Different environmental variables predict distribution and cover of the introduced red seaweed Eucheuma denticulatum in two geographical locations
In this study we examined abiotic and biotic factors that could potentially influence the presence of a non-indigenous seaweed, Eucheuma denticulatum, in two locations, one outside (Kane’ohe Bay, Hawai’i, USA) and one within (Mafia Island, Tanzania) its natural geographical range. We hypothesized th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological invasions 2021-04, Vol.23 (4), p.1049-1067 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1067 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1049 |
container_title | Biological invasions |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Eggertsen, M. Tano, S. A. Chacin, D. H. Eklöf, J. S. Larsson, J. Berkström, C. Buriyo, A. S. Halling, C. |
description | In this study we examined abiotic and biotic factors that could potentially influence the presence of a non-indigenous seaweed,
Eucheuma denticulatum,
in two locations, one outside (Kane’ohe Bay, Hawai’i, USA) and one within (Mafia Island, Tanzania) its natural geographical range. We hypothesized that the availability of hard substrate and the amount of wave exposure would explain distribution patterns, and that higher abundance of herbivorous fishes in Tanzania would exert stronger top–down control than in Hawai’i. To address these hypotheses, we surveyed
E. denticulatum
in sites subjected to different environmental conditions and used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to identify predictors of
E. denticulatum
presence. We also estimated grazing intensity on
E. denticulatum
by surveying the type and the amount of grazing scars. Finally, we used molecular tools to distinguish between indigenous and non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
on Mafia Island. In Kane’ohe Bay, the likelihood of finding
E. denticulatum
increased with wave exposure, whereas on Mafia Island, the likelihood increased with cover of coral rubble, and decreased with distance from areas of introduction (AOI), but this decrease was less pronounced in the presence of coral rubble. Grazing intensity was higher in Kane’ohe Bay than on Mafia Island. However, we still suggest that efforts to reduce non-indigenous
E. denticulatum
should include protection of important herbivores in both sites because of the high levels of grazing close to AOI. Moreover
,
we recommend that areas with hard substrate and high structural complexity should be avoided when farming non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10530-020-02417-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_109035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503052119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-67ed5b4ec26c1658ca537f4aa83222ccb0473e6b649f36e1f031f6bf2d1b73023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstuFDEQRVuISISQH2BliSV0KL_aPcsoCQ8pEhuSreV2l2cc9bQbP2ZEPoMvxsNEsAKxKN1anHvLsm7TvKZwQQHU-0RBcmiBHUZQ1T4-a06pVLylohPP68571XIp1IvmZUoPALBSIE-bH9feOYw4Z4Lzzscwb-tuJrIz0ZthwkSWiKO3mYw-5eiHkn2YiZlHYsMOIwmO5A0SP-cYxmJxJJUnCc0eq94Uu8GyNWSssd6WyeSyrTDJ-0DWGNbRLBtv68EpWHOITq-aE2emhOdPetbcfbj5evWpvf3y8fPV5W1rhZK57RSOchBoWWdpJ3trJFdOGNNzxpi1AwjFsRs6sXK8Q-qAU9cNjo10UBwYP2sujrlpj0sZ9BL91sTvOhiv01QGEw-iE2oKK-CyGt791XDt7y91iGudiqZ93wNU_O1_4BstGOtVpd8c6SWGbwVT1g-hxLl-gGYSOEhG6apS7EjZGFKK6H6nUtCHJuhjE3Rtgv7VBP1YTfzpIRWe1xj_RP_D9ROZhru8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503052119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different environmental variables predict distribution and cover of the introduced red seaweed Eucheuma denticulatum in two geographical locations</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Eggertsen, M. ; Tano, S. A. ; Chacin, D. H. ; Eklöf, J. S. ; Larsson, J. ; Berkström, C. ; Buriyo, A. S. ; Halling, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eggertsen, M. ; Tano, S. A. ; Chacin, D. H. ; Eklöf, J. S. ; Larsson, J. ; Berkström, C. ; Buriyo, A. S. ; Halling, C. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we examined abiotic and biotic factors that could potentially influence the presence of a non-indigenous seaweed,
Eucheuma denticulatum,
in two locations, one outside (Kane’ohe Bay, Hawai’i, USA) and one within (Mafia Island, Tanzania) its natural geographical range. We hypothesized that the availability of hard substrate and the amount of wave exposure would explain distribution patterns, and that higher abundance of herbivorous fishes in Tanzania would exert stronger top–down control than in Hawai’i. To address these hypotheses, we surveyed
E. denticulatum
in sites subjected to different environmental conditions and used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to identify predictors of
E. denticulatum
presence. We also estimated grazing intensity on
E. denticulatum
by surveying the type and the amount of grazing scars. Finally, we used molecular tools to distinguish between indigenous and non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
on Mafia Island. In Kane’ohe Bay, the likelihood of finding
E. denticulatum
increased with wave exposure, whereas on Mafia Island, the likelihood increased with cover of coral rubble, and decreased with distance from areas of introduction (AOI), but this decrease was less pronounced in the presence of coral rubble. Grazing intensity was higher in Kane’ohe Bay than on Mafia Island. However, we still suggest that efforts to reduce non-indigenous
E. denticulatum
should include protection of important herbivores in both sites because of the high levels of grazing close to AOI. Moreover
,
we recommend that areas with hard substrate and high structural complexity should be avoided when farming non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02417-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Algae ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotic factors ; Developmental Biology ; Distribution patterns ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; Eucheuma denticulatum ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Geographical locations ; Grazing ; Grazing intensity ; Herbivores ; Herbivorous fish ; Herbivory ; Introduced seaweeds ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Macroalgae ; marin ekologi ; Marine Ecology ; Original Paper ; Phase shift ; Plant Sciences ; Scars ; Seaweeds ; Statistical models ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2021-04, Vol.23 (4), p.1049-1067</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-67ed5b4ec26c1658ca537f4aa83222ccb0473e6b649f36e1f031f6bf2d1b73023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-67ed5b4ec26c1658ca537f4aa83222ccb0473e6b649f36e1f031f6bf2d1b73023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7295-424X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-020-02417-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-020-02417-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-42287$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-188800$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/109035$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eggertsen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tano, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chacin, D. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklöf, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsson, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkström, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buriyo, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halling, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Different environmental variables predict distribution and cover of the introduced red seaweed Eucheuma denticulatum in two geographical locations</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>In this study we examined abiotic and biotic factors that could potentially influence the presence of a non-indigenous seaweed,
Eucheuma denticulatum,
in two locations, one outside (Kane’ohe Bay, Hawai’i, USA) and one within (Mafia Island, Tanzania) its natural geographical range. We hypothesized that the availability of hard substrate and the amount of wave exposure would explain distribution patterns, and that higher abundance of herbivorous fishes in Tanzania would exert stronger top–down control than in Hawai’i. To address these hypotheses, we surveyed
E. denticulatum
in sites subjected to different environmental conditions and used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to identify predictors of
E. denticulatum
presence. We also estimated grazing intensity on
E. denticulatum
by surveying the type and the amount of grazing scars. Finally, we used molecular tools to distinguish between indigenous and non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
on Mafia Island. In Kane’ohe Bay, the likelihood of finding
E. denticulatum
increased with wave exposure, whereas on Mafia Island, the likelihood increased with cover of coral rubble, and decreased with distance from areas of introduction (AOI), but this decrease was less pronounced in the presence of coral rubble. Grazing intensity was higher in Kane’ohe Bay than on Mafia Island. However, we still suggest that efforts to reduce non-indigenous
E. denticulatum
should include protection of important herbivores in both sites because of the high levels of grazing close to AOI. Moreover
,
we recommend that areas with hard substrate and high structural complexity should be avoided when farming non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotic factors</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Distribution patterns</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Eucheuma denticulatum</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Grazing intensity</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivorous fish</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Introduced seaweeds</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Macroalgae</subject><subject>marin ekologi</subject><subject>Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phase shift</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Scars</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstuFDEQRVuISISQH2BliSV0KL_aPcsoCQ8pEhuSreV2l2cc9bQbP2ZEPoMvxsNEsAKxKN1anHvLsm7TvKZwQQHU-0RBcmiBHUZQ1T4-a06pVLylohPP68571XIp1IvmZUoPALBSIE-bH9feOYw4Z4Lzzscwb-tuJrIz0ZthwkSWiKO3mYw-5eiHkn2YiZlHYsMOIwmO5A0SP-cYxmJxJJUnCc0eq94Uu8GyNWSssd6WyeSyrTDJ-0DWGNbRLBtv68EpWHOITq-aE2emhOdPetbcfbj5evWpvf3y8fPV5W1rhZK57RSOchBoWWdpJ3trJFdOGNNzxpi1AwjFsRs6sXK8Q-qAU9cNjo10UBwYP2sujrlpj0sZ9BL91sTvOhiv01QGEw-iE2oKK-CyGt791XDt7y91iGudiqZ93wNU_O1_4BstGOtVpd8c6SWGbwVT1g-hxLl-gGYSOEhG6apS7EjZGFKK6H6nUtCHJuhjE3Rtgv7VBP1YTfzpIRWe1xj_RP_D9ROZhru8</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Eggertsen, M.</creator><creator>Tano, S. A.</creator><creator>Chacin, D. H.</creator><creator>Eklöf, J. S.</creator><creator>Larsson, J.</creator><creator>Berkström, C.</creator><creator>Buriyo, A. S.</creator><creator>Halling, C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>ANHQQ</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DF8</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>ABAVF</scope><scope>DG7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-424X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Different environmental variables predict distribution and cover of the introduced red seaweed Eucheuma denticulatum in two geographical locations</title><author>Eggertsen, M. ; Tano, S. A. ; Chacin, D. H. ; Eklöf, J. S. ; Larsson, J. ; Berkström, C. ; Buriyo, A. S. ; Halling, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-67ed5b4ec26c1658ca537f4aa83222ccb0473e6b649f36e1f031f6bf2d1b73023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotic factors</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Distribution patterns</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Eucheuma denticulatum</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Grazing intensity</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivorous fish</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Introduced seaweeds</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Macroalgae</topic><topic>marin ekologi</topic><topic>Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phase shift</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Scars</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eggertsen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tano, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chacin, D. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklöf, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsson, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkström, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buriyo, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halling, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SWEPUB Södertörns högskola- SwePub full text</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Södertörns högskola- SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eggertsen, M.</au><au>Tano, S. A.</au><au>Chacin, D. H.</au><au>Eklöf, J. S.</au><au>Larsson, J.</au><au>Berkström, C.</au><au>Buriyo, A. S.</au><au>Halling, C.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different environmental variables predict distribution and cover of the introduced red seaweed Eucheuma denticulatum in two geographical locations</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1049</spage><epage>1067</epage><pages>1049-1067</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>In this study we examined abiotic and biotic factors that could potentially influence the presence of a non-indigenous seaweed,
Eucheuma denticulatum,
in two locations, one outside (Kane’ohe Bay, Hawai’i, USA) and one within (Mafia Island, Tanzania) its natural geographical range. We hypothesized that the availability of hard substrate and the amount of wave exposure would explain distribution patterns, and that higher abundance of herbivorous fishes in Tanzania would exert stronger top–down control than in Hawai’i. To address these hypotheses, we surveyed
E. denticulatum
in sites subjected to different environmental conditions and used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to identify predictors of
E. denticulatum
presence. We also estimated grazing intensity on
E. denticulatum
by surveying the type and the amount of grazing scars. Finally, we used molecular tools to distinguish between indigenous and non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
on Mafia Island. In Kane’ohe Bay, the likelihood of finding
E. denticulatum
increased with wave exposure, whereas on Mafia Island, the likelihood increased with cover of coral rubble, and decreased with distance from areas of introduction (AOI), but this decrease was less pronounced in the presence of coral rubble. Grazing intensity was higher in Kane’ohe Bay than on Mafia Island. However, we still suggest that efforts to reduce non-indigenous
E. denticulatum
should include protection of important herbivores in both sites because of the high levels of grazing close to AOI. Moreover
,
we recommend that areas with hard substrate and high structural complexity should be avoided when farming non-indigenous strains of
E. denticulatum
.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-020-02417-z</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-424X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-3547 |
ispartof | Biological invasions, 2021-04, Vol.23 (4), p.1049-1067 |
issn | 1387-3547 1573-1464 1573-1464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_109035 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online |
subjects | Algae Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotic factors Developmental Biology Distribution patterns Ecology Ekologi Environmental conditions Environmental factors Eucheuma denticulatum Freshwater & Marine Ecology Geographical locations Grazing Grazing intensity Herbivores Herbivorous fish Herbivory Introduced seaweeds Invasive species Life Sciences Macroalgae marin ekologi Marine Ecology Original Paper Phase shift Plant Sciences Scars Seaweeds Statistical models Substrates |
title | Different environmental variables predict distribution and cover of the introduced red seaweed Eucheuma denticulatum in two geographical locations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T10%3A10%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20environmental%20variables%20predict%20distribution%20and%20cover%20of%20the%20introduced%20red%20seaweed%20Eucheuma%20denticulatum%20in%20two%20geographical%20locations&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Eggertsen,%20M.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1049&rft.epage=1067&rft.pages=1049-1067&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-020-02417-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2503052119%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503052119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |