Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine

The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, C. V. S., Sheela, J. J. J., Chandrasekharan, N.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 3161
creator Kumar, C. V. S.
Sheela, J. J. J.
Chandrasekharan, N.
description The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p < 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0229426
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0229426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3098898387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p636-2f03fccba553526b9fad0d6cf351df3307c8507907831a1b3f62493419d16e243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkDtPwzAAhC0EEqUw8A8ssSGl-BE78Yiq8pCqsnRgixw_iKsmNrZTwb8npZ1uuE93ugPgHqMFRpw-sQUiRJSEX4AZZgwXFcf8EswQEmVBSvp5DW5S2iFERFXVM6BXP2Hvoxu-oBk6OSij4XKzgdZHGKLRTuWjl0zvlB_0qPJkaHNwysDOyH3uoPJ9kBMKs4dpDMHHDA_mH-yl6txgbsGVlftk7s46B9uX1Xb5Vqw_Xt-Xz-sicMoLYhG1SrWSMcoIb4WVGmmuLGVYW0pRpWqGKoGqmmKJW2o5KQUtsdCYm2nbHDycYkP036NJudn5MQ5TY0ORqGtR07qaqMcTlZTLMjs_NCG6XsbfBqPmeGLDmvOJ9A8TWGQ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3098898387</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Kumar, C. V. S. ; Sheela, J. J. J. ; Chandrasekharan, N.</creator><contributor>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon ; Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva ; Yong, Lau Chee ; Sivanesan, Siva Kumar ; Thiruchelvam, Vinesh ; Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kumar, C. V. S. ; Sheela, J. J. J. ; Chandrasekharan, N. ; Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon ; Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva ; Yong, Lau Chee ; Sivanesan, Siva Kumar ; Thiruchelvam, Vinesh ; Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p &lt; 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0229426</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Predictions ; Semiconductor devices ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3161 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0229426$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,794,4511,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,76255</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon</contributor><contributor>Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva</contributor><contributor>Yong, Lau Chee</contributor><contributor>Sivanesan, Siva Kumar</contributor><contributor>Thiruchelvam, Vinesh</contributor><contributor>Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kumar, C. V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheela, J. J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</title><title>AIP Conference Proceedings</title><description>The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p &lt; 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Semiconductor devices</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkDtPwzAAhC0EEqUw8A8ssSGl-BE78Yiq8pCqsnRgixw_iKsmNrZTwb8npZ1uuE93ugPgHqMFRpw-sQUiRJSEX4AZZgwXFcf8EswQEmVBSvp5DW5S2iFERFXVM6BXP2Hvoxu-oBk6OSij4XKzgdZHGKLRTuWjl0zvlB_0qPJkaHNwysDOyH3uoPJ9kBMKs4dpDMHHDA_mH-yl6txgbsGVlftk7s46B9uX1Xb5Vqw_Xt-Xz-sicMoLYhG1SrWSMcoIb4WVGmmuLGVYW0pRpWqGKoGqmmKJW2o5KQUtsdCYm2nbHDycYkP036NJudn5MQ5TY0ORqGtR07qaqMcTlZTLMjs_NCG6XsbfBqPmeGLDmvOJ9A8TWGQ1</recordid><startdate>20240830</startdate><enddate>20240830</enddate><creator>Kumar, C. V. S.</creator><creator>Sheela, J. J. J.</creator><creator>Chandrasekharan, N.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240830</creationdate><title>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</title><author>Kumar, C. V. S. ; Sheela, J. J. J. ; Chandrasekharan, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p636-2f03fccba553526b9fad0d6cf351df3307c8507907831a1b3f62493419d16e243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Semiconductor devices</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, C. V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheela, J. J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, C. V. S.</au><au>Sheela, J. J. J.</au><au>Chandrasekharan, N.</au><au>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon</au><au>Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva</au><au>Yong, Lau Chee</au><au>Sivanesan, Siva Kumar</au><au>Thiruchelvam, Vinesh</au><au>Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine</atitle><btitle>AIP Conference Proceedings</btitle><date>2024-08-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3161</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy of semiconductor device health prediction by comparing the efficacy of Enhanced CNN with the Support Vector Machine technique. Support vector machines and Novel Enhanced CNN were the two groups that were used. The parameters were a G-Power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2. Two iterations were conducted for each group, for a total of 40 iterations and a sample size of 1641. Independent T-tests confirmed the significance of the hypothesis at a level of p = 0.003 (p &lt; 0.05). Based on statistical study with SPSS, the Novel Enhanced CNN and the Support Vector Machine Algorithm had accuracy of 97.10% and 95.85%, respectively. These noteworthy accuracy numbers imply that the Enhanced CNN strategy (97.10% accuracy) works better than the Support Vector Machine methodology (95.85% accuracy) for estimating the health of semiconductor devices.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0229426</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3161 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0229426
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Algorithms
Predictions
Semiconductor devices
Support vector machines
title Exploring enhanced CNN for predicting semiconductor device health compared to support vector machine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A45%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Exploring%20enhanced%20CNN%20for%20predicting%20semiconductor%20device%20health%20compared%20to%20support%20vector%20machine&rft.btitle=AIP%20Conference%20Proceedings&rft.au=Kumar,%20C.%20V.%20S.&rft.date=2024-08-30&rft.volume=3161&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0229426&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3098898387%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098898387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true