Analyzing the radiation effect on human body with improved SAR using 44 dipole antenna comparing with 55 dipole array antenna
Examining the effects of radiation on humans, this study contrasts an older 5*5 dipole array antenna with a modern 4*4 antenna that increases the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). Two sets of samples were used for the statistical analysis. Forty tissue samples were provided by researchers from two sep...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | 2871 |
| creator | Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar Nagalakshmi, T. J. |
| description | Examining the effects of radiation on humans, this study contrasts an older 5*5 dipole array antenna with a modern 4*4 antenna that increases the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). Two sets of samples were used for the statistical analysis. Forty tissue samples were provided by researchers from two separate organizations. Two groups of dipole arrays were employed to build the antennas: one group used 5X5 arrays and the other group used the more modern 4*4 arrays. We use G-power 0.8, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 0.2, and a 95% confidence interval to estimate the sample size. Antennas are deemed effective when the significance level is lower than 0.05. Consequently, a 4*4 dipole array antenna has a SAR that is 0.4328 times higher than a 5*5 models. A statistically significant influence (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0227984 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0227984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104168357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p634-46a44ddf5f2f662823cb240d3430ed4d5e426fc9e1348877c1ce97bcf4cdf49b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AQxxdRsFYPfoMFb0LqPmZ3k2MpvqAgaA_ewmYfdkvzcJMoEfzuprV6moH5_YeZH0KXlMwokfxGzAhjKkvhCE2oEDRRkspjNCEkg4QBfz1FZ227IYRlSqUT9D2v9Hb4CtUb7tYOR22D7kJdYee9Mx0eu3Vf6goXtR3wZ-jWOJRNrD-cxS_zZ9y3uygAtqGptw7rqnNVpbGpy0bH3WyfEeIfiFEPf9g5OvF627qLQ52i1d3tavGQLJ_uHxfzZdJIDglIDWCtF555KVnKuCkYEMuBE2fBCgdMepM5yiFNlTLUuEwVxoOxHrKCT9HV79rx8PfetV2-qfs4Pt7mnBKgMuVCjdT1L9Wa0O0l5E0MpY5DTkm-s5uL_GCX_wDzKWzv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3104168357</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Analyzing the radiation effect on human body with improved SAR using 44 dipole antenna comparing with 55 dipole array antenna</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar ; Nagalakshmi, T. J.</creator><contributor>Prabu, R. Thandaiah ; Ramkumar, G. ; G, Anitha ; Vidhyalakshmi, S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar ; Nagalakshmi, T. J. ; Prabu, R. Thandaiah ; Ramkumar, G. ; G, Anitha ; Vidhyalakshmi, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Examining the effects of radiation on humans, this study contrasts an older 5*5 dipole array antenna with a modern 4*4 antenna that increases the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). Two sets of samples were used for the statistical analysis. Forty tissue samples were provided by researchers from two separate organizations. Two groups of dipole arrays were employed to build the antennas: one group used 5X5 arrays and the other group used the more modern 4*4 arrays. We use G-power 0.8, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 0.2, and a 95% confidence interval to estimate the sample size. Antennas are deemed effective when the significance level is lower than 0.05. Consequently, a 4*4 dipole array antenna has a SAR that is 0.4328 times higher than a 5*5 models. A statistically significant influence (p<0.05) was shown by the research, with a p-value of 0.0735. Instead of 5*5 arrays, researchers now employ 4*4 dipole array antennas to monitor Specific Absorption Rates (SARs), which helps them understand radiation’s effects on humans better.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0227984</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Antenna arrays ; Arrays ; Confidence intervals ; Dipole antennas ; Radiation ; Radiation effects ; Samples ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2871 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0227984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,794,4510,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,76155</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Prabu, R. Thandaiah</contributor><contributor>Ramkumar, G.</contributor><contributor>G, Anitha</contributor><contributor>Vidhyalakshmi, S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagalakshmi, T. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing the radiation effect on human body with improved SAR using 44 dipole antenna comparing with 55 dipole array antenna</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>Examining the effects of radiation on humans, this study contrasts an older 5*5 dipole array antenna with a modern 4*4 antenna that increases the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). Two sets of samples were used for the statistical analysis. Forty tissue samples were provided by researchers from two separate organizations. Two groups of dipole arrays were employed to build the antennas: one group used 5X5 arrays and the other group used the more modern 4*4 arrays. We use G-power 0.8, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 0.2, and a 95% confidence interval to estimate the sample size. Antennas are deemed effective when the significance level is lower than 0.05. Consequently, a 4*4 dipole array antenna has a SAR that is 0.4328 times higher than a 5*5 models. A statistically significant influence (p<0.05) was shown by the research, with a p-value of 0.0735. Instead of 5*5 arrays, researchers now employ 4*4 dipole array antennas to monitor Specific Absorption Rates (SARs), which helps them understand radiation’s effects on humans better.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Antenna arrays</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Dipole antennas</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AQxxdRsFYPfoMFb0LqPmZ3k2MpvqAgaA_ewmYfdkvzcJMoEfzuprV6moH5_YeZH0KXlMwokfxGzAhjKkvhCE2oEDRRkspjNCEkg4QBfz1FZ227IYRlSqUT9D2v9Hb4CtUb7tYOR22D7kJdYee9Mx0eu3Vf6goXtR3wZ-jWOJRNrD-cxS_zZ9y3uygAtqGptw7rqnNVpbGpy0bH3WyfEeIfiFEPf9g5OvF627qLQ52i1d3tavGQLJ_uHxfzZdJIDglIDWCtF555KVnKuCkYEMuBE2fBCgdMepM5yiFNlTLUuEwVxoOxHrKCT9HV79rx8PfetV2-qfs4Pt7mnBKgMuVCjdT1L9Wa0O0l5E0MpY5DTkm-s5uL_GCX_wDzKWzv</recordid><startdate>20240913</startdate><enddate>20240913</enddate><creator>Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar</creator><creator>Nagalakshmi, T. J.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240913</creationdate><title>Analyzing the radiation effect on human body with improved SAR using 44 dipole antenna comparing with 55 dipole array antenna</title><author>Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar ; Nagalakshmi, T. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p634-46a44ddf5f2f662823cb240d3430ed4d5e426fc9e1348877c1ce97bcf4cdf49b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Antenna arrays</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Dipole antennas</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagalakshmi, T. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reddy, K. Tarun Kumar</au><au>Nagalakshmi, T. J.</au><au>Prabu, R. Thandaiah</au><au>Ramkumar, G.</au><au>G, Anitha</au><au>Vidhyalakshmi, S.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Analyzing the radiation effect on human body with improved SAR using 44 dipole antenna comparing with 55 dipole array antenna</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-09-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2871</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>Examining the effects of radiation on humans, this study contrasts an older 5*5 dipole array antenna with a modern 4*4 antenna that increases the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). Two sets of samples were used for the statistical analysis. Forty tissue samples were provided by researchers from two separate organizations. Two groups of dipole arrays were employed to build the antennas: one group used 5X5 arrays and the other group used the more modern 4*4 arrays. We use G-power 0.8, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 0.2, and a 95% confidence interval to estimate the sample size. Antennas are deemed effective when the significance level is lower than 0.05. Consequently, a 4*4 dipole array antenna has a SAR that is 0.4328 times higher than a 5*5 models. A statistically significant influence (p<0.05) was shown by the research, with a p-value of 0.0735. Instead of 5*5 arrays, researchers now employ 4*4 dipole array antennas to monitor Specific Absorption Rates (SARs), which helps them understand radiation’s effects on humans better.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0227984</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
| ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2871 (1) |
| issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0227984 |
| source | AIP Journals Complete |
| subjects | Absorption Antenna arrays Arrays Confidence intervals Dipole antennas Radiation Radiation effects Samples Statistical analysis |
| title | Analyzing the radiation effect on human body with improved SAR using 44 dipole antenna comparing with 55 dipole array antenna |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20the%20radiation%20effect%20on%20human%20body%20with%20improved%20SAR%20using%2044%20dipole%20antenna%20comparing%20with%2055%20dipole%20array%20antenna&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Reddy,%20K.%20Tarun%20Kumar&rft.date=2024-09-13&rft.volume=2871&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0227984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3104168357%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104168357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |