A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace
We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human relations (New York) 2024-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1620-1649 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1649 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1620 |
container_title | Human relations (New York) |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Einola, Katja Khoreva, Violetta Tienari, Janne |
description | We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00187267231206328 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_hhs_se_1164991920006056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00187267231206328</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3117018470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFLHTEQx4Mo-Gr7AXoL9GIPazPJbrLr7SG1FSy9KHgL2ezEXbtvsyZZXv32ZlHqoQgDw2Tm98_wH0I-AzsDUOobY1ArLhUXwJkUvD4gG1AlFLzmd4dks_aLdeCYfIjxga21aDZk3lLrxxHN_YJ0Mjvs6C_z95zm5zCkwZqRDtPjMoSnnJOnxjm0KdJ9jxM1a6Q--NnvfJj7IWZ8e0VPg__a-kRxShgiTT3SvQ9_5tFY_EiOnBkjfnrNJ-T28vvNxc_i-vePq4vtdWFFo1LBO1Na56DlXAHPv4oGpFWOi0phDaaslJNSQG3bqutcVXJZtVJ1DJVB4ChOCLzoxj3OS6vnMOxMeNLeDLrvo46oAWTZNNDw7IZklczMlxdmDv5xwZj0g1_ClNfUIrucLSsVe1O2wccY0P3TBqbXY-j_jpGZs9dtzD2-qb4PPAMGbIhH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3117018470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Einola, Katja ; Khoreva, Violetta ; Tienari, Janne</creator><creatorcontrib>Einola, Katja ; Khoreva, Violetta ; Tienari, Janne</creatorcontrib><description>We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7267</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1741-282X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-282X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00187267231206328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anthropomorphism ; Artificial intelligence ; Consultants ; Humanization ; New technology ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Human relations (New York), 2024-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1620-1649</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1548-9510 ; 0000-0002-2605-2760</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00187267231206328$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00187267231206328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://research.hhs.se/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/A-colleague-named-Max-A-critical/991001542398606056$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Einola, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoreva, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tienari, Janne</creatorcontrib><title>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</title><title>Human relations (New York)</title><description>We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected.</description><subject>Anthropomorphism</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Humanization</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0018-7267</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFLHTEQx4Mo-Gr7AXoL9GIPazPJbrLr7SG1FSy9KHgL2ezEXbtvsyZZXv32ZlHqoQgDw2Tm98_wH0I-AzsDUOobY1ArLhUXwJkUvD4gG1AlFLzmd4dks_aLdeCYfIjxga21aDZk3lLrxxHN_YJ0Mjvs6C_z95zm5zCkwZqRDtPjMoSnnJOnxjm0KdJ9jxM1a6Q--NnvfJj7IWZ8e0VPg__a-kRxShgiTT3SvQ9_5tFY_EiOnBkjfnrNJ-T28vvNxc_i-vePq4vtdWFFo1LBO1Na56DlXAHPv4oGpFWOi0phDaaslJNSQG3bqutcVXJZtVJ1DJVB4ChOCLzoxj3OS6vnMOxMeNLeDLrvo46oAWTZNNDw7IZklczMlxdmDv5xwZj0g1_ClNfUIrucLSsVe1O2wccY0P3TBqbXY-j_jpGZs9dtzD2-qb4PPAMGbIhH</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Einola, Katja</creator><creator>Khoreva, Violetta</creator><creator>Tienari, Janne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-9510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-2760</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</title><author>Einola, Katja ; Khoreva, Violetta ; Tienari, Janne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropomorphism</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Humanization</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Einola, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoreva, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tienari, Janne</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Einola, Katja</au><au>Khoreva, Violetta</au><au>Tienari, Janne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</atitle><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1620</spage><epage>1649</epage><pages>1620-1649</pages><issn>0018-7267</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><eissn>1741-282X</eissn><abstract>We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00187267231206328</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-9510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-2760</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7267 |
ispartof | Human relations (New York), 2024-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1620-1649 |
issn | 0018-7267 1741-282X 1741-282X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_hhs_se_1164991920006056 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Anthropomorphism Artificial intelligence Consultants Humanization New technology Workplaces |
title | A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T08%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20colleague%20named%20Max:%20A%20critical%20inquiry%20into%20affects%20when%20an%20anthropomorphised%20AI%20(ro)bot%20enters%20the%20workplace&rft.jtitle=Human%20relations%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Einola,%20Katja&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1620&rft.epage=1649&rft.pages=1620-1649&rft.issn=0018-7267&rft.eissn=1741-282X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00187267231206328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3117018470%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3117018470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00187267231206328&rfr_iscdi=true |