Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening
The growth of the global terrestrial sink of carbon dioxide has puzzled scientists for decades. We propose that the role of land management practices—from intensive forestry to allowing passive afforestation of abandoned lands—have played a major role in the growth of the terrestrial carbon sink in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.5365-5370 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5370 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 5365 |
container_title | Global change biology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Kauppi, Pekka E. Ciais, Philippe Högberg, Peter Nordin, Annika Lappi, Juha Lundmark, Tomas Wernick, Iddo K. |
description | The growth of the global terrestrial sink of carbon dioxide has puzzled scientists for decades. We propose that the role of land management practices—from intensive forestry to allowing passive afforestation of abandoned lands—have played a major role in the growth of the terrestrial carbon sink in the decades since the mid twentieth century. The Forest Transition, a historic transition from shrinking to expanding forests, and from sparser to denser forests, has seen an increase of biomass and carbon across large regions of the globe. We propose that the contribution of Forest Transitions to the terrestrial carbon sink has been underestimated. Because forest growth is slow and incremental, changes in the carbon density in forest biomass and soils often elude detection. Measurement technologies that rely on changes in two‐dimensional ground cover can miss changes in forest density. In contrast, changes from abrupt and total losses of biomass in land clearing, forest fires and clear cuts are easy to measure. Land management improves over time providing important present contributions and future potential to climate change mitigation. Appreciating the contributions of Forest Transitions to the sequestering of atmospheric carbon will enable its potential to aid in climate change mitigation.
Abrupt losses of forest biomass are relatively easy to detect and monitor. Forestry reports are sometimes overly pessimistic as they acknowledge the biomass losses but fail to observe the gradual and subtle gains of biomass, which are difficult to detect empirically. Land management has promoted biomass gains at national and global levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcb.15292 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_107718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2444794544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5162-7f28a697f4b9bc9adb56eb2920c6e67fc6d6a4e240dc34b87324447937ab10ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtv1DAQtipQX3DgD1SROHHI1m8nl0plRVuklThQzpbtTHZddu2tnW3pv69DSqGV8GWs-R72zIfQB4JnpJzTpbMzImhL99AhYVLUlDfyzXgXvCaYsAN0lPMNxphRLPfRAaMNkUy0h-j73CQbQ2UhQO-HXPUpbqqLmCAP1XUyIfvBx5CrbenHwYdlZX3cmJwr-LUd4RE0oauGlXc_IRTGO_S2N-sM75_qMfpx8eV6flUvvl1-nZ8vaieIpLXqaWNkq3puW-ta01khwZYpsJMgVe9kJw0HynHnGLeNYpRzrlqmjCUYgB2j2eSb72G7s3qb_MakBx2N13m9syaNRWfQBCtFmiI4mwSFvYHOQRiSWb_QvUSCX-llvNNKcCyIKAafJoPVK9nV-UKPPUzbhlPJ70jhfnx6LMXbXVmnvom7FMpC9DQHF5z_dXQp5pygf7YlWI_h6hKu_h1u4Z78-_1n5p80C-F0Itz7NTz830lfzj9Plo-q7a-j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2444794544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kauppi, Pekka E. ; Ciais, Philippe ; Högberg, Peter ; Nordin, Annika ; Lappi, Juha ; Lundmark, Tomas ; Wernick, Iddo K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauppi, Pekka E. ; Ciais, Philippe ; Högberg, Peter ; Nordin, Annika ; Lappi, Juha ; Lundmark, Tomas ; Wernick, Iddo K. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>The growth of the global terrestrial sink of carbon dioxide has puzzled scientists for decades. We propose that the role of land management practices—from intensive forestry to allowing passive afforestation of abandoned lands—have played a major role in the growth of the terrestrial carbon sink in the decades since the mid twentieth century. The Forest Transition, a historic transition from shrinking to expanding forests, and from sparser to denser forests, has seen an increase of biomass and carbon across large regions of the globe. We propose that the contribution of Forest Transitions to the terrestrial carbon sink has been underestimated. Because forest growth is slow and incremental, changes in the carbon density in forest biomass and soils often elude detection. Measurement technologies that rely on changes in two‐dimensional ground cover can miss changes in forest density. In contrast, changes from abrupt and total losses of biomass in land clearing, forest fires and clear cuts are easy to measure. Land management improves over time providing important present contributions and future potential to climate change mitigation. Appreciating the contributions of Forest Transitions to the sequestering of atmospheric carbon will enable its potential to aid in climate change mitigation.
Abrupt losses of forest biomass are relatively easy to detect and monitor. Forestry reports are sometimes overly pessimistic as they acknowledge the biomass losses but fail to observe the gradual and subtle gains of biomass, which are difficult to detect empirically. Land management has promoted biomass gains at national and global levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15292</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32816359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abandoned land ; Afforestation ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Clearcutting ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Density ; Dimensional changes ; Environmental Sciences ; Forest biomass ; Forest fires ; Forest growth ; Forest management ; Forest Science ; forest transitions ; Forestry ; Forests ; global carbon budget ; Global Changes ; Ground cover ; Land clearance ; Land clearing ; Land management ; Land use planning ; missing sink ; Mitigation ; Opinion ; Sequestering ; Skogsvetenskap ; Soil ; sustainable forestry ; terrestrial ecosystems ; Thickening ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.5365-5370</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2020</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5162-7f28a697f4b9bc9adb56eb2920c6e67fc6d6a4e240dc34b87324447937ab10ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5162-7f28a697f4b9bc9adb56eb2920c6e67fc6d6a4e240dc34b87324447937ab10ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1735-756X ; 0000-0001-8560-4943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.15292$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.15292$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02984264$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/107718$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauppi, Pekka E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciais, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Högberg, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordin, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappi, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundmark, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wernick, Iddo K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>The growth of the global terrestrial sink of carbon dioxide has puzzled scientists for decades. We propose that the role of land management practices—from intensive forestry to allowing passive afforestation of abandoned lands—have played a major role in the growth of the terrestrial carbon sink in the decades since the mid twentieth century. The Forest Transition, a historic transition from shrinking to expanding forests, and from sparser to denser forests, has seen an increase of biomass and carbon across large regions of the globe. We propose that the contribution of Forest Transitions to the terrestrial carbon sink has been underestimated. Because forest growth is slow and incremental, changes in the carbon density in forest biomass and soils often elude detection. Measurement technologies that rely on changes in two‐dimensional ground cover can miss changes in forest density. In contrast, changes from abrupt and total losses of biomass in land clearing, forest fires and clear cuts are easy to measure. Land management improves over time providing important present contributions and future potential to climate change mitigation. Appreciating the contributions of Forest Transitions to the sequestering of atmospheric carbon will enable its potential to aid in climate change mitigation.
Abrupt losses of forest biomass are relatively easy to detect and monitor. Forestry reports are sometimes overly pessimistic as they acknowledge the biomass losses but fail to observe the gradual and subtle gains of biomass, which are difficult to detect empirically. Land management has promoted biomass gains at national and global levels.</description><subject>Abandoned land</subject><subject>Afforestation</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dimensional changes</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Forest biomass</subject><subject>Forest fires</subject><subject>Forest growth</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest Science</subject><subject>forest transitions</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>global carbon budget</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>Ground cover</subject><subject>Land clearance</subject><subject>Land clearing</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>missing sink</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Opinion</subject><subject>Sequestering</subject><subject>Skogsvetenskap</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>sustainable forestry</subject><subject>terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Thickening</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UUtv1DAQtipQX3DgD1SROHHI1m8nl0plRVuklThQzpbtTHZddu2tnW3pv69DSqGV8GWs-R72zIfQB4JnpJzTpbMzImhL99AhYVLUlDfyzXgXvCaYsAN0lPMNxphRLPfRAaMNkUy0h-j73CQbQ2UhQO-HXPUpbqqLmCAP1XUyIfvBx5CrbenHwYdlZX3cmJwr-LUd4RE0oauGlXc_IRTGO_S2N-sM75_qMfpx8eV6flUvvl1-nZ8vaieIpLXqaWNkq3puW-ta01khwZYpsJMgVe9kJw0HynHnGLeNYpRzrlqmjCUYgB2j2eSb72G7s3qb_MakBx2N13m9syaNRWfQBCtFmiI4mwSFvYHOQRiSWb_QvUSCX-llvNNKcCyIKAafJoPVK9nV-UKPPUzbhlPJ70jhfnx6LMXbXVmnvom7FMpC9DQHF5z_dXQp5pygf7YlWI_h6hKu_h1u4Z78-_1n5p80C-F0Itz7NTz830lfzj9Plo-q7a-j</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Kauppi, Pekka E.</creator><creator>Ciais, Philippe</creator><creator>Högberg, Peter</creator><creator>Nordin, Annika</creator><creator>Lappi, Juha</creator><creator>Lundmark, Tomas</creator><creator>Wernick, Iddo K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1735-756X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-4943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening</title><author>Kauppi, Pekka E. ; Ciais, Philippe ; Högberg, Peter ; Nordin, Annika ; Lappi, Juha ; Lundmark, Tomas ; Wernick, Iddo K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5162-7f28a697f4b9bc9adb56eb2920c6e67fc6d6a4e240dc34b87324447937ab10ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abandoned land</topic><topic>Afforestation</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dimensional changes</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Forest biomass</topic><topic>Forest fires</topic><topic>Forest growth</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest Science</topic><topic>forest transitions</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>global carbon budget</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>Ground cover</topic><topic>Land clearance</topic><topic>Land clearing</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>missing sink</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Opinion</topic><topic>Sequestering</topic><topic>Skogsvetenskap</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>sustainable forestry</topic><topic>terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Thickening</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauppi, Pekka E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciais, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Högberg, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordin, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappi, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundmark, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wernick, Iddo K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauppi, Pekka E.</au><au>Ciais, Philippe</au><au>Högberg, Peter</au><au>Nordin, Annika</au><au>Lappi, Juha</au><au>Lundmark, Tomas</au><au>Wernick, Iddo K.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5365</spage><epage>5370</epage><pages>5365-5370</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>The growth of the global terrestrial sink of carbon dioxide has puzzled scientists for decades. We propose that the role of land management practices—from intensive forestry to allowing passive afforestation of abandoned lands—have played a major role in the growth of the terrestrial carbon sink in the decades since the mid twentieth century. The Forest Transition, a historic transition from shrinking to expanding forests, and from sparser to denser forests, has seen an increase of biomass and carbon across large regions of the globe. We propose that the contribution of Forest Transitions to the terrestrial carbon sink has been underestimated. Because forest growth is slow and incremental, changes in the carbon density in forest biomass and soils often elude detection. Measurement technologies that rely on changes in two‐dimensional ground cover can miss changes in forest density. In contrast, changes from abrupt and total losses of biomass in land clearing, forest fires and clear cuts are easy to measure. Land management improves over time providing important present contributions and future potential to climate change mitigation. Appreciating the contributions of Forest Transitions to the sequestering of atmospheric carbon will enable its potential to aid in climate change mitigation.
Abrupt losses of forest biomass are relatively easy to detect and monitor. Forestry reports are sometimes overly pessimistic as they acknowledge the biomass losses but fail to observe the gradual and subtle gains of biomass, which are difficult to detect empirically. Land management has promoted biomass gains at national and global levels.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32816359</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.15292</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1735-756X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-4943</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-1013 |
ispartof | Global change biology, 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.5365-5370 |
issn | 1354-1013 1365-2486 1365-2486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_107718 |
source | MEDLINE; SWEPUB Freely available online; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Abandoned land Afforestation Biomass Carbon Carbon dioxide Carbon Sequestration Carbon sinks Clearcutting Climate change Climate change mitigation Density Dimensional changes Environmental Sciences Forest biomass Forest fires Forest growth Forest management Forest Science forest transitions Forestry Forests global carbon budget Global Changes Ground cover Land clearance Land clearing Land management Land use planning missing sink Mitigation Opinion Sequestering Skogsvetenskap Soil sustainable forestry terrestrial ecosystems Thickening Trees |
title | Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20benefits%20from%20Forest%20Transitions%20promoting%20biomass%20expansions%20and%20thickening&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Kauppi,%20Pekka%20E.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5365&rft.epage=5370&rft.pages=5365-5370&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.15292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2444794544%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2444794544&rft_id=info:pmid/32816359&rfr_iscdi=true |