SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis

Purpose: To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime. Methods: Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3375-3375
Hauptverfasser: DiCostanzo, D, Ayan, A, Woollard, J, Gupta, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3375
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3375
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 43
creator DiCostanzo, D
Ayan, A
Woollard, J
Gupta, N
description Purpose: To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime. Methods: Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers. Results: Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis. Conclusion: Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4955784
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4955784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP5784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1354-691d9e8f0e10213306acc1f802bf1c61b170a597414a009f9a1f6e999239ecf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiB_9BE0-aFDtt96PekIiQrIEonJtSWiyBXdMuIfvvXbJc9TSHefLO5EXoHugAAPJnGAiZJFkuLlCPiYwTwai8RD1KpSBM0OQa3cS4pZSmPKE9NPtakjH5JMBe8DzYtTe1r0pcObwIB_tq9R5PdFgfdbB4GuPBRryMvty0a721pq5Cg4tqg4el3jXRx1t05fQu2rvz7KPl-G0xmpBi9j4dDQtigCeCpBLW0uaOWqAMOKepNgZcTtnKgUlhBRnVicwECN2-7qQGl1opJePSGpfzPnrocqtYexWNr635NlVZtj8pxlKWZly26rFTJlQxBuvUT_B7HRoFVJ36UqDOfbWWdPbod7b5G6qP-dk_df50XJ9a-yf8F8vodQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DiCostanzo, D ; Ayan, A ; Woollard, J ; Gupta, N</creator><creatorcontrib>DiCostanzo, D ; Ayan, A ; Woollard, J ; Gupta, N</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime. Methods: Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers. Results: Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis. Conclusion: Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4955784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ALARM SYSTEMS ; Cancer ; COMPUTER CODES ; Computer software ; Data analysis ; ENGINEERING ; Engineers ; ERRORS ; Failure analysis ; FAILURES ; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ; LINEAR ACCELERATORS ; MOTORS ; Multileaf collimators</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3375-3375</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4955784$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22626739$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DiCostanzo, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woollard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, N</creatorcontrib><title>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime. Methods: Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers. Results: Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis. Conclusion: Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion.</description><subject>ALARM SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>COMPUTER CODES</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>ENGINEERING</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>ERRORS</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>FAILURES</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</subject><subject>MOTORS</subject><subject>Multileaf collimators</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiB_9BE0-aFDtt96PekIiQrIEonJtSWiyBXdMuIfvvXbJc9TSHefLO5EXoHugAAPJnGAiZJFkuLlCPiYwTwai8RD1KpSBM0OQa3cS4pZSmPKE9NPtakjH5JMBe8DzYtTe1r0pcObwIB_tq9R5PdFgfdbB4GuPBRryMvty0a721pq5Cg4tqg4el3jXRx1t05fQu2rvz7KPl-G0xmpBi9j4dDQtigCeCpBLW0uaOWqAMOKepNgZcTtnKgUlhBRnVicwECN2-7qQGl1opJePSGpfzPnrocqtYexWNr635NlVZtj8pxlKWZly26rFTJlQxBuvUT_B7HRoFVJ36UqDOfbWWdPbod7b5G6qP-dk_df50XJ9a-yf8F8vodQg</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>DiCostanzo, D</creator><creator>Ayan, A</creator><creator>Woollard, J</creator><creator>Gupta, N</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</title><author>DiCostanzo, D ; Ayan, A ; Woollard, J ; Gupta, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1354-691d9e8f0e10213306acc1f802bf1c61b170a597414a009f9a1f6e999239ecf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ALARM SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>COMPUTER CODES</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>ENGINEERING</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>ERRORS</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>FAILURES</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</topic><topic>MOTORS</topic><topic>Multileaf collimators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DiCostanzo, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woollard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DiCostanzo, D</au><au>Ayan, A</au><au>Woollard, J</au><au>Gupta, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3375</spage><epage>3375</epage><pages>3375-3375</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: To predict potential failures of hardware within the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator in order to proactively replace parts and decrease machine downtime. Methods: Machine downtime is a problem for all radiation oncology departments and vendors. Most often it is the result of unexpected equipment failure, and increased due to lack of in-house clinical engineering support. Preventative maintenance attempts to assuage downtime, but often is ineffective at preemptively preventing many failure modes such as MLC motor failures, the need to tighten a gantry chain, or the replacement of a jaw motor, among other things. To attempt to alleviate downtime, software was developed in house that determines the maximum value of each axis enumerated in the Truebeam trajectory log files. After patient treatments, this data is stored in a SQL database. Microsoft Power BI is used to plot the average maximum error of each day of each machine as a function of time. The results are then correlated with actual faults that occurred at the machine with the help of Varian service engineers. Results: Over the course of six months, 76,312 trajectory logs have been written into the database and plotted in Power BI. Throughout the course of analysis MLC motors have been replaced on three machines due to the early warning of the trajectory log analysis. The service engineers have also been alerted to possible gantry issues on one occasion due to the aforementioned analysis. Conclusion: Analyzing the trajectory log data is a viable and effective early warning system for potential failures of the TrueBeam linear accelerator. With further analysis and tightening of the tolerance values used to determine a possible imminent failure, it should be possible to pinpoint future issues more thoroughly and for more axes of motion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4955784</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3375-3375
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4955784
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ALARM SYSTEMS
Cancer
COMPUTER CODES
Computer software
Data analysis
ENGINEERING
Engineers
ERRORS
Failure analysis
FAILURES
INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
LINEAR ACCELERATORS
MOTORS
Multileaf collimators
title SU-F-R-12: Prediction of TrueBeam Hardware Issues Using Trajectory Log Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A42%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU-F-R-12:%20Prediction%20of%20TrueBeam%20Hardware%20Issues%20Using%20Trajectory%20Log%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=DiCostanzo,%20D&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3375&rft.epage=3375&rft.pages=3375-3375&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4955784&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_scita%3EMP5784%3C/wiley_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true