Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe

Past failures of monocultures, caused by wind-throw or insect damages, and ongoing climate change currently strongly stimulate research into mixed-species stands. So far, the focus has mainly been on combinations of species with obvious complementary functional traits. However, for any generalizatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of forest research 2020-06, Vol.139 (3), p.349-367
Hauptverfasser: Pretzsch, H., Steckel, M., Heym, M., Biber, P., Ammer, C., Ehbrecht, M., Bielak, K., Bravo, F., Ordóñez, C., Collet, C., Vast, F., Drössler, L., Brazaitis, G., Godvod, K., Jansons, A., de-Dios-García, J., Löf, M., Aldea, J., Korboulewsky, N., Reventlow, D. O. J., Nothdurft, A., Engel, M., Pach, M., Skrzyszewski, J., Pardos, M., Ponette, Q., Sitko, R., Fabrika, M., Svoboda, M., Černý, J., Wolff, B., Ruíz-Peinado, R., del Río, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 367
container_issue 3
container_start_page 349
container_title European journal of forest research
container_volume 139
creator Pretzsch, H.
Steckel, M.
Heym, M.
Biber, P.
Ammer, C.
Ehbrecht, M.
Bielak, K.
Bravo, F.
Ordóñez, C.
Collet, C.
Vast, F.
Drössler, L.
Brazaitis, G.
Godvod, K.
Jansons, A.
de-Dios-García, J.
Löf, M.
Aldea, J.
Korboulewsky, N.
Reventlow, D. O. J.
Nothdurft, A.
Engel, M.
Pach, M.
Skrzyszewski, J.
Pardos, M.
Ponette, Q.
Sitko, R.
Fabrika, M.
Svoboda, M.
Černý, J.
Wolff, B.
Ruíz-Peinado, R.
del Río, M.
description Past failures of monocultures, caused by wind-throw or insect damages, and ongoing climate change currently strongly stimulate research into mixed-species stands. So far, the focus has mainly been on combinations of species with obvious complementary functional traits. However, for any generalization, a broad overview of the mixing reactions of functionally different tree species in different mixing proportions, patterns and under different site conditions is needed, including assemblages of species with rather similar demands on resources such as light. Here, we studied the growth of Scots pine and oak in mixed versus monospecific stands on 36 triplets located along a productivity gradient across Europe, reaching from Sweden to Spain and from France to Georgia. The set-up represents a wide variation in precipitation (456–1250 mm year −1 ), mean annual temperature (6.7–11.5 °C) and drought index by de Martonne (21–63 mm °C −1 ). Stand inventories and increment cores of trees stemming from 40- to 132-year-old, fully stocked stands on 0.04–0.94-ha-sized plots provided insight into how species mixing modifies stand growth and structure compared with neighbouring monospecific stands. On average, the standing stem volume was 436 and 360 m 3  ha −1 in the monocultures of Scots pine and oak, respectively, and 418 m 3  ha −1 in the mixed stands. The corresponding periodical annual volume increment amounted to 10.5 and 9.1 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the monocultures and 10.5 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the mixed stands. Scots pine showed a 10% larger quadratic mean diameter ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10342-019-01233-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_105750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2298557154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-693dbeb75a0097d805eb8f6ba4e4d35203b9eede9fe3babcd41f47a08752982f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEEqXwAqwssTmVyMGXXJdV1dJKQVAV1pYdT85xyYmDL6fkOXmhOklVxIaFNePx9_8eW5Mk7wneEozLT45gltEUkzouylg6vUhOSEFomhVl-fI5L-rXyRvn7jGmVV1VJ8mfOy8GhXbWPPg9mlPnbWh9sIBMhw76N6jUjdBqcMvxwQxm2Xe6jWwsuRm8a413aNQDoM03PQSH3NQfIZpph5rt2aI14ifa3G6RNTLYWP2IbgPYNsIjeCtAoM0X4X2kGw2yX1SinxwoJHoz7JBAozUqtqeP2k-xa6E0DB75vTVht0eXwZoR3iavOtE7ePcUT5MfV5ffL67T5uvnm4vzJm0zVvi0qJmSIMtcYFyXqsI5yKorpMggUyynmMkaQEHdAZNCtiojXVYKXJU5rSvasdNku_q6BxiD5KPVB2EnboTmrg9S2DlwB5zgvMxxFJytgr3o_6Gvzxs-1zAtCKasOpLIfljZ-OJfIX4kvzfBxu9wnMbr87wkeRYpulKtNc5Z6J5tCebzZPB1MnicDL5MBp-iiD31HeFhB_av9X9Uj3TYv1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2298557154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Pretzsch, H. ; Steckel, M. ; Heym, M. ; Biber, P. ; Ammer, C. ; Ehbrecht, M. ; Bielak, K. ; Bravo, F. ; Ordóñez, C. ; Collet, C. ; Vast, F. ; Drössler, L. ; Brazaitis, G. ; Godvod, K. ; Jansons, A. ; de-Dios-García, J. ; Löf, M. ; Aldea, J. ; Korboulewsky, N. ; Reventlow, D. O. J. ; Nothdurft, A. ; Engel, M. ; Pach, M. ; Skrzyszewski, J. ; Pardos, M. ; Ponette, Q. ; Sitko, R. ; Fabrika, M. ; Svoboda, M. ; Černý, J. ; Wolff, B. ; Ruíz-Peinado, R. ; del Río, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pretzsch, H. ; Steckel, M. ; Heym, M. ; Biber, P. ; Ammer, C. ; Ehbrecht, M. ; Bielak, K. ; Bravo, F. ; Ordóñez, C. ; Collet, C. ; Vast, F. ; Drössler, L. ; Brazaitis, G. ; Godvod, K. ; Jansons, A. ; de-Dios-García, J. ; Löf, M. ; Aldea, J. ; Korboulewsky, N. ; Reventlow, D. O. J. ; Nothdurft, A. ; Engel, M. ; Pach, M. ; Skrzyszewski, J. ; Pardos, M. ; Ponette, Q. ; Sitko, R. ; Fabrika, M. ; Svoboda, M. ; Černý, J. ; Wolff, B. ; Ruíz-Peinado, R. ; del Río, M. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Past failures of monocultures, caused by wind-throw or insect damages, and ongoing climate change currently strongly stimulate research into mixed-species stands. So far, the focus has mainly been on combinations of species with obvious complementary functional traits. However, for any generalization, a broad overview of the mixing reactions of functionally different tree species in different mixing proportions, patterns and under different site conditions is needed, including assemblages of species with rather similar demands on resources such as light. Here, we studied the growth of Scots pine and oak in mixed versus monospecific stands on 36 triplets located along a productivity gradient across Europe, reaching from Sweden to Spain and from France to Georgia. The set-up represents a wide variation in precipitation (456–1250 mm year −1 ), mean annual temperature (6.7–11.5 °C) and drought index by de Martonne (21–63 mm °C −1 ). Stand inventories and increment cores of trees stemming from 40- to 132-year-old, fully stocked stands on 0.04–0.94-ha-sized plots provided insight into how species mixing modifies stand growth and structure compared with neighbouring monospecific stands. On average, the standing stem volume was 436 and 360 m 3  ha −1 in the monocultures of Scots pine and oak, respectively, and 418 m 3  ha −1 in the mixed stands. The corresponding periodical annual volume increment amounted to 10.5 and 9.1 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the monocultures and 10.5 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the mixed stands. Scots pine showed a 10% larger quadratic mean diameter ( p  < 0.05), a 7% larger dominant diameter ( p  < 0.01) and a 9% higher growth of basal area and volume in mixed stands compared with neighbouring monocultures. For Scots pine, the productivity advantages of growing in mixture increased with site index ( p  < 0.01) and water supply ( p  < 0.01), while for oak they decreased with site index ( p  < 0.01). In total, the superior productivity of mixed stands compared to monocultures increased with water supply ( p  < 0.10). Based on 7843 measured crowns, we found that in mixture both species, but especially oak, had significantly wider crowns ( p  < 0.001) than in monocultures. On average, we found relatively small effects of species mixing on stand growth and structure. Scots pine benefiting on rich, and oak on poor sites, allows for a mixture that is productive and most likely climate resistant all along a wide ecological gradient. We discuss the potential of this mixture in view of climate change.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4669</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4677</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10342-019-01233-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate change ; Cores ; Drought ; Drought index ; Environmental Sciences ; Evergreen trees ; Forest Science ; Forestry ; Insects ; Life Sciences ; Monoculture ; Oak ; Original Paper ; Pine ; Pine trees ; Pinus sylvestris ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Productivity ; Site index ; Skogsvetenskap ; Species ; Water supply ; Wind damage</subject><ispartof>European journal of forest research, 2020-06, Vol.139 (3), p.349-367</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-693dbeb75a0097d805eb8f6ba4e4d35203b9eede9fe3babcd41f47a08752982f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-693dbeb75a0097d805eb8f6ba4e4d35203b9eede9fe3babcd41f47a08752982f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2726-7392 ; 0000-0003-0861-7796 ; 0000-0002-6017-1114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10342-019-01233-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10342-019-01233-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02610238$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/105750$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pretzsch, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steckel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heym, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biber, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammer, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehbrecht, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielak, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravo, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordóñez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collet, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vast, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drössler, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazaitis, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godvod, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansons, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de-Dios-García, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löf, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldea, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korboulewsky, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reventlow, D. O. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nothdurft, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skrzyszewski, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardos, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponette, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitko, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabrika, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svoboda, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černý, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruíz-Peinado, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Río, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe</title><title>European journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Eur J Forest Res</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Past failures of monocultures, caused by wind-throw or insect damages, and ongoing climate change currently strongly stimulate research into mixed-species stands. So far, the focus has mainly been on combinations of species with obvious complementary functional traits. However, for any generalization, a broad overview of the mixing reactions of functionally different tree species in different mixing proportions, patterns and under different site conditions is needed, including assemblages of species with rather similar demands on resources such as light. Here, we studied the growth of Scots pine and oak in mixed versus monospecific stands on 36 triplets located along a productivity gradient across Europe, reaching from Sweden to Spain and from France to Georgia. The set-up represents a wide variation in precipitation (456–1250 mm year −1 ), mean annual temperature (6.7–11.5 °C) and drought index by de Martonne (21–63 mm °C −1 ). Stand inventories and increment cores of trees stemming from 40- to 132-year-old, fully stocked stands on 0.04–0.94-ha-sized plots provided insight into how species mixing modifies stand growth and structure compared with neighbouring monospecific stands. On average, the standing stem volume was 436 and 360 m 3  ha −1 in the monocultures of Scots pine and oak, respectively, and 418 m 3  ha −1 in the mixed stands. The corresponding periodical annual volume increment amounted to 10.5 and 9.1 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the monocultures and 10.5 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the mixed stands. Scots pine showed a 10% larger quadratic mean diameter ( p  < 0.05), a 7% larger dominant diameter ( p  < 0.01) and a 9% higher growth of basal area and volume in mixed stands compared with neighbouring monocultures. For Scots pine, the productivity advantages of growing in mixture increased with site index ( p  < 0.01) and water supply ( p  < 0.01), while for oak they decreased with site index ( p  < 0.01). In total, the superior productivity of mixed stands compared to monocultures increased with water supply ( p  < 0.10). Based on 7843 measured crowns, we found that in mixture both species, but especially oak, had significantly wider crowns ( p  < 0.001) than in monocultures. On average, we found relatively small effects of species mixing on stand growth and structure. Scots pine benefiting on rich, and oak on poor sites, allows for a mixture that is productive and most likely climate resistant all along a wide ecological gradient. We discuss the potential of this mixture in view of climate change.]]></description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought index</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Evergreen trees</subject><subject>Forest Science</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Oak</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus sylvestris</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Site index</subject><subject>Skogsvetenskap</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Wind damage</subject><issn>1612-4669</issn><issn>1612-4677</issn><issn>1612-4677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEEqXwAqwssTmVyMGXXJdV1dJKQVAV1pYdT85xyYmDL6fkOXmhOklVxIaFNePx9_8eW5Mk7wneEozLT45gltEUkzouylg6vUhOSEFomhVl-fI5L-rXyRvn7jGmVV1VJ8mfOy8GhXbWPPg9mlPnbWh9sIBMhw76N6jUjdBqcMvxwQxm2Xe6jWwsuRm8a413aNQDoM03PQSH3NQfIZpph5rt2aI14ifa3G6RNTLYWP2IbgPYNsIjeCtAoM0X4X2kGw2yX1SinxwoJHoz7JBAozUqtqeP2k-xa6E0DB75vTVht0eXwZoR3iavOtE7ePcUT5MfV5ffL67T5uvnm4vzJm0zVvi0qJmSIMtcYFyXqsI5yKorpMggUyynmMkaQEHdAZNCtiojXVYKXJU5rSvasdNku_q6BxiD5KPVB2EnboTmrg9S2DlwB5zgvMxxFJytgr3o_6Gvzxs-1zAtCKasOpLIfljZ-OJfIX4kvzfBxu9wnMbr87wkeRYpulKtNc5Z6J5tCebzZPB1MnicDL5MBp-iiD31HeFhB_av9X9Uj3TYv1Q</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Pretzsch, H.</creator><creator>Steckel, M.</creator><creator>Heym, M.</creator><creator>Biber, P.</creator><creator>Ammer, C.</creator><creator>Ehbrecht, M.</creator><creator>Bielak, K.</creator><creator>Bravo, F.</creator><creator>Ordóñez, C.</creator><creator>Collet, C.</creator><creator>Vast, F.</creator><creator>Drössler, L.</creator><creator>Brazaitis, G.</creator><creator>Godvod, K.</creator><creator>Jansons, A.</creator><creator>de-Dios-García, J.</creator><creator>Löf, M.</creator><creator>Aldea, J.</creator><creator>Korboulewsky, N.</creator><creator>Reventlow, D. O. J.</creator><creator>Nothdurft, A.</creator><creator>Engel, M.</creator><creator>Pach, M.</creator><creator>Skrzyszewski, J.</creator><creator>Pardos, M.</creator><creator>Ponette, Q.</creator><creator>Sitko, R.</creator><creator>Fabrika, M.</creator><creator>Svoboda, M.</creator><creator>Černý, J.</creator><creator>Wolff, B.</creator><creator>Ruíz-Peinado, R.</creator><creator>del Río, M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-7392</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-7796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6017-1114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe</title><author>Pretzsch, H. ; Steckel, M. ; Heym, M. ; Biber, P. ; Ammer, C. ; Ehbrecht, M. ; Bielak, K. ; Bravo, F. ; Ordóñez, C. ; Collet, C. ; Vast, F. ; Drössler, L. ; Brazaitis, G. ; Godvod, K. ; Jansons, A. ; de-Dios-García, J. ; Löf, M. ; Aldea, J. ; Korboulewsky, N. ; Reventlow, D. O. J. ; Nothdurft, A. ; Engel, M. ; Pach, M. ; Skrzyszewski, J. ; Pardos, M. ; Ponette, Q. ; Sitko, R. ; Fabrika, M. ; Svoboda, M. ; Černý, J. ; Wolff, B. ; Ruíz-Peinado, R. ; del Río, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-693dbeb75a0097d805eb8f6ba4e4d35203b9eede9fe3babcd41f47a08752982f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought index</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Evergreen trees</topic><topic>Forest Science</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Oak</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus sylvestris</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Site index</topic><topic>Skogsvetenskap</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Wind damage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pretzsch, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steckel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heym, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biber, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammer, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehbrecht, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielak, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravo, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordóñez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collet, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vast, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drössler, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazaitis, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godvod, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansons, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de-Dios-García, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löf, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldea, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korboulewsky, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reventlow, D. O. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nothdurft, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skrzyszewski, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardos, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponette, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitko, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabrika, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svoboda, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černý, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruíz-Peinado, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Río, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pretzsch, H.</au><au>Steckel, M.</au><au>Heym, M.</au><au>Biber, P.</au><au>Ammer, C.</au><au>Ehbrecht, M.</au><au>Bielak, K.</au><au>Bravo, F.</au><au>Ordóñez, C.</au><au>Collet, C.</au><au>Vast, F.</au><au>Drössler, L.</au><au>Brazaitis, G.</au><au>Godvod, K.</au><au>Jansons, A.</au><au>de-Dios-García, J.</au><au>Löf, M.</au><au>Aldea, J.</au><au>Korboulewsky, N.</au><au>Reventlow, D. O. J.</au><au>Nothdurft, A.</au><au>Engel, M.</au><au>Pach, M.</au><au>Skrzyszewski, J.</au><au>Pardos, M.</au><au>Ponette, Q.</au><au>Sitko, R.</au><au>Fabrika, M.</au><au>Svoboda, M.</au><au>Černý, J.</au><au>Wolff, B.</au><au>Ruíz-Peinado, R.</au><au>del Río, M.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe</atitle><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Forest Res</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>349-367</pages><issn>1612-4669</issn><issn>1612-4677</issn><eissn>1612-4677</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Past failures of monocultures, caused by wind-throw or insect damages, and ongoing climate change currently strongly stimulate research into mixed-species stands. So far, the focus has mainly been on combinations of species with obvious complementary functional traits. However, for any generalization, a broad overview of the mixing reactions of functionally different tree species in different mixing proportions, patterns and under different site conditions is needed, including assemblages of species with rather similar demands on resources such as light. Here, we studied the growth of Scots pine and oak in mixed versus monospecific stands on 36 triplets located along a productivity gradient across Europe, reaching from Sweden to Spain and from France to Georgia. The set-up represents a wide variation in precipitation (456–1250 mm year −1 ), mean annual temperature (6.7–11.5 °C) and drought index by de Martonne (21–63 mm °C −1 ). Stand inventories and increment cores of trees stemming from 40- to 132-year-old, fully stocked stands on 0.04–0.94-ha-sized plots provided insight into how species mixing modifies stand growth and structure compared with neighbouring monospecific stands. On average, the standing stem volume was 436 and 360 m 3  ha −1 in the monocultures of Scots pine and oak, respectively, and 418 m 3  ha −1 in the mixed stands. The corresponding periodical annual volume increment amounted to 10.5 and 9.1 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the monocultures and 10.5 m 3  ha −1  year −1 in the mixed stands. Scots pine showed a 10% larger quadratic mean diameter ( p  < 0.05), a 7% larger dominant diameter ( p  < 0.01) and a 9% higher growth of basal area and volume in mixed stands compared with neighbouring monocultures. For Scots pine, the productivity advantages of growing in mixture increased with site index ( p  < 0.01) and water supply ( p  < 0.01), while for oak they decreased with site index ( p  < 0.01). In total, the superior productivity of mixed stands compared to monocultures increased with water supply ( p  < 0.10). Based on 7843 measured crowns, we found that in mixture both species, but especially oak, had significantly wider crowns ( p  < 0.001) than in monocultures. On average, we found relatively small effects of species mixing on stand growth and structure. Scots pine benefiting on rich, and oak on poor sites, allows for a mixture that is productive and most likely climate resistant all along a wide ecological gradient. We discuss the potential of this mixture in view of climate change.]]></abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10342-019-01233-y</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-7392</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-7796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6017-1114</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1612-4669
ispartof European journal of forest research, 2020-06, Vol.139 (3), p.349-367
issn 1612-4669
1612-4677
1612-4677
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_105750
source SpringerLink Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Climate change
Cores
Drought
Drought index
Environmental Sciences
Evergreen trees
Forest Science
Forestry
Insects
Life Sciences
Monoculture
Oak
Original Paper
Pine
Pine trees
Pinus sylvestris
Plant Ecology
Plant Sciences
Plant species
Productivity
Site index
Skogsvetenskap
Species
Water supply
Wind damage
title Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stand%20growth%20and%20structure%20of%20mixed-species%20and%20monospecific%20stands%20of%20Scots%20pine%20(Pinus%20sylvestris%20L.)%20and%20oak%20(Q.%20robur%20L.,%20Quercus%20petraea%20(Matt.)%20Liebl.)%20analysed%20along%20a%20productivity%20gradient%20through%20Europe&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Pretzsch,%20H.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=349-367&rft.issn=1612-4669&rft.eissn=1612-4677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10342-019-01233-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2298557154%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2298557154&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true