Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine
The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%,...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 3161 |
creator | Kumar, C. V. S. Sheela, J. J. J. Chandrasekharan, N. |
description | The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p < 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0229426 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0229426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3098898387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p636-2f03fccba553526b9fad0d6cf351df3307c8507907831a1b3f62493419d16e243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkDtPwzAAhC0EEqUw8A8ssSGl-BE78Yiq8pCqsnRgixw_iKsmNrZTwb8npZ1uuE93ugPgHqMFRpw-sQUiRJSEX4AZZgwXFcf8EswQEmVBSvp5DW5S2iFERFXVM6BXP2Hvoxu-oBk6OSij4XKzgdZHGKLRTuWjl0zvlB_0qPJkaHNwysDOyH3uoPJ9kBMKs4dpDMHHDA_mH-yl6txgbsGVlftk7s46B9uX1Xb5Vqw_Xt-Xz-sicMoLYhG1SrWSMcoIb4WVGmmuLGVYW0pRpWqGKoGqmmKJW2o5KQUtsdCYm2nbHDycYkP036NJudn5MQ5TY0ORqGtR07qaqMcTlZTLMjs_NCG6XsbfBqPmeGLDmvOJ9A8TWGQ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3098898387</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Kumar, C. V. S. ; Sheela, J. J. J. ; Chandrasekharan, N.</creator><contributor>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon ; Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva ; Yong, Lau Chee ; Sivanesan, Siva Kumar ; Thiruchelvam, Vinesh ; Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kumar, C. V. S. ; Sheela, J. J. J. ; Chandrasekharan, N. ; Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon ; Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva ; Yong, Lau Chee ; Sivanesan, Siva Kumar ; Thiruchelvam, Vinesh ; Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p < 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0229426</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Predictions ; Semiconductor devices ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3161 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0229426$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,794,4511,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,76255</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon</contributor><contributor>Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva</contributor><contributor>Yong, Lau Chee</contributor><contributor>Sivanesan, Siva Kumar</contributor><contributor>Thiruchelvam, Vinesh</contributor><contributor>Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kumar, C. V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheela, J. J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</title><title>AIP Conference Proceedings</title><description>The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p < 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Semiconductor devices</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkDtPwzAAhC0EEqUw8A8ssSGl-BE78Yiq8pCqsnRgixw_iKsmNrZTwb8npZ1uuE93ugPgHqMFRpw-sQUiRJSEX4AZZgwXFcf8EswQEmVBSvp5DW5S2iFERFXVM6BXP2Hvoxu-oBk6OSij4XKzgdZHGKLRTuWjl0zvlB_0qPJkaHNwysDOyH3uoPJ9kBMKs4dpDMHHDA_mH-yl6txgbsGVlftk7s46B9uX1Xb5Vqw_Xt-Xz-sicMoLYhG1SrWSMcoIb4WVGmmuLGVYW0pRpWqGKoGqmmKJW2o5KQUtsdCYm2nbHDycYkP036NJudn5MQ5TY0ORqGtR07qaqMcTlZTLMjs_NCG6XsbfBqPmeGLDmvOJ9A8TWGQ1</recordid><startdate>20240830</startdate><enddate>20240830</enddate><creator>Kumar, C. V. S.</creator><creator>Sheela, J. J. J.</creator><creator>Chandrasekharan, N.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240830</creationdate><title>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</title><author>Kumar, C. V. S. ; Sheela, J. J. J. ; Chandrasekharan, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p636-2f03fccba553526b9fad0d6cf351df3307c8507907831a1b3f62493419d16e243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Semiconductor devices</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, C. V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheela, J. J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, C. V. S.</au><au>Sheela, J. J. J.</au><au>Chandrasekharan, N.</au><au>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon</au><au>Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva</au><au>Yong, Lau Chee</au><au>Sivanesan, Siva Kumar</au><au>Thiruchelvam, Vinesh</au><au>Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</atitle><btitle>AIP Conference Proceedings</btitle><date>2024-08-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3161</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p < 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0229426</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3161 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0229426 |
source | AIP Journals Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Predictions Semiconductor devices Support vector machines |
title | Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A45%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Exploring%20enhanced%20CNN%20for%20predicting%20semiconductor%20device%20health%20compared%20to%20support%20vector%20machine&rft.btitle=AIP%20Conference%20Proceedings&rft.au=Kumar,%20C.%20V.%20S.&rft.date=2024-08-30&rft.volume=3161&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0229426&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3098898387%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098898387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |