Relationship between the inverse scattering techniques of Belinskii–Zakharov and Hauser–Ernst in general relativity

We make a quantitative comparison between the p u r e‐n o n s o l i t o n part of the inverse scattering method of Belinskii and Zakharov (BZ) and the homogeneous Hilbert problem of Hauser and Ernst (HE), these being two independent representations of an infinite‐dimensional subgroup K of the Geroch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of mathematical physics 1982-04, Vol.23 (4), p.615-633
1. Verfasser: Cosgrove, Christopher M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 633
container_issue 4
container_start_page 615
container_title Journal of mathematical physics
container_volume 23
creator Cosgrove, Christopher M.
description We make a quantitative comparison between the p u r e‐n o n s o l i t o n part of the inverse scattering method of Belinskii and Zakharov (BZ) and the homogeneous Hilbert problem of Hauser and Ernst (HE), these being two independent representations of an infinite‐dimensional subgroup K of the Geroch group K of invariance transformations for spacetimes with two commuting Killing vectors. An explicit formula for the BZ representing matrix function G 0(λ) in terms of the HE representing matrix function u(t) is derived. It is shown how certain solution generating techniques (e.g., Harrison’s Bäcklund transformation, HKX transformation, generation of Weyl solution from flat space, generation of n‐Kerr–NUT solution from n‐Schwarzschild) can be derived directly from the BZ formalism, including the soliton part in some cases, thereby bringing our understanding of the BZ formalism up to the level of the more fully developed HE formalism. A technical point which needed to be resolved along the way was how to analytically continue the complex matrix potential F(t) across a quadratic branch cut and onto the second Riemann sheet. Finally, we consider how the subgroup K⊆K represented by the BZ and HE formalisms can be enlarged either by simple limiting transitions or by relaxing boundary conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.525399
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_525399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jmp</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-cc05e172b51c1c9bcd15b1fab43aab783148a55fe295416c00d236f5c8d719613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkNFKwzAYhYMoOKfgI-RSLzrzN02bXuqYThgIojfelDT9u8bVdCZZx-58B9_QJ3Fu4gN4deDwcQ58hJwDGwFL-RWMRCx4nh-QATCZR1kq5CEZMBbHUZxIeUxOvH9lDEAmyYCsH7FVwXTWN2ZJSwxrREtDg9TYHp1H6rUKAZ2xcxpQN9a8r9DTrqY32BrrF8Z8fXy-qEWjXNdTZSs6VSuPbttOnPVhO0TnaNGplrrdWW_C5pQc1ar1ePabQ_J8O3kaT6PZw939-HoWaR7nIdKaCYQsLgVo0HmpKxAl1KpMuFJlJjkkUglRY5yLBFLNWBXztBZaVhnkKfAhudjvatd577Auls68KbcpgBU_wgoo9sK26OUe9dqEnZN_sX3n_rhiWdX8G7JBffI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship between the inverse scattering techniques of Belinskii–Zakharov and Hauser–Ernst in general relativity</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Cosgrove, Christopher M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><description>We make a quantitative comparison between the p u r e‐n o n s o l i t o n part of the inverse scattering method of Belinskii and Zakharov (BZ) and the homogeneous Hilbert problem of Hauser and Ernst (HE), these being two independent representations of an infinite‐dimensional subgroup K of the Geroch group K of invariance transformations for spacetimes with two commuting Killing vectors. An explicit formula for the BZ representing matrix function G 0(λ) in terms of the HE representing matrix function u(t) is derived. It is shown how certain solution generating techniques (e.g., Harrison’s Bäcklund transformation, HKX transformation, generation of Weyl solution from flat space, generation of n‐Kerr–NUT solution from n‐Schwarzschild) can be derived directly from the BZ formalism, including the soliton part in some cases, thereby bringing our understanding of the BZ formalism up to the level of the more fully developed HE formalism. A technical point which needed to be resolved along the way was how to analytically continue the complex matrix potential F(t) across a quadratic branch cut and onto the second Riemann sheet. Finally, we consider how the subgroup K⊆K represented by the BZ and HE formalisms can be enlarged either by simple limiting transitions or by relaxing boundary conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.525399</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMAPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of mathematical physics, 1982-04, Vol.23 (4), p.615-633</ispartof><rights>American Institute of Physics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-cc05e172b51c1c9bcd15b1fab43aab783148a55fe295416c00d236f5c8d719613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-cc05e172b51c1c9bcd15b1fab43aab783148a55fe295416c00d236f5c8d719613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jmp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.525399$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1556,27907,27908,76141</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship between the inverse scattering techniques of Belinskii–Zakharov and Hauser–Ernst in general relativity</title><title>Journal of mathematical physics</title><description>We make a quantitative comparison between the p u r e‐n o n s o l i t o n part of the inverse scattering method of Belinskii and Zakharov (BZ) and the homogeneous Hilbert problem of Hauser and Ernst (HE), these being two independent representations of an infinite‐dimensional subgroup K of the Geroch group K of invariance transformations for spacetimes with two commuting Killing vectors. An explicit formula for the BZ representing matrix function G 0(λ) in terms of the HE representing matrix function u(t) is derived. It is shown how certain solution generating techniques (e.g., Harrison’s Bäcklund transformation, HKX transformation, generation of Weyl solution from flat space, generation of n‐Kerr–NUT solution from n‐Schwarzschild) can be derived directly from the BZ formalism, including the soliton part in some cases, thereby bringing our understanding of the BZ formalism up to the level of the more fully developed HE formalism. A technical point which needed to be resolved along the way was how to analytically continue the complex matrix potential F(t) across a quadratic branch cut and onto the second Riemann sheet. Finally, we consider how the subgroup K⊆K represented by the BZ and HE formalisms can be enlarged either by simple limiting transitions or by relaxing boundary conditions.</description><issn>0022-2488</issn><issn>1089-7658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkNFKwzAYhYMoOKfgI-RSLzrzN02bXuqYThgIojfelDT9u8bVdCZZx-58B9_QJ3Fu4gN4deDwcQ58hJwDGwFL-RWMRCx4nh-QATCZR1kq5CEZMBbHUZxIeUxOvH9lDEAmyYCsH7FVwXTWN2ZJSwxrREtDg9TYHp1H6rUKAZ2xcxpQN9a8r9DTrqY32BrrF8Z8fXy-qEWjXNdTZSs6VSuPbttOnPVhO0TnaNGplrrdWW_C5pQc1ar1ePabQ_J8O3kaT6PZw939-HoWaR7nIdKaCYQsLgVo0HmpKxAl1KpMuFJlJjkkUglRY5yLBFLNWBXztBZaVhnkKfAhudjvatd577Auls68KbcpgBU_wgoo9sK26OUe9dqEnZN_sX3n_rhiWdX8G7JBffI</recordid><startdate>198204</startdate><enddate>198204</enddate><creator>Cosgrove, Christopher M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198204</creationdate><title>Relationship between the inverse scattering techniques of Belinskii–Zakharov and Hauser–Ernst in general relativity</title><author>Cosgrove, Christopher M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-cc05e172b51c1c9bcd15b1fab43aab783148a55fe295416c00d236f5c8d719613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of mathematical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cosgrove, Christopher M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship between the inverse scattering techniques of Belinskii–Zakharov and Hauser–Ernst in general relativity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mathematical physics</jtitle><date>1982-04</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>615-633</pages><issn>0022-2488</issn><eissn>1089-7658</eissn><coden>JMAPAQ</coden><abstract>We make a quantitative comparison between the p u r e‐n o n s o l i t o n part of the inverse scattering method of Belinskii and Zakharov (BZ) and the homogeneous Hilbert problem of Hauser and Ernst (HE), these being two independent representations of an infinite‐dimensional subgroup K of the Geroch group K of invariance transformations for spacetimes with two commuting Killing vectors. An explicit formula for the BZ representing matrix function G 0(λ) in terms of the HE representing matrix function u(t) is derived. It is shown how certain solution generating techniques (e.g., Harrison’s Bäcklund transformation, HKX transformation, generation of Weyl solution from flat space, generation of n‐Kerr–NUT solution from n‐Schwarzschild) can be derived directly from the BZ formalism, including the soliton part in some cases, thereby bringing our understanding of the BZ formalism up to the level of the more fully developed HE formalism. A technical point which needed to be resolved along the way was how to analytically continue the complex matrix potential F(t) across a quadratic branch cut and onto the second Riemann sheet. Finally, we consider how the subgroup K⊆K represented by the BZ and HE formalisms can be enlarged either by simple limiting transitions or by relaxing boundary conditions.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.525399</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2488
ispartof Journal of mathematical physics, 1982-04, Vol.23 (4), p.615-633
issn 0022-2488
1089-7658
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_525399
source AIP Digital Archive
title Relationship between the inverse scattering techniques of Belinskii–Zakharov and Hauser–Ernst in general relativity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20between%20the%20inverse%20scattering%20techniques%20of%20Belinskii%E2%80%93Zakharov%20and%20Hauser%E2%80%93Ernst%20in%20general%20relativity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mathematical%20physics&rft.au=Cosgrove,%20Christopher%20M.&rft.date=1982-04&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=615-633&rft.issn=0022-2488&rft.eissn=1089-7658&rft.coden=JMAPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.525399&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejmp%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true