Economic analysis of oil and gas field using PSC method

The government issues regulations related to new business schemes, namely the gross split scheme for businesses in the upstream oil and gas business. The new business scheme model no longer includes the calculation and supervision of cost recovery, but the Government immediately takes advantage of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lumi, Alfret, Mardiana, Dwi Atty, Rakhmanto, Pri Agung, Pramadika, Havidh, Ristawati, Arinda, Fattahanisa, Aqlyna
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 3019
creator Lumi, Alfret
Mardiana, Dwi Atty
Rakhmanto, Pri Agung
Pramadika, Havidh
Ristawati, Arinda
Fattahanisa, Aqlyna
description The government issues regulations related to new business schemes, namely the gross split scheme for businesses in the upstream oil and gas business. The new business scheme model no longer includes the calculation and supervision of cost recovery, but the Government immediately takes advantage of the gross profit and the difference belongs to the contractor so that the contractor is more flexible in processing costs and programs. This study compares the income from contractors and the Government if the PSC cost recovery contract scheme and the PSC gross split work area scheme are to be applied. The analysis scenario uses a development scenario based on work commitments until the contract period expires using a base scenario at oil prices of 60 USD/barrel, gas prices of 6 USD/MMBTU (3 percent escalation every year) and also analyzed on various operating costs. Production Forecasting from each Work Area is determined based on historical Production. The impact of using a gross split business scheme. The government’s income for the GS PSC is lower than that of the CR PSC, the GS PSC Scheme provides more income for the Contractor compared to the CR PSC, due to the definite split variable based on field conditions. In the calculation of this study, the same cost parameters are used for both the CR PSC and the GS PSC scheme.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0226241
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0226241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3101350076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-dd7b627c456c1dbac9e42bcdbec6fac174c0005f613438cb9ef2ad4fcbf275d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAnTD13jw7Syn1AQUFu3AXMnnUlOlknEwX_fdW2tXhwMfh8BFyjzBDUPxJzoAxxQRekAlKiZVWqC7JBKAWFRP8-5rclLIFYLXW8wnRS5e7vEuO2s62h5IKzZHm1B67pxtbaEyh9XRfUrehn18LugvjT_a35CratoS7c07J-mW5XrxVq4_X98XzquoVx8p73SimnZDKoW-sq4NgjfNNcCpah1o4AJBRIRd87po6RGa9iK6JTEsv-ZQ8nGb7If_uQxnNNu-H49NiOAJyCaDVkXo8UcWl0Y4pd6Yf0s4OB4Ng_r0Yac5e-B-E1VPP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3101350076</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Economic analysis of oil and gas field using PSC method</title><source>American Institute of Physics (AIP) Journals</source><creator>Lumi, Alfret ; Mardiana, Dwi Atty ; Rakhmanto, Pri Agung ; Pramadika, Havidh ; Ristawati, Arinda ; Fattahanisa, Aqlyna</creator><contributor>Ardian, Aldin ; Prastistho, Widyawanto ; Haq, Shofa Rijalul ; Gomareuzzaman, Muammar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lumi, Alfret ; Mardiana, Dwi Atty ; Rakhmanto, Pri Agung ; Pramadika, Havidh ; Ristawati, Arinda ; Fattahanisa, Aqlyna ; Ardian, Aldin ; Prastistho, Widyawanto ; Haq, Shofa Rijalul ; Gomareuzzaman, Muammar</creatorcontrib><description>The government issues regulations related to new business schemes, namely the gross split scheme for businesses in the upstream oil and gas business. The new business scheme model no longer includes the calculation and supervision of cost recovery, but the Government immediately takes advantage of the gross profit and the difference belongs to the contractor so that the contractor is more flexible in processing costs and programs. This study compares the income from contractors and the Government if the PSC cost recovery contract scheme and the PSC gross split work area scheme are to be applied. The analysis scenario uses a development scenario based on work commitments until the contract period expires using a base scenario at oil prices of 60 USD/barrel, gas prices of 6 USD/MMBTU (3 percent escalation every year) and also analyzed on various operating costs. Production Forecasting from each Work Area is determined based on historical Production. The impact of using a gross split business scheme. The government’s income for the GS PSC is lower than that of the CR PSC, the GS PSC Scheme provides more income for the Contractor compared to the CR PSC, due to the definite split variable based on field conditions. In the calculation of this study, the same cost parameters are used for both the CR PSC and the GS PSC scheme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0226241</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Contractors ; Cost analysis ; Cost recovery ; Crude oil ; Economic analysis ; Impact analysis ; Income ; Mathematical analysis ; Operating costs ; Pricing ; Recovery</subject><ispartof>AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3019 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0226241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,794,4512,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Ardian, Aldin</contributor><contributor>Prastistho, Widyawanto</contributor><contributor>Haq, Shofa Rijalul</contributor><contributor>Gomareuzzaman, Muammar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lumi, Alfret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardiana, Dwi Atty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakhmanto, Pri Agung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pramadika, Havidh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ristawati, Arinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattahanisa, Aqlyna</creatorcontrib><title>Economic analysis of oil and gas field using PSC method</title><title>AIP Conference Proceedings</title><description>The government issues regulations related to new business schemes, namely the gross split scheme for businesses in the upstream oil and gas business. The new business scheme model no longer includes the calculation and supervision of cost recovery, but the Government immediately takes advantage of the gross profit and the difference belongs to the contractor so that the contractor is more flexible in processing costs and programs. This study compares the income from contractors and the Government if the PSC cost recovery contract scheme and the PSC gross split work area scheme are to be applied. The analysis scenario uses a development scenario based on work commitments until the contract period expires using a base scenario at oil prices of 60 USD/barrel, gas prices of 6 USD/MMBTU (3 percent escalation every year) and also analyzed on various operating costs. Production Forecasting from each Work Area is determined based on historical Production. The impact of using a gross split business scheme. The government’s income for the GS PSC is lower than that of the CR PSC, the GS PSC Scheme provides more income for the Contractor compared to the CR PSC, due to the definite split variable based on field conditions. In the calculation of this study, the same cost parameters are used for both the CR PSC and the GS PSC scheme.</description><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost recovery</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAnTD13jw7Syn1AQUFu3AXMnnUlOlknEwX_fdW2tXhwMfh8BFyjzBDUPxJzoAxxQRekAlKiZVWqC7JBKAWFRP8-5rclLIFYLXW8wnRS5e7vEuO2s62h5IKzZHm1B67pxtbaEyh9XRfUrehn18LugvjT_a35CratoS7c07J-mW5XrxVq4_X98XzquoVx8p73SimnZDKoW-sq4NgjfNNcCpah1o4AJBRIRd87po6RGa9iK6JTEsv-ZQ8nGb7If_uQxnNNu-H49NiOAJyCaDVkXo8UcWl0Y4pd6Yf0s4OB4Ng_r0Yac5e-B-E1VPP</recordid><startdate>20240906</startdate><enddate>20240906</enddate><creator>Lumi, Alfret</creator><creator>Mardiana, Dwi Atty</creator><creator>Rakhmanto, Pri Agung</creator><creator>Pramadika, Havidh</creator><creator>Ristawati, Arinda</creator><creator>Fattahanisa, Aqlyna</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240906</creationdate><title>Economic analysis of oil and gas field using PSC method</title><author>Lumi, Alfret ; Mardiana, Dwi Atty ; Rakhmanto, Pri Agung ; Pramadika, Havidh ; Ristawati, Arinda ; Fattahanisa, Aqlyna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-dd7b627c456c1dbac9e42bcdbec6fac174c0005f613438cb9ef2ad4fcbf275d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost recovery</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lumi, Alfret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardiana, Dwi Atty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakhmanto, Pri Agung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pramadika, Havidh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ristawati, Arinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattahanisa, Aqlyna</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lumi, Alfret</au><au>Mardiana, Dwi Atty</au><au>Rakhmanto, Pri Agung</au><au>Pramadika, Havidh</au><au>Ristawati, Arinda</au><au>Fattahanisa, Aqlyna</au><au>Ardian, Aldin</au><au>Prastistho, Widyawanto</au><au>Haq, Shofa Rijalul</au><au>Gomareuzzaman, Muammar</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Economic analysis of oil and gas field using PSC method</atitle><btitle>AIP Conference Proceedings</btitle><date>2024-09-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3019</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>The government issues regulations related to new business schemes, namely the gross split scheme for businesses in the upstream oil and gas business. The new business scheme model no longer includes the calculation and supervision of cost recovery, but the Government immediately takes advantage of the gross profit and the difference belongs to the contractor so that the contractor is more flexible in processing costs and programs. This study compares the income from contractors and the Government if the PSC cost recovery contract scheme and the PSC gross split work area scheme are to be applied. The analysis scenario uses a development scenario based on work commitments until the contract period expires using a base scenario at oil prices of 60 USD/barrel, gas prices of 6 USD/MMBTU (3 percent escalation every year) and also analyzed on various operating costs. Production Forecasting from each Work Area is determined based on historical Production. The impact of using a gross split business scheme. The government’s income for the GS PSC is lower than that of the CR PSC, the GS PSC Scheme provides more income for the Contractor compared to the CR PSC, due to the definite split variable based on field conditions. In the calculation of this study, the same cost parameters are used for both the CR PSC and the GS PSC scheme.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0226241</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3019 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0226241
source American Institute of Physics (AIP) Journals
subjects Contractors
Cost analysis
Cost recovery
Crude oil
Economic analysis
Impact analysis
Income
Mathematical analysis
Operating costs
Pricing
Recovery
title Economic analysis of oil and gas field using PSC method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A26%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Economic%20analysis%20of%20oil%20and%20gas%20field%20using%20PSC%20method&rft.btitle=AIP%20Conference%20Proceedings&rft.au=Lumi,%20Alfret&rft.date=2024-09-06&rft.volume=3019&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0226241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3101350076%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3101350076&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true