Exploration of perceptual differences of virtually enhanced sound fields using timbre toolbox

In this presentation, we approach the analysis of perceived spatial differences from the perspective of timbre using the Timbre Toolbox [Peeters et al., 2011, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 2902–2916]. The Timbre Toolbox, using MATLAB, calculates 88 descriptors that have been reported in various timbre p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2017-10, Vol.142 (4), p.2499-2500
Hauptverfasser: Chon, Song Hui, Kim, Sungyoung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2500
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2499
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 142
creator Chon, Song Hui
Kim, Sungyoung
description In this presentation, we approach the analysis of perceived spatial differences from the perspective of timbre using the Timbre Toolbox [Peeters et al., 2011, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 2902–2916]. The Timbre Toolbox, using MATLAB, calculates 88 descriptors that have been reported in various timbre perception literature. These include temporal (such as RMS energy), spectral (both in magnitude and power spectra), and harmonic descriptors, as well as those based on the Equivalent Rectangular Bandwidth (ERB) model, which approximates the auditory processing. Analyses were performed on 27 stimuli of nine string quartet groups performing one excerpt in three room conditions, as well as the data from perceptual experiments reported in an earlier study [Chon et al., 2015, Proc. Audio Eng. Soc.]. The three room conditions have different spatial profiles, which consist of one natural room and two virtually enhanced rooms, where many physical parameters were closely controlled (e.g., ST1 and ST2). The experimental data include both the musicians’ ratings of spatial quality for performance (e.g., tonal balance and envelopment) as well as recording engineers’ ratings of recorded spaces (e.g., clarity and room size). The best timbre descriptor for each question will be reported, and an overall merit of this approach discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.5014126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1121_1_5014126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jasa</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-205d31627270f9866c22c4fd6067c2de213aebc4f91bf442796dc5f298f4de4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUx4MoOKcHv0GuCp15aZo2RxlzCgMvepSSJi8a6ZqStLJ9ezu3s6fH-_1_PHh_Qm6BLQA4PMCiYCCAyzMyg4KzrCq4OCczxhhkQkl5Sa5S-p7WosrVjHysdn0boh586GhwtMdosB9G3VLrncOIncF0SH58POB2T7H70hO1NIWxs9R5bG2iY_LdJx38tolIhxDaJuyuyYXTbcKb05yT96fV2_I527yuX5aPm8wAUzLjrLA5SF7ykjlVSWk4N8JZyWRpuEUOucZmIgoaJwQvlbSmcFxVTlgUOp-Tu-NdE0NKEV3dR7_VcV8Dqw-91FCfepnc-6ObjB_-_v5H_gWlUWOf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploration of perceptual differences of virtually enhanced sound fields using timbre toolbox</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Acoustical Society of America (AIP)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chon, Song Hui ; Kim, Sungyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Chon, Song Hui ; Kim, Sungyoung</creatorcontrib><description>In this presentation, we approach the analysis of perceived spatial differences from the perspective of timbre using the Timbre Toolbox [Peeters et al., 2011, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 2902–2916]. The Timbre Toolbox, using MATLAB, calculates 88 descriptors that have been reported in various timbre perception literature. These include temporal (such as RMS energy), spectral (both in magnitude and power spectra), and harmonic descriptors, as well as those based on the Equivalent Rectangular Bandwidth (ERB) model, which approximates the auditory processing. Analyses were performed on 27 stimuli of nine string quartet groups performing one excerpt in three room conditions, as well as the data from perceptual experiments reported in an earlier study [Chon et al., 2015, Proc. Audio Eng. Soc.]. The three room conditions have different spatial profiles, which consist of one natural room and two virtually enhanced rooms, where many physical parameters were closely controlled (e.g., ST1 and ST2). The experimental data include both the musicians’ ratings of spatial quality for performance (e.g., tonal balance and envelopment) as well as recording engineers’ ratings of recorded spaces (e.g., clarity and room size). The best timbre descriptor for each question will be reported, and an overall merit of this approach discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.5014126</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017-10, Vol.142 (4), p.2499-2500</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-205d31627270f9866c22c4fd6067c2de213aebc4f91bf442796dc5f298f4de4a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.5014126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,315,781,785,795,1566,4513,27929,27930,76389</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chon, Song Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sungyoung</creatorcontrib><title>Exploration of perceptual differences of virtually enhanced sound fields using timbre toolbox</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>In this presentation, we approach the analysis of perceived spatial differences from the perspective of timbre using the Timbre Toolbox [Peeters et al., 2011, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 2902–2916]. The Timbre Toolbox, using MATLAB, calculates 88 descriptors that have been reported in various timbre perception literature. These include temporal (such as RMS energy), spectral (both in magnitude and power spectra), and harmonic descriptors, as well as those based on the Equivalent Rectangular Bandwidth (ERB) model, which approximates the auditory processing. Analyses were performed on 27 stimuli of nine string quartet groups performing one excerpt in three room conditions, as well as the data from perceptual experiments reported in an earlier study [Chon et al., 2015, Proc. Audio Eng. Soc.]. The three room conditions have different spatial profiles, which consist of one natural room and two virtually enhanced rooms, where many physical parameters were closely controlled (e.g., ST1 and ST2). The experimental data include both the musicians’ ratings of spatial quality for performance (e.g., tonal balance and envelopment) as well as recording engineers’ ratings of recorded spaces (e.g., clarity and room size). The best timbre descriptor for each question will be reported, and an overall merit of this approach discussed.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUx4MoOKcHv0GuCp15aZo2RxlzCgMvepSSJi8a6ZqStLJ9ezu3s6fH-_1_PHh_Qm6BLQA4PMCiYCCAyzMyg4KzrCq4OCczxhhkQkl5Sa5S-p7WosrVjHysdn0boh586GhwtMdosB9G3VLrncOIncF0SH58POB2T7H70hO1NIWxs9R5bG2iY_LdJx38tolIhxDaJuyuyYXTbcKb05yT96fV2_I527yuX5aPm8wAUzLjrLA5SF7ykjlVSWk4N8JZyWRpuEUOucZmIgoaJwQvlbSmcFxVTlgUOp-Tu-NdE0NKEV3dR7_VcV8Dqw-91FCfepnc-6ObjB_-_v5H_gWlUWOf</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Chon, Song Hui</creator><creator>Kim, Sungyoung</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Exploration of perceptual differences of virtually enhanced sound fields using timbre toolbox</title><author>Chon, Song Hui ; Kim, Sungyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-205d31627270f9866c22c4fd6067c2de213aebc4f91bf442796dc5f298f4de4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chon, Song Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sungyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chon, Song Hui</au><au>Kim, Sungyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploration of perceptual differences of virtually enhanced sound fields using timbre toolbox</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2499</spage><epage>2500</epage><pages>2499-2500</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>In this presentation, we approach the analysis of perceived spatial differences from the perspective of timbre using the Timbre Toolbox [Peeters et al., 2011, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 2902–2916]. The Timbre Toolbox, using MATLAB, calculates 88 descriptors that have been reported in various timbre perception literature. These include temporal (such as RMS energy), spectral (both in magnitude and power spectra), and harmonic descriptors, as well as those based on the Equivalent Rectangular Bandwidth (ERB) model, which approximates the auditory processing. Analyses were performed on 27 stimuli of nine string quartet groups performing one excerpt in three room conditions, as well as the data from perceptual experiments reported in an earlier study [Chon et al., 2015, Proc. Audio Eng. Soc.]. The three room conditions have different spatial profiles, which consist of one natural room and two virtually enhanced rooms, where many physical parameters were closely controlled (e.g., ST1 and ST2). The experimental data include both the musicians’ ratings of spatial quality for performance (e.g., tonal balance and envelopment) as well as recording engineers’ ratings of recorded spaces (e.g., clarity and room size). The best timbre descriptor for each question will be reported, and an overall merit of this approach discussed.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.5014126</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017-10, Vol.142 (4), p.2499-2500
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1121_1_5014126
source AIP Journals Complete; Acoustical Society of America (AIP); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Exploration of perceptual differences of virtually enhanced sound fields using timbre toolbox
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T04%3A02%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploration%20of%20perceptual%20differences%20of%20virtually%20enhanced%20sound%20fields%20using%20timbre%20toolbox&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Chon,%20Song%20Hui&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2499&rft.epage=2500&rft.pages=2499-2500&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.5014126&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejasa%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true