Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance

One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physics 2024-06, Vol.135 (21)
Hauptverfasser: Wehring, Bettina, Karakus, Firat, Gerlich, Lukas, Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin, Hecker, Michael, Leyens, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page
container_title Journal of applied physics
container_volume 135
creator Wehring, Bettina
Karakus, Firat
Gerlich, Lukas
Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin
Hecker, Michael
Leyens, Christoph
description One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to 675 °C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include Ru 60 Ta 40, Ru 45 W 55, Mo 47 Ru 53, Mo 36 Ru 50 Ta 14, and Co 40 Mo 35 Ta 25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only Ru 45 W 55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0211802
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0211802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3064316189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-4f248ee0a65875a5326d7958dec16d800107f47db90c9dd7ab1fe79895496aed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UUtPxCAQJkYT18fBf0DizaQrtKUFb2bjK9mNFz03tAzKhoUK9LD_xx8q-_AyM8x8HzPfDEI3lMwpaap7NiclpZyUJ2hGCRdFyxg5RTOS0wUXrThHFzGuCcmgSszQ70omCEZaHIcA4Iz7wtoHrKc0BcDKaD1F4x3uZQgGQsTG4cWUbaYN3jkYUnzAK6_A7rhe4944GbZYOoUzZh9vIOUO0lq_jfuCygljQeWHtNto4o6YvsGE_0Z4hJAH2Ug3wBU609JGuD76S_T5_PSxeC2W7y9vi8dlMWYxqah1WXMAIhvGWyZZVTaqFYwrGGijeNZMWl23qhdkEEq1sqcaWsEFq0UjQVWX6Pbw7xj8zwQxdWs_ZQU2dhVp6oo2lIuMujug4mCSTHk53RjMJuvsKOl2V-hYd7xC9Qco5Xzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064316189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wehring, Bettina ; Karakus, Firat ; Gerlich, Lukas ; Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin ; Hecker, Michael ; Leyens, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Wehring, Bettina ; Karakus, Firat ; Gerlich, Lukas ; Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin ; Hecker, Michael ; Leyens, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to 675 °C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include Ru 60 Ta 40, Ru 45 W 55, Mo 47 Ru 53, Mo 36 Ru 50 Ta 14, and Co 40 Mo 35 Ta 25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only Ru 45 W 55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0211802</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Adhesive strength ; Binary alloys ; Copper ; Depth profiling ; Diffusion barriers ; Electrical resistivity ; Interconnections ; Magnetron sputtering ; Phase composition ; Photoelectrons ; Ternary alloys ; Thin films ; X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 2024-06, Vol.135 (21)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4255-5552 ; 0009-0004-7489-5625 ; 0009-0003-9850-2323</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wehring, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakus, Firat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlich, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyens, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to 675 °C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include Ru 60 Ta 40, Ru 45 W 55, Mo 47 Ru 53, Mo 36 Ru 50 Ta 14, and Co 40 Mo 35 Ta 25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only Ru 45 W 55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.</description><subject>Adhesive strength</subject><subject>Binary alloys</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Depth profiling</subject><subject>Diffusion barriers</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Interconnections</subject><subject>Magnetron sputtering</subject><subject>Phase composition</subject><subject>Photoelectrons</subject><subject>Ternary alloys</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><subject>X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</subject><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1UUtPxCAQJkYT18fBf0DizaQrtKUFb2bjK9mNFz03tAzKhoUK9LD_xx8q-_AyM8x8HzPfDEI3lMwpaap7NiclpZyUJ2hGCRdFyxg5RTOS0wUXrThHFzGuCcmgSszQ70omCEZaHIcA4Iz7wtoHrKc0BcDKaD1F4x3uZQgGQsTG4cWUbaYN3jkYUnzAK6_A7rhe4944GbZYOoUzZh9vIOUO0lq_jfuCygljQeWHtNto4o6YvsGE_0Z4hJAH2Ug3wBU609JGuD76S_T5_PSxeC2W7y9vi8dlMWYxqah1WXMAIhvGWyZZVTaqFYwrGGijeNZMWl23qhdkEEq1sqcaWsEFq0UjQVWX6Pbw7xj8zwQxdWs_ZQU2dhVp6oo2lIuMujug4mCSTHk53RjMJuvsKOl2V-hYd7xC9Qco5Xzw</recordid><startdate>20240607</startdate><enddate>20240607</enddate><creator>Wehring, Bettina</creator><creator>Karakus, Firat</creator><creator>Gerlich, Lukas</creator><creator>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</creator><creator>Hecker, Michael</creator><creator>Leyens, Christoph</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AJDQP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-5552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7489-5625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9850-2323</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240607</creationdate><title>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</title><author>Wehring, Bettina ; Karakus, Firat ; Gerlich, Lukas ; Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin ; Hecker, Michael ; Leyens, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-4f248ee0a65875a5326d7958dec16d800107f47db90c9dd7ab1fe79895496aed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adhesive strength</topic><topic>Binary alloys</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Depth profiling</topic><topic>Diffusion barriers</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Interconnections</topic><topic>Magnetron sputtering</topic><topic>Phase composition</topic><topic>Photoelectrons</topic><topic>Ternary alloys</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><topic>X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wehring, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakus, Firat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlich, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hecker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyens, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>AIP Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wehring, Bettina</au><au>Karakus, Firat</au><au>Gerlich, Lukas</au><au>Lilienthal-Uhlig, Benjamin</au><au>Hecker, Michael</au><au>Leyens, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>2024-06-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>21</issue><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><coden>JAPIAU</coden><abstract>One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to 675 °C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include Ru 60 Ta 40, Ru 45 W 55, Mo 47 Ru 53, Mo 36 Ru 50 Ta 14, and Co 40 Mo 35 Ta 25, showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only Ru 45 W 55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0211802</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-5552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7489-5625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9850-2323</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8979
ispartof Journal of applied physics, 2024-06, Vol.135 (21)
issn 0021-8979
1089-7550
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0211802
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adhesive strength
Binary alloys
Copper
Depth profiling
Diffusion barriers
Electrical resistivity
Interconnections
Magnetron sputtering
Phase composition
Photoelectrons
Ternary alloys
Thin films
X ray photoelectron spectroscopy
title Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Material%20screening%20for%20future%20diffusion%20barriers%20in%20Cu%20interconnects:%20Modeling%20of%20binary%20and%20ternary%20metal%20alloys%20and%20detailed%20analysis%20of%20their%20barrier%20performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Wehring,%20Bettina&rft.date=2024-06-07&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=21&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft.coden=JAPIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0211802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3064316189%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064316189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true