Optimized packet loss ratio for health monitoring applications in urban traffic networks with VANET in wireless body sensor networks using IGPSR protocol compared with GPSR protocol
The key objectives of this research are to decrease the amount of packets that are lost and to raise the percentage of packets that are delivered. In the context of WBAN-based remote medical applications, the improved greedy perimeter stateless routing system decreases the amount of packets that are...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | 3193 |
| creator | Nandini, M. Sai Senthilkumar, C. |
| description | The key objectives of this research are to decrease the amount of packets that are lost and to raise the percentage of packets that are delivered. In the context of WBAN-based remote medical applications, the improved greedy perimeter stateless routing system decreases the amount of packets that are lost while simultaneously increasing the percentage of packets that are delivered. The original Greedy perimeter stateless routing system is contrasted with an upgraded version of the protocol known as IGPSR, which is one of the proposed alternatives (GPSR). Both the Procedures and the Materials: The IGPSR protocol reduces the amount of packets that are lost and increases the percentage of packets that are delivered by utilising a number of selection factors. These criteria include the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), the distance between nodes, and the ingenious node coverage area. Clinical.com, 80 percent pretest power (G-power), alpha and beta coefficients of 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, and twenty samples from each group are utilised in order to assess the effectiveness of the IGPSR protocol with regard to the ratio of packet loss to packet delivery. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the IGPSR protocol performed better than the GPSR protocol during the simulations. As a result of utilising the IGPSR protocol, the ratio of packets that were successfully delivered increased by 67-92 percent, while the percentage of packets that were lost decreased by 12.94 percent. The statistical significance (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0233007 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0233007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3126775144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p637-dc01accb31c3399f90a3efb1048958ba1f547da1b2f8398ae2cfefdb7d3f3433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdFKwzAUhoMoOKcXvkHAO6EzadqmvRxjzsFw4oZ4V9I0cdnapCYpY76X72e7ieDVuTjf-f7DOQDcYjTCKCEP8QiFhCBEz8AAxzEOaIKTczBAKIuCMCLvl-DKuS1CYUZpOgDfy8arWn2JEjaM74SHlXEOWuaVgdJYuBGs8htYG628sUp_QNY0leI9oB1UGra2YBp6y6RUHGrh98buHNyrbuxt_Dxd99BeWVGJzlyY8gCd0K5z_7Gt68Xz2cvqFTbWeMNNBbmpG2a7xY6mf71rcCFZ5cTNbx2C1eN0PXkKFsvZfDJeBE1CaFByhBnnBcGckCyTGWJEyAKjKM3itGBYxhEtGS5CmZIsZSLkUsiyoCWRJCJkCO5O1i72sxXO51vTWt0F5gSHCaUxjqKOuj9Rjit_vEreWFUze8gxyvun5HH--xTyA0-ag24</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3126775144</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Optimized packet loss ratio for health monitoring applications in urban traffic networks with VANET in wireless body sensor networks using IGPSR protocol compared with GPSR protocol</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Nandini, M. Sai ; Senthilkumar, C.</creator><contributor>Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nandini, M. Sai ; Senthilkumar, C. ; Srinivasan, R ; Balasubramanian, PL ; Seenivasan, M ; Sharma, T. Rakesh ; Vijayan, V. ; Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</creatorcontrib><description>The key objectives of this research are to decrease the amount of packets that are lost and to raise the percentage of packets that are delivered. In the context of WBAN-based remote medical applications, the improved greedy perimeter stateless routing system decreases the amount of packets that are lost while simultaneously increasing the percentage of packets that are delivered. The original Greedy perimeter stateless routing system is contrasted with an upgraded version of the protocol known as IGPSR, which is one of the proposed alternatives (GPSR). Both the Procedures and the Materials: The IGPSR protocol reduces the amount of packets that are lost and increases the percentage of packets that are delivered by utilising a number of selection factors. These criteria include the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), the distance between nodes, and the ingenious node coverage area. Clinical.com, 80 percent pretest power (G-power), alpha and beta coefficients of 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, and twenty samples from each group are utilised in order to assess the effectiveness of the IGPSR protocol with regard to the ratio of packet loss to packet delivery. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the IGPSR protocol performed better than the GPSR protocol during the simulations. As a result of utilising the IGPSR protocol, the ratio of packets that were successfully delivered increased by 67-92 percent, while the percentage of packets that were lost decreased by 12.94 percent. The statistical significance (p<0.05) of the IGPSR and GPSR protocols is indicated by the significant value of 0.001, which was determined by the Independent sample T-test methodology. The suggested IGPSR procedure is superior than the GPSR protocol, according to the findings of previous experiments and a T-test conducted on an independent sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0233007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Body area networks ; Independent sample ; Packets (communication) ; Protocol ; Protocol (computers) ; Remote monitoring ; Routing (telecommunications) ; Signal to noise ratio ; Statelessness ; Wireless sensor networks</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1)</ispartof><rights>AIP Publishing LLC</rights><rights>2024 AIP Publishing LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0233007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,791,4498,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,76133</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Srinivasan, R</contributor><contributor>Balasubramanian, PL</contributor><contributor>Seenivasan, M</contributor><contributor>Sharma, T. Rakesh</contributor><contributor>Vijayan, V.</contributor><contributor>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nandini, M. Sai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthilkumar, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimized packet loss ratio for health monitoring applications in urban traffic networks with VANET in wireless body sensor networks using IGPSR protocol compared with GPSR protocol</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>The key objectives of this research are to decrease the amount of packets that are lost and to raise the percentage of packets that are delivered. In the context of WBAN-based remote medical applications, the improved greedy perimeter stateless routing system decreases the amount of packets that are lost while simultaneously increasing the percentage of packets that are delivered. The original Greedy perimeter stateless routing system is contrasted with an upgraded version of the protocol known as IGPSR, which is one of the proposed alternatives (GPSR). Both the Procedures and the Materials: The IGPSR protocol reduces the amount of packets that are lost and increases the percentage of packets that are delivered by utilising a number of selection factors. These criteria include the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), the distance between nodes, and the ingenious node coverage area. Clinical.com, 80 percent pretest power (G-power), alpha and beta coefficients of 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, and twenty samples from each group are utilised in order to assess the effectiveness of the IGPSR protocol with regard to the ratio of packet loss to packet delivery. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the IGPSR protocol performed better than the GPSR protocol during the simulations. As a result of utilising the IGPSR protocol, the ratio of packets that were successfully delivered increased by 67-92 percent, while the percentage of packets that were lost decreased by 12.94 percent. The statistical significance (p<0.05) of the IGPSR and GPSR protocols is indicated by the significant value of 0.001, which was determined by the Independent sample T-test methodology. The suggested IGPSR procedure is superior than the GPSR protocol, according to the findings of previous experiments and a T-test conducted on an independent sample.</description><subject>Body area networks</subject><subject>Independent sample</subject><subject>Packets (communication)</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Protocol (computers)</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Routing (telecommunications)</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Statelessness</subject><subject>Wireless sensor networks</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkdFKwzAUhoMoOKcXvkHAO6EzadqmvRxjzsFw4oZ4V9I0cdnapCYpY76X72e7ieDVuTjf-f7DOQDcYjTCKCEP8QiFhCBEz8AAxzEOaIKTczBAKIuCMCLvl-DKuS1CYUZpOgDfy8arWn2JEjaM74SHlXEOWuaVgdJYuBGs8htYG628sUp_QNY0leI9oB1UGra2YBp6y6RUHGrh98buHNyrbuxt_Dxd99BeWVGJzlyY8gCd0K5z_7Gt68Xz2cvqFTbWeMNNBbmpG2a7xY6mf71rcCFZ5cTNbx2C1eN0PXkKFsvZfDJeBE1CaFByhBnnBcGckCyTGWJEyAKjKM3itGBYxhEtGS5CmZIsZSLkUsiyoCWRJCJkCO5O1i72sxXO51vTWt0F5gSHCaUxjqKOuj9Rjit_vEreWFUze8gxyvun5HH--xTyA0-ag24</recordid><startdate>20241111</startdate><enddate>20241111</enddate><creator>Nandini, M. Sai</creator><creator>Senthilkumar, C.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241111</creationdate><title>Optimized packet loss ratio for health monitoring applications in urban traffic networks with VANET in wireless body sensor networks using IGPSR protocol compared with GPSR protocol</title><author>Nandini, M. Sai ; Senthilkumar, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p637-dc01accb31c3399f90a3efb1048958ba1f547da1b2f8398ae2cfefdb7d3f3433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Body area networks</topic><topic>Independent sample</topic><topic>Packets (communication)</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Protocol (computers)</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Routing (telecommunications)</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Statelessness</topic><topic>Wireless sensor networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nandini, M. Sai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthilkumar, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nandini, M. Sai</au><au>Senthilkumar, C.</au><au>Srinivasan, R</au><au>Balasubramanian, PL</au><au>Seenivasan, M</au><au>Sharma, T. Rakesh</au><au>Vijayan, V.</au><au>Babu, A. B. Karthick Anand</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Optimized packet loss ratio for health monitoring applications in urban traffic networks with VANET in wireless body sensor networks using IGPSR protocol compared with GPSR protocol</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-11-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3193</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>The key objectives of this research are to decrease the amount of packets that are lost and to raise the percentage of packets that are delivered. In the context of WBAN-based remote medical applications, the improved greedy perimeter stateless routing system decreases the amount of packets that are lost while simultaneously increasing the percentage of packets that are delivered. The original Greedy perimeter stateless routing system is contrasted with an upgraded version of the protocol known as IGPSR, which is one of the proposed alternatives (GPSR). Both the Procedures and the Materials: The IGPSR protocol reduces the amount of packets that are lost and increases the percentage of packets that are delivered by utilising a number of selection factors. These criteria include the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), the distance between nodes, and the ingenious node coverage area. Clinical.com, 80 percent pretest power (G-power), alpha and beta coefficients of 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, and twenty samples from each group are utilised in order to assess the effectiveness of the IGPSR protocol with regard to the ratio of packet loss to packet delivery. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the IGPSR protocol performed better than the GPSR protocol during the simulations. As a result of utilising the IGPSR protocol, the ratio of packets that were successfully delivered increased by 67-92 percent, while the percentage of packets that were lost decreased by 12.94 percent. The statistical significance (p<0.05) of the IGPSR and GPSR protocols is indicated by the significant value of 0.001, which was determined by the Independent sample T-test methodology. The suggested IGPSR procedure is superior than the GPSR protocol, according to the findings of previous experiments and a T-test conducted on an independent sample.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0233007</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
| ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.3193 (1) |
| issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0233007 |
| source | AIP Journals Complete |
| subjects | Body area networks Independent sample Packets (communication) Protocol Protocol (computers) Remote monitoring Routing (telecommunications) Signal to noise ratio Statelessness Wireless sensor networks |
| title | Optimized packet loss ratio for health monitoring applications in urban traffic networks with VANET in wireless body sensor networks using IGPSR protocol compared with GPSR protocol |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T06%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Optimized%20packet%20loss%20ratio%20for%20health%20monitoring%20applications%20in%20urban%20traffic%20networks%20with%20VANET%20in%20wireless%20body%20sensor%20networks%20using%20IGPSR%20protocol%20compared%20with%20GPSR%20protocol&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Nandini,%20M.%20Sai&rft.date=2024-11-11&rft.volume=3193&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0233007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3126775144%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126775144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |