Evaluation of two extraction methods for determination of nonylphenol contaminant in sediment
Environmental pollution levels have been more sensitively assessed as a result of the ongoing, unchecked release of contaminants into aquatic systems in emerging countries like Indonesia. Sediment of Citarum river was collected and analysed for 4-Nonylphenol that has been shown to possess endocrine-...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 2902 |
creator | Rosmalina, Raden Tina Meirinawati, Hanny Sholihah, Atti Wulan, Diana Rahayuning Rohman, Oman Azman, Shamila |
description | Environmental pollution levels have been more sensitively assessed as a result of the ongoing, unchecked release of contaminants into aquatic systems in emerging countries like Indonesia. Sediment of Citarum river was collected and analysed for 4-Nonylphenol that has been shown to possess endocrine-disrupting properties. This study evaluated two extraction methods using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) for determination of nonylphenol in sediment to find the best extraction method. The liquid-liquid extraction was performed using dichloromethane: hexane (2: 1). The SPE method is combination of small amount of liquid-liquid extraction using methanol: water (70: 30) followed by solid phase extraction using C-18 cartridge and methanol-acetonitrile as an eluent. The measurement was performed using gas chromatography with HP-5 column and flame ionization detector. The linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection and limit of quantification were evaluated. Nonylphenol determination was linear at the concentration range of 0.1-10 µg/mL. The precision of 2.26-2.34% was obtained for both methods. The recovery of the fortified sample (0.05 and 0.1 µg-NP/mL) were 76.28-80.52 % for the LLE method and 96.24-104.78% for the SPE method. Limits of detection and quantification were 0.2 and 0.4 µg/mL for the LLE method. Limits of detection and quantification for the SPE method were 0.05 and 0.2 µg/mL. Based on the high recovery and low limits of detection and quantification, the extraction method using solid phase extraction is better than liquid-liquid extraction and it can be used for rapid and accurate quantification of nonylphenol. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0173538 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0173538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2873050995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p962-5bae0738ce0c58df599d3d3cafa028483264fb2eb48afbc857a94e861ab4df343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAnTA1z5lkKaU-oOCmCzcSMnnQKTPJmKRq_721La4OnPNxLvcAcIvRDKOaPvAZwg3lVJyBCeYcV02N63MwQUiyijD6fgmuct4gRGTTiAn4WHzpfqtLFwOMHpbvCN1PSdocnMGVdbQZ-pigdcWloQv_bIhh149rF2IPTQxF_4WhwC7A7Gw3uFCuwYXXfXY3J52C1dNiNX-plm_Pr_PHZTXKmlS81Q41VBiHDBfWcykttdRorxERTFBSM98S1zKhfWsEb7RkTtRYt8x6yugU3B1rxxQ_ty4XtYnbFPYXFRENRRxJyffU_ZHKpiuHL9SYukGnncJI_a2nuDqtR38BFZJjoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2873050995</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Evaluation of two extraction methods for determination of nonylphenol contaminant in sediment</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Rosmalina, Raden Tina ; Meirinawati, Hanny ; Sholihah, Atti ; Wulan, Diana Rahayuning ; Rohman, Oman ; Azman, Shamila</creator><contributor>Septiyanti, Melati ; Indriyati ; Tasfiyati, Aprilia Nur ; Putri, Ary Mauliva Hada ; Dahnum, Deliana ; Sudiyarmanto ; Ndruru, Sun Theo Constan Lotebulo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosmalina, Raden Tina ; Meirinawati, Hanny ; Sholihah, Atti ; Wulan, Diana Rahayuning ; Rohman, Oman ; Azman, Shamila ; Septiyanti, Melati ; Indriyati ; Tasfiyati, Aprilia Nur ; Putri, Ary Mauliva Hada ; Dahnum, Deliana ; Sudiyarmanto ; Ndruru, Sun Theo Constan Lotebulo</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental pollution levels have been more sensitively assessed as a result of the ongoing, unchecked release of contaminants into aquatic systems in emerging countries like Indonesia. Sediment of Citarum river was collected and analysed for 4-Nonylphenol that has been shown to possess endocrine-disrupting properties. This study evaluated two extraction methods using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) for determination of nonylphenol in sediment to find the best extraction method. The liquid-liquid extraction was performed using dichloromethane: hexane (2: 1). The SPE method is combination of small amount of liquid-liquid extraction using methanol: water (70: 30) followed by solid phase extraction using C-18 cartridge and methanol-acetonitrile as an eluent. The measurement was performed using gas chromatography with HP-5 column and flame ionization detector. The linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection and limit of quantification were evaluated. Nonylphenol determination was linear at the concentration range of 0.1-10 µg/mL. The precision of 2.26-2.34% was obtained for both methods. The recovery of the fortified sample (0.05 and 0.1 µg-NP/mL) were 76.28-80.52 % for the LLE method and 96.24-104.78% for the SPE method. Limits of detection and quantification were 0.2 and 0.4 µg/mL for the LLE method. Limits of detection and quantification for the SPE method were 0.05 and 0.2 µg/mL. Based on the high recovery and low limits of detection and quantification, the extraction method using solid phase extraction is better than liquid-liquid extraction and it can be used for rapid and accurate quantification of nonylphenol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0173538</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Acetonitrile ; Column chromatography ; Contaminants ; Dichloromethane ; Evaluation ; Flame ionization detectors ; Gas chromatography ; Hexanes ; Ions ; Linearity ; Liquid-liquid extraction ; Methanol ; Pollution levels ; Recovery ; Sediments ; Solid phases</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2023, Vol.2902 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0173538$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,791,4498,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,76133</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Septiyanti, Melati</contributor><contributor>Indriyati</contributor><contributor>Tasfiyati, Aprilia Nur</contributor><contributor>Putri, Ary Mauliva Hada</contributor><contributor>Dahnum, Deliana</contributor><contributor>Sudiyarmanto</contributor><contributor>Ndruru, Sun Theo Constan Lotebulo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosmalina, Raden Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meirinawati, Hanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sholihah, Atti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulan, Diana Rahayuning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohman, Oman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azman, Shamila</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of two extraction methods for determination of nonylphenol contaminant in sediment</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>Environmental pollution levels have been more sensitively assessed as a result of the ongoing, unchecked release of contaminants into aquatic systems in emerging countries like Indonesia. Sediment of Citarum river was collected and analysed for 4-Nonylphenol that has been shown to possess endocrine-disrupting properties. This study evaluated two extraction methods using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) for determination of nonylphenol in sediment to find the best extraction method. The liquid-liquid extraction was performed using dichloromethane: hexane (2: 1). The SPE method is combination of small amount of liquid-liquid extraction using methanol: water (70: 30) followed by solid phase extraction using C-18 cartridge and methanol-acetonitrile as an eluent. The measurement was performed using gas chromatography with HP-5 column and flame ionization detector. The linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection and limit of quantification were evaluated. Nonylphenol determination was linear at the concentration range of 0.1-10 µg/mL. The precision of 2.26-2.34% was obtained for both methods. The recovery of the fortified sample (0.05 and 0.1 µg-NP/mL) were 76.28-80.52 % for the LLE method and 96.24-104.78% for the SPE method. Limits of detection and quantification were 0.2 and 0.4 µg/mL for the LLE method. Limits of detection and quantification for the SPE method were 0.05 and 0.2 µg/mL. Based on the high recovery and low limits of detection and quantification, the extraction method using solid phase extraction is better than liquid-liquid extraction and it can be used for rapid and accurate quantification of nonylphenol.</description><subject>Acetonitrile</subject><subject>Column chromatography</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Dichloromethane</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flame ionization detectors</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Hexanes</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Linearity</subject><subject>Liquid-liquid extraction</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Pollution levels</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Solid phases</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAnTA1z5lkKaU-oOCmCzcSMnnQKTPJmKRq_721La4OnPNxLvcAcIvRDKOaPvAZwg3lVJyBCeYcV02N63MwQUiyijD6fgmuct4gRGTTiAn4WHzpfqtLFwOMHpbvCN1PSdocnMGVdbQZ-pigdcWloQv_bIhh149rF2IPTQxF_4WhwC7A7Gw3uFCuwYXXfXY3J52C1dNiNX-plm_Pr_PHZTXKmlS81Q41VBiHDBfWcykttdRorxERTFBSM98S1zKhfWsEb7RkTtRYt8x6yugU3B1rxxQ_ty4XtYnbFPYXFRENRRxJyffU_ZHKpiuHL9SYukGnncJI_a2nuDqtR38BFZJjoQ</recordid><startdate>20231005</startdate><enddate>20231005</enddate><creator>Rosmalina, Raden Tina</creator><creator>Meirinawati, Hanny</creator><creator>Sholihah, Atti</creator><creator>Wulan, Diana Rahayuning</creator><creator>Rohman, Oman</creator><creator>Azman, Shamila</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231005</creationdate><title>Evaluation of two extraction methods for determination of nonylphenol contaminant in sediment</title><author>Rosmalina, Raden Tina ; Meirinawati, Hanny ; Sholihah, Atti ; Wulan, Diana Rahayuning ; Rohman, Oman ; Azman, Shamila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p962-5bae0738ce0c58df599d3d3cafa028483264fb2eb48afbc857a94e861ab4df343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acetonitrile</topic><topic>Column chromatography</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Dichloromethane</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flame ionization detectors</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Hexanes</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Linearity</topic><topic>Liquid-liquid extraction</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Pollution levels</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Solid phases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosmalina, Raden Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meirinawati, Hanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sholihah, Atti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulan, Diana Rahayuning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohman, Oman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azman, Shamila</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosmalina, Raden Tina</au><au>Meirinawati, Hanny</au><au>Sholihah, Atti</au><au>Wulan, Diana Rahayuning</au><au>Rohman, Oman</au><au>Azman, Shamila</au><au>Septiyanti, Melati</au><au>Indriyati</au><au>Tasfiyati, Aprilia Nur</au><au>Putri, Ary Mauliva Hada</au><au>Dahnum, Deliana</au><au>Sudiyarmanto</au><au>Ndruru, Sun Theo Constan Lotebulo</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of two extraction methods for determination of nonylphenol contaminant in sediment</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2023-10-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2902</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>Environmental pollution levels have been more sensitively assessed as a result of the ongoing, unchecked release of contaminants into aquatic systems in emerging countries like Indonesia. Sediment of Citarum river was collected and analysed for 4-Nonylphenol that has been shown to possess endocrine-disrupting properties. This study evaluated two extraction methods using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) for determination of nonylphenol in sediment to find the best extraction method. The liquid-liquid extraction was performed using dichloromethane: hexane (2: 1). The SPE method is combination of small amount of liquid-liquid extraction using methanol: water (70: 30) followed by solid phase extraction using C-18 cartridge and methanol-acetonitrile as an eluent. The measurement was performed using gas chromatography with HP-5 column and flame ionization detector. The linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection and limit of quantification were evaluated. Nonylphenol determination was linear at the concentration range of 0.1-10 µg/mL. The precision of 2.26-2.34% was obtained for both methods. The recovery of the fortified sample (0.05 and 0.1 µg-NP/mL) were 76.28-80.52 % for the LLE method and 96.24-104.78% for the SPE method. Limits of detection and quantification were 0.2 and 0.4 µg/mL for the LLE method. Limits of detection and quantification for the SPE method were 0.05 and 0.2 µg/mL. Based on the high recovery and low limits of detection and quantification, the extraction method using solid phase extraction is better than liquid-liquid extraction and it can be used for rapid and accurate quantification of nonylphenol.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0173538</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2023, Vol.2902 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0173538 |
source | AIP Journals Complete |
subjects | Acetonitrile Column chromatography Contaminants Dichloromethane Evaluation Flame ionization detectors Gas chromatography Hexanes Ions Linearity Liquid-liquid extraction Methanol Pollution levels Recovery Sediments Solid phases |
title | Evaluation of two extraction methods for determination of nonylphenol contaminant in sediment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A35%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20two%20extraction%20methods%20for%20determination%20of%20nonylphenol%20contaminant%20in%20sediment&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Rosmalina,%20Raden%20Tina&rft.date=2023-10-05&rft.volume=2902&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0173538&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2873050995%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2873050995&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |