Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery
Key Points It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. Drug development is a pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Drug discovery 2003-07, Vol.2 (7), p.542-553 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 553 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 542 |
container_title | Nature reviews. Drug discovery |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Pritchard, J. Fred Jurima-Romet, Malle Reimer, Mark L. J. Mortimer, Elisabeth Rolfe, Brenda Cayen, Mitchell N. |
description | Key Points
It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery.
Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product.
Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost.
Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New
in vitro
methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market.
This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.
Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated
in vitro
tests that complement traditional
in vivo
animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nrd1131 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>springer</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1038_nrd1131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1038_nrd1131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-springer_journals_10_1038_nrd11313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjssKwjAURIMoWB_4C1m6qeba0hSXtj42unIfQr2W1JqUJPX7rVLcu5qBOQyHkAWwFbAoXWt7A4hgQAKIeRwCT-Phr_NkTCbOVYxBAnwTkPwsH0qXdIfeo6W5bUu3pTkWyimj6VF6dFRpejE6zGqlVSHrL9UxL6xN80TtZ2R0l7XDeZ9Tsjzsr9kpdI3tztGKyrRWd5MAJj6WoreM_kDfQldCOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery</title><source>Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pritchard, J. Fred ; Jurima-Romet, Malle ; Reimer, Mark L. J. ; Mortimer, Elisabeth ; Rolfe, Brenda ; Cayen, Mitchell N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, J. Fred ; Jurima-Romet, Malle ; Reimer, Mark L. J. ; Mortimer, Elisabeth ; Rolfe, Brenda ; Cayen, Mitchell N.</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points
It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery.
Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product.
Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost.
Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New
in vitro
methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market.
This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.
Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated
in vitro
tests that complement traditional
in vivo
animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-1776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-1784</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrd1131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Cancer Research ; Medicinal Chemistry ; Molecular Medicine ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; review-article</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003-07, Vol.2 (7), p.542-553</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, J. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurima-Romet, Malle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimer, Mark L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfe, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayen, Mitchell N.</creatorcontrib><title>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery</title><title>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</addtitle><description>Key Points
It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery.
Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product.
Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost.
Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New
in vitro
methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market.
This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.
Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated
in vitro
tests that complement traditional
in vivo
animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Medicinal Chemistry</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>review-article</subject><issn>1474-1776</issn><issn>1474-1784</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjssKwjAURIMoWB_4C1m6qeba0hSXtj42unIfQr2W1JqUJPX7rVLcu5qBOQyHkAWwFbAoXWt7A4hgQAKIeRwCT-Phr_NkTCbOVYxBAnwTkPwsH0qXdIfeo6W5bUu3pTkWyimj6VF6dFRpejE6zGqlVSHrL9UxL6xN80TtZ2R0l7XDeZ9Tsjzsr9kpdI3tztGKyrRWd5MAJj6WoreM_kDfQldCOQ</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Pritchard, J. Fred</creator><creator>Jurima-Romet, Malle</creator><creator>Reimer, Mark L. J.</creator><creator>Mortimer, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Rolfe, Brenda</creator><creator>Cayen, Mitchell N.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development</title><author>Pritchard, J. Fred ; Jurima-Romet, Malle ; Reimer, Mark L. J. ; Mortimer, Elisabeth ; Rolfe, Brenda ; Cayen, Mitchell N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-springer_journals_10_1038_nrd11313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Medicinal Chemistry</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>review-article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, J. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurima-Romet, Malle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimer, Mark L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfe, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayen, Mitchell N.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pritchard, J. Fred</au><au>Jurima-Romet, Malle</au><au>Reimer, Mark L. J.</au><au>Mortimer, Elisabeth</au><au>Rolfe, Brenda</au><au>Cayen, Mitchell N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</stitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>542</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>542-553</pages><issn>1474-1776</issn><eissn>1474-1784</eissn><abstract>Key Points
It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery.
Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product.
Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost.
Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New
in vitro
methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market.
This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.
Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated
in vitro
tests that complement traditional
in vivo
animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/nrd1131</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1474-1776 |
ispartof | Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003-07, Vol.2 (7), p.542-553 |
issn | 1474-1776 1474-1784 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_springer_journals_10_1038_nrd1131 |
source | Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Biotechnology Cancer Research Medicinal Chemistry Molecular Medicine Pharmacology/Toxicology review-article |
title | Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T22%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-springer&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20Better%20Drugs:%20Decision%20Gates%20in%20Non-Clinical%20Drug%20Development:%20A%20guide%20to%20drug%20discovery&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Drug%20discovery&rft.au=Pritchard,%20J.%20Fred&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=542-553&rft.issn=1474-1776&rft.eissn=1474-1784&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrd1131&rft_dat=%3Cspringer%3E10_1038_nrd1131%3C/springer%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |