Designing on-farm irrigation ponds for high and stable yield for different climates and risk-coping attitudes

•On-farm ponds can sustainably provide water for irrigation, but impose trade-offs.•A minimalist model coupling soil water, crop and pond water storage is developed.•We identify the best pond size for different climates, soils and irrigation strategies.•Production maximization and low yield risk min...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2020-05, Vol.584, p.124634, Article 124634
Hauptverfasser: Vico, Giulia, Tamburino, Lucia, Rigby, James Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 124634
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 584
creator Vico, Giulia
Tamburino, Lucia
Rigby, James Robert
description •On-farm ponds can sustainably provide water for irrigation, but impose trade-offs.•A minimalist model coupling soil water, crop and pond water storage is developed.•We identify the best pond size for different climates, soils and irrigation strategies.•Production maximization and low yield risk minimization require different pond sizes.•Future more extreme climates will make these goals even harder to reconcile. In many regions precipitation does not reliably meet crop water demands – a situation that climate change will likely exacerbate. Supplemental irrigation can help enhance and stabilize crop yields, but the need of water for irrigation has often led to groundwater over-exploitation. On-farm ponds can provide a more sustainable water source. Their use has often been promoted by local authorities, but, by converting a portion of cultivated area to water storage and reducing water availability downstream, on-farm ponds also imply constraints and trade-offs. For an effective exploitation of their potential benefits, they must be carefully designed and managed based on the local edaphic and climate conditions – a non trivial, task because of the cascading effects of rainfall unpredictability. Here we identify the most suitable on-farm pond size, according to two criteria: maximization of average yield (i.e., production maximization) and achievement of a minimum acceptable yield (i.e., risk minimization, accounting for the farmer’s risk aversion). To this aim, we develop a minimalist model, requiring few, physically based parameters, coupling crop biomass, soil moisture, and water stored in the pond. While general, the model is here applied to a case-study in the Lower Mississippi River Basin (USA). Simulations show that yield maximization and risk minimization are goals hard to reconcile, regardless of climatic conditions, soil type and irrigation strategy, with smaller ponds allowing the maximum average yield at the cost of reducing its stability from year to year. Stress avoidance irrigation ensures higher yields than deficit irrigation, even if it implies a faster use of the stored water. Future, more extreme climates will result in lower maximum average yields and narrower ranges of pond sizes ensuring desirable minimum yields.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_105248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169420300949</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0022169420300949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-436844504702e95d9656b61817a16c0a546a5d2f82394e87089deefc3adf74353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUj-gRS_4iQrhMpTqsQG1pZrj1OHNK5sF9S_J32ILbO50sycq5mL0C0lM0qovOtm3WpnY-hnjLCxx4Tk4gxNaF01BatIdY4mhDBWUNmIS3SVUkfG4lxM0PoRkm8HP7Q4DIXTcY19jL7V2YcBb8JgE3Yh4pVvV1gPFqeslz3gnYfeHibWOwcRhoxN79c6QzrsRZ--ChM2e2eds89bC-kaXTjdJ7g56RR9Pj99zF-LxfvL2_xhURgu6lwILmshSiIqwqApbSNLuZS0ppWm0hBdCqlLy1zNeCOgrkjdWABnuLauErzkUzQ7-qYf2GyXahPHy-JOBe1V6rdLHfeiEihKSibqESiPgIkhpQjuD6FE7UNWnTqFrPYhq2PII3d_5GD85tvD6Gs8DAasj2CyssH_4_ALqEiJ_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing on-farm irrigation ponds for high and stable yield for different climates and risk-coping attitudes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vico, Giulia ; Tamburino, Lucia ; Rigby, James Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Vico, Giulia ; Tamburino, Lucia ; Rigby, James Robert ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>•On-farm ponds can sustainably provide water for irrigation, but impose trade-offs.•A minimalist model coupling soil water, crop and pond water storage is developed.•We identify the best pond size for different climates, soils and irrigation strategies.•Production maximization and low yield risk minimization require different pond sizes.•Future more extreme climates will make these goals even harder to reconcile. In many regions precipitation does not reliably meet crop water demands – a situation that climate change will likely exacerbate. Supplemental irrigation can help enhance and stabilize crop yields, but the need of water for irrigation has often led to groundwater over-exploitation. On-farm ponds can provide a more sustainable water source. Their use has often been promoted by local authorities, but, by converting a portion of cultivated area to water storage and reducing water availability downstream, on-farm ponds also imply constraints and trade-offs. For an effective exploitation of their potential benefits, they must be carefully designed and managed based on the local edaphic and climate conditions – a non trivial, task because of the cascading effects of rainfall unpredictability. Here we identify the most suitable on-farm pond size, according to two criteria: maximization of average yield (i.e., production maximization) and achievement of a minimum acceptable yield (i.e., risk minimization, accounting for the farmer’s risk aversion). To this aim, we develop a minimalist model, requiring few, physically based parameters, coupling crop biomass, soil moisture, and water stored in the pond. While general, the model is here applied to a case-study in the Lower Mississippi River Basin (USA). Simulations show that yield maximization and risk minimization are goals hard to reconcile, regardless of climatic conditions, soil type and irrigation strategy, with smaller ponds allowing the maximum average yield at the cost of reducing its stability from year to year. Stress avoidance irrigation ensures higher yields than deficit irrigation, even if it implies a faster use of the stored water. Future, more extreme climates will result in lower maximum average yields and narrower ranges of pond sizes ensuring desirable minimum yields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural Science ; Crop yield ; Irrigation ; Jordbruksvetenskap ; Lower Mississippi River Basin ; Oceanografi, hydrologi, vattenresurser ; Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources ; On-farm pond ; Risk aversion ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2020-05, Vol.584, p.124634, Article 124634</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-436844504702e95d9656b61817a16c0a546a5d2f82394e87089deefc3adf74353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-436844504702e95d9656b61817a16c0a546a5d2f82394e87089deefc3adf74353</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1974-7158 ; 0000-0002-7849-2653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169420300949$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/105248$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vico, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamburino, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, James Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Designing on-farm irrigation ponds for high and stable yield for different climates and risk-coping attitudes</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•On-farm ponds can sustainably provide water for irrigation, but impose trade-offs.•A minimalist model coupling soil water, crop and pond water storage is developed.•We identify the best pond size for different climates, soils and irrigation strategies.•Production maximization and low yield risk minimization require different pond sizes.•Future more extreme climates will make these goals even harder to reconcile. In many regions precipitation does not reliably meet crop water demands – a situation that climate change will likely exacerbate. Supplemental irrigation can help enhance and stabilize crop yields, but the need of water for irrigation has often led to groundwater over-exploitation. On-farm ponds can provide a more sustainable water source. Their use has often been promoted by local authorities, but, by converting a portion of cultivated area to water storage and reducing water availability downstream, on-farm ponds also imply constraints and trade-offs. For an effective exploitation of their potential benefits, they must be carefully designed and managed based on the local edaphic and climate conditions – a non trivial, task because of the cascading effects of rainfall unpredictability. Here we identify the most suitable on-farm pond size, according to two criteria: maximization of average yield (i.e., production maximization) and achievement of a minimum acceptable yield (i.e., risk minimization, accounting for the farmer’s risk aversion). To this aim, we develop a minimalist model, requiring few, physically based parameters, coupling crop biomass, soil moisture, and water stored in the pond. While general, the model is here applied to a case-study in the Lower Mississippi River Basin (USA). Simulations show that yield maximization and risk minimization are goals hard to reconcile, regardless of climatic conditions, soil type and irrigation strategy, with smaller ponds allowing the maximum average yield at the cost of reducing its stability from year to year. Stress avoidance irrigation ensures higher yields than deficit irrigation, even if it implies a faster use of the stored water. Future, more extreme climates will result in lower maximum average yields and narrower ranges of pond sizes ensuring desirable minimum yields.</description><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Jordbruksvetenskap</subject><subject>Lower Mississippi River Basin</subject><subject>Oceanografi, hydrologi, vattenresurser</subject><subject>Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources</subject><subject>On-farm pond</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUj-gRS_4iQrhMpTqsQG1pZrj1OHNK5sF9S_J32ILbO50sycq5mL0C0lM0qovOtm3WpnY-hnjLCxx4Tk4gxNaF01BatIdY4mhDBWUNmIS3SVUkfG4lxM0PoRkm8HP7Q4DIXTcY19jL7V2YcBb8JgE3Yh4pVvV1gPFqeslz3gnYfeHibWOwcRhoxN79c6QzrsRZ--ChM2e2eds89bC-kaXTjdJ7g56RR9Pj99zF-LxfvL2_xhURgu6lwILmshSiIqwqApbSNLuZS0ppWm0hBdCqlLy1zNeCOgrkjdWABnuLauErzkUzQ7-qYf2GyXahPHy-JOBe1V6rdLHfeiEihKSibqESiPgIkhpQjuD6FE7UNWnTqFrPYhq2PII3d_5GD85tvD6Gs8DAasj2CyssH_4_ALqEiJ_Q</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Vico, Giulia</creator><creator>Tamburino, Lucia</creator><creator>Rigby, James Robert</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1974-7158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-2653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Designing on-farm irrigation ponds for high and stable yield for different climates and risk-coping attitudes</title><author>Vico, Giulia ; Tamburino, Lucia ; Rigby, James Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-436844504702e95d9656b61817a16c0a546a5d2f82394e87089deefc3adf74353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Jordbruksvetenskap</topic><topic>Lower Mississippi River Basin</topic><topic>Oceanografi, hydrologi, vattenresurser</topic><topic>Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources</topic><topic>On-farm pond</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vico, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamburino, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, James Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vico, Giulia</au><au>Tamburino, Lucia</au><au>Rigby, James Robert</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing on-farm irrigation ponds for high and stable yield for different climates and risk-coping attitudes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>584</volume><spage>124634</spage><pages>124634-</pages><artnum>124634</artnum><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><abstract>•On-farm ponds can sustainably provide water for irrigation, but impose trade-offs.•A minimalist model coupling soil water, crop and pond water storage is developed.•We identify the best pond size for different climates, soils and irrigation strategies.•Production maximization and low yield risk minimization require different pond sizes.•Future more extreme climates will make these goals even harder to reconcile. In many regions precipitation does not reliably meet crop water demands – a situation that climate change will likely exacerbate. Supplemental irrigation can help enhance and stabilize crop yields, but the need of water for irrigation has often led to groundwater over-exploitation. On-farm ponds can provide a more sustainable water source. Their use has often been promoted by local authorities, but, by converting a portion of cultivated area to water storage and reducing water availability downstream, on-farm ponds also imply constraints and trade-offs. For an effective exploitation of their potential benefits, they must be carefully designed and managed based on the local edaphic and climate conditions – a non trivial, task because of the cascading effects of rainfall unpredictability. Here we identify the most suitable on-farm pond size, according to two criteria: maximization of average yield (i.e., production maximization) and achievement of a minimum acceptable yield (i.e., risk minimization, accounting for the farmer’s risk aversion). To this aim, we develop a minimalist model, requiring few, physically based parameters, coupling crop biomass, soil moisture, and water stored in the pond. While general, the model is here applied to a case-study in the Lower Mississippi River Basin (USA). Simulations show that yield maximization and risk minimization are goals hard to reconcile, regardless of climatic conditions, soil type and irrigation strategy, with smaller ponds allowing the maximum average yield at the cost of reducing its stability from year to year. Stress avoidance irrigation ensures higher yields than deficit irrigation, even if it implies a faster use of the stored water. Future, more extreme climates will result in lower maximum average yields and narrower ranges of pond sizes ensuring desirable minimum yields.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124634</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1974-7158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-2653</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2020-05, Vol.584, p.124634, Article 124634
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_105248
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural Science
Crop yield
Irrigation
Jordbruksvetenskap
Lower Mississippi River Basin
Oceanografi, hydrologi, vattenresurser
Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources
On-farm pond
Risk aversion
Sustainability
title Designing on-farm irrigation ponds for high and stable yield for different climates and risk-coping attitudes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A39%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20on-farm%20irrigation%20ponds%20for%20high%20and%20stable%20yield%20for%20different%20climates%20and%20risk-coping%20attitudes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Vico,%20Giulia&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=584&rft.spage=124634&rft.pages=124634-&rft.artnum=124634&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124634&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_swepu%3ES0022169420300949%3C/elsevier_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169420300949&rfr_iscdi=true