Does Psychopathy Predict Institutional Misconduct Among Adults? A Meta-Analytic Investigation

Narrative reviews have raised several questions regarding the predictive validity of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 2003 ) and related scales in institutional settings. In this meta-analysis, the authors coded 273 effect sizes to investigate the association between the Ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2005-12, Vol.73 (6), p.1056-1064
Hauptverfasser: Guy, Laura S, Edens, John F, Anthony, Christine, Douglas, Kevin S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Narrative reviews have raised several questions regarding the predictive validity of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 2003 ) and related scales in institutional settings. In this meta-analysis, the authors coded 273 effect sizes to investigate the association between the Hare scales and a hierarchy of increasingly specific forms of institutional misconduct. Effect sizes for Total, Factor 1, and Factor 2 scores were quite heterogeneous overall and weakest for physically violent misconduct ( r w = .17, .14, and .15, respectively). Moderator analyses suggested that physical violence effect sizes were smaller in U.S. prison samples ( r w = .11) than in non-U.S. prison samples ( r w = .23). Findings are discussed in terms of the utility of the Hare measures for decision-making in institutional and other contexts.
ISSN:0022-006X
1939-2117
1939-2117
DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1056