Choosy beetles: How host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities
•Many boreal forest saproxylic beetles strongly associated with a single tree species.•Oaks (Quercus sp.) in particular harbor many red-listed species.•Most saproxylic beetles are also associated with near-natural, vs. managed, forests.•Tree species is a better predictor of beetle communities than f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest ecology and management 2021-05, Vol.487, p.119023, Article 119023 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 119023 |
container_title | Forest ecology and management |
container_volume | 487 |
creator | Burner, Ryan C. Birkemoe, Tone Stephan, Jörg G. Drag, Lukas Muller, Jörg Ovaskainen, Otso Potterf, Mária Skarpaas, Olav Snall, Tord Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne |
description | •Many boreal forest saproxylic beetles strongly associated with a single tree species.•Oaks (Quercus sp.) in particular harbor many red-listed species.•Most saproxylic beetles are also associated with near-natural, vs. managed, forests.•Tree species is a better predictor of beetle communities than forest management.
Wood-living beetles make up a large proportion of forest biodiversity and contribute to important ecosystem services, including decomposition. Beetle communities in managed southern boreal forests are less species rich than in natural and near-natural forest stands. In addition, many beetle species rely primarily on specific tree species. Yet, the associations between individual beetle species, forest management category, and tree species are seldom quantified, even for red-listed beetles. We compiled a beetle capture dataset from flight intercept traps placed on Norway spruce (Picea abies), oak (Quercus sp.), and Eurasian aspen (Populus tremulae) trees in 413 sites in mature managed forest, near-natural forest, and clear-cuts in southeastern Norway. We used joint species distribution models to estimate the strength of associations for 368 saproxylic beetle species (including 20 vulnerable, endangered, or critical red-listed species) for each forest management category and tree species. Tree species on which traps were mounted had the largest effect on beetle communities; oaks had the most highly associated beetle species, including most of the red-listed species, followed by Norway spruce and Eurasian aspen. Most beetle species were more likely to be captured in near-natural than in mature managed forest. Our estimated associations were compatible – for many species – with categorical classifications found in several existing databases of saproxylic beetle preferences. These quantitative beetle-habitat associations will improve future analyses that have typically relied on categorical classifications. Our results highlight the need to prioritize conservation of near-natural forests and oak trees in Scandinavia to protect the habitat of many red-listed species in particular. Furthermore, we underline the importance of carefully considering the species of trees on which traps are mounted in order to representatively sample beetle communities in forest stands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_110869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112721001122</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0378112721001122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c4cc51ae81d656977dc222b8ebd74382c6f487abc87644672d88444f96be910a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gYu8QGuSpk3qQpDBPxhwo-uQJrdMhrYZktRh3t6WDi5dnbs43zncg9A9JTkltHrY560PYHzOCKM5pTVhxQVaUSlYJghnl2hFCiEzSpm4Rjcx7gkhZcnlCh02O-_jCTcAqYP4iN_9Ee98TDgFgIj1YHH0Y9pBGHAztegOz2WTYdBpDLobIEbc6xO2kCD0boDp0hYfvbfnWGx834-DSw7iLbpqdRfh7qxr9P368rV5z7afbx-b521mipqmzHBjSqpBUluVVS2ENYyxRkJjBS8kM1XLpdCNkaLivBLMSsk5b-uqgZoSXaxRvuTGIxzGRh2C63U4Ka-dit3Y6DCLiqAoJbKqJ4AvgAk-xgDtH0KJmmdWe7XMrOaZ1TLzhD0tGEzP_DiYYo2DwYB1kzcp693_Ab--PorI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choosy beetles: How host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Burner, Ryan C. ; Birkemoe, Tone ; Stephan, Jörg G. ; Drag, Lukas ; Muller, Jörg ; Ovaskainen, Otso ; Potterf, Mária ; Skarpaas, Olav ; Snall, Tord ; Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Burner, Ryan C. ; Birkemoe, Tone ; Stephan, Jörg G. ; Drag, Lukas ; Muller, Jörg ; Ovaskainen, Otso ; Potterf, Mária ; Skarpaas, Olav ; Snall, Tord ; Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>•Many boreal forest saproxylic beetles strongly associated with a single tree species.•Oaks (Quercus sp.) in particular harbor many red-listed species.•Most saproxylic beetles are also associated with near-natural, vs. managed, forests.•Tree species is a better predictor of beetle communities than forest management.
Wood-living beetles make up a large proportion of forest biodiversity and contribute to important ecosystem services, including decomposition. Beetle communities in managed southern boreal forests are less species rich than in natural and near-natural forest stands. In addition, many beetle species rely primarily on specific tree species. Yet, the associations between individual beetle species, forest management category, and tree species are seldom quantified, even for red-listed beetles. We compiled a beetle capture dataset from flight intercept traps placed on Norway spruce (Picea abies), oak (Quercus sp.), and Eurasian aspen (Populus tremulae) trees in 413 sites in mature managed forest, near-natural forest, and clear-cuts in southeastern Norway. We used joint species distribution models to estimate the strength of associations for 368 saproxylic beetle species (including 20 vulnerable, endangered, or critical red-listed species) for each forest management category and tree species. Tree species on which traps were mounted had the largest effect on beetle communities; oaks had the most highly associated beetle species, including most of the red-listed species, followed by Norway spruce and Eurasian aspen. Most beetle species were more likely to be captured in near-natural than in mature managed forest. Our estimated associations were compatible – for many species – with categorical classifications found in several existing databases of saproxylic beetle preferences. These quantitative beetle-habitat associations will improve future analyses that have typically relied on categorical classifications. Our results highlight the need to prioritize conservation of near-natural forests and oak trees in Scandinavia to protect the habitat of many red-listed species in particular. Furthermore, we underline the importance of carefully considering the species of trees on which traps are mounted in order to representatively sample beetle communities in forest stands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Coleoptera ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; Forest Science ; Indicator species ; Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) ; Near-natural forest ; Red-listed species ; Saproxylic beetles ; Skogsvetenskap</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2021-05, Vol.487, p.119023, Article 119023</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c4cc51ae81d656977dc222b8ebd74382c6f487abc87644672d88444f96be910a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c4cc51ae81d656977dc222b8ebd74382c6f487abc87644672d88444f96be910a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/110869$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burner, Ryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkemoe, Tone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Jörg G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drag, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovaskainen, Otso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potterf, Mária</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarpaas, Olav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snall, Tord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Choosy beetles: How host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>•Many boreal forest saproxylic beetles strongly associated with a single tree species.•Oaks (Quercus sp.) in particular harbor many red-listed species.•Most saproxylic beetles are also associated with near-natural, vs. managed, forests.•Tree species is a better predictor of beetle communities than forest management.
Wood-living beetles make up a large proportion of forest biodiversity and contribute to important ecosystem services, including decomposition. Beetle communities in managed southern boreal forests are less species rich than in natural and near-natural forest stands. In addition, many beetle species rely primarily on specific tree species. Yet, the associations between individual beetle species, forest management category, and tree species are seldom quantified, even for red-listed beetles. We compiled a beetle capture dataset from flight intercept traps placed on Norway spruce (Picea abies), oak (Quercus sp.), and Eurasian aspen (Populus tremulae) trees in 413 sites in mature managed forest, near-natural forest, and clear-cuts in southeastern Norway. We used joint species distribution models to estimate the strength of associations for 368 saproxylic beetle species (including 20 vulnerable, endangered, or critical red-listed species) for each forest management category and tree species. Tree species on which traps were mounted had the largest effect on beetle communities; oaks had the most highly associated beetle species, including most of the red-listed species, followed by Norway spruce and Eurasian aspen. Most beetle species were more likely to be captured in near-natural than in mature managed forest. Our estimated associations were compatible – for many species – with categorical classifications found in several existing databases of saproxylic beetle preferences. These quantitative beetle-habitat associations will improve future analyses that have typically relied on categorical classifications. Our results highlight the need to prioritize conservation of near-natural forests and oak trees in Scandinavia to protect the habitat of many red-listed species in particular. Furthermore, we underline the importance of carefully considering the species of trees on which traps are mounted in order to representatively sample beetle communities in forest stands.