PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants

The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom exp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.419-435
Hauptverfasser: Parodi, Katia, Paganetti, Harald, Cascio, Ethan, Flanz, Jacob B., Bonab, Ali A., Alpert, Nathaniel M., Lohmann, Kevin, Bortfeld, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 435
container_issue 2
container_start_page 419
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 34
creator Parodi, Katia
Paganetti, Harald
Cascio, Ethan
Flanz, Jacob B.
Bonab, Ali A.
Alpert, Nathaniel M.
Lohmann, Kevin
Bortfeld, Thomas
description The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within 20 min after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of 2 Gy , despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2401042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2401042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70325414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxYModq0--AUkIAgK0yaZZGemD0JZqi1U7MP6HDL5sxOZmYxJdst-e2_dwdaHFp9Ccn85uSfnIvSWkhNKaX1KTxgnlHD2DC0Yr8qCM9I8RwtCGl5ASRyhVyn9JIQsS0FeoiNalXVNRb1A6eZifbpaYz-ojR832IWIc7QqD3bMeGejd16r7MOIlcs24imGDJvc2aim_Rk-xylvzR7f-tzhqVcpe42nTo05DAmr0eDBZtX3cOoHqI85vUYvnOqTfTOvx-jHl4v16rK4_v71anV-XWix5KwQ3DHH2lZQy5TRylhRsbZkhijSVrU2oqlr0TaVZrS21KiKN7Rd1kq1jjXUlcfo80F32raDNRocRdXLKYLZuJdBeflvZfSd3ISdZKxh0AEIvD8IBHAlk_bZ6k6HcbQ6S_hiQUkpgPowPxPDr61NWQ4-aduDVxu2SVakZIJTDuDHA6hjSCla97cVSuRdkJLKOUhg3z3s_Z6ckwOgOAC3vrf7x5Xkt5tZcP6MOxt_An38DsyEXK3lPBMSZkJmEPj03wJPwTtQu-9uMq78DSrx2Rc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70325414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Parodi, Katia ; Paganetti, Harald ; Cascio, Ethan ; Flanz, Jacob B. ; Bonab, Ali A. ; Alpert, Nathaniel M. ; Lohmann, Kevin ; Bortfeld, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Parodi, Katia ; Paganetti, Harald ; Cascio, Ethan ; Flanz, Jacob B. ; Bonab, Ali A. ; Alpert, Nathaniel M. ; Lohmann, Kevin ; Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within 20 min after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of 2 Gy , despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2401042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17388158</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ACCURACY ; ALGORITHMS ; Ancillary equipment ; bone ; BRAGG CURVE ; Calibration ; CLINICAL TRIALS ; Computed radiography ; Computed tomography ; computerised tomography ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; HOSPITALS ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; IMAGE SCANNERS ; IMPLANTS ; IRRADIATION ; Isotopes ; lung ; LUNGS ; MASSACHUSETTS ; Medical imaging ; Medical treatment planning ; Metals ; Monte Carlo ; MONTE CARLO METHOD ; Monte Carlo methods ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; PLASTICS ; PMMA ; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ; positron emission tomography ; Positron emission tomography (PET) ; Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Prostheses and Implants ; prosthetics ; PROTON BEAMS ; proton therapy ; Protons ; Protons - therapeutic use ; radiation therapy ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; SKELETON ; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION ; Subtraction Technique ; Tissues ; titanium ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Treatment strategy ; VERIFICATION</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.419-435</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.2401042$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2401042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20951035$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parodi, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganetti, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascio, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanz, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonab, Ali A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohmann, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within 20 min after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of 2 Gy , despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications.</description><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Ancillary equipment</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>BRAGG CURVE</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>CLINICAL TRIALS</subject><subject>Computed radiography</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>HOSPITALS</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>IMAGE SCANNERS</subject><subject>IMPLANTS</subject><subject>IRRADIATION</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>LUNGS</subject><subject>MASSACHUSETTS</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical treatment planning</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>MONTE CARLO METHOD</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>PLASTICS</subject><subject>PMMA</subject><subject>POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography (PET)</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>prosthetics</subject><subject>PROTON BEAMS</subject><subject>proton therapy</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Protons - therapeutic use</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>SKELETON</subject><subject>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>Subtraction Technique</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>titanium</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Treatment strategy</subject><subject>VERIFICATION</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxYModq0--AUkIAgK0yaZZGemD0JZqi1U7MP6HDL5sxOZmYxJdst-e2_dwdaHFp9Ccn85uSfnIvSWkhNKaX1KTxgnlHD2DC0Yr8qCM9I8RwtCGl5ASRyhVyn9JIQsS0FeoiNalXVNRb1A6eZifbpaYz-ojR832IWIc7QqD3bMeGejd16r7MOIlcs24imGDJvc2aim_Rk-xylvzR7f-tzhqVcpe42nTo05DAmr0eDBZtX3cOoHqI85vUYvnOqTfTOvx-jHl4v16rK4_v71anV-XWix5KwQ3DHH2lZQy5TRylhRsbZkhijSVrU2oqlr0TaVZrS21KiKN7Rd1kq1jjXUlcfo80F32raDNRocRdXLKYLZuJdBeflvZfSd3ISdZKxh0AEIvD8IBHAlk_bZ6k6HcbQ6S_hiQUkpgPowPxPDr61NWQ4-aduDVxu2SVakZIJTDuDHA6hjSCla97cVSuRdkJLKOUhg3z3s_Z6ckwOgOAC3vrf7x5Xkt5tZcP6MOxt_An38DsyEXK3lPBMSZkJmEPj03wJPwTtQu-9uMq78DSrx2Rc</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Parodi, Katia</creator><creator>Paganetti, Harald</creator><creator>Cascio, Ethan</creator><creator>Flanz, Jacob B.</creator><creator>Bonab, Ali A.</creator><creator>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</creator><creator>Lohmann, Kevin</creator><creator>Bortfeld, Thomas</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</title><author>Parodi, Katia ; Paganetti, Harald ; Cascio, Ethan ; Flanz, Jacob B. ; Bonab, Ali A. ; Alpert, Nathaniel M. ; Lohmann, Kevin ; Bortfeld, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Ancillary equipment</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>BRAGG CURVE</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>CLINICAL TRIALS</topic><topic>Computed radiography</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>HOSPITALS</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>IMAGE SCANNERS</topic><topic>IMPLANTS</topic><topic>IRRADIATION</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>LUNGS</topic><topic>MASSACHUSETTS</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical treatment planning</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>MONTE CARLO METHOD</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>PLASTICS</topic><topic>PMMA</topic><topic>POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography (PET)</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>prosthetics</topic><topic>PROTON BEAMS</topic><topic>proton therapy</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Protons - therapeutic use</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>SKELETON</topic><topic>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>Subtraction Technique</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>titanium</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Treatment strategy</topic><topic>VERIFICATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parodi, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganetti, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascio, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanz, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonab, Ali A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohmann, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parodi, Katia</au><au>Paganetti, Harald</au><au>Cascio, Ethan</au><au>Flanz, Jacob B.</au><au>Bonab, Ali A.</au><au>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</au><au>Lohmann, Kevin</au><au>Bortfeld, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>419-435</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within 20 min after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of 2 Gy , despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>17388158</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.2401042</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.419-435
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2401042
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects ACCURACY
ALGORITHMS
Ancillary equipment
bone
BRAGG CURVE
Calibration
CLINICAL TRIALS
Computed radiography
Computed tomography
computerised tomography
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
HOSPITALS
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
IMAGE SCANNERS
IMPLANTS
IRRADIATION
Isotopes
lung
LUNGS
MASSACHUSETTS
Medical imaging
Medical treatment planning
Metals
Monte Carlo
MONTE CARLO METHOD
Monte Carlo methods
PHANTOMS
Phantoms, Imaging
PLASTICS
PMMA
POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
positron emission tomography
Positron emission tomography (PET)
Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Prostheses and Implants
prosthetics
PROTON BEAMS
proton therapy
Protons
Protons - therapeutic use
radiation therapy
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
SKELETON
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
Subtraction Technique
Tissues
titanium
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Treatment strategy
VERIFICATION
title PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A29%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PET/CT%20imaging%20for%20treatment%20verification%20after%20proton%20therapy:%20A%20study%20with%20plastic%20phantoms%20and%20metallic%20implants&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Parodi,%20Katia&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=419-435&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2401042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E70325414%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70325414&rft_id=info:pmid/17388158&rfr_iscdi=true