Comparison of local gasoline fuel characteristics and SI engine performance with commercial fuel additives

Fossil fuel is the main source for powering internal combustion engine in the existing design. Though different sources of renewable and alternative fuels were suggested, gasoline fuel still the dominant source for operating SI engine. In this study, a comparison has been conducted to evaluate the f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hadi, Ali Shukur, Ahmed, Omer Khalil, Ali, Obed Majeed
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2213
creator Hadi, Ali Shukur
Ahmed, Omer Khalil
Ali, Obed Majeed
description Fossil fuel is the main source for powering internal combustion engine in the existing design. Though different sources of renewable and alternative fuels were suggested, gasoline fuel still the dominant source for operating SI engine. In this study, a comparison has been conducted to evaluate the fuel properties and engine performance with commercial additives. Has been studied locally available types of gasoline fuel, which include local gasoline M0, local enhanced gasoline M2, commercial enhanced gasoline M3, in addition to using a type of commercial fuel optimizer with local gasoline M1, the addition ratio (1 / 120) by volume. It was adopted local gasoline M0 as a reference for comparison. Performance tests are conducted by using different fuel (M0, M1, M2, M3) in a single-cylinder SI engine under the wide-open throttle (WOT) condition at a wide range of engine speeds (1200–2800 rpm). The results showed an increase octane number and viscosity of fuel by about (19.77% 11.538%) respectively and the reduction of the heating value of fuel by about 2.78% when using the commercial fuel optimizer. As well as increased brake torque and brake power at an average of 6.852% compared to fuel M0. Also, brake specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency improved by an average of 4.07% and 7.27%, respectively. The best performance was with fuel M1 at which the brake torque and the brake thermal efficiency were at 2800 rpm higher than the M0 fuel by 18% and 10.9% respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0000068
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0000068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2382870819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-e0c0b770b00c90eeffe46c9f8f59ec30052f1e2358b64f4ce34b383ec71f282e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEYhIMoWKsH_0HAm7D1TbIf2aMUPwoFDyp4W7LZN23K7mZN0or_3q0teHMuc3lmBoaQawYzBrm4y2awVy5PyIRlGUuKnOWnZAJQpglPxcc5uQhhA8DLopATspm7blDeBtdTZ2jrtGrpSgXX2h6p2WJL9Vp5pSOOULQ6UNU39HVBsV_tkQG9cb5TvUb6ZeOaatd16LUde37jqmlstDsMl-TMqDbg1dGn5P3x4W3-nCxfnhbz-2WiOciYIGioiwJqAF0CojGY5ro00mQlagGQccOQi0zWeWpSjSKthRSoC2a45Cim5ObQO3j3ucUQq43b-n6crLiQXBYgWTlStwcqaBtVtK6vBm875b-rnfNVVh1_rIbG_AczqPbH_wXED0z7dl0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2382870819</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of local gasoline fuel characteristics and SI engine performance with commercial fuel additives</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Hadi, Ali Shukur ; Ahmed, Omer Khalil ; Ali, Obed Majeed</creator><contributor>Zulkepli, Nik Noriman ; Dahham, Omar S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Ali Shukur ; Ahmed, Omer Khalil ; Ali, Obed Majeed ; Zulkepli, Nik Noriman ; Dahham, Omar S.</creatorcontrib><description>Fossil fuel is the main source for powering internal combustion engine in the existing design. Though different sources of renewable and alternative fuels were suggested, gasoline fuel still the dominant source for operating SI engine. In this study, a comparison has been conducted to evaluate the fuel properties and engine performance with commercial additives. Has been studied locally available types of gasoline fuel, which include local gasoline M0, local enhanced gasoline M2, commercial enhanced gasoline M3, in addition to using a type of commercial fuel optimizer with local gasoline M1, the addition ratio (1 / 120) by volume. It was adopted local gasoline M0 as a reference for comparison. Performance tests are conducted by using different fuel (M0, M1, M2, M3) in a single-cylinder SI engine under the wide-open throttle (WOT) condition at a wide range of engine speeds (1200–2800 rpm). The results showed an increase octane number and viscosity of fuel by about (19.77% 11.538%) respectively and the reduction of the heating value of fuel by about 2.78% when using the commercial fuel optimizer. As well as increased brake torque and brake power at an average of 6.852% compared to fuel M0. Also, brake specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency improved by an average of 4.07% and 7.27%, respectively. The best performance was with fuel M1 at which the brake torque and the brake thermal efficiency were at 2800 rpm higher than the M0 fuel by 18% and 10.9% respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0000068</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Alternative fuels ; Brakes ; Calorific value ; Fossil fuels ; Fuel additives ; Gasoline ; Internal combustion engines ; Octane number ; Performance tests ; Spark ignition ; Thermodynamic efficiency ; Throttles ; Torque</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2020, Vol.2213 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2020 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-e0c0b770b00c90eeffe46c9f8f59ec30052f1e2358b64f4ce34b383ec71f282e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0000068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,794,4509,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923,76154</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Zulkepli, Nik Noriman</contributor><contributor>Dahham, Omar S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Ali Shukur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Omer Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Obed Majeed</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of local gasoline fuel characteristics and SI engine performance with commercial fuel additives</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>Fossil fuel is the main source for powering internal combustion engine in the existing design. Though different sources of renewable and alternative fuels were suggested, gasoline fuel still the dominant source for operating SI engine. In this study, a comparison has been conducted to evaluate the fuel properties and engine performance with commercial additives. Has been studied locally available types of gasoline fuel, which include local gasoline M0, local enhanced gasoline M2, commercial enhanced gasoline M3, in addition to using a type of commercial fuel optimizer with local gasoline M1, the addition ratio (1 / 120) by volume. It was adopted local gasoline M0 as a reference for comparison. Performance tests are conducted by using different fuel (M0, M1, M2, M3) in a single-cylinder SI engine under the wide-open throttle (WOT) condition at a wide range of engine speeds (1200–2800 rpm). The results showed an increase octane number and viscosity of fuel by about (19.77% 11.538%) respectively and the reduction of the heating value of fuel by about 2.78% when using the commercial fuel optimizer. As well as increased brake torque and brake power at an average of 6.852% compared to fuel M0. Also, brake specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency improved by an average of 4.07% and 7.27%, respectively. The best performance was with fuel M1 at which the brake torque and the brake thermal efficiency were at 2800 rpm higher than the M0 fuel by 18% and 10.9% respectively.</description><subject>Alternative fuels</subject><subject>Brakes</subject><subject>Calorific value</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Fuel additives</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Internal combustion engines</subject><subject>Octane number</subject><subject>Performance tests</subject><subject>Spark ignition</subject><subject>Thermodynamic efficiency</subject><subject>Throttles</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEYhIMoWKsH_0HAm7D1TbIf2aMUPwoFDyp4W7LZN23K7mZN0or_3q0teHMuc3lmBoaQawYzBrm4y2awVy5PyIRlGUuKnOWnZAJQpglPxcc5uQhhA8DLopATspm7blDeBtdTZ2jrtGrpSgXX2h6p2WJL9Vp5pSOOULQ6UNU39HVBsV_tkQG9cb5TvUb6ZeOaatd16LUde37jqmlstDsMl-TMqDbg1dGn5P3x4W3-nCxfnhbz-2WiOciYIGioiwJqAF0CojGY5ro00mQlagGQccOQi0zWeWpSjSKthRSoC2a45Cim5ObQO3j3ucUQq43b-n6crLiQXBYgWTlStwcqaBtVtK6vBm875b-rnfNVVh1_rIbG_AczqPbH_wXED0z7dl0</recordid><startdate>20200325</startdate><enddate>20200325</enddate><creator>Hadi, Ali Shukur</creator><creator>Ahmed, Omer Khalil</creator><creator>Ali, Obed Majeed</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200325</creationdate><title>Comparison of local gasoline fuel characteristics and SI engine performance with commercial fuel additives</title><author>Hadi, Ali Shukur ; Ahmed, Omer Khalil ; Ali, Obed Majeed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-e0c0b770b00c90eeffe46c9f8f59ec30052f1e2358b64f4ce34b383ec71f282e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuels</topic><topic>Brakes</topic><topic>Calorific value</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Fuel additives</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Internal combustion engines</topic><topic>Octane number</topic><topic>Performance tests</topic><topic>Spark ignition</topic><topic>Thermodynamic efficiency</topic><topic>Throttles</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Ali Shukur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Omer Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Obed Majeed</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadi, Ali Shukur</au><au>Ahmed, Omer Khalil</au><au>Ali, Obed Majeed</au><au>Zulkepli, Nik Noriman</au><au>Dahham, Omar S.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of local gasoline fuel characteristics and SI engine performance with commercial fuel additives</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2020-03-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2213</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>Fossil fuel is the main source for powering internal combustion engine in the existing design. Though different sources of renewable and alternative fuels were suggested, gasoline fuel still the dominant source for operating SI engine. In this study, a comparison has been conducted to evaluate the fuel properties and engine performance with commercial additives. Has been studied locally available types of gasoline fuel, which include local gasoline M0, local enhanced gasoline M2, commercial enhanced gasoline M3, in addition to using a type of commercial fuel optimizer with local gasoline M1, the addition ratio (1 / 120) by volume. It was adopted local gasoline M0 as a reference for comparison. Performance tests are conducted by using different fuel (M0, M1, M2, M3) in a single-cylinder SI engine under the wide-open throttle (WOT) condition at a wide range of engine speeds (1200–2800 rpm). The results showed an increase octane number and viscosity of fuel by about (19.77% 11.538%) respectively and the reduction of the heating value of fuel by about 2.78% when using the commercial fuel optimizer. As well as increased brake torque and brake power at an average of 6.852% compared to fuel M0. Also, brake specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency improved by an average of 4.07% and 7.27%, respectively. The best performance was with fuel M1 at which the brake torque and the brake thermal efficiency were at 2800 rpm higher than the M0 fuel by 18% and 10.9% respectively.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0000068</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2020, Vol.2213 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_5_0000068
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Alternative fuels
Brakes
Calorific value
Fossil fuels
Fuel additives
Gasoline
Internal combustion engines
Octane number
Performance tests
Spark ignition
Thermodynamic efficiency
Throttles
Torque
title Comparison of local gasoline fuel characteristics and SI engine performance with commercial fuel additives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T12%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20local%20gasoline%20fuel%20characteristics%20and%20SI%20engine%20performance%20with%20commercial%20fuel%20additives&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Hadi,%20Ali%20Shukur&rft.date=2020-03-25&rft.volume=2213&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0000068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2382870819%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382870819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true