Enhancing automatic number plate recognition accuracy with novel support vector machine algorithm and comparison with Lasso Regression
In this study, we used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) technique to build a system that could recognise and identify licence plates, and we compared its accuracy to that of the Lasso Regression approach to see how well it performed (TM). The Parts and Methods: Using machine learning techniques like...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 3193 |
creator | Srinu, R. Naga Madhavan, Ramkumar |
description | In this study, we used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) technique to build a system that could recognise and identify licence plates, and we compared its accuracy to that of the Lasso Regression approach to see how well it performed (TM). The Parts and Methods: Using machine learning techniques like the Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm and the Lasso Regression algorithm, the methodology employs a sample size of five hundred and fifty datasets sourced from IEEE-dataport.org, with twenty datasets used for each group. The sample size was determined with the following parameters: G power = 80%, alpha = 0.05, and confidence level = 96%. Findings: The Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm outperformed the Lasso Regression algorithm with an accuracy of 88.99 percent ("Analysis and Comparison for Innovative Prediction Technique Using Logistic Regression Algorithm over Support Vector Machine Algorithm with Improved Accuracy" 2022). Both algorithms were compared to one another. Utilizing independent sample t-tests, it was shown that the two methods varied significantly in terms of accuracy. The groups were found to be statistically significant, since the p-value for these tests was 0.0057, which is greater than 0.05. The Novel Support Vector Machine Technique outperformed the Lasso Regression technique by a wide margin, with an accuracy of 88.99 percent compared to 84.82 percent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0233112 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0233112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3127405004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p632-6898d2774178c248e9b81d278eef4e849b9f64a64cdcf411cd987c03001e24bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkF1LwzAUhoMoOKcX_oOAd0JnvtqklzLmBwwE2YV3JU3TLqNNYpJO9gf83XZuVwcOz_sczgvAPUYLjAr6lC8QoRRjcgFmOM9xxgtcXIIZQiXLCKNf1-Amxh1CpORczMDvym6lVcZ2UI7JDTIZBe041DpA38ukYdDKddYk4yyUSo1BqgP8MWkLrdvrHsbRexcS3GuVXICDVFtjNZR958JEDVDaBio3eBlMnBz_0bWM0cFP3QUd42S-BVet7KO-O8852LysNsu3bP3x-r58Xme-oCQrRCkawjnDXCjChC5rgaeF0LplWrCyLtuCyYKpRrUMY9WUgitEEcKasLqhc_Bw0vrgvkcdU7VzY7DTxYpiwhnKEWIT9XiiojJJHh-vfDCDDIcKo-pYc5VX55rpH3w5cfM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3127405004</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Enhancing automatic number plate recognition accuracy with novel support vector machine algorithm and comparison with Lasso Regression</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Srinu, R. Naga ; Madhavan, Ramkumar</creator><contributor>Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Srinu, R. Naga ; Madhavan, Ramkumar ; Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) technique to build a system that could recognise and identify licence plates, and we compared its accuracy to that of the Lasso Regression approach to see how well it performed (TM). The Parts and Methods: Using machine learning techniques like the Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm and the Lasso Regression algorithm, the methodology employs a sample size of five hundred and fifty datasets sourced from IEEE-dataport.org, with twenty datasets used for each group. The sample size was determined with the following parameters: G power = 80%, alpha = 0.05, and confidence level = 96%. Findings: The Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm outperformed the Lasso Regression algorithm with an accuracy of 88.99 percent ("Analysis and Comparison for Innovative Prediction Technique Using Logistic Regression Algorithm over Support Vector Machine Algorithm with Improved Accuracy" 2022). Both algorithms were compared to one another. Utilizing independent sample t-tests, it was shown that the two methods varied significantly in terms of accuracy. The groups were found to be statistically significant, since the p-value for these tests was 0.0057, which is greater than 0.05. The Novel Support Vector Machine Technique outperformed the Lasso Regression technique by a wide margin, with an accuracy of 88.99 percent compared to 84.82 percent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0233112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Confidence intervals ; Datasets ; Machine learning ; Parameter identification ; Regression ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0233112$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,794,4512,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Srinivasan, R</contributor><contributor>Balasubramanian, PL</contributor><contributor>Seenivasan, M</contributor><contributor>Sharma, T. Rakesh</contributor><contributor>Vijayan, V.