SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis
Purpose: To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime. Methods: Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3375-3375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3375 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | DiCostanzo, D Ayan, A Woollard, J Gupta, N |
description | Purpose:
To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime.
Methods:
Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers.
Results:
Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis.
Conclusion:
Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.4955784 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4955784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP5784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1354-691d9e8f0e10213306acc1f802bf1c61b170a597414a009f9a1f6e999239ecf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiB_9BE0-aFDtt96PekIiQrIEonJtSWiyBXdMuIfvvXbJc9TSHefLO5EXoHugAAPJnGAiZJFkuLlCPiYwTwai8RD1KpSBM0OQa3cS4pZSmPKE9NPtakjH5JMBe8DzYtTe1r0pcObwIB_tq9R5PdFgfdbB4GuPBRryMvty0a721pq5Cg4tqg4el3jXRx1t05fQu2rvz7KPl-G0xmpBi9j4dDQtigCeCpBLW0uaOWqAMOKepNgZcTtnKgUlhBRnVicwECN2-7qQGl1opJePSGpfzPnrocqtYexWNr635NlVZtj8pxlKWZly26rFTJlQxBuvUT_B7HRoFVJ36UqDOfbWWdPbod7b5G6qP-dk_df50XJ9a-yf8F8vodQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DiCostanzo, D ; Ayan, A ; Woollard, J ; Gupta, N</creator><creatorcontrib>DiCostanzo, D ; Ayan, A ; Woollard, J ; Gupta, N</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime.
Methods:
Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers.
Results:
Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis.
Conclusion:
Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4955784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ALARM SYSTEMS ; Cancer ; COMPUTER CODES ; Computer software ; Data analysis ; ENGINEERING ; Engineers ; ERRORS ; Failure analysis ; FAILURES ; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ; LINEAR ACCELERATORS ; MOTORS ; Multileaf collimators</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3375-3375</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4955784$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22626739$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DiCostanzo, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woollard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, N</creatorcontrib><title>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose:
To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime.
Methods:
Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers.
Results:
Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis.
Conclusion:
Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion.</description><subject>ALARM SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>COMPUTER CODES</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>ENGINEERING</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>ERRORS</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>FAILURES</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</subject><subject>MOTORS</subject><subject>Multileaf collimators</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiB_9BE0-aFDtt96PekIiQrIEonJtSWiyBXdMuIfvvXbJc9TSHefLO5EXoHugAAPJnGAiZJFkuLlCPiYwTwai8RD1KpSBM0OQa3cS4pZSmPKE9NPtakjH5JMBe8DzYtTe1r0pcObwIB_tq9R5PdFgfdbB4GuPBRryMvty0a721pq5Cg4tqg4el3jXRx1t05fQu2rvz7KPl-G0xmpBi9j4dDQtigCeCpBLW0uaOWqAMOKepNgZcTtnKgUlhBRnVicwECN2-7qQGl1opJePSGpfzPnrocqtYexWNr635NlVZtj8pxlKWZly26rFTJlQxBuvUT_B7HRoFVJ36UqDOfbWWdPbod7b5G6qP-dk_df50XJ9a-yf8F8vodQg</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>DiCostanzo, D</creator><creator>Ayan, A</creator><creator>Woollard, J</creator><creator>Gupta, N</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</title><author>DiCostanzo, D ; Ayan, A ; Woollard, J ; Gupta, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1354-691d9e8f0e10213306acc1f802bf1c61b170a597414a009f9a1f6e999239ecf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ALARM SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>COMPUTER CODES</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>ENGINEERING</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>ERRORS</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>FAILURES</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</topic><topic>MOTORS</topic><topic>Multileaf collimators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DiCostanzo, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woollard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DiCostanzo, D</au><au>Ayan, A</au><au>Woollard, J</au><au>Gupta, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3375</spage><epage>3375</epage><pages>3375-3375</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose:
To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime.
Methods:
Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers.
Results:
Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis.
Conclusion:
Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4955784</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3375-3375 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4955784 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ALARM SYSTEMS Cancer COMPUTER CODES Computer software Data analysis ENGINEERING Engineers ERRORS Failure analysis FAILURES INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LINEAR ACCELERATORS MOTORS Multileaf collimators |
title | SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A42%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU-F-R-12:%20Prediction%20of%20TrueBeam%20Hardware%20Issues%20Using%20Trajectory%20Log%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=DiCostanzo,%20D&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3375&rft.epage=3375&rft.pages=3375-3375&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4955784&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_scita%3EMP5784%3C/wiley_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |