg h−1) pelleting study generated detailed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable energy 2021-11, Vol.178, p.766-774
Hauptverfasser: Agar, David A., Rudolfsson, Magnus, Lavergne, Simon, Melkior, Thierry, Da Silva Perez, Denilson, Dupont, Capucine, Campargue, Matthieu, Kalén, Gunnar, Larsson, Sylvia H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 774
container_issue
container_start_page 766
container_title Renewable energy
container_volume 178
creator Agar, David A.
Rudolfsson, Magnus
Lavergne, Simon
Melkior, Thierry
Da Silva Perez, Denilson
Dupont, Capucine
Campargue, Matthieu
Kalén, Gunnar
Larsson, Sylvia H.
description The co-firing of solid biofuels in coal plants is an attractive and fast-track means of cutting emissions but its potential is linked to biomass densification. For torrefied materials this topic is under-represented in literature. This pilot-scale (121–203 kg h−1) pelleting study generated detailed knowledge on the densification of torrefied biomass compared to untreated biomass. Four feedstock with high supply availability (beech, poplar, wheat straw and corn cob) were studied in their untreated and torrefied forms. Systematic methods were used to produce 180 batches of 8 mm dia. pellets using press channel length (PCL) and moisture content (MC) ranges of 30–60 mm and 7.3–16.6% (wet basis) respectively. Analysis showed that moderate degrees of torrefaction (250–280 °C, 20–75 min) strongly affected pelleting behaviour. The highest quality black pellets had a mechanical durability and bulk density range of 87.5–98.7% and 662–697 kg m−3 respectively. Pelleting energy using torrefied feedstock varied from −15 to +53 kWh t−1 from untreated with increases in production fines. Optimal pelleting MC and PCL were reduced significantly for torrefied feedstock and pellet quality was characterised by a decrease in mechanical durability and an increase in bulk density. Energy densities of 11.9–13.2 GJ m−3 (as received) were obtained. ●A pilot-scale comparison of pelleting torrefied versus untreated biomass.●Torrefaction of beech, poplar, straw and corn cob strongly affects pelleting.●Torrefaction weakens pellet durability yet improves bulk density and energy density.●Moisture contents and press channel lengths reduced for torrefied biomass.●Replacing coal requires min. 50 % more capacity for pulverisers and fuel storage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.094
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_114075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960148121009605</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0960148121009605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-f2d74a5b0085f15705d44f50ef4415963ed820408f023ba95557973c40f8f0a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtKxDAUQIMoOD7-wEV-oPWmTdp0I8jgCwZUcNYhTRPJkGmGJKPMzn_wD_0SM1RcCnIXFy6cA_cgdEGgJECay1UZ9JinrKAiJTQldPQAzQhvuwIaXh2iGXQNFIRycoxOYlwBEMZbOkPLJ-2cTnZ8xcmHoI3VA-6tX8sYsUx4Y51PRVTSafz18Ymft9LZtMNyHLBdb5xVMlk_Rmx8wMoXxobsOkNHRrqoz3_2KVre3rzM74vF493D_HpRKFpDKkw1tFSyHoAzQ1gLbKDUMNCGUsK6ptYDr4ACN1DVvewYY23X1oqCySfJ61NUTt74rjfbXmyCXcuwE15aEd22l2G_RNSCEAot-xdQNTXNAJ0AFXyMuc8vQkDs44uVmOKLfXwBjcjxM3Y1YTp__2Z11iqrR6UHG7RKYvD2b8E3VS-Rhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pelleting torrefied biomass at pilot-scale – Quality and implications for co-firing</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Agar, David A. ; Rudolfsson, Magnus ; Lavergne, Simon ; Melkior, Thierry ; Da Silva Perez, Denilson ; Dupont, Capucine ; Campargue, Matthieu ; Kalén, Gunnar ; Larsson, Sylvia H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Agar, David A. ; Rudolfsson, Magnus ; Lavergne, Simon ; Melkior, Thierry ; Da Silva Perez, Denilson ; Dupont, Capucine ; Campargue, Matthieu ; Kalén, Gunnar ; Larsson, Sylvia H. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>The co-firing of solid biofuels in coal plants is an attractive and fast-track means of cutting emissions but its potential is linked to biomass densification. For torrefied materials this topic is under-represented in literature. This pilot-scale (121–203 kg h−1) pelleting study generated detailed knowledge on the densification of torrefied biomass compared to untreated biomass. Four feedstock with high supply availability (beech, poplar, wheat straw and corn cob) were studied in their untreated and torrefied forms. Systematic methods were used to produce 180 batches of 8 mm dia. pellets using press channel length (PCL) and moisture content (MC) ranges of 30–60 mm and 7.3–16.6% (wet basis) respectively. Analysis showed that moderate degrees of torrefaction (250–280 °C, 20–75 min) strongly affected pelleting behaviour. The highest quality black pellets had a mechanical durability and bulk density range of 87.5–98.7% and 662–697 kg m−3 respectively. Pelleting energy using torrefied feedstock varied from −15 to +53 kWh t−1 from untreated with increases in production fines. Optimal pelleting MC and PCL were reduced significantly for torrefied feedstock and pellet quality was characterised by a decrease in mechanical durability and an increase in bulk density. Energy densities of 11.9–13.2 GJ m−3 (as received) were obtained. ●A pilot-scale comparison of pelleting torrefied versus untreated biomass.●Torrefaction of beech, poplar, straw and corn cob strongly affects pelleting.●Torrefaction weakens pellet durability yet improves bulk density and energy density.●Moisture contents and press channel lengths reduced for torrefied biomass.●Replacing coal requires min. 50 % more capacity for pulverisers and fuel storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bio-coal ; Bioenergi ; Bioenergy ; Chemical Process Engineering ; Densification ; Durability ; Energy density ; Förnyelsebar bioenergi ; Kemiska processer ; Pelletization ; Renewable Bioenergy Research ; Torrefaction</subject><ispartof>Renewable energy, 2021-11, Vol.178, p.766-774</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-f2d74a5b0085f15705d44f50ef4415963ed820408f023ba95557973c40f8f0a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-f2d74a5b0085f15705d44f50ef4415963ed820408f023ba95557973c40f8f0a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5647-3630 ; 0000-0001-9655-2923 ; 0000-0002-5900-9806</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.094$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/112634$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/114075$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agar, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolfsson, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavergne, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melkior, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Silva Perez, Denilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Capucine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campargue, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalén, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsson, Sylvia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Pelleting torrefied biomass at pilot-scale – Quality and implications for co-firing</title><title>Renewable energy</title><description>The co-firing of solid biofuels in coal plants is an attractive and fast-track means of cutting emissions but its potential is linked to biomass densification. For torrefied materials this topic is under-represented in literature. This pilot-scale (121–203 kg h−1) pelleting study generated detailed knowledge on the densification of torrefied biomass compared to untreated biomass. Four feedstock with high supply availability (beech, poplar, wheat straw and corn cob) were studied in their untreated and torrefied forms. Systematic methods were used to produce 180 batches of 8 mm dia. pellets using press channel length (PCL) and moisture content (MC) ranges of 30–60 mm and 7.3–16.6% (wet basis) respectively. Analysis showed that moderate degrees of torrefaction (250–280 °C, 20–75 min) strongly affected pelleting behaviour. The highest quality black pellets had a mechanical durability and bulk density range of 87.5–98.7% and 662–697 kg m−3 respectively. Pelleting energy using torrefied feedstock varied from −15 to +53 kWh t−1 from untreated with increases in production fines. Optimal pelleting MC and PCL were reduced significantly for torrefied feedstock and pellet quality was characterised by a decrease in mechanical durability and an increase in bulk density. Energy densities of 11.9–13.2 GJ m−3 (as received) were obtained. ●A pilot-scale comparison of pelleting torrefied versus untreated biomass.●Torrefaction of beech, poplar, straw and corn cob strongly affects pelleting.●Torrefaction weakens pellet durability yet improves bulk density and energy density.●Moisture contents and press channel lengths reduced for torrefied biomass.●Replacing coal requires min. 50 % more capacity for pulverisers and fuel storage.</description><subject>Bio-coal</subject><subject>Bioenergi</subject><subject>Bioenergy</subject><subject>Chemical Process Engineering</subject><subject>Densification</subject><subject>Durability</subject><subject>Energy density</subject><subject>Förnyelsebar bioenergi</subject><subject>Kemiska processer</subject><subject>Pelletization</subject><subject>Renewable Bioenergy Research</subject><subject>Torrefaction</subject><issn>0960-1481</issn><issn>1879-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtKxDAUQIMoOD7-wEV-oPWmTdp0I8jgCwZUcNYhTRPJkGmGJKPMzn_wD_0SM1RcCnIXFy6cA_cgdEGgJECay1UZ9JinrKAiJTQldPQAzQhvuwIaXh2iGXQNFIRycoxOYlwBEMZbOkPLJ-2cTnZ8xcmHoI3VA-6tX8sYsUx4Y51PRVTSafz18Ymft9LZtMNyHLBdb5xVMlk_Rmx8wMoXxobsOkNHRrqoz3_2KVre3rzM74vF493D_HpRKFpDKkw1tFSyHoAzQ1gLbKDUMNCGUsK6ptYDr4ACN1DVvewYY23X1oqCySfJ61NUTt74rjfbXmyCXcuwE15aEd22l2G_RNSCEAot-xdQNTXNAJ0AFXyMuc8vQkDs44uVmOKLfXwBjcjxM3Y1YTp__2Z11iqrR6UHG7RKYvD2b8E3VS-Rhw</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Agar, David A.</creator><creator>Rudolfsson, Magnus</creator><creator>Lavergne, Simon</creator><creator>Melkior, Thierry</creator><creator>Da Silva Perez, Denilson</creator><creator>Dupont, Capucine</creator><creator>Campargue, Matthieu</creator><creator>Kalén, Gunnar</creator><creator>Larsson, Sylvia H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-3630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-2923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-9806</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Pelleting torrefied biomass at pilot-scale – Quality and implications for co-firing</title><author>Agar, David A. ; Rudolfsson, Magnus ; Lavergne, Simon ; Melkior, Thierry ; Da Silva Perez, Denilson ; Dupont, Capucine ; Campargue, Matthieu ; Kalén, Gunnar ; Larsson, Sylvia H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-f2d74a5b0085f15705d44f50ef4415963ed820408f023ba95557973c40f8f0a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bio-coal</topic><topic>Bioenergi</topic><topic>Bioenergy</topic><topic>Chemical Process Engineering</topic><topic>Densification</topic><topic>Durability</topic><topic>Energy density</topic><topic>Förnyelsebar bioenergi</topic><topic>Kemiska processer</topic><topic>Pelletization</topic><topic>Renewable Bioenergy Research</topic><topic>Torrefaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agar, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolfsson, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavergne, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melkior, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Silva Perez, Denilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Capucine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campargue, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalén, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsson, Sylvia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agar, David A.</au><au>Rudolfsson, Magnus</au><au>Lavergne, Simon</au><au>Melkior, Thierry</au><au>Da Silva Perez, Denilson</au><au>Dupont, Capucine</au><au>Campargue, Matthieu</au><au>Kalén, Gunnar</au><au>Larsson, Sylvia H.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pelleting torrefied biomass at pilot-scale – Quality and implications for co-firing</atitle><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>178</volume><spage>766</spage><epage>774</epage><pages>766-774</pages><issn>0960-1481</issn><eissn>1879-0682</eissn><abstract>The co-firing of solid biofuels in coal plants is an attractive and fast-track means of cutting emissions but its potential is linked to biomass densification. For torrefied materials this topic is under-represented in literature. This pilot-scale (121–203 kg h−1) pelleting study generated detailed knowledge on the densification of torrefied biomass compared to untreated biomass. Four feedstock with high supply availability (beech, poplar, wheat straw and corn cob) were studied in their untreated and torrefied forms. Systematic methods were used to produce 180 batches of 8 mm dia. pellets using press channel length (PCL) and moisture content (MC) ranges of 30–60 mm and 7.3–16.6% (wet basis) respectively. Analysis showed that moderate degrees of torrefaction (250–280 °C, 20–75 min) strongly affected pelleting behaviour. The highest quality black pellets had a mechanical durability and bulk density range of 87.5–98.7% and 662–697 kg m−3 respectively. Pelleting energy using torrefied feedstock varied from −15 to +53 kWh t−1 from untreated with increases in production fines. Optimal pelleting MC and PCL were reduced significantly for torrefied feedstock and pellet quality was characterised by a decrease in mechanical durability and an increase in bulk density. Energy densities of 11.9–13.2 GJ m−3 (as received) were obtained. ●A pilot-scale comparison of pelleting torrefied versus untreated biomass.●Torrefaction of beech, poplar, straw and corn cob strongly affects pelleting.●Torrefaction weakens pellet durability yet improves bulk density and energy density.●Moisture contents and press channel lengths reduced for torrefied biomass.●Replacing coal requires min. 50 % more capacity for pulverisers and fuel storage.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.094</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-3630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-2923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-9806</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-1481
ispartof Renewable energy, 2021-11, Vol.178, p.766-774
issn 0960-1481
1879-0682
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_114075
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects Bio-coal
Bioenergi
Bioenergy
Chemical Process Engineering
Densification
Durability
Energy density
Förnyelsebar bioenergi
Kemiska processer
Pelletization
Renewable Bioenergy Research
Torrefaction
title Pelleting torrefied biomass at pilot-scale – Quality and implications for co-firing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pelleting%20torrefied%20biomass%20at%20pilot-scale%20%E2%80%93%20Quality%20and%20implications%20for%20co-firing&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20energy&rft.au=Agar,%20David%20A.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=178&rft.spage=766&rft.epage=774&rft.pages=766-774&rft.issn=0960-1481&rft.eissn=1879-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.094&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_swepu%3ES0960148121009605%3C/elsevier_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960148121009605&rfr_iscdi=true