Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery

Key Points It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. Drug development is a pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature reviews. Drug discovery 2003-07, Vol.2 (7), p.542-553
Hauptverfasser: Pritchard, J. Fred, Jurima-Romet, Malle, Reimer, Mark L. J., Mortimer, Elisabeth, Rolfe, Brenda, Cayen, Mitchell N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 553
container_issue 7
container_start_page 542
container_title Nature reviews. Drug discovery
container_volume 2
creator Pritchard, J. Fred
Jurima-Romet, Malle
Reimer, Mark L. J.
Mortimer, Elisabeth
Rolfe, Brenda
Cayen, Mitchell N.
description Key Points It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product. Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost. Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New in vitro methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing. Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated in vitro tests that complement traditional in vivo animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/nrd1131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>springer</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1038_nrd1131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1038_nrd1131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-springer_journals_10_1038_nrd11313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjssKwjAURIMoWB_4C1m6qeba0hSXtj42unIfQr2W1JqUJPX7rVLcu5qBOQyHkAWwFbAoXWt7A4hgQAKIeRwCT-Phr_NkTCbOVYxBAnwTkPwsH0qXdIfeo6W5bUu3pTkWyimj6VF6dFRpejE6zGqlVSHrL9UxL6xN80TtZ2R0l7XDeZ9Tsjzsr9kpdI3tztGKyrRWd5MAJj6WoreM_kDfQldCOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery</title><source>Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pritchard, J. Fred ; Jurima-Romet, Malle ; Reimer, Mark L. J. ; Mortimer, Elisabeth ; Rolfe, Brenda ; Cayen, Mitchell N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, J. Fred ; Jurima-Romet, Malle ; Reimer, Mark L. J. ; Mortimer, Elisabeth ; Rolfe, Brenda ; Cayen, Mitchell N.</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product. Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost. Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New in vitro methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing. Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated in vitro tests that complement traditional in vivo animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-1776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-1784</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrd1131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Cancer Research ; Medicinal Chemistry ; Molecular Medicine ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; review-article</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003-07, Vol.2 (7), p.542-553</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, J. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurima-Romet, Malle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimer, Mark L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfe, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayen, Mitchell N.</creatorcontrib><title>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery</title><title>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</addtitle><description>Key Points It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product. Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost. Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New in vitro methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing. Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated in vitro tests that complement traditional in vivo animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Medicinal Chemistry</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>review-article</subject><issn>1474-1776</issn><issn>1474-1784</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjssKwjAURIMoWB_4C1m6qeba0hSXtj42unIfQr2W1JqUJPX7rVLcu5qBOQyHkAWwFbAoXWt7A4hgQAKIeRwCT-Phr_NkTCbOVYxBAnwTkPwsH0qXdIfeo6W5bUu3pTkWyimj6VF6dFRpejE6zGqlVSHrL9UxL6xN80TtZ2R0l7XDeZ9Tsjzsr9kpdI3tztGKyrRWd5MAJj6WoreM_kDfQldCOQ</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Pritchard, J. Fred</creator><creator>Jurima-Romet, Malle</creator><creator>Reimer, Mark L. J.</creator><creator>Mortimer, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Rolfe, Brenda</creator><creator>Cayen, Mitchell N.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development</title><author>Pritchard, J. Fred ; Jurima-Romet, Malle ; Reimer, Mark L. J. ; Mortimer, Elisabeth ; Rolfe, Brenda ; Cayen, Mitchell N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-springer_journals_10_1038_nrd11313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Medicinal Chemistry</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>review-article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, J. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurima-Romet, Malle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimer, Mark L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortimer, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfe, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayen, Mitchell N.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pritchard, J. Fred</au><au>Jurima-Romet, Malle</au><au>Reimer, Mark L. J.</au><au>Mortimer, Elisabeth</au><au>Rolfe, Brenda</au><au>Cayen, Mitchell N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</stitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>542</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>542-553</pages><issn>1474-1776</issn><eissn>1474-1784</eissn><abstract>Key Points It is estimated that only 1 out of 5,000 screened compounds is approved as a new medicine. Success or failure in drug development often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. Drug development is a process that proceeds through several key go/no-go 'decision gates', from the identification of a potential therapeutic candidate through to marketing a drug product. Success rests not only in the intrinsic qualities of the molecule but also in how the drug's development is planned and executed, and in the effective management of key resources: effort, time and cost. Non-clinical studies form the basis for confidence in the safe and efficient progression of a new chemical entity into clinical testing. New in vitro methodologies that predict human response, coupled with time-tested protocols for drug testing in live animals and the emergence of sensitive analytical instrumentation and molecular genetics, play important roles in bringing safe and efficacious new drug candidates to market. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing. Drug development is a risky business. Success or failure often depends on selecting one or two molecules for development from many choices offered by the engines of high-throughput discovery. A lead candidate needs to possess adequate bioactivity, appropriate physical–chemical properties to enable formulation development, the ability to cross crucial membranes, reasonable metabolic stability and appropriate safety and efficacy in humans. Predicting how a drug will behave in humans before clinical testing requires a battery of sophisticated in vitro tests that complement traditional in vivo animal safety assessments. This review discusses how to strategically identify which non-clinical studies should be performed to provide the required guidance and comfort to stakeholders involved in clinical drug testing.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/nrd1131</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1474-1776
ispartof Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003-07, Vol.2 (7), p.542-553
issn 1474-1776
1474-1784
language eng
recordid cdi_springer_journals_10_1038_nrd1131
source Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Biotechnology
Cancer Research
Medicinal Chemistry
Molecular Medicine
Pharmacology/Toxicology
review-article
title Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development: A guide to drug discovery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T22%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-springer&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20Better%20Drugs:%20Decision%20Gates%20in%20Non-Clinical%20Drug%20Development:%20A%20guide%20to%20drug%20discovery&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Drug%20discovery&rft.au=Pritchard,%20J.%20Fred&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=542-553&rft.issn=1474-1776&rft.eissn=1474-1784&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrd1131&rft_dat=%3Cspringer%3E10_1038_nrd1131%3C/springer%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true