The differential effect of disease status at allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation on outcomes in acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia

This study aimed to compare the effect of disease status at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) on post-transplant outcomes between acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Japanese nationwide registry data for 6901 patients with AML and 2469 p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of hematology 2021-12, Vol.100 (12), p.3017-3027
Hauptverfasser: Yanada, Masamitsu, Konuma, Takaaki, Yamasaki, Satoshi, Mizuno, Shohei, Hirabayashi, Shigeki, Nishiwaki, Satoshi, Uchida, Naoyuki, Doki, Noriko, Tanaka, Masatsugu, Ozawa, Yukiyasu, Sawa, Masashi, Eto, Tetsuya, Kawakita, Toshiro, Ota, Shuichi, Fukuda, Takahiro, Onizuka, Makoto, Kimura, Takafumi, Atsuta, Yoshiko, Kako, Shinichi, Yano, Shingo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to compare the effect of disease status at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) on post-transplant outcomes between acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Japanese nationwide registry data for 6901 patients with AML and 2469 patients with ALL were analyzed. In this study, 2850 (41%), 937 (14%), 62 (1%), and 3052 (44%) AML patients and 1751 (71%), 265 (11%), 23 (1%), and 430 (17%) ALL patients underwent transplantation in first complete remission (CR1), second CR (CR2), third or subsequent CR (CR3 +), and non-CR, respectively. The probabilities of overall survival at 5 years for patients transplanted in CR1, CR2, CR3 + , and non-CR were 58%, 61%, 41%, and 26% for AML patients and 67%, 45%, 20%, and 21% for ALL patients, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the risks of relapse and overall mortality were similar for AML patients transplanted in CR1 and CR2 ( P  = 0.672 and P  = 0.703), whereas they were higher for ALL patients transplanted in CR2 than for those transplanted in CR1 ( P  
ISSN:0939-5555
1432-0584
DOI:10.1007/s00277-021-04661-2