</contributor><contributor>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Srinu, R. Naga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Ramkumar</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing automatic number plate recognition accuracy with novel support vector machine algorithm and comparison with Lasso Regression</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>In this study, we used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) technique to build a system that could recognise and identify licence plates, and we compared its accuracy to that of the Lasso Regression approach to see how well it performed (TM). The Parts and Methods: Using machine learning techniques like the Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm and the Lasso Regression algorithm, the methodology employs a sample size of five hundred and fifty datasets sourced from IEEE-dataport.org, with twenty datasets used for each group. The sample size was determined with the following parameters: G power = 80%, alpha = 0.05, and confidence level = 96%. Findings: The Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm outperformed the Lasso Regression algorithm with an accuracy of 88.99 percent ("Analysis and Comparison for Innovative Prediction Technique Using Logistic Regression Algorithm over Support Vector Machine Algorithm with Improved Accuracy" 2022). Both algorithms were compared to one another. Utilizing independent sample t-tests, it was shown that the two methods varied significantly in terms of accuracy. The groups were found to be statistically significant, since the p-value for these tests was 0.0057, which is greater than 0.05. The Novel Support Vector Machine Technique outperformed the Lasso Regression technique by a wide margin, with an accuracy of 88.99 percent compared to 84.82 percent.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkF1LwzAUhoMoOKcX_oOAd0JnvtqklzLmBwwE2YV3JU3TLqNNYpJO9gf83XZuVwcOz_sczgvAPUYLjAr6lC8QoRRjcgFmOM9xxgtcXIIZQiXLCKNf1-Amxh1CpORczMDvym6lVcZ2UI7JDTIZBe041DpA38ukYdDKddYk4yyUSo1BqgP8MWkLrdvrHsbRexcS3GuVXICDVFtjNZR958JEDVDaBio3eBlMnBz_0bWM0cFP3QUd42S-BVet7KO-O8852LysNsu3bP3x-r58Xme-oCQrRCkawjnDXCjChC5rgaeF0LplWrCyLtuCyYKpRrUMY9WUgitEEcKasLqhc_Bw0vrgvkcdU7VzY7DTxYpiwhnKEWIT9XiiojJJHh-vfDCDDIcKo-pYc5VX55rpH3w5cfM</recordid><startdate>20241111</startdate><enddate>20241111</enddate><creator>Srinu, R. Naga</creator><creator>Madhavan, Ramkumar</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241111</creationdate><title>Enhancing automatic number plate recognition accuracy with novel support vector machine algorithm and comparison with Lasso Regression</title><author>Srinu, R. Naga ; Madhavan, Ramkumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p632-6898d2774178c248e9b81d278eef4e849b9f64a64cdcf411cd987c03001e24bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Srinu, R. Naga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Ramkumar</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Srinu, R. Naga</au><au>Madhavan, Ramkumar</au><au>Srinivasan, R</au><au>Balasubramanian, PL</au><au>Seenivasan, M</au><au>Sharma, T. Rakesh</au><au>Vijayan, V.</au><au>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Enhancing automatic number plate recognition accuracy with novel support vector machine algorithm and comparison with Lasso Regression</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-11-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3193</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>In this study, we used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) technique to build a system that could recognise and identify licence plates, and we compared its accuracy to that of the Lasso Regression approach to see how well it performed (TM). The Parts and Methods: Using machine learning techniques like the Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm and the Lasso Regression algorithm, the methodology employs a sample size of five hundred and fifty datasets sourced from IEEE-dataport.org, with twenty datasets used for each group. The sample size was determined with the following parameters: G power = 80%, alpha = 0.05, and confidence level = 96%. Findings: The Novel Support Vector Machine Algorithm outperformed the Lasso Regression algorithm with an accuracy of 88.99 percent ("Analysis and Comparison for Innovative Prediction Technique Using Logistic Regression Algorithm over Support Vector Machine Algorithm with Improved Accuracy" 2022). Both algorithms were compared to one another. Utilizing independent sample t-tests, it was shown that the two methods varied significantly in terms of accuracy. The groups were found to be statistically significant, since the p-value for these tests was 0.0057, which is greater than 0.05. The Novel Support Vector Machine Technique outperformed the Lasso Regression technique by a wide margin, with an accuracy of 88.99 percent compared to 84.82 percent.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0233112</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0233112 |
source | AIP Journals Complete |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Confidence intervals Datasets Machine learning Parameter identification Regression Statistical analysis Statistical methods Support vector machines |
title | Enhancing automatic number plate recognition accuracy with novel support vector machine algorithm and comparison with Lasso Regression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A15%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20automatic%20number%20plate%20recognition%20accuracy%20with%20novel%20support%20vector%20machine%20algorithm%20and%20comparison%20with%20Lasso%20Regression&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Srinu,%20R.%20Naga&rft.date=2024-11-11&rft.volume=3193&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0233112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3127405004%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3127405004&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |