Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources
Pig production systems provide multiple benefits to humans. However, the global increase in meat consumption has profound consequences for our earth. This perspective describes two alternative scenarios for improving the sustainability of future pig production systems. The first scenario is a high i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2020-07, Vol.100 (9), p.3575-3586 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3586 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3575 |
container_title | Journal of the science of food and agriculture |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Rauw, Wendy M Rydhmer, Lotta Kyriazakis, Ilias Øverland, Margareth Gilbert, Hélène Dekkers, Jack CM Hermesch, Susanne Bouquet, Alban Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio Louveau, Isabelle Gomez‐Raya, Luis |
description | Pig production systems provide multiple benefits to humans. However, the global increase in meat consumption has profound consequences for our earth. This perspective describes two alternative scenarios for improving the sustainability of future pig production systems. The first scenario is a high input–high output system based on sustainable intensification, maximizing animal protein production efficiency on a limited land surface at the same time as minimizing environmental impacts. The second scenario is a reduced input–reduced output system based on selecting animals that are more robust to climate change and are better adapted to transform low quality feed (local feeds, feedstuff co‐products, food waste) into meat. However, in contrast to the first scenario, the latter scenario results in reduced predicted yields, reduced production efficiency and possibly increased costs to the consumer. National evaluation of the availability of local feed and feedstuff co‐product alternatives, determination of limits to feed sourced from international markets, available land for crop and livestock production, desired production levels, and a willingness to politically enforce policies through subsidies and/or penalties are some of the considerations to combine these two scenarios. Given future novel sustainable alternatives to livestock animal protein, it may become reasonable to move towards an added general premium price on ‘protein from livestock animals’ to the benefit of promoting higher incomes to farmers at the same time as covering the extra costs of, politically enforced, welfare of livestock animals in sustainable production systems. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jsfa.10338 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_105049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2411979842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5218-f79b60a34404b2cc43b6e81072786f9f0640324a9966cfc86a3b83a770a9763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq2--AEk4FOFqTd_djJ5EZZibWVBob6HTDbZzTJNxmRmy357M51abB98yiX3d05u7kHoPYFzAkA_77PTpWKseYEWBKSoAAi8RIvSpNWScHqC3uS8BwAp6_o1OmEUhOCSLpD9mWLurRkydjHhPOZB-6Bb3_nhiKPDvd_iPsXNaAYfA_YBJ9vp-3qI2HT-Vg8Wm50OW4t12OAQD7bDztpNIXMck7H5LXrldJftu4fzFN1cfv11cVWtf3y7vlitK7OkpKmckG0NmnEOvKXGcNbWtiEgqGhqJx3UHBjlevqFcaapNWsbpoUALUXNTtH57JrvbD-2qk9luHRUUXuVu7HVaTpUtorAErgsgi-zoNC3dmNsGJLunuiedoLfqW08KMFIQwQrBmezwe6Z7Gq1VtMd0GXJhZIDKezHh8dS_D3aPKh9WU4o61CUEyKFbDgt1KeZMiWXnKx7tCWgprTVlLa6T7vAH_6d_xH9G28ByAzc-c4e_2Olvt9crmbTP9cztds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2411979842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Rauw, Wendy M ; Rydhmer, Lotta ; Kyriazakis, Ilias ; Øverland, Margareth ; Gilbert, Hélène ; Dekkers, Jack CM ; Hermesch, Susanne ; Bouquet, Alban ; Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio ; Louveau, Isabelle ; Gomez‐Raya, Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Rauw, Wendy M ; Rydhmer, Lotta ; Kyriazakis, Ilias ; Øverland, Margareth ; Gilbert, Hélène ; Dekkers, Jack CM ; Hermesch, Susanne ; Bouquet, Alban ; Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio ; Louveau, Isabelle ; Gomez‐Raya, Luis ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Pig production systems provide multiple benefits to humans. However, the global increase in meat consumption has profound consequences for our earth. This perspective describes two alternative scenarios for improving the sustainability of future pig production systems. The first scenario is a high input–high output system based on sustainable intensification, maximizing animal protein production efficiency on a limited land surface at the same time as minimizing environmental impacts. The second scenario is a reduced input–reduced output system based on selecting animals that are more robust to climate change and are better adapted to transform low quality feed (local feeds, feedstuff co‐products, food waste) into meat. However, in contrast to the first scenario, the latter scenario results in reduced predicted yields, reduced production efficiency and possibly increased costs to the consumer. National evaluation of the availability of local feed and feedstuff co‐product alternatives, determination of limits to feed sourced from international markets, available land for crop and livestock production, desired production levels, and a willingness to politically enforce policies through subsidies and/or penalties are some of the considerations to combine these two scenarios. Given future novel sustainable alternatives to livestock animal protein, it may become reasonable to move towards an added general premium price on ‘protein from livestock animals’ to the benefit of promoting higher incomes to farmers at the same time as covering the extra costs of, politically enforced, welfare of livestock animals in sustainable production systems. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32077492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural production ; Animal and Dairy Science ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Husbandry ; Animal protein ; animal robustness ; Animals ; Climate Change ; Crop production ; Environmental impact ; Feeds ; Food ; Food production ; Food sources ; Food Supply ; Food waste ; Humans ; Husdjursvetenskap ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Livestock production ; local feed resources ; Meat ; Meat - analysis ; pig production ; Proteins ; Subsidies ; Sustainability ; sustainable agriculture ; Swine - growth & development ; Swine - metabolism ; Swine production</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2020-07, Vol.100 (9), p.3575-3586</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5218-f79b60a34404b2cc43b6e81072786f9f0640324a9966cfc86a3b83a770a9763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5218-f79b60a34404b2cc43b6e81072786f9f0640324a9966cfc86a3b83a770a9763</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9684-6294 ; 0000-0002-9647-5988 ; 0000-0003-1142-6624 ; 0000-0003-1875-3951 ; 0000-0002-2885-1961 ; 0000-0002-4385-3228</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjsfa.10338$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjsfa.10338$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32077492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02503321$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/105049$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rauw, Wendy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydhmer, Lotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øverland, Margareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekkers, Jack CM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermesch, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouquet, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louveau, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐Raya, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><description>Pig production systems provide multiple benefits to humans. However, the global increase in meat consumption has profound consequences for our earth. This perspective describes two alternative scenarios for improving the sustainability of future pig production systems. The first scenario is a high input–high output system based on sustainable intensification, maximizing animal protein production efficiency on a limited land surface at the same time as minimizing environmental impacts. The second scenario is a reduced input–reduced output system based on selecting animals that are more robust to climate change and are better adapted to transform low quality feed (local feeds, feedstuff co‐products, food waste) into meat. However, in contrast to the first scenario, the latter scenario results in reduced predicted yields, reduced production efficiency and possibly increased costs to the consumer. National evaluation of the availability of local feed and feedstuff co‐product alternatives, determination of limits to feed sourced from international markets, available land for crop and livestock production, desired production levels, and a willingness to politically enforce policies through subsidies and/or penalties are some of the considerations to combine these two scenarios. Given future novel sustainable alternatives to livestock animal protein, it may become reasonable to move towards an added general premium price on ‘protein from livestock animals’ to the benefit of promoting higher incomes to farmers at the same time as covering the extra costs of, politically enforced, welfare of livestock animals in sustainable production systems. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Animal and Dairy Science</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animal protein</subject><subject>animal robustness</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Husdjursvetenskap</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock production</subject><subject>local feed resources</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat - analysis</subject><subject>pig production</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Swine - growth & development</subject><subject>Swine - metabolism</subject><subject>Swine production</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq2--AEk4FOFqTd_djJ5EZZibWVBob6HTDbZzTJNxmRmy357M51abB98yiX3d05u7kHoPYFzAkA_77PTpWKseYEWBKSoAAi8RIvSpNWScHqC3uS8BwAp6_o1OmEUhOCSLpD9mWLurRkydjHhPOZB-6Bb3_nhiKPDvd_iPsXNaAYfA_YBJ9vp-3qI2HT-Vg8Wm50OW4t12OAQD7bDztpNIXMck7H5LXrldJftu4fzFN1cfv11cVWtf3y7vlitK7OkpKmckG0NmnEOvKXGcNbWtiEgqGhqJx3UHBjlevqFcaapNWsbpoUALUXNTtH57JrvbD-2qk9luHRUUXuVu7HVaTpUtorAErgsgi-zoNC3dmNsGJLunuiedoLfqW08KMFIQwQrBmezwe6Z7Gq1VtMd0GXJhZIDKezHh8dS_D3aPKh9WU4o61CUEyKFbDgt1KeZMiWXnKx7tCWgprTVlLa6T7vAH_6d_xH9G28ByAzc-c4e_2Olvt9crmbTP9cztds</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Rauw, Wendy M</creator><creator>Rydhmer, Lotta</creator><creator>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creator><creator>Øverland, Margareth</creator><creator>Gilbert, Hélène</creator><creator>Dekkers, Jack CM</creator><creator>Hermesch, Susanne</creator><creator>Bouquet, Alban</creator><creator>Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio</creator><creator>Louveau, Isabelle</creator><creator>Gomez‐Raya, Luis</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9684-6294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-5988</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-6624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-3951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2885-1961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-3228</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources</title><author>Rauw, Wendy M ; Rydhmer, Lotta ; Kyriazakis, Ilias ; Øverland, Margareth ; Gilbert, Hélène ; Dekkers, Jack CM ; Hermesch, Susanne ; Bouquet, Alban ; Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio ; Louveau, Isabelle ; Gomez‐Raya, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5218-f79b60a34404b2cc43b6e81072786f9f0640324a9966cfc86a3b83a770a9763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Animal and Dairy Science</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animal protein</topic><topic>animal robustness</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Husdjursvetenskap</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock production</topic><topic>local feed resources</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat - analysis</topic><topic>pig production</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Swine - growth & development</topic><topic>Swine - metabolism</topic><topic>Swine production</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rauw, Wendy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydhmer, Lotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øverland, Margareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekkers, Jack CM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermesch, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouquet, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louveau, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐Raya, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rauw, Wendy M</au><au>Rydhmer, Lotta</au><au>Kyriazakis, Ilias</au><au>Øverland, Margareth</au><au>Gilbert, Hélène</au><au>Dekkers, Jack CM</au><au>Hermesch, Susanne</au><au>Bouquet, Alban</au><au>Gómez Izquierdo, Emilio</au><au>Louveau, Isabelle</au><au>Gomez‐Raya, Luis</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3575</spage><epage>3586</epage><pages>3575-3586</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><abstract>Pig production systems provide multiple benefits to humans. However, the global increase in meat consumption has profound consequences for our earth. This perspective describes two alternative scenarios for improving the sustainability of future pig production systems. The first scenario is a high input–high output system based on sustainable intensification, maximizing animal protein production efficiency on a limited land surface at the same time as minimizing environmental impacts. The second scenario is a reduced input–reduced output system based on selecting animals that are more robust to climate change and are better adapted to transform low quality feed (local feeds, feedstuff co‐products, food waste) into meat. However, in contrast to the first scenario, the latter scenario results in reduced predicted yields, reduced production efficiency and possibly increased costs to the consumer. National evaluation of the availability of local feed and feedstuff co‐product alternatives, determination of limits to feed sourced from international markets, available land for crop and livestock production, desired production levels, and a willingness to politically enforce policies through subsidies and/or penalties are some of the considerations to combine these two scenarios. Given future novel sustainable alternatives to livestock animal protein, it may become reasonable to move towards an added general premium price on ‘protein from livestock animals’ to the benefit of promoting higher incomes to farmers at the same time as covering the extra costs of, politically enforced, welfare of livestock animals in sustainable production systems. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>32077492</pmid><doi>10.1002/jsfa.10338</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9684-6294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-5988</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-6624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-3951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2885-1961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-3228</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5142 |
ispartof | Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2020-07, Vol.100 (9), p.3575-3586 |
issn | 0022-5142 1097-0010 1097-0010 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_105049 |
source | MEDLINE; SWEPUB Freely available online; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural production Animal and Dairy Science Animal Feed - analysis Animal Husbandry Animal protein animal robustness Animals Climate Change Crop production Environmental impact Feeds Food Food production Food sources Food Supply Food waste Humans Husdjursvetenskap Life Sciences Livestock Livestock production local feed resources Meat Meat - analysis pig production Proteins Subsidies Sustainability sustainable agriculture Swine - growth & development Swine - metabolism Swine production |
title | Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospects%20for%20sustainability%20of%20pig%20production%20in%20relation%20to%20climate%20change%20and%20novel%20feed%20resources&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Rauw,%20Wendy%20M&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3575&rft.epage=3586&rft.pages=3575-3586&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jsfa.10338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2411979842%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2411979842&rft_id=info:pmid/32077492&rfr_iscdi=true |