Does Psychopathy Predict Institutional Misconduct Among Adults? A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Narrative reviews have raised several questions regarding the predictive validity of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 2003 ) and related scales in institutional settings. In this meta-analysis, the authors coded 273 effect sizes to investigate the association between the Ha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2005-12, Vol.73 (6), p.1056-1064 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Narrative reviews have raised several questions regarding the predictive validity of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R;
R. D. Hare, 2003
) and related scales in institutional settings. In this meta-analysis, the authors coded 273 effect sizes to investigate the association between the Hare scales and a hierarchy of increasingly specific forms of institutional misconduct. Effect sizes for Total, Factor 1, and Factor 2 scores were quite heterogeneous overall and weakest for physically violent misconduct (
r
w
= .17, .14, and .15, respectively). Moderator analyses suggested that physical violence effect sizes were smaller in U.S. prison samples (
r
w
= .11) than in non-U.S. prison samples (
r
w
= .23). Findings are discussed in terms of the utility of the Hare measures for decision-making in institutional and other contexts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-006X 1939-2117 1939-2117 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1056 |