How Abnormal Are the PDFs of the DIA Method: A Quality Description in the Context of GNSS

The DIA-method, for the detection, identification and adaptation of modeling errors, has been widely used in a broad range of applications including the quality control of geodetic networks and the integrity monitoring of GNSS models. The DIA-method combines two key statistical inference tools, esti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zaminpardaz, Safoora, Teunissen, Peter J.  G.
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue
container_start_page 89
container_title
container_volume
creator Zaminpardaz, Safoora
Teunissen, Peter J.  G.
description The DIA-method, for the detection, identification and adaptation of modeling errors, has been widely used in a broad range of applications including the quality control of geodetic networks and the integrity monitoring of GNSS models. The DIA-method combines two key statistical inference tools, estimation and testing. Through the former, one seeks estimates of the parameters of interest, whereas through the latter, one validates these estimates and corrects them for biases that may be present. As a result of this intimate link between estimation and testing, the quality of the DIA outcome x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} must also be driven by the probabilistic characteristics of both estimation and testing. In practice however, the evaluation of the quality of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} is never carried out as such. Instead, use is made of the probability density function (PDF) of the estimator under the identified hypothesis, say x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}, thereby thus neglecting the conditioning process that led to the decision to accept the ith hypothesis. In this contribution, we conduct a comparative study of the probabilistic properties of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} and x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}. Our analysis will be carried out in the framework of GNSS-based positioning. We will also elaborate on the circ
doi_str_mv 10.1007/1345_2019_57
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>springer</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_springer_books_10_1007_1345_2019_57</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>springer_books_10_1007_1345_2019_57</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-s1057-4d9104036162a88c94c6f69e561a00f40a96623d1055d4d1263af30ddca757333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkElPwzAUhM0mUUpv_ACfkQLPfl5iblFDF6lsKkhwitzYoRElruIg4N9DC0icZqT5Zg5DyAmDMwagzxkKWXBgppB6hxwhIEjBlX7cJT3OjE4MSrNHBkanf5mS-6QHBk1iZCoPySDGegGMcwNCQ488TcI7zRZNaF_timatp93S09t8FGmotj6fZvTKd8vgLmhG797squ4-ae5j2dbrrg4NrZstOAxN5z-6TW98PZ8fk4PKrqIf_GqfPIwu74eTZHYzng6zWRIZSJ0IZxgIQMUUt2laGlGqShkvFbMAlQBrlOLovmHphGNcoa0QnCutlhoR--T0Zzeu27p59m2xCOElFgyKzWnF_9PwC-3QVn4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>How Abnormal Are the PDFs of the DIA Method: A Quality Description in the Context of GNSS</title><source>Springer Books</source><creator>Zaminpardaz, Safoora ; Teunissen, Peter J.  G.</creator><contributor>Novák, Pavel ; Crespi, Mattia ; Sneeuw, Nico ; Sansò, Fernando</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zaminpardaz, Safoora ; Teunissen, Peter J.  G. ; Novák, Pavel ; Crespi, Mattia ; Sneeuw, Nico ; Sansò, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>The DIA-method, for the detection, identification and adaptation of modeling errors, has been widely used in a broad range of applications including the quality control of geodetic networks and the integrity monitoring of GNSS models. The DIA-method combines two key statistical inference tools, estimation and testing. Through the former, one seeks estimates of the parameters of interest, whereas through the latter, one validates these estimates and corrects them for biases that may be present. As a result of this intimate link between estimation and testing, the quality of the DIA outcome x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} must also be driven by the probabilistic characteristics of both estimation and testing. In practice however, the evaluation of the quality of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} is never carried out as such. Instead, use is made of the probability density function (PDF) of the estimator under the identified hypothesis, say x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}, thereby thus neglecting the conditioning process that led to the decision to accept the ith hypothesis. In this contribution, we conduct a comparative study of the probabilistic properties of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} and x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}. Our analysis will be carried out in the framework of GNSS-based positioning. We will also elaborate on the circumstances under which the distribution of the estimator x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document} provides either poor or reasonable approximations to that of the DIA-estimator x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document}.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0939-9585</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783030542665</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3030542661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2197-9359</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 303054267X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9783030542672</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/1345_2019_57</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Detection, identification and adaptation (DIA) ; DIA-estimator ; Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) ; Probability density function (PDF) ; Statistical testing</subject><ispartof>IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, 2021, p.89-97</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>International Association of Geodesy Symposia</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1345_2019_57$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/1345_2019_57$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>775,776,780,789,27902,38232,41418,42487</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Novák, Pavel</contributor><contributor>Crespi, Mattia</contributor><contributor>Sneeuw, Nico</contributor><contributor>Sansò, Fernando</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zaminpardaz, Safoora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Peter J.  G.</creatorcontrib><title>How Abnormal Are the PDFs of the DIA Method: A Quality Description in the Context of GNSS</title><title>IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy</title><description>The DIA-method, for the detection, identification and adaptation of modeling errors, has been widely used in a broad range of applications including the quality control of geodetic networks and the integrity monitoring of GNSS models. The DIA-method combines two key statistical inference tools, estimation and testing. Through the former, one seeks estimates of the parameters of interest, whereas through the latter, one validates these estimates and corrects them for biases that may be present. As a result of this intimate link between estimation and testing, the quality of the DIA outcome x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} must also be driven by the probabilistic characteristics of both estimation and testing. In practice however, the evaluation of the quality of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} is never carried out as such. Instead, use is made of the probability density function (PDF) of the estimator under the identified hypothesis, say x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}, thereby thus neglecting the conditioning process that led to the decision to accept the ith hypothesis. In this contribution, we conduct a comparative study of the probabilistic properties of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} and x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}. Our analysis will be carried out in the framework of GNSS-based positioning. We will also elaborate on the circumstances under which the distribution of the estimator x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document} provides either poor or reasonable approximations to that of the DIA-estimator x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document}.</description><subject>Detection, identification and adaptation (DIA)</subject><subject>DIA-estimator</subject><subject>Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)</subject><subject>Probability density function (PDF)</subject><subject>Statistical testing</subject><issn>0939-9585</issn><issn>2197-9359</issn><isbn>9783030542665</isbn><isbn>3030542661</isbn><isbn>303054267X</isbn><isbn>9783030542672</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpNkElPwzAUhM0mUUpv_ACfkQLPfl5iblFDF6lsKkhwitzYoRElruIg4N9DC0icZqT5Zg5DyAmDMwagzxkKWXBgppB6hxwhIEjBlX7cJT3OjE4MSrNHBkanf5mS-6QHBk1iZCoPySDGegGMcwNCQ488TcI7zRZNaF_timatp93S09t8FGmotj6fZvTKd8vgLmhG797squ4-ae5j2dbrrg4NrZstOAxN5z-6TW98PZ8fk4PKrqIf_GqfPIwu74eTZHYzng6zWRIZSJ0IZxgIQMUUt2laGlGqShkvFbMAlQBrlOLovmHphGNcoa0QnCutlhoR--T0Zzeu27p59m2xCOElFgyKzWnF_9PwC-3QVn4</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Zaminpardaz, Safoora</creator><creator>Teunissen, Peter J.  G.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>How Abnormal Are the PDFs of the DIA Method: A Quality Description in the Context of GNSS</title><author>Zaminpardaz, Safoora ; Teunissen, Peter J.  G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s1057-4d9104036162a88c94c6f69e561a00f40a96623d1055d4d1263af30ddca757333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Detection, identification and adaptation (DIA)</topic><topic>DIA-estimator</topic><topic>Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)</topic><topic>Probability density function (PDF)</topic><topic>Statistical testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zaminpardaz, Safoora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Peter J.  G.</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zaminpardaz, Safoora</au><au>Teunissen, Peter J.  G.</au><au>Novák, Pavel</au><au>Crespi, Mattia</au><au>Sneeuw, Nico</au><au>Sansò, Fernando</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>How Abnormal Are the PDFs of the DIA Method: A Quality Description in the Context of GNSS</atitle><btitle>IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy</btitle><seriestitle>International Association of Geodesy Symposia</seriestitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><spage>89</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>89-97</pages><issn>0939-9585</issn><eissn>2197-9359</eissn><isbn>9783030542665</isbn><isbn>3030542661</isbn><eisbn>303054267X</eisbn><eisbn>9783030542672</eisbn><abstract>The DIA-method, for the detection, identification and adaptation of modeling errors, has been widely used in a broad range of applications including the quality control of geodetic networks and the integrity monitoring of GNSS models. The DIA-method combines two key statistical inference tools, estimation and testing. Through the former, one seeks estimates of the parameters of interest, whereas through the latter, one validates these estimates and corrects them for biases that may be present. As a result of this intimate link between estimation and testing, the quality of the DIA outcome x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} must also be driven by the probabilistic characteristics of both estimation and testing. In practice however, the evaluation of the quality of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} is never carried out as such. Instead, use is made of the probability density function (PDF) of the estimator under the identified hypothesis, say x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}, thereby thus neglecting the conditioning process that led to the decision to accept the ith hypothesis. In this contribution, we conduct a comparative study of the probabilistic properties of x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document} and x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document}. Our analysis will be carried out in the framework of GNSS-based positioning. We will also elaborate on the circumstances under which the distribution of the estimator x̂i\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\hat {x}_{i}$$ \end{document} provides either poor or reasonable approximations to that of the DIA-estimator x̄\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $$\bar {x}$$ \end{document}.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/1345_2019_57</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0939-9585
ispartof IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, 2021, p.89-97
issn 0939-9585
2197-9359
language eng
recordid cdi_springer_books_10_1007_1345_2019_57
source Springer Books
subjects Detection, identification and adaptation (DIA)
DIA-estimator
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)
Probability density function (PDF)
Statistical testing
title How Abnormal Are the PDFs of the DIA Method: A Quality Description in the Context of GNSS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A55%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-springer&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=How%20Abnormal%20Are%20the%20PDFs%20of%20the%20DIA%20Method:%20A%20Quality%20Description%20in%20the%20Context%20of%20GNSS&rft.btitle=IX%20Hotine-Marussi%20Symposium%20on%20Mathematical%20Geodesy&rft.au=Zaminpardaz,%20Safoora&rft.date=2021&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=89-97&rft.issn=0939-9585&rft.eissn=2197-9359&rft.isbn=9783030542665&rft.isbn_list=3030542661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/1345_2019_57&rft_dat=%3Cspringer%3Espringer_books_10_1007_1345_2019_57%3C/springer%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=303054267X&rft.eisbn_list=9783030542672&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true