Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance
One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physics 2024-06, Vol.135 (21) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of applied physics |
container_volume | 135 |
creator | Wehring, Bettina Karakus, Firat Gerlich, Lukas Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin Hecker, Michael Leyens, Christoph |
description | One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to
675
°C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include
Ru
60
Ta
40,
Ru
45
W
55,
Mo
47
Ru
53,
Mo
36
Ru
50
Ta
14, and
Co
40
Mo
35
Ta
25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only
Ru
45
W
55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0211802 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0211802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3064316189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-4f248ee0a65875a5326d7958dec16d800107f47db90c9dd7ab1fe79895496aed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UUtPxCAQJkYT18fBf0DizaQrtKUFb2bjK9mNFz03tAzKhoUK9LD_xx8q-_AyM8x8HzPfDEI3lMwpaap7NiclpZyUJ2hGCRdFyxg5RTOS0wUXrThHFzGuCcmgSszQ70omCEZaHIcA4Iz7wtoHrKc0BcDKaD1F4x3uZQgGQsTG4cWUbaYN3jkYUnzAK6_A7rhe4944GbZYOoUzZh9vIOUO0lq_jfuCygljQeWHtNto4o6YvsGE_0Z4hJAH2Ug3wBU609JGuD76S_T5_PSxeC2W7y9vi8dlMWYxqah1WXMAIhvGWyZZVTaqFYwrGGijeNZMWl23qhdkEEq1sqcaWsEFq0UjQVWX6Pbw7xj8zwQxdWs_ZQU2dhVp6oo2lIuMujug4mCSTHk53RjMJuvsKOl2V-hYd7xC9Qco5Xzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064316189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wehring, Bettina ; Karakus, Firat ; Gerlich, Lukas ; Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin ; Hecker, Michael ; Leyens, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Wehring, Bettina ; Karakus, Firat ; Gerlich, Lukas ; Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin ; Hecker, Michael ; Leyens, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to
675
°C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include
Ru
60
Ta
40,
Ru
45
W
55,
Mo
47
Ru
53,
Mo
36
Ru
50
Ta
14, and
Co
40
Mo
35
Ta
25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only
Ru
45
W
55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0211802</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Adhesive strength ; Binary alloys ; Copper ; Depth profiling ; Diffusion barriers ; Electrical resistivity ; Interconnections ; Magnetron sputtering ; Phase composition ; Photoelectrons ; Ternary alloys ; Thin films ; X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 2024-06, Vol.135 (21)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4255-5552 ; 0009-0004-7489-5625 ; 0009-0003-9850-2323</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wehring, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakus, Firat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlich, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyens, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to
675
°C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include
Ru
60
Ta
40,
Ru
45
W
55,
Mo
47
Ru
53,
Mo
36
Ru
50
Ta
14, and
Co
40
Mo
35
Ta
25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only
Ru
45
W
55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.</description><subject>Adhesive strength</subject><subject>Binary alloys</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Depth profiling</subject><subject>Diffusion barriers</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Interconnections</subject><subject>Magnetron sputtering</subject><subject>Phase composition</subject><subject>Photoelectrons</subject><subject>Ternary alloys</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><subject>X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</subject><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1UUtPxCAQJkYT18fBf0DizaQrtKUFb2bjK9mNFz03tAzKhoUK9LD_xx8q-_AyM8x8HzPfDEI3lMwpaap7NiclpZyUJ2hGCRdFyxg5RTOS0wUXrThHFzGuCcmgSszQ70omCEZaHIcA4Iz7wtoHrKc0BcDKaD1F4x3uZQgGQsTG4cWUbaYN3jkYUnzAK6_A7rhe4944GbZYOoUzZh9vIOUO0lq_jfuCygljQeWHtNto4o6YvsGE_0Z4hJAH2Ug3wBU609JGuD76S_T5_PSxeC2W7y9vi8dlMWYxqah1WXMAIhvGWyZZVTaqFYwrGGijeNZMWl23qhdkEEq1sqcaWsEFq0UjQVWX6Pbw7xj8zwQxdWs_ZQU2dhVp6oo2lIuMujug4mCSTHk53RjMJuvsKOl2V-hYd7xC9Qco5Xzw</recordid><startdate>20240607</startdate><enddate>20240607</enddate><creator>Wehring, Bettina</creator><creator>Karakus, Firat</creator><creator>Gerlich, Lukas</creator><creator>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</creator><creator>Hecker, Michael</creator><creator>Leyens, Christoph</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AJDQP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-5552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7489-5625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9850-2323</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240607</creationdate><title>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</title><author>Wehring, Bettina ; Karakus, Firat ; Gerlich, Lukas ; Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin ; Hecker, Michael ; Leyens, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-4f248ee0a65875a5326d7958dec16d800107f47db90c9dd7ab1fe79895496aed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adhesive strength</topic><topic>Binary alloys</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Depth profiling</topic><topic>Diffusion barriers</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Interconnections</topic><topic>Magnetron sputtering</topic><topic>Phase composition</topic><topic>Photoelectrons</topic><topic>Ternary alloys</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><topic>X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wehring, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakus, Firat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlich, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyens, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>AIP Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wehring, Bettina</au><au>Karakus, Firat</au><au>Gerlich, Lukas</au><au>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</au><au>Hecker, Michael</au><au>Leyens, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>2024-06-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>21</issue><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><coden>JAPIAU</coden><abstract>One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to
675
°C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include
Ru
60
Ta
40,
Ru
45
W
55,
Mo
47
Ru
53,
Mo
36
Ru
50
Ta
14, and
Co
40
Mo
35
Ta
25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only
Ru
45
W
55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0211802</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-5552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7489-5625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9850-2323</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8979 |
ispartof | Journal of applied physics, 2024-06, Vol.135 (21) |
issn | 0021-8979 1089-7550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0211802 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adhesive strength Binary alloys Copper Depth profiling Diffusion barriers Electrical resistivity Interconnections Magnetron sputtering Phase composition Photoelectrons Ternary alloys Thin films X ray photoelectron spectroscopy |
title | Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Material%20screening%20for%20future%20diffusion%20barriers%20in%20Cu%20interconnects:%20Modeling%20of%20binary%20and%20ternary%20metal%20alloys%20and%20detailed%20analysis%20of%20their%20barrier%20performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Wehring,%20Bettina&rft.date=2024-06-07&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=21&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft.coden=JAPIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0211802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3064316189%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064316189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |