Optimized packet loss ratio for health monitoring applications in urban traffic networks with VANET in wireless body sensor networks using IGPSR protocol compared with GPSR protocol

The key objectives of this research are to decrease the amount of packets that are lost and to raise the percentage of packets that are delivered. In the context of WBAN-based remote medical applications, the improved greedy perimeter stateless routing system decreases the amount of packets that are lost while simultaneously increasing the percentage of packets that are delivered. The original Greedy perimeter stateless routing system is contrasted with an upgraded version of the protocol known as IGPSR, which is one of the proposed alternatives (GPSR). Both the Procedures and the Materials: The IGPSR protocol reduces the amount of packets that are lost and increases the percentage of packets that are delivered by utilising a number of selection factors. These criteria include the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), the distance between nodes, and the ingenious node coverage area. Clinical.com, 80 percent pretest power (G-power), alpha and beta coefficients of 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, and twenty samples from each group are utilised in order to assess the effectiveness of the IGPSR protocol with regard to the ratio of packet loss to packet delivery. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the IGPSR protocol performed better than the GPSR protocol during the simulations. As a result of utilising the IGPSR protocol, the ratio of packets that were successfully delivered increased by 67-92 percent, while the percentage of packets that were lost decreased by 12.94 percent. The statistical significance (p