MO‐D‐351‐01: (Jack Fowler Junior Investigator Competition Winner) Optimization Tools for Modulated Electron Radiotherapy

Purpose: To devise optimization tools to plan Modulated Electron Radiotherapy (MERT) and to compare MERT plans to conventional or IMRT plans. Method and Materials: There are no commercially available treatment systems to plan or deliver MERT. Tertiary electron MLCs for MERT has been met with practic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Physics 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2867-2867
Hauptverfasser: Surucu, M, Mamalui‐Hunter, M, Klein, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2867
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2867
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 35
creator Surucu, M
Mamalui‐Hunter, M
Klein, E
description Purpose: To devise optimization tools to plan Modulated Electron Radiotherapy (MERT) and to compare MERT plans to conventional or IMRT plans. Method and Materials: There are no commercially available treatment systems to plan or deliver MERT. Tertiary electron MLCs for MERT has been met with practical limitations. We've investigated use of the inherent photon MLCs. We optimized MERT plans for a left sided post‐mastectomy breast cancer patient. From CT images, target organs such as chest wall, axillas, inter‐mammary nodes were contoured. The MERT plan was performed in a three‐step optimization process. Distances from the external contour‐to‐distal location of the PTV were calculated in transverse CT images. Energies were selected for efficient target coverage and energy bins were generated. Optimization of the energy bins was accomplished using a custom MERT Planning graphic user interface (MERTgui). Monte Carlo simulations were then performed using different MLC instructions for each segment generated by the MERTgui. Dose distributions of each segment were imported to CERR. Finally we used a custom built dose superposition GUI to combine doses for each segment using different weights which yields their relative MUs. The resulting dose distribution was used to calculate DVHs using CERR and compared to the conventional plan. Results: The MERT plan resulted in good target organ coverage and less dose to the organs at risk than the conventional plan. The dose that 20% of the ipsilateral lung received was reduced from 45Gy (conventional) to 26Gy (MERT). Using MERT, 80% volume of both axilla and IM received the prescription dose without consequence of excess dosage as with the conventional plan. Contralateral breast dose decreased significantly to 1/10 the dose of the conventional plan. Conclusion: MERT is ideal for treatment of shallow targets such as post‐mastectomy chest wall. We have devised optimization tools to facilitate the MC based planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2962352
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2962352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP2352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-a7c5ad8eacc97f86b00e9da6d7be7a66865f594a57c50e1d03c2ce028d0c510d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYgefIMexWRx2t3uH28GQSEQjMF43JS2q9Vlu2mLBA_GR_AZfRJX4KqHmck388uXzIfQKYEuISS9IF2axTRkdA-1aJSEQUQh20ctgCwKaATsEB059wIAccighT4m0-_Pr-umQkaaDuQSn424eMUDsyqVxaNlpY3Fw-pNOa-fuG9Ezyxq5bXXpsKPuqqU7eBp7fVCv_PNcmZM6XDRoBMjlyX3SuJ-qYS3zfGeS238s7K8Xh-jg4KXTp3sZhs9DPqz3m0wnt4Me1fjQJAkoQFPBOMyVVyILCnSeA6gMsljmcxVwuM4jVnBsoizhgNFJISCCgU0lSAYARm2UWfrK6xxzqoir61ecLvOCeS_weUk3wXXsMGWXelSrf8G88ndjj_f8k5ov_n_H_MfKp9-5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MO‐D‐351‐01: (Jack Fowler Junior Investigator Competition Winner) Optimization Tools for Modulated Electron Radiotherapy</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Surucu, M ; Mamalui‐Hunter, M ; Klein, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Surucu, M ; Mamalui‐Hunter, M ; Klein, E</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To devise optimization tools to plan Modulated Electron Radiotherapy (MERT) and to compare MERT plans to conventional or IMRT plans. Method and Materials: There are no commercially available treatment systems to plan or deliver MERT. Tertiary electron MLCs for MERT has been met with practical limitations. We've investigated use of the inherent photon MLCs. We optimized MERT plans for a left sided post‐mastectomy breast cancer patient. From CT images, target organs such as chest wall, axillas, inter‐mammary nodes were contoured. The MERT plan was performed in a three‐step optimization process. Distances from the external contour‐to‐distal location of the PTV were calculated in transverse CT images. Energies were selected for efficient target coverage and energy bins were generated. Optimization of the energy bins was accomplished using a custom MERT Planning graphic user interface (MERTgui). Monte Carlo simulations were then performed using different MLC instructions for each segment generated by the MERTgui. Dose distributions of each segment were imported to CERR. Finally we used a custom built dose superposition GUI to combine doses for each segment using different weights which yields their relative MUs. The resulting dose distribution was used to calculate DVHs using CERR and compared to the conventional plan. Results: The MERT plan resulted in good target organ coverage and less dose to the organs at risk than the conventional plan. The dose that 20% of the ipsilateral lung received was reduced from 45Gy (conventional) to 26Gy (MERT). Using MERT, 80% volume of both axilla and IM received the prescription dose without consequence of excess dosage as with the conventional plan. Contralateral breast dose decreased significantly to 1/10 the dose of the conventional plan. Conclusion: MERT is ideal for treatment of shallow targets such as post‐mastectomy chest wall. We have devised optimization tools to facilitate the MC based planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2962352</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Dosimetry ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; Medical imaging ; Monte Carlo methods ; Multileaf collimators ; Photons ; Radiation therapy</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2867-2867</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2962352$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Surucu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamalui‐Hunter, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, E</creatorcontrib><title>MO‐D‐351‐01: (Jack Fowler Junior Investigator Competition Winner) Optimization Tools for Modulated Electron Radiotherapy</title><title>Medical Physics</title><description>Purpose: To devise optimization tools to plan Modulated Electron Radiotherapy (MERT) and to compare MERT plans to conventional or IMRT plans. Method and Materials: There are no commercially available treatment systems to plan or deliver MERT. Tertiary electron MLCs for MERT has been met with practical limitations. We've investigated use of the inherent photon MLCs. We optimized MERT plans for a left sided post‐mastectomy breast cancer patient. From CT images, target organs such as chest wall, axillas, inter‐mammary nodes were contoured. The MERT plan was performed in a three‐step optimization process. Distances from the external contour‐to‐distal location of the PTV were calculated in transverse CT images. Energies were selected for efficient target coverage and energy bins were generated. Optimization of the energy bins was accomplished using a custom MERT Planning graphic user interface (MERTgui). Monte Carlo simulations were then performed using different MLC instructions for each segment generated by the MERTgui. Dose distributions of each segment were imported to CERR. Finally we used a custom built dose superposition GUI to combine doses for each segment using different weights which yields their relative MUs. The resulting dose distribution was used to calculate DVHs using CERR and compared to the conventional plan. Results: The MERT plan resulted in good target organ coverage and less dose to the organs at risk than the conventional plan. The dose that 20% of the ipsilateral lung received was reduced from 45Gy (conventional) to 26Gy (MERT). Using MERT, 80% volume of both axilla and IM received the prescription dose without consequence of excess dosage as with the conventional plan. Contralateral breast dose decreased significantly to 1/10 the dose of the conventional plan. Conclusion: MERT is ideal for treatment of shallow targets such as post‐mastectomy chest wall. We have devised optimization tools to facilitate the MC based planning.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Multileaf collimators</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYgefIMexWRx2t3uH28GQSEQjMF43JS2q9Vlu2mLBA_GR_AZfRJX4KqHmck388uXzIfQKYEuISS9IF2axTRkdA-1aJSEQUQh20ctgCwKaATsEB059wIAccighT4m0-_Pr-umQkaaDuQSn424eMUDsyqVxaNlpY3Fw-pNOa-fuG9Ezyxq5bXXpsKPuqqU7eBp7fVCv_PNcmZM6XDRoBMjlyX3SuJ-qYS3zfGeS238s7K8Xh-jg4KXTp3sZhs9DPqz3m0wnt4Me1fjQJAkoQFPBOMyVVyILCnSeA6gMsljmcxVwuM4jVnBsoizhgNFJISCCgU0lSAYARm2UWfrK6xxzqoir61ecLvOCeS_weUk3wXXsMGWXelSrf8G88ndjj_f8k5ov_n_H_MfKp9-5A</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Surucu, M</creator><creator>Mamalui‐Hunter, M</creator><creator>Klein, E</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>MO‐D‐351‐01: (Jack Fowler Junior Investigator Competition Winner) Optimization Tools for Modulated Electron Radiotherapy</title><author>Surucu, M ; Mamalui‐Hunter, M ; Klein, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-a7c5ad8eacc97f86b00e9da6d7be7a66865f594a57c50e1d03c2ce028d0c510d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Multileaf collimators</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Surucu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamalui‐Hunter, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Surucu, M</au><au>Mamalui‐Hunter, M</au><au>Klein, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MO‐D‐351‐01: (Jack Fowler Junior Investigator Competition Winner) Optimization Tools for Modulated Electron Radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2867</spage><epage>2867</epage><pages>2867-2867</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: To devise optimization tools to plan Modulated Electron Radiotherapy (MERT) and to compare MERT plans to conventional or IMRT plans. Method and Materials: There are no commercially available treatment systems to plan or deliver MERT. Tertiary electron MLCs for MERT has been met with practical limitations. We've investigated use of the inherent photon MLCs. We optimized MERT plans for a left sided post‐mastectomy breast cancer patient. From CT images, target organs such as chest wall, axillas, inter‐mammary nodes were contoured. The MERT plan was performed in a three‐step optimization process. Distances from the external contour‐to‐distal location of the PTV were calculated in transverse CT images. Energies were selected for efficient target coverage and energy bins were generated. Optimization of the energy bins was accomplished using a custom MERT Planning graphic user interface (MERTgui). Monte Carlo simulations were then performed using different MLC instructions for each segment generated by the MERTgui. Dose distributions of each segment were imported to CERR. Finally we used a custom built dose superposition GUI to combine doses for each segment using different weights which yields their relative MUs. The resulting dose distribution was used to calculate DVHs using CERR and compared to the conventional plan. Results: The MERT plan resulted in good target organ coverage and less dose to the organs at risk than the conventional plan. The dose that 20% of the ipsilateral lung received was reduced from 45Gy (conventional) to 26Gy (MERT). Using MERT, 80% volume of both axilla and IM received the prescription dose without consequence of excess dosage as with the conventional plan. Contralateral breast dose decreased significantly to 1/10 the dose of the conventional plan. Conclusion: MERT is ideal for treatment of shallow targets such as post‐mastectomy chest wall. We have devised optimization tools to facilitate the MC based planning.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.2962352</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2867-2867
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2962352
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anatomy
Cancer
Computed tomography
Dosimetry
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
Medical imaging
Monte Carlo methods
Multileaf collimators
Photons
Radiation therapy
title MO‐D‐351‐01: (Jack Fowler Junior Investigator Competition Winner) Optimization Tools for Modulated Electron Radiotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MO%E2%80%90D%E2%80%90351%E2%80%9001:%20(Jack%20Fowler%20Junior%20Investigator%20Competition%20Winner)%20Optimization%20Tools%20for%20Modulated%20Electron%20Radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Surucu,%20M&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2867&rft.epage=2867&rft.pages=2867-2867&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2962352&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_scita%3EMP2352%3C/wiley_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true