PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants
The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom exp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.419-435 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 435 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Parodi, Katia Paganetti, Harald Cascio, Ethan Flanz, Jacob B. Bonab, Ali A. Alpert, Nathaniel M. Lohmann, Kevin Bortfeld, Thomas |
description | The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within
20
min
after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of
2
Gy
, despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.2401042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2401042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70325414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxYModq0--AUkIAgK0yaZZGemD0JZqi1U7MP6HDL5sxOZmYxJdst-e2_dwdaHFp9Ccn85uSfnIvSWkhNKaX1KTxgnlHD2DC0Yr8qCM9I8RwtCGl5ASRyhVyn9JIQsS0FeoiNalXVNRb1A6eZifbpaYz-ojR832IWIc7QqD3bMeGejd16r7MOIlcs24imGDJvc2aim_Rk-xylvzR7f-tzhqVcpe42nTo05DAmr0eDBZtX3cOoHqI85vUYvnOqTfTOvx-jHl4v16rK4_v71anV-XWix5KwQ3DHH2lZQy5TRylhRsbZkhijSVrU2oqlr0TaVZrS21KiKN7Rd1kq1jjXUlcfo80F32raDNRocRdXLKYLZuJdBeflvZfSd3ISdZKxh0AEIvD8IBHAlk_bZ6k6HcbQ6S_hiQUkpgPowPxPDr61NWQ4-aduDVxu2SVakZIJTDuDHA6hjSCla97cVSuRdkJLKOUhg3z3s_Z6ckwOgOAC3vrf7x5Xkt5tZcP6MOxt_An38DsyEXK3lPBMSZkJmEPj03wJPwTtQu-9uMq78DSrx2Rc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70325414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Parodi, Katia ; Paganetti, Harald ; Cascio, Ethan ; Flanz, Jacob B. ; Bonab, Ali A. ; Alpert, Nathaniel M. ; Lohmann, Kevin ; Bortfeld, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Parodi, Katia ; Paganetti, Harald ; Cascio, Ethan ; Flanz, Jacob B. ; Bonab, Ali A. ; Alpert, Nathaniel M. ; Lohmann, Kevin ; Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within
20
min
after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of
2
Gy
, despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2401042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17388158</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ACCURACY ; ALGORITHMS ; Ancillary equipment ; bone ; BRAGG CURVE ; Calibration ; CLINICAL TRIALS ; Computed radiography ; Computed tomography ; computerised tomography ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; HOSPITALS ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; IMAGE SCANNERS ; IMPLANTS ; IRRADIATION ; Isotopes ; lung ; LUNGS ; MASSACHUSETTS ; Medical imaging ; Medical treatment planning ; Metals ; Monte Carlo ; MONTE CARLO METHOD ; Monte Carlo methods ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; PLASTICS ; PMMA ; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ; positron emission tomography ; Positron emission tomography (PET) ; Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Prostheses and Implants ; prosthetics ; PROTON BEAMS ; proton therapy ; Protons ; Protons - therapeutic use ; radiation therapy ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; SKELETON ; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION ; Subtraction Technique ; Tissues ; titanium ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Treatment strategy ; VERIFICATION</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.419-435</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.2401042$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2401042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20951035$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parodi, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganetti, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascio, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanz, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonab, Ali A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohmann, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within
20
min
after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of
2
Gy
, despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications.</description><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Ancillary equipment</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>BRAGG CURVE</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>CLINICAL TRIALS</subject><subject>Computed radiography</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>HOSPITALS</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>IMAGE SCANNERS</subject><subject>IMPLANTS</subject><subject>IRRADIATION</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>LUNGS</subject><subject>MASSACHUSETTS</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical treatment planning</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>MONTE CARLO METHOD</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>PLASTICS</subject><subject>PMMA</subject><subject>POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography (PET)</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>prosthetics</subject><subject>PROTON BEAMS</subject><subject>proton therapy</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Protons - therapeutic use</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>SKELETON</subject><subject>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>Subtraction Technique</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>titanium</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Treatment strategy</subject><subject>VERIFICATION</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxYModq0--AUkIAgK0yaZZGemD0JZqi1U7MP6HDL5sxOZmYxJdst-e2_dwdaHFp9Ccn85uSfnIvSWkhNKaX1KTxgnlHD2DC0Yr8qCM9I8RwtCGl5ASRyhVyn9JIQsS0FeoiNalXVNRb1A6eZifbpaYz-ojR832IWIc7QqD3bMeGejd16r7MOIlcs24imGDJvc2aim_Rk-xylvzR7f-tzhqVcpe42nTo05DAmr0eDBZtX3cOoHqI85vUYvnOqTfTOvx-jHl4v16rK4_v71anV-XWix5KwQ3DHH2lZQy5TRylhRsbZkhijSVrU2oqlr0TaVZrS21KiKN7Rd1kq1jjXUlcfo80F32raDNRocRdXLKYLZuJdBeflvZfSd3ISdZKxh0AEIvD8IBHAlk_bZ6k6HcbQ6S_hiQUkpgPowPxPDr61NWQ4-aduDVxu2SVakZIJTDuDHA6hjSCla97cVSuRdkJLKOUhg3z3s_Z6ckwOgOAC3vrf7x5Xkt5tZcP6MOxt_An38DsyEXK3lPBMSZkJmEPj03wJPwTtQu-9uMq78DSrx2Rc</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Parodi, Katia</creator><creator>Paganetti, Harald</creator><creator>Cascio, Ethan</creator><creator>Flanz, Jacob B.</creator><creator>Bonab, Ali A.</creator><creator>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</creator><creator>Lohmann, Kevin</creator><creator>Bortfeld, Thomas</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</title><author>Parodi, Katia ; Paganetti, Harald ; Cascio, Ethan ; Flanz, Jacob B. ; Bonab, Ali A. ; Alpert, Nathaniel M. ; Lohmann, Kevin ; Bortfeld, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-54f2f2bb51e2adcade572b32d0a0b78cd59885b97c218e1da7491b68aabf291f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Ancillary equipment</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>BRAGG CURVE</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>CLINICAL TRIALS</topic><topic>Computed radiography</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>HOSPITALS</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>IMAGE SCANNERS</topic><topic>IMPLANTS</topic><topic>IRRADIATION</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>LUNGS</topic><topic>MASSACHUSETTS</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical treatment planning</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>MONTE CARLO METHOD</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>PLASTICS</topic><topic>PMMA</topic><topic>POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography (PET)</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>prosthetics</topic><topic>PROTON BEAMS</topic><topic>proton therapy</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Protons - therapeutic use</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>SKELETON</topic><topic>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>Subtraction Technique</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>titanium</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Treatment strategy</topic><topic>VERIFICATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parodi, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganetti, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascio, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanz, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonab, Ali A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohmann, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parodi, Katia</au><au>Paganetti, Harald</au><au>Cascio, Ethan</au><au>Flanz, Jacob B.</au><au>Bonab, Ali A.</au><au>Alpert, Nathaniel M.</au><au>Lohmann, Kevin</au><au>Bortfeld, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>419-435</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>The feasibility of off-line positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for routine three dimensional in-vivo treatment verification of proton radiation therapy is currently under investigation at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In preparation for clinical trials, phantom experiments were carried out to investigate the sensitivity and accuracy of the method depending on irradiation and imaging parameters. Furthermore, they addressed the feasibility of PET/CT as a robust verification tool in the presence of metallic implants. These produce x-ray CT artifacts and fluence perturbations which may compromise the accuracy of treatment planning algorithms. Spread-out Bragg peak proton fields were delivered to different phantoms consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PMMA stacked with lung and bone equivalent materials, and PMMA with titanium rods to mimic implants in patients. PET data were acquired in list mode starting within
20
min
after irradiation at a commercial luthetium-oxyorthosilicate (LSO)-based PET/CT scanner. The amount and spatial distribution of the measured activity could be well reproduced by calculations based on the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. This phantom study supports the potential of millimeter accuracy for range monitoring and lateral field position verification even after low therapeutic dose exposures of
2
Gy
, despite the delay between irradiation and imaging. It also indicates the value of PET for treatment verification in the presence of metallic implants, demonstrating a higher sensitivity to fluence perturbations in comparison to a commercial analytical treatment planning system. Finally, it addresses the suitability of LSO-based PET detectors for hadron therapy monitoring. This unconventional application of PET involves countrates which are orders of magnitude lower than in diagnostic tracer imaging, i.e., the signal of interest is comparable to the noise originating from the intrinsic radioactivity of the detector itself. In addition to PET alone, PET/CT imaging provides accurate information on the position of the imaged object and may assess possible anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy in clinical applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>17388158</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.2401042</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.419-435 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2401042 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | ACCURACY ALGORITHMS Ancillary equipment bone BRAGG CURVE Calibration CLINICAL TRIALS Computed radiography Computed tomography computerised tomography Dosimetry/exposure assessment HOSPITALS Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods IMAGE SCANNERS IMPLANTS IRRADIATION Isotopes lung LUNGS MASSACHUSETTS Medical imaging Medical treatment planning Metals Monte Carlo MONTE CARLO METHOD Monte Carlo methods PHANTOMS Phantoms, Imaging PLASTICS PMMA POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY positron emission tomography Positron emission tomography (PET) Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Prostheses and Implants prosthetics PROTON BEAMS proton therapy Protons Protons - therapeutic use radiation therapy RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity SKELETON SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION Subtraction Technique Tissues titanium Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Treatment strategy VERIFICATION |
title | PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: A study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A29%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PET/CT%20imaging%20for%20treatment%20verification%20after%20proton%20therapy:%20A%20study%20with%20plastic%20phantoms%20and%20metallic%20implants&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Parodi,%20Katia&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=419-435&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2401042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E70325414%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70325414&rft_id=info:pmid/17388158&rfr_iscdi=true |