Spectral weighting functions for localization of complex sound. III. The effect of sensorineural hearing lossa

Spectral weighting functions for sound localization were measured in participants with bilateral mild sloping to moderately severe, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and compared to normal hearing (NH) participants with and without simulated SNHL. Each participant group localized thre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2024-10, Vol.156 (4), p.2434-2447
Hauptverfasser: Folkerts, Monica L., Picou, Erin M., Stecker, G. Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2447
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2434
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 156
creator Folkerts, Monica L.
Picou, Erin M.
Stecker, G. Christopher
description Spectral weighting functions for sound localization were measured in participants with bilateral mild sloping to moderately severe, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and compared to normal hearing (NH) participants with and without simulated SNHL. Each participant group localized three types of complex tones, comprised of seven frequency components spatially jittered and presented from the horizontal frontal field. A threshold-elevating noise masker was implemented in the free field to simulate SNHL for participants with NH. On average, participants with SNHL and NH (in quiet and simulated SNHL) placed the greatest perceptual weight on components within the interaural time difference “dominance region,” found previously to peak around 800 Hz [Folkerts and Stecker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 3409–3425 (2022)]. In addition to the peak at 800 Hz, both participant groups (including NH participants in quiet) placed near equal weight on 400 Hz, resulting in a broadened “peak” in the dominance region, most likely due to the reduction of audibility to higher frequency components. However, individual weighting strategies were more variable across participants with SNHL than participants with NH. Localization performance was reduced for participants with SNHL but not for NH participants with simulated hearing loss when compared to NH participants in quiet.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0030471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1121_10_0030471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3116338568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p921-6ffeb2b260fa55c60918953d95347156b44aea28061b29970299a21bf66237383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1LAzEQhoMotlYv_gDJUZCtk2STbo4ifhQKHux9yW6TNpJN1s0ufvx6s7Z6mHlJeHhgZhC6JDAnhJLblAAM8gU5QlPCKWQFp_kxmgIAyXIpxASdxfiWnrxg8hRNmMwBqBBT5F9bXfedcvhD2-2ut36LzeDr3gYfsQkddqFWzn6r8QcHg-vQtE5_4hgGv5nj5XI5x-udxtqYZBqJqH0MnfV6GL07rbrR6kKM6hydGOWivjjkDK0fH9b3z9nq5Wl5f7fKWklJJpKqohUVYBTntQBJCsnZJlUakosqz5VWtABBKirlAlJTlFRGCMoWrGAzdL3Xtl14H3Tsy8bGWjunvA5DLBkhgrGCixG9OqBD1ehN2Xa2Ud1X-beiBNzsgVjb_ncL_wyBcjzAmIcDsB9rQXRF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116338568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spectral weighting functions for localization of complex sound. III. The effect of sensorineural hearing lossa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Folkerts, Monica L. ; Picou, Erin M. ; Stecker, G. Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Folkerts, Monica L. ; Picou, Erin M. ; Stecker, G. Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Spectral weighting functions for sound localization were measured in participants with bilateral mild sloping to moderately severe, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and compared to normal hearing (NH) participants with and without simulated SNHL. Each participant group localized three types of complex tones, comprised of seven frequency components spatially jittered and presented from the horizontal frontal field. A threshold-elevating noise masker was implemented in the free field to simulate SNHL for participants with NH. On average, participants with SNHL and NH (in quiet and simulated SNHL) placed the greatest perceptual weight on components within the interaural time difference “dominance region,” found previously to peak around 800 Hz [Folkerts and Stecker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 3409–3425 (2022)]. In addition to the peak at 800 Hz, both participant groups (including NH participants in quiet) placed near equal weight on 400 Hz, resulting in a broadened “peak” in the dominance region, most likely due to the reduction of audibility to higher frequency components. However, individual weighting strategies were more variable across participants with SNHL than participants with NH. Localization performance was reduced for participants with SNHL but not for NH participants with simulated hearing loss when compared to NH participants in quiet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0030471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39400266</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Aged ; Auditory Threshold ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Noise - adverse effects ; Perceptual Masking ; Sound Localization ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024-10, Vol.156 (4), p.2434-2447</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><rights>2024 Acoustical Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1442-9839 ; 0000-0001-6246-8467 ; 0000-0003-3083-0809</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/10.0030471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,790,1559,4498,27901,27902,76126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39400266$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Folkerts, Monica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picou, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stecker, G. Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Spectral weighting functions for localization of complex sound. III. The effect of sensorineural hearing lossa</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Spectral weighting functions for sound localization were measured in participants with bilateral mild sloping to moderately severe, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and compared to normal hearing (NH) participants with and without simulated SNHL. Each participant group localized three types of complex tones, comprised of seven frequency components spatially jittered and presented from the horizontal frontal field. A threshold-elevating noise masker was implemented in the free field to simulate SNHL for participants with NH. On average, participants with SNHL and NH (in quiet and simulated SNHL) placed the greatest perceptual weight on components within the interaural time difference “dominance region,” found previously to peak around 800 Hz [Folkerts and Stecker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 3409–3425 (2022)]. In addition to the peak at 800 Hz, both participant groups (including NH participants in quiet) placed near equal weight on 400 Hz, resulting in a broadened “peak” in the dominance region, most likely due to the reduction of audibility to higher frequency components. However, individual weighting strategies were more variable across participants with SNHL than participants with NH. Localization performance was reduced for participants with SNHL but not for NH participants with simulated hearing loss when compared to NH participants in quiet.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise - adverse effects</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Sound Localization</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1LAzEQhoMotlYv_gDJUZCtk2STbo4ifhQKHux9yW6TNpJN1s0ufvx6s7Z6mHlJeHhgZhC6JDAnhJLblAAM8gU5QlPCKWQFp_kxmgIAyXIpxASdxfiWnrxg8hRNmMwBqBBT5F9bXfedcvhD2-2ut36LzeDr3gYfsQkddqFWzn6r8QcHg-vQtE5_4hgGv5nj5XI5x-udxtqYZBqJqH0MnfV6GL07rbrR6kKM6hydGOWivjjkDK0fH9b3z9nq5Wl5f7fKWklJJpKqohUVYBTntQBJCsnZJlUakosqz5VWtABBKirlAlJTlFRGCMoWrGAzdL3Xtl14H3Tsy8bGWjunvA5DLBkhgrGCixG9OqBD1ehN2Xa2Ud1X-beiBNzsgVjb_ncL_wyBcjzAmIcDsB9rQXRF</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Folkerts, Monica L.</creator><creator>Picou, Erin M.</creator><creator>Stecker, G. Christopher</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-8467</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3083-0809</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Spectral weighting functions for localization of complex sound. III. The effect of sensorineural hearing lossa</title><author>Folkerts, Monica L. ; Picou, Erin M. ; Stecker, G. Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p921-6ffeb2b260fa55c60918953d95347156b44aea28061b29970299a21bf66237383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise - adverse effects</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Sound Localization</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Folkerts, Monica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picou, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stecker, G. Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Folkerts, Monica L.</au><au>Picou, Erin M.</au><au>Stecker, G. Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spectral weighting functions for localization of complex sound. III. The effect of sensorineural hearing lossa</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2434</spage><epage>2447</epage><pages>2434-2447</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Spectral weighting functions for sound localization were measured in participants with bilateral mild sloping to moderately severe, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and compared to normal hearing (NH) participants with and without simulated SNHL. Each participant group localized three types of complex tones, comprised of seven frequency components spatially jittered and presented from the horizontal frontal field. A threshold-elevating noise masker was implemented in the free field to simulate SNHL for participants with NH. On average, participants with SNHL and NH (in quiet and simulated SNHL) placed the greatest perceptual weight on components within the interaural time difference “dominance region,” found previously to peak around 800 Hz [Folkerts and Stecker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 3409–3425 (2022)]. In addition to the peak at 800 Hz, both participant groups (including NH participants in quiet) placed near equal weight on 400 Hz, resulting in a broadened “peak” in the dominance region, most likely due to the reduction of audibility to higher frequency components. However, individual weighting strategies were more variable across participants with SNHL than participants with NH. Localization performance was reduced for participants with SNHL but not for NH participants with simulated hearing loss when compared to NH participants in quiet.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39400266</pmid><doi>10.1121/10.0030471</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-8467</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3083-0809</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024-10, Vol.156 (4), p.2434-2447
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1121_10_0030471
source MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Aged
Auditory Threshold
Case-Control Studies
Female
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Noise - adverse effects
Perceptual Masking
Sound Localization
Young Adult
title Spectral weighting functions for localization of complex sound. III. The effect of sensorineural hearing lossa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A04%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spectral%20weighting%20functions%20for%20localization%20of%20complex%20sound.%20III.%20The%20effect%20of%20sensorineural%20hearing%20lossa&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Folkerts,%20Monica%20L.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2434&rft.epage=2447&rft.pages=2434-2447&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0030471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3116338568%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116338568&rft_id=info:pmid/39400266&rfr_iscdi=true