Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study

With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and materia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics of plasmas 2023-12, Vol.30 (12)
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Shaojie, Zhang, Yongmin, Lu, Yong, Zhao, Hejie, Luo, Cheng, Wang, Haodong, Wang, Shuangming, Qiu, Aici
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page
container_title Physics of plasmas
container_volume 30
creator Zhang, Shaojie
Zhang, Yongmin
Lu, Yong
Zhao, Hejie
Luo, Cheng
Wang, Haodong
Wang, Shuangming
Qiu, Aici
description With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and material. Load voltage, circuit current, and shock wave pressure were measured and analyzed, and electric power, energy deposition, and energy deposition rate were also calculated and investigated. Experimental results indicated that the underwater electrical tube explosion (UETE) always has higher and earlier local resistance peak, voltage peak, and electric power peak, as well as faster phase transition and ionization process than the underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE). In addition, the energy deposition rate from the beginning of discharge or the decrease in current to the voltage peak is significantly increased when replacing a wire with a tube. For the shock-wave characteristics, the peak pressure, energy density, and impulse of the shock wave generated by UETE are greater than that generated by UEWE. The peak pressure at ∼33 cm increased from 21.1 to 24.5 MPa in the first set and from 18.1 to 21.7 MPa in the second when a tube was used instead of a wire. These experimental results help us understand the physical process of UETE and provide an alternative methodology for load design in industrial applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0180925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0180925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2903076684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-781a8544e325f8b91a7fe58a4bc902fc8bac1341914c5da39f34dc0879f0364e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB_9BwJNC10nz0cTbsvgFK15c8FbSNIEubVOTlHX_vV12z55mDs_MMC9CtwQWBAR95AsgElTOz9CMgFRZIQp2fugLyIRg35foKsYtADDB5Qx9bPrahp1ONmDbWpNCY3SL7e_Q-tj4HnuHO5t02zYG75pgse5rnMbKPuElNr4bdGji5GIa6_01unC6jfbmVOdo8_L8tXrL1p-v76vlOjM5z1NWSKIlZ8zSnDtZKaILZ7nUrDIKcmdkpQ2hjCjCDK81VY6y2oAslAMqprE5ujvuHYL_GW1M5daPoZ9OlrkCCoUQkk3q_qhM8DEG68ohNJ0O-5JAeUir5OUprck-HG00TdJp-vwf_Ac1bWkh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2903076684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Shaojie ; Zhang, Yongmin ; Lu, Yong ; Zhao, Hejie ; Luo, Cheng ; Wang, Haodong ; Wang, Shuangming ; Qiu, Aici</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shaojie ; Zhang, Yongmin ; Lu, Yong ; Zhao, Hejie ; Luo, Cheng ; Wang, Haodong ; Wang, Shuangming ; Qiu, Aici</creatorcontrib><description>With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and material. Load voltage, circuit current, and shock wave pressure were measured and analyzed, and electric power, energy deposition, and energy deposition rate were also calculated and investigated. Experimental results indicated that the underwater electrical tube explosion (UETE) always has higher and earlier local resistance peak, voltage peak, and electric power peak, as well as faster phase transition and ionization process than the underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE). In addition, the energy deposition rate from the beginning of discharge or the decrease in current to the voltage peak is significantly increased when replacing a wire with a tube. For the shock-wave characteristics, the peak pressure, energy density, and impulse of the shock wave generated by UETE are greater than that generated by UEWE. The peak pressure at ∼33 cm increased from 21.1 to 24.5 MPa in the first set and from 18.1 to 21.7 MPa in the second when a tube was used instead of a wire. These experimental results help us understand the physical process of UETE and provide an alternative methodology for load design in industrial applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-664X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7674</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0180925</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHPAEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Circuits ; Deposition ; Electric potential ; Electric power ; Electric wire ; Electrical loads ; Energy storage ; Explosions ; Industrial applications ; Peak pressure ; Phase transitions ; Plasma physics ; Underwater ; Voltage</subject><ispartof>Physics of plasmas, 2023-12, Vol.30 (12)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-781a8544e325f8b91a7fe58a4bc902fc8bac1341914c5da39f34dc0879f0364e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8169-2229 ; 0000-0001-6131-7667</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/pop/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0180925$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,795,4513,27929,27930,76389</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Hejie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Aici</creatorcontrib><title>Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study</title><title>Physics of plasmas</title><description>With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and material. Load voltage, circuit current, and shock wave pressure were measured and analyzed, and electric power, energy deposition, and energy deposition rate were also calculated and investigated. Experimental results indicated that the underwater electrical tube explosion (UETE) always has higher and earlier local resistance peak, voltage peak, and electric power peak, as well as faster phase transition and ionization process than the underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE). In addition, the energy deposition rate from the beginning of discharge or the decrease in current to the voltage peak is significantly increased when replacing a wire with a tube. For the shock-wave characteristics, the peak pressure, energy density, and impulse of the shock wave generated by UETE are greater than that generated by UEWE. The peak pressure at ∼33 cm increased from 21.1 to 24.5 MPa in the first set and from 18.1 to 21.7 MPa in the second when a tube was used instead of a wire. These experimental results help us understand the physical process of UETE and provide an alternative methodology for load design in industrial applications.</description><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric wire</subject><subject>Electrical loads</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Industrial applications</subject><subject>Peak pressure</subject><subject>Phase transitions</subject><subject>Plasma physics</subject><subject>Underwater</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><issn>1070-664X</issn><issn>1089-7674</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB_9BwJNC10nz0cTbsvgFK15c8FbSNIEubVOTlHX_vV12z55mDs_MMC9CtwQWBAR95AsgElTOz9CMgFRZIQp2fugLyIRg35foKsYtADDB5Qx9bPrahp1ONmDbWpNCY3SL7e_Q-tj4HnuHO5t02zYG75pgse5rnMbKPuElNr4bdGji5GIa6_01unC6jfbmVOdo8_L8tXrL1p-v76vlOjM5z1NWSKIlZ8zSnDtZKaILZ7nUrDIKcmdkpQ2hjCjCDK81VY6y2oAslAMqprE5ujvuHYL_GW1M5daPoZ9OlrkCCoUQkk3q_qhM8DEG68ohNJ0O-5JAeUir5OUprck-HG00TdJp-vwf_Ac1bWkh</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Zhang, Shaojie</creator><creator>Zhang, Yongmin</creator><creator>Lu, Yong</creator><creator>Zhao, Hejie</creator><creator>Luo, Cheng</creator><creator>Wang, Haodong</creator><creator>Wang, Shuangming</creator><creator>Qiu, Aici</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8169-2229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6131-7667</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study</title><author>Zhang, Shaojie ; Zhang, Yongmin ; Lu, Yong ; Zhao, Hejie ; Luo, Cheng ; Wang, Haodong ; Wang, Shuangming ; Qiu, Aici</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-781a8544e325f8b91a7fe58a4bc902fc8bac1341914c5da39f34dc0879f0364e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric wire</topic><topic>Electrical loads</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Industrial applications</topic><topic>Peak pressure</topic><topic>Phase transitions</topic><topic>Plasma physics</topic><topic>Underwater</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Hejie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Aici</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physics of plasmas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Shaojie</au><au>Zhang, Yongmin</au><au>Lu, Yong</au><au>Zhao, Hejie</au><au>Luo, Cheng</au><au>Wang, Haodong</au><au>Wang, Shuangming</au><au>Qiu, Aici</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study</atitle><jtitle>Physics of plasmas</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>12</issue><issn>1070-664X</issn><eissn>1089-7674</eissn><coden>PHPAEN</coden><abstract>With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and material. Load voltage, circuit current, and shock wave pressure were measured and analyzed, and electric power, energy deposition, and energy deposition rate were also calculated and investigated. Experimental results indicated that the underwater electrical tube explosion (UETE) always has higher and earlier local resistance peak, voltage peak, and electric power peak, as well as faster phase transition and ionization process than the underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE). In addition, the energy deposition rate from the beginning of discharge or the decrease in current to the voltage peak is significantly increased when replacing a wire with a tube. For the shock-wave characteristics, the peak pressure, energy density, and impulse of the shock wave generated by UETE are greater than that generated by UEWE. The peak pressure at ∼33 cm increased from 21.1 to 24.5 MPa in the first set and from 18.1 to 21.7 MPa in the second when a tube was used instead of a wire. These experimental results help us understand the physical process of UETE and provide an alternative methodology for load design in industrial applications.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0180925</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8169-2229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6131-7667</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-664X
ispartof Physics of plasmas, 2023-12, Vol.30 (12)
issn 1070-664X
1089-7674
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0180925
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Circuits
Deposition
Electric potential
Electric power
Electric wire
Electrical loads
Energy storage
Explosions
Industrial applications
Peak pressure
Phase transitions
Plasma physics
Underwater
Voltage
title Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T18%3A10%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Underwater%20electrical%20explosion%20of%20metallic%20wire%20and%20tube:%20A%20comparison%20study&rft.jtitle=Physics%20of%20plasmas&rft.au=Zhang,%20Shaojie&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=12&rft.issn=1070-664X&rft.eissn=1089-7674&rft.coden=PHPAEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0180925&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2903076684%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2903076684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true