A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace

We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human relations (New York) 2024-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1620-1649
Hauptverfasser: Einola, Katja, Khoreva, Violetta, Tienari, Janne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1649
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1620
container_title Human relations (New York)
container_volume 77
creator Einola, Katja
Khoreva, Violetta
Tienari, Janne
description We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00187267231206328
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_hhs_se_1164991920006056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00187267231206328</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3117018470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFLHTEQx4Mo-Gr7AXoL9GIPazPJbrLr7SG1FSy9KHgL2ezEXbtvsyZZXv32ZlHqoQgDw2Tm98_wH0I-AzsDUOobY1ArLhUXwJkUvD4gG1AlFLzmd4dks_aLdeCYfIjxga21aDZk3lLrxxHN_YJ0Mjvs6C_z95zm5zCkwZqRDtPjMoSnnJOnxjm0KdJ9jxM1a6Q--NnvfJj7IWZ8e0VPg__a-kRxShgiTT3SvQ9_5tFY_EiOnBkjfnrNJ-T28vvNxc_i-vePq4vtdWFFo1LBO1Na56DlXAHPv4oGpFWOi0phDaaslJNSQG3bqutcVXJZtVJ1DJVB4ChOCLzoxj3OS6vnMOxMeNLeDLrvo46oAWTZNNDw7IZklczMlxdmDv5xwZj0g1_ClNfUIrucLSsVe1O2wccY0P3TBqbXY-j_jpGZs9dtzD2-qb4PPAMGbIhH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3117018470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Einola, Katja ; Khoreva, Violetta ; Tienari, Janne</creator><creatorcontrib>Einola, Katja ; Khoreva, Violetta ; Tienari, Janne</creatorcontrib><description>We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7267</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1741-282X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-282X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00187267231206328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anthropomorphism ; Artificial intelligence ; Consultants ; Humanization ; New technology ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Human relations (New York), 2024-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1620-1649</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1548-9510 ; 0000-0002-2605-2760</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00187267231206328$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00187267231206328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://research.hhs.se/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/A-colleague-named-Max-A-critical/991001542398606056$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Einola, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoreva, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tienari, Janne</creatorcontrib><title>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</title><title>Human relations (New York)</title><description>We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected.</description><subject>Anthropomorphism</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Humanization</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0018-7267</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFLHTEQx4Mo-Gr7AXoL9GIPazPJbrLr7SG1FSy9KHgL2ezEXbtvsyZZXv32ZlHqoQgDw2Tm98_wH0I-AzsDUOobY1ArLhUXwJkUvD4gG1AlFLzmd4dks_aLdeCYfIjxga21aDZk3lLrxxHN_YJ0Mjvs6C_z95zm5zCkwZqRDtPjMoSnnJOnxjm0KdJ9jxM1a6Q--NnvfJj7IWZ8e0VPg__a-kRxShgiTT3SvQ9_5tFY_EiOnBkjfnrNJ-T28vvNxc_i-vePq4vtdWFFo1LBO1Na56DlXAHPv4oGpFWOi0phDaaslJNSQG3bqutcVXJZtVJ1DJVB4ChOCLzoxj3OS6vnMOxMeNLeDLrvo46oAWTZNNDw7IZklczMlxdmDv5xwZj0g1_ClNfUIrucLSsVe1O2wccY0P3TBqbXY-j_jpGZs9dtzD2-qb4PPAMGbIhH</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Einola, Katja</creator><creator>Khoreva, Violetta</creator><creator>Tienari, Janne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-9510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-2760</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</title><author>Einola, Katja ; Khoreva, Violetta ; Tienari, Janne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-2da4cff1b22712aff3916c7f2357e81a457f66318cb5ddf54265b67d0e7ae12e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropomorphism</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Humanization</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Einola, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoreva, Violetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tienari, Janne</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Einola, Katja</au><au>Khoreva, Violetta</au><au>Tienari, Janne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace</atitle><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1620</spage><epage>1649</epage><pages>1620-1649</pages><issn>0018-7267</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><eissn>1741-282X</eissn><abstract>We offer a critical inquiry into the faltering entry of an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot, an algorithm without physical or visual form, into the workplace in a media consultancy company. While living a digital life in the virtual world, the ro(bot) was given a human name. We highlight the unexpected consequences the humanisation of an early form of artificial intelligence (AI) has on the affects circulating between people and the new technology and between members of different organisational groups. We argue that anthropomorphising technologies such as AI influences the affective life of organisations and amplifies existing discontent between organisational members, complicating the introduction of the technology. Focusing on human–AI interaction, our analysis reveals a rift between managers who are excited and hopeful about the future capabilities of AI and employees who are frustrated and angry about its present shortcomings. We conclude that collective affects play a central role in contemporary technology-driven organisations in which the role people play in relation to the avalanche of AI technologies is often neglected.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00187267231206328</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-9510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-2760</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7267
ispartof Human relations (New York), 2024-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1620-1649
issn 0018-7267
1741-282X
1741-282X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_hhs_se_1164991920006056
source SAGE Complete
subjects Anthropomorphism
Artificial intelligence
Consultants
Humanization
New technology
Workplaces
title A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T08%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20colleague%20named%20Max:%20A%20critical%20inquiry%20into%20affects%20when%20an%20anthropomorphised%20AI%20(ro)bot%20enters%20the%20workplace&rft.jtitle=Human%20relations%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Einola,%20Katja&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1620&rft.epage=1649&rft.pages=1620-1649&rft.issn=0018-7267&rft.eissn=1741-282X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00187267231206328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3117018470%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3117018470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00187267231206328&rfr_iscdi=true