Reduced biodiversity in modernized villages: A conflict between sustainable development goals

Despite large conservation efforts to halt the loss of farmland biodiversity in Europe, negative population trends are still observed, especially for common species. Old villages and human settlements are biodiversity hotspots and important breeding habitats for farmland birds, but recent requiremen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2020-03, Vol.57 (3), p.467-475
Hauptverfasser: Rosin, Zuzanna M., Hiron, Matthew, Żmihorski, Michał, Szymański, Paweł, Tobolka, Marcin, Pärt, Tomas, McKenzie, Ailsa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 475
container_issue 3
container_start_page 467
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 57
creator Rosin, Zuzanna M.
Hiron, Matthew
Żmihorski, Michał
Szymański, Paweł
Tobolka, Marcin
Pärt, Tomas
McKenzie, Ailsa
description Despite large conservation efforts to halt the loss of farmland biodiversity in Europe, negative population trends are still observed, especially for common species. Old villages and human settlements are biodiversity hotspots and important breeding habitats for farmland birds, but recent requirements for energy saving measures and improved living comfort have changed their architecture and habitats. Consequently, modernization of villages may negatively affect bird diversity due to the loss of nesting and foraging sites. We investigated how the abundance and diversity of birds breeding in 104 Polish villages varied in relation to the degree of modernization as estimated by the proportion of new and renovated homesteads. Abundance of building‐nesting species, but not tree‐nesting species, declined by 50% across a gradient of old to highly modernized villages. The contribution of new versus renovated houses to the observed decline was similar. Synthesis and applications. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversity conservation suggests that sustainable rural development should better link modernization with conservation measures, for example, by constructing nesting sites when renovating and building new houses. The challenge is to design modern buildings that are both energy‐efficient and biodiversity‐friendly to generally improve quality of life for rural communities and to halt or reduce farmland bird declines in rural landscapes. Designers and architects can find inspiration from traditional architecture and add a variety of nest‐box types. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversit
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.13566
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_104344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369186763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3956-892a420c5c220ee246d167035a1210807931a388b63ed1a2fe8c7a2e328cdaca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbPXhc8p92PZJN4K6V-ISiiR1k2m0nZss3G3aSl_vUmRnp1Lg9m3m94PISuKZnRfuaUiyRiQsQzyhMhTtDkuDlFE0IYjbKc0HN0EcKGEJInnE_Q5xuUnYYSF8aVZgc-mPaATY23rgRfm-_-tDPWqjWEW7zA2tWVNbrFBbR7gBqHLrTK1KqwgEvYgXXNFuoWr52y4RKdVb3A1Z9O0cfd6n35ED2_3D8uF8-R5nki-lxMxYzoRDNGAFgsSipSwhNFGSUZSXNOFc-yQnAoqWIVZDpVDDjLdKm04lM0G_-GPTRdIRtvtsofpFNGBtsVyg8iA0hKYh7HPXAzAo13Xx2EVm5c5-s-o2Rc5DQTqeC9az66tHcheKiOjymRQ-lyqFgOFcvf0nsiGYm9sXD4zy6fXlcj9wOh84SL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369186763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduced biodiversity in modernized villages: A conflict between sustainable development goals</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Rosin, Zuzanna M. ; Hiron, Matthew ; Żmihorski, Michał ; Szymański, Paweł ; Tobolka, Marcin ; Pärt, Tomas ; McKenzie, Ailsa</creator><contributor>McKenzie, Ailsa</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosin, Zuzanna M. ; Hiron, Matthew ; Żmihorski, Michał ; Szymański, Paweł ; Tobolka, Marcin ; Pärt, Tomas ; McKenzie, Ailsa ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet ; McKenzie, Ailsa</creatorcontrib><description>Despite large conservation efforts to halt the loss of farmland biodiversity in Europe, negative population trends are still observed, especially for common species. Old villages and human settlements are biodiversity hotspots and important breeding habitats for farmland birds, but recent requirements for energy saving measures and improved living comfort have changed their architecture and habitats. Consequently, modernization of villages may negatively affect bird diversity due to the loss of nesting and foraging sites. We investigated how the abundance and diversity of birds breeding in 104 Polish villages varied in relation to the degree of modernization as estimated by the proportion of new and renovated homesteads. Abundance of building‐nesting species, but not tree‐nesting species, declined by 50% across a gradient of old to highly modernized villages. The contribution of new versus renovated houses to the observed decline was similar. Synthesis and applications. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversity conservation suggests that sustainable rural development should better link modernization with conservation measures, for example, by constructing nesting sites when renovating and building new houses. The challenge is to design modern buildings that are both energy‐efficient and biodiversity‐friendly to generally improve quality of life for rural communities and to halt or reduce farmland bird declines in rural landscapes. Designers and architects can find inspiration from traditional architecture and add a variety of nest‐box types. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversity conservation suggests that sustainable rural development should better link modernization with conservation measures, for example, by constructing nesting sites when renovating and building new houses. The challenge is to design modern buildings that are both energy‐efficient and biodiversity‐friendly to generally improve quality of life for rural communities and to halt or reduce farmland bird declines in rural landscapes. Designers and architects can find inspiration from traditional architecture and add a variety of nest‐box types. Image credit: Darek Świtała.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural resources ; Architecture ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity hot spots ; Bird populations ; Birds ; Breeding ; Building design ; building modernization ; Buildings ; Conservation ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; Energy conservation ; Energy efficiency ; energy saving measures ; Environmental policy ; farmland birds ; Foraging habitats ; Forest Science ; house sparrow ; Houses ; Housing ; Human settlements ; Landscape architecture ; Landscape design ; Modernization ; Nesting ; Population decline ; Protected areas ; Quality of life ; Residential areas ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural development ; rural settlement ; Skogsvetenskap ; Species ; Sustainable development ; urban habitat ; Villages ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2020-03, Vol.57 (3), p.467-475</ispartof><rights>2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2020 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3956-892a420c5c220ee246d167035a1210807931a388b63ed1a2fe8c7a2e328cdaca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3956-892a420c5c220ee246d167035a1210807931a388b63ed1a2fe8c7a2e328cdaca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6922-5804 ; 0000-0002-4989-1524 ; 0000-0002-7565-7547 ; 0000-0001-5137-1635 ; 0000-0001-7388-6672 ; 0000-0002-3938-043X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/104344$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McKenzie, Ailsa</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosin, Zuzanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiron, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żmihorski, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobolka, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pärt, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Ailsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Reduced biodiversity in modernized villages: A conflict between sustainable development goals</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>Despite large conservation efforts to halt the loss of farmland biodiversity in Europe, negative population trends are still observed, especially for common species. Old villages and human settlements are biodiversity hotspots and important breeding habitats for farmland birds, but recent requirements for energy saving measures and improved living comfort have changed their architecture and habitats. Consequently, modernization of villages may negatively affect bird diversity due to the loss of nesting and foraging sites. We investigated how the abundance and diversity of birds breeding in 104 Polish villages varied in relation to the degree of modernization as estimated by the proportion of new and renovated homesteads. Abundance of building‐nesting species, but not tree‐nesting species, declined by 50% across a gradient of old to highly modernized villages. The contribution of new versus renovated houses to the observed decline was similar. Synthesis and applications. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversity conservation suggests that sustainable rural development should better link modernization with conservation measures, for example, by constructing nesting sites when renovating and building new houses. The challenge is to design modern buildings that are both energy‐efficient and biodiversity‐friendly to generally improve quality of life for rural communities and to halt or reduce farmland bird declines in rural landscapes. Designers and architects can find inspiration from traditional architecture and add a variety of nest‐box types. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversity conservation suggests that sustainable rural development should better link modernization with conservation measures, for example, by constructing nesting sites when renovating and building new houses. The challenge is to design modern buildings that are both energy‐efficient and biodiversity‐friendly to generally improve quality of life for rural communities and to halt or reduce farmland bird declines in rural landscapes. Designers and architects can find inspiration from traditional architecture and add a variety of nest‐box types. Image credit: Darek Świtała.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural resources</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity hot spots</subject><subject>Bird populations</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Building design</subject><subject>building modernization</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>energy saving measures</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>farmland birds</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Forest Science</subject><subject>house sparrow</subject><subject>Houses</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Landscape architecture</subject><subject>Landscape design</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>rural settlement</subject><subject>Skogsvetenskap</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>urban habitat</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbPXhc8p92PZJN4K6V-ISiiR1k2m0nZss3G3aSl_vUmRnp1Lg9m3m94PISuKZnRfuaUiyRiQsQzyhMhTtDkuDlFE0IYjbKc0HN0EcKGEJInnE_Q5xuUnYYSF8aVZgc-mPaATY23rgRfm-_-tDPWqjWEW7zA2tWVNbrFBbR7gBqHLrTK1KqwgEvYgXXNFuoWr52y4RKdVb3A1Z9O0cfd6n35ED2_3D8uF8-R5nki-lxMxYzoRDNGAFgsSipSwhNFGSUZSXNOFc-yQnAoqWIVZDpVDDjLdKm04lM0G_-GPTRdIRtvtsofpFNGBtsVyg8iA0hKYh7HPXAzAo13Xx2EVm5c5-s-o2Rc5DQTqeC9az66tHcheKiOjymRQ-lyqFgOFcvf0nsiGYm9sXD4zy6fXlcj9wOh84SL</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Rosin, Zuzanna M.</creator><creator>Hiron, Matthew</creator><creator>Żmihorski, Michał</creator><creator>Szymański, Paweł</creator><creator>Tobolka, Marcin</creator><creator>Pärt, Tomas</creator><creator>McKenzie, Ailsa</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-5804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4989-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7565-7547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-1635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7388-6672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3938-043X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Reduced biodiversity in modernized villages: A conflict between sustainable development goals</title><author>Rosin, Zuzanna M. ; Hiron, Matthew ; Żmihorski, Michał ; Szymański, Paweł ; Tobolka, Marcin ; Pärt, Tomas ; McKenzie, Ailsa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3956-892a420c5c220ee246d167035a1210807931a388b63ed1a2fe8c7a2e328cdaca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural resources</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity hot spots</topic><topic>Bird populations</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Building design</topic><topic>building modernization</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>energy saving measures</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>farmland birds</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Forest Science</topic><topic>house sparrow</topic><topic>Houses</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Landscape architecture</topic><topic>Landscape design</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>rural settlement</topic><topic>Skogsvetenskap</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>urban habitat</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosin, Zuzanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiron, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żmihorski, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobolka, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pärt, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Ailsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosin, Zuzanna M.</au><au>Hiron, Matthew</au><au>Żmihorski, Michał</au><au>Szymański, Paweł</au><au>Tobolka, Marcin</au><au>Pärt, Tomas</au><au>McKenzie, Ailsa</au><au>McKenzie, Ailsa</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduced biodiversity in modernized villages: A conflict between sustainable development goals</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>475</epage><pages>467-475</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>Despite large conservation efforts to halt the loss of farmland biodiversity in Europe, negative population trends are still observed, especially for common species. Old villages and human settlements are biodiversity hotspots and important breeding habitats for farmland birds, but recent requirements for energy saving measures and improved living comfort have changed their architecture and habitats. Consequently, modernization of villages may negatively affect bird diversity due to the loss of nesting and foraging sites. We investigated how the abundance and diversity of birds breeding in 104 Polish villages varied in relation to the degree of modernization as estimated by the proportion of new and renovated homesteads. Abundance of building‐nesting species, but not tree‐nesting species, declined by 50% across a gradient of old to highly modernized villages. The contribution of new versus renovated houses to the observed decline was similar. Synthesis and applications. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversity conservation suggests that sustainable rural development should better link modernization with conservation measures, for example, by constructing nesting sites when renovating and building new houses. The challenge is to design modern buildings that are both energy‐efficient and biodiversity‐friendly to generally improve quality of life for rural communities and to halt or reduce farmland bird declines in rural landscapes. Designers and architects can find inspiration from traditional architecture and add a variety of nest‐box types. Rural modernization may have a dramatic effect on abundance of birds nesting on buildings, thus may be an important and overlooked contributor to farmland bird population declines in Europe. Villages and rural properties fall outside of current conservation policy as they are neither protected areas nor agricultural lands (where agri‐environmental schemes can be applied). The observed conflict between sustainability goals such as increased building energy efficiency and biodiversity conservation suggests that sustainable rural development should better link modernization with conservation measures, for example, by constructing nesting sites when renovating and building new houses. The challenge is to design modern buildings that are both energy‐efficient and biodiversity‐friendly to generally improve quality of life for rural communities and to halt or reduce farmland bird declines in rural landscapes. Designers and architects can find inspiration from traditional architecture and add a variety of nest‐box types. Image credit: Darek Świtała.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.13566</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-5804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4989-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7565-7547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-1635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7388-6672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3938-043X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2020-03, Vol.57 (3), p.467-475
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_104344
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Abundance
Agricultural land
Agricultural resources
Architecture
Biodiversity
Biodiversity hot spots
Bird populations
Birds
Breeding
Building design
building modernization
Buildings
Conservation
Ecology
Ekologi
Energy conservation
Energy efficiency
energy saving measures
Environmental policy
farmland birds
Foraging habitats
Forest Science
house sparrow
Houses
Housing
Human settlements
Landscape architecture
Landscape design
Modernization
Nesting
Population decline
Protected areas
Quality of life
Residential areas
Rural areas
Rural communities
Rural development
rural settlement
Skogsvetenskap
Species
Sustainable development
urban habitat
Villages
Wildlife conservation
title Reduced biodiversity in modernized villages: A conflict between sustainable development goals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A17%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduced%20biodiversity%20in%20modernized%20villages:%20A%20conflict%20between%20sustainable%20development%20goals&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Rosin,%20Zuzanna%20M.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=475&rft.pages=467-475&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2369186763%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369186763&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true