</description><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Forest Science</subject><subject>Indicator species</subject><subject>Joint species distribution models (JSDMs)</subject><subject>Near-natural forest</subject><subject>Red-listed species</subject><subject>Saproxylic beetles</subject><subject>Skogsvetenskap</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gYu8QGuSpk3qQpDBPxhwo-uQJrdMhrYZktRh3t6WDi5dnbs43zncg9A9JTkltHrY560PYHzOCKM5pTVhxQVaUSlYJghnl2hFCiEzSpm4Rjcx7gkhZcnlCh02O-_jCTcAqYP4iN_9Ee98TDgFgIj1YHH0Y9pBGHAztegOz2WTYdBpDLobIEbc6xO2kCD0boDp0hYfvbfnWGx834-DSw7iLbpqdRfh7qxr9P368rV5z7afbx-b521mipqmzHBjSqpBUluVVS2ENYyxRkJjBS8kM1XLpdCNkaLivBLMSsk5b-uqgZoSXaxRvuTGIxzGRh2C63U4Ka-dit3Y6DCLiqAoJbKqJ4AvgAk-xgDtH0KJmmdWe7XMrOaZ1TLzhD0tGEzP_DiYYo2DwYB1kzcp693_Ab--PorI</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Burner, Ryan C.</creator><creator>Birkemoe, Tone</creator><creator>Stephan, Jörg G.</creator><creator>Drag, Lukas</creator><creator>Muller, Jörg</creator><creator>Ovaskainen, Otso</creator><creator>Potterf, Mária</creator><creator>Skarpaas, Olav</creator><creator>Snall, Tord</creator><creator>Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Choosy beetles: How host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities</title><author>Burner, Ryan C. ; Birkemoe, Tone ; Stephan, Jörg G. ; Drag, Lukas ; Muller, Jörg ; Ovaskainen, Otso ; Potterf, Mária ; Skarpaas, Olav ; Snall, Tord ; Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c4cc51ae81d656977dc222b8ebd74382c6f487abc87644672d88444f96be910a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Forest Science</topic><topic>Indicator species</topic><topic>Joint species distribution models (JSDMs)</topic><topic>Near-natural forest</topic><topic>Red-listed species</topic><topic>Saproxylic beetles</topic><topic>Skogsvetenskap</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burner, Ryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkemoe, Tone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Jörg G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drag, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovaskainen, Otso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potterf, Mária</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarpaas, Olav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snall, Tord</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burner, Ryan C.</au><au>Birkemoe, Tone</au><au>Stephan, Jörg G.</au><au>Drag, Lukas</au><au>Muller, Jörg</au><au>Ovaskainen, Otso</au><au>Potterf, Mária</au><au>Skarpaas, Olav</au><au>Snall, Tord</au><au>Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choosy beetles: How host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>487</volume><spage>119023</spage><pages>119023-</pages><artnum>119023</artnum><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><abstract>•Many boreal forest saproxylic beetles strongly associated with a single tree species.•Oaks (Quercus sp.) in particular harbor many red-listed species.•Most saproxylic beetles are also associated with near-natural, vs. managed, forests.•Tree species is a better predictor of beetle communities than forest management.
Wood-living beetles make up a large proportion of forest biodiversity and contribute to important ecosystem services, including decomposition. Beetle communities in managed southern boreal forests are less species rich than in natural and near-natural forest stands. In addition, many beetle species rely primarily on specific tree species. Yet, the associations between individual beetle species, forest management category, and tree species are seldom quantified, even for red-listed beetles. We compiled a beetle capture dataset from flight intercept traps placed on Norway spruce (Picea abies), oak (Quercus sp.), and Eurasian aspen (Populus tremulae) trees in 413 sites in mature managed forest, near-natural forest, and clear-cuts in southeastern Norway. We used joint species distribution models to estimate the strength of associations for 368 saproxylic beetle species (including 20 vulnerable, endangered, or critical red-listed species) for each forest management category and tree species. Tree species on which traps were mounted had the largest effect on beetle communities; oaks had the most highly associated beetle species, including most of the red-listed species, followed by Norway spruce and Eurasian aspen. Most beetle species were more likely to be captured in near-natural than in mature managed forest. Our estimated associations were compatible – for many species – with categorical classifications found in several existing databases of saproxylic beetle preferences. These quantitative beetle-habitat associations will improve future analyses that have typically relied on categorical classifications. Our results highlight the need to prioritize conservation of near-natural forests and oak trees in Scandinavia to protect the habitat of many red-listed species in particular. Furthermore, we underline the importance of carefully considering the species of trees on which traps are mounted in order to representatively sample beetle communities in forest stands.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119023</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1127 |
ispartof | Forest ecology and management, 2021-05, Vol.487, p.119023, Article 119023 |
issn | 0378-1127 1872-7042 1872-7042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_110869 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; SWEPUB Freely available online |
subjects | Coleoptera Ecology Ekologi Forest Science Indicator species Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) Near-natural forest Red-listed species Saproxylic beetles Skogsvetenskap |
title | Choosy beetles: How host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choosy%20beetles:%20How%20host%20trees%20and%20southern%20boreal%20forest%20naturalness%20may%20determine%20dead%20wood%20beetle%20communities&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Burner,%20Ryan%20C.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=487&rft.spage=119023&rft.pages=119023-&rft.artnum=119023&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119023&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_swepu%3ES0378112721001122%3C/elsevier_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112721001122&rfr_iscdi=